logo
Epstein furor upends House for second week in row

Epstein furor upends House for second week in row

The Hill21 hours ago
The Jeffrey Epstein saga is causing chaos in the House for the second week in a row, as threats of Democrats forcing politically tough votes is prompting House GOP leadership to toss out many of their plans for the week.
The trouble started as soon as lawmakers returned to Washington on Monday when the House Rules Committee, which sets up action for bills on the floor, met to tee up votes to rescind Biden-era rules and on an immigration bill.
But Democrats, who had forced Republicans on the panel into a number of politically difficult votes on the Epstein matter last week, threatened to do so again. They planned to stage a vote on bringing legislation to the floor that would compel the release of the Epstein files.
Rather than face those votes, Republicans are opting to simply not tee up any votes at all, according to multiple members of the panel — leaving the House with no floor business in the days ahead of August recess beyond non-controversial suspension bills, fast-track measures that need two-thirds support to pass.
'Democrats keep putting all these amendments up. They want to make Epstein — and, you know, we're all for transparency, and we're going to do that, but what they want to do is grandstand. They said they'll be there all night, we'll be there all night,' Rep. Ralph Norman (R-S.C.), a member of the Rules Committee, told reporters. He added that the committee was not expected to return, and the House would only deal with suspension votes.
Rep. Jim McGovern (Mass.), the top Democrat on the Rules Committee, confirmed that the panel would not re-convene for the rest of the week.
'We're done,' McGovern told The Hill. 'Not reporting out a rule, we're done for the night, we're done for the week… There's some issues going on within the Republican conference, I think around the Epstein stuff, that they can't seem to get under control. So we'll do, probably suspensions for the remainder of the week.'
It is the second time in as many weeks the so-called Epstein files saga has thwarted GOP leadership's plans for the House floor.
Republicans on the Rules Committee last week had tried to address the Epstein matter after being lambasted by the public over rejecting a Democratic amendment, an effort that delayed action on a bill to codify Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) cuts to public broadcasting and foreign aid for hours.
The GOP members on the panel came up with a non-binding resolution calling for release for more files, and teed it up for floor action. But GOP leadership has no plans to bring the matter for a vote.
Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) said earlier Monday that the House would not vote on the legislation before August recess — which is scheduled to begin after votes on Thursday.
Instead, Johnson said he wanted to give the administration time to act on the matter on its own.
'Here's what I would say about the Epstein files: There is no daylight between the House Republicans, the House, and the president on maximum transparency,' Johnson said in the Capitol on Monday. 'He has said that he wants all the credible files related to Epstein to be released. He's asked the attorney general to request the grand jury files of the court. All of that is in process right now.'
'My belief is we need the administration to have the space to do what it is doing and if further Congressional action is necessary or appropriate, then we'll look at that,' he added. 'But I don't think we're at that point right now because we agree with the president.'
One source said that holding a floor vote on the non-binding resolution was suggested to leadership as a way to avoid the headaches over votes forced by Democrats, and that was not the favored option by leadership.
The dilemma for Republicans came up in a meeting with leadership and other top House leaders on Monday, two sources told The Hill. Rep. Erin Houchin (R-Ind.), who sits on the Rules Committee, raised concerns with having to vote on the Democratic-led amendment — which has key differences from the GOP-crafted one — in the panel meeting and instead advocated for voting on the Republican resolution or a different measure for transparency, one of the sources said.
A competing Epstein measure from Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) — one that would, if passed by both chambers and signed by the president, have more teeth — is further complicating the Epstein dynamic.
Massie and Khanna have pledged to force a vote on their Epstein-release bill through the discharge petition process, if they can get 218 House members to sign on. If all Democrats in the House and all the Republicans who have already co-sponsored the resolution do so, they can back GOP leadership into a corner.
Due to procedural rules, any vote wouldn't take place until at least after the House returns from August recess in September — by which time many Republicans hope the Epstein furor will have died down.
But Massie — carrying a binder that read 'The Epstein Files: Phase 2' in reference to the fateful 'Phase 1' binders that Attorney General Pam Bondi distributed to MAGA influencers earlier this year — expects there will still be an appetite for that forced vote.
'This is not going away,' Massie said Monday.
House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) downplayed the significance of the logjam, saying the House this week can still vote on suspensions and focus on committee meetings and hearings.
'We still have a lot of other work to do,' he told reporters.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Obama rebukes Trump's accusations in rare response
Obama rebukes Trump's accusations in rare response

Axios

time15 minutes ago

  • Axios

Obama rebukes Trump's accusations in rare response

Former President Obama swung back at President Trump on Tuesday in a rare response to unfounded accusations. The big picture: Trump peddled conspiracy theories about Obama, telling reporters the former president tried to rig the 2016 presidential election. What they're saying: "Out of respect for the office of the presidency, our office does not normally dignify the constant nonsense and misinformation flowing out of this White House with a response," Patrick Rodenbush, a spokesperson for Obama, said in a statement. "But these claims are outrageous enough to merit one," he added. "These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction." "Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes," Rodenbush said. The findings, he continued, were affirmed in a 2020 report by the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee, led by then-Chairman Marco Rubio. Context: Trump accused Obama, former President Biden, Hillary Clinton, former FBI Director James Comey and former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper of trying "to rig an election," adding without merit that "they got caught." Trump was referencing a new memo from Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard accusing the Obama administration of a "treasonous conspiracy" to sabotage Trump's presidency in 2016. It centers on findings from the Obama-era intelligence community that Russia didn't alter vote tallies by hacking election infrastructure. Gabbard alleged that senior Obama officials suppressed or manipulated these internal assessments to support a broader narrative that Russia had intervened in the 2016 election to help Trump. "This is like proof, irrefutable proof, that Obama was sedatious, that Obama was trying to lead a coup," Trump said Tuesday, appearing to mispronounce "seditious."

Education Department pauses student loan forgiveness under IBR plan
Education Department pauses student loan forgiveness under IBR plan

The Hill

time15 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Education Department pauses student loan forgiveness under IBR plan

The Education Department has paused student loan forgiveness under the Income-Based Repayment (IBR) plan without a clear timeline of when it might resume. The department argues any IBR forbearances were impacted by ongoing court action. 'The Department has temporarily paused discharges for IBR borrowers in order to comply with ongoing court injunctions regarding the Biden Administration's illegal attempts at student loan forgiveness. The Department's SAVE rule provided the authority to count forbearances in IBR toward loan forgiveness, but that rule has been enjoined,' said Ellen Keast, deputy press secretary for the department. 'Legal IBR discharges will resume as soon as the Department is able to establish the correct payment count. For any borrower that makes a payment after the date of borrower eligibility, the Department will refund overpayments when the discharges resume,' she added. The Department of Education is working through a court's injunction after the Biden administration's Saving on Valuable Education (SAVE) plan was ruled illegal. The agency argues that while the case did not impact forgiveness under IBR, what type of forbearances would count for loan discharges were. IBR allows individuals to make payments based on income and family size, receiving forgiveness after 20 to 25 years of consecutive payments. The department has encouraged individuals to join this plan as it shuts down the SAVE option. Those on SAVE will see interest accrual restart at the beginning of August and be kicked off the plan entirely in the following year.

Judge reinstates credit union agency members fired by Trump
Judge reinstates credit union agency members fired by Trump

The Hill

time15 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Judge reinstates credit union agency members fired by Trump

A federal judge reinstated two Democratic appointees at the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) on Tuesday whom President Trump purported to fire. It's the latest decision reversing Trump's firings of independent agency leaders across the federal bureaucracy. U.S. District Judge Amir Ali warned in his 27-page ruling that accepting the administration's position would mean that Trump could also fire the Federal Reserve chair without cause. 'The overlap in powers wielded by the NCUA Board and the Federal Reserve, and their common role as financial regulators, supports the conclusion that Congress can insulate NCUA Board members from at-will removal,' Ali wrote. Ali did not reference Trump's recent flirtations with firing Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell. But the Biden-appointed judge repeatedly suggested the government 'all but concedes' the point that they'd equally be able to fire Powell, too. The Justice Department declined to comment. The Hill has reached out to Harper and Otsuka's legal team for comment. Created in 1970, the NCUA is tasked with regulating and insuring credit unions. It plays a similar role to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, which insures banks. The NCUA board members once served at the pleasure of the president. But within a few years, Congress removed that language and provided they should instead serve fixed, six-year terms, with no more than two of the three members coming from the same political party. In April, Trump purported to fire Todd Harper and Tanya Otsuka, the two Democrats on NCUA's board, without explanation. Harper and Otsuka soon sued. The administration in court did not purport to have cause, but it argued Trump has absolute authority to remove the duo at will and the courts had no authority to order their reinstatement. The NCUA is one of a handful of agencies where Trump has attempted to fire top leadership despite their traditional independence from the White House. The administration has a pending request with the Supreme Court to greenlight Trump's firings at the Consumer Product Safety Commission. It comes after the justices in May sided with the administration in its effort to fire officials at the National Labor Relations Board and Merit Systems Protection Board. Other battles could soon reach the justices. On Monday, a panel on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit temporarily halted a lower judge's order reinstating a fired member at the Federal Trade Commission.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store