
How a war-torn Myanmar plays a critical role in China's rare earth dominance
However, over recent years, China itself has become reliant on rare earth supplies from an unexpected source: the relatively small and war-torn economy of Myanmar.
While China is the world's top producer of rare earths, it still imports raw materials containing the coveted metals from abroad.
Myanmar accounted for about 57% of China's total rare earth imports last year, Gracelin Baskaran, director of the Critical Minerals Security Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, told CNBC.
According to Chinese Customs data, Myanmar's rare earth exports to China significantly picked up in 2018 and reached a peak of nearly 42,000 metric tons by 2023.
Baskaran added that the imports from Myanmar are also particularly high in heavy rare earth element contents, which are generally less abundant in the earth's crust, elevating their value and scarcity.
'Myanmar's production has significantly strengthened China's dominant position, effectively giving Beijing a de facto monopoly over the global heavy rare earths supply chain — and much of the leverage it wields today.'
The country has become a key source of two highly sought-after heavy rare earths, dysprosium and terbium, that play crucial roles in high-tech manufacturing, including in defense and the military, aerospace and renewables sectors.
'This dynamic has given rise to a supply chain in which extraction is concentrated in Myanmar, while downstream processing and value addition are predominantly carried out in China,' said Baskaran.
Why Myanmar?
Myanmar is home to deposits that tend to have higher heavy rare earth content, David Merriman, research director at Project Blue, told CNBC.
These 'ionic adsorption clay,' or IAC, deposits are exploited through leaching methods that apply chemical reagents to the clay — and that comes with high environmental costs.
According to Merriman, the vast majority of the world's IAC operations were in Southern China in the early to mid-2010s. But, as Beijing began implementing new environmental controls and standards in the rare earths industry, many of these projects began to close down.
'Myanmar, particularly the north of the country, was seen as a key region which had similar geology to many of the IAC deposit areas within China,' Merriman said.
'You started to see quite a rapid buildout of new IAC-type mines within Myanmar, essentially replacing the domestic Chinese production. There was a lot of Chinese business involvement in the development of these new IAC projects.'
The rare earths extracted by these IAC miners in Myanmar are then shipped to China mostly in the form of 'rare earth oxides' for further processing and refining, Yue Wang, a senior consultant of rare earths at Wood Mackenzie, told CNBC.
In 2024, a report from Global Witness, a nonprofit focused on environmental and human rights abuses, said that China had effectively outsourced much of its rare earth extraction to Myanmar 'at a terrible cost to the environment and local communities.'
China's rare earth risks
China's reliance on Myanmar for rare earths has also opened it up to supply chain risks, experts said.
According to Global Witness's research, most of the heavy rare earths from Myanmar originate from the Northern Kachin State, which borders China. However, following Myanmar's violent military coup in 2021, the military junta has struggled to maintain control of the territory amid opposition from the public and armed groups.
'Myanmar is a risky jurisdiction to rely on, given the ongoing civil war. In 2024, the Kachin Independence Army (KIA), a group of armed rebels, seized sites responsible for half the world's heavy rare earths production,' said CSIS' Baskaran.
Since the seizure, there have been reports of supply disruptions causing spikes in the prices of some heavy rare earths. According to a Reuters report, the KIA was seeking to use the resources as leverage against Beijing.
Chinese customs data shows imports of rare earth oxides from Myanmar fell by over a third in the first five months of the year compared with the same period last year.
'If Myanmar were to cease all exports of rare earth feed stocks to China, China would struggle to meet its demand for heavy rare earths in the short term,' said Project Blue's Merriman.
Not surprisingly, Beijing has been looking to diversify its sources of heavy rare earths.
According to Merriman, there are IAC deposits in nearby countries, including Malaysia and Laos, where some projects have been set up with Chinese involvement.
Still, he notes that environmental standards are expected to be higher in those countries, which will present challenges for rare earth miners.
China's decision to cut back on its own extraction of heavy rare earth elements may serve as a warning to other countries about the costs of developing such projects. A report by Chinese media group Caixin in 2022 documented how former IAC operation sites in Southern China had left behind toxic water and contaminated soil, hurting local farmers' livelihoods.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Spectator
an hour ago
- Spectator
Nissan's future looks bleak
Nissan has announced that hundreds of jobs will be cut at its Sunderland plant. The Japanese auto-maker said the lay-offs would be in the form of 'voluntary redundancies'. The move is part of the beleaguered corporate behemoth's plan to reduce its global workforce by 15 per cent following several disastrous years, not least because of slow demand for its fleet of electric cars. While the cuts only affect four per cent of the plant's 6,000 workers, the question now is whether this is just the start. So serious is the state of Nissan's finances – it announced losses of $4.5 billion (£3.3 billion) in 2024, with this year not expected to be any better – that it would be foolish to assume this is where it will end. The company has maintained that the Sunderland plant is at the heart of its corporate strategy and it justified the lay-offs as necessary to produce a 'leaner more flexible' operation. Football mad Mackems though might note that these comments sound uncomfortably like the endorsements football club chairmen give under-fire managers days before they, well, fire them. There are certainly reasons to be anxious: on the same day Nissan announced the Sunderland lay-offs it was reported that the company had asked some suppliers in the UK and EU to delay payments to free up short-term funds. The importance of Nissan to the Sunderland area is hard to overstate. Thousands of people are directly employed at the plant with an additional 4,000 jobs in the city reliant on the company in some way. By staying put in Sunderland, Nissan has bucked the trend in an area synonymous with declining industry. Its presence has acted as a symbol of hope and pride for almost 40 years now. Nissan has been a sponsor of Sunderland FC and runs the Nissan Academy offering engineering courses and apprenticeships for students amongst many other good works. But what happens if it shuts up shop? The prospects for Sunderland look bleak. Despite recent difficulties, the company is still officially bullish about its future in the region and has ambitious plans. These include the 'Arc' business strategy, which it claims will transform the process of electric car production and maximise efficiency and profits. To this end the company has invested a billion pounds in a nearby battery plant to supply its new range of EVs. The problem is that none of this will work if customers are not interested and Nissan has been haemorrhaging sales to the much 'leaner and more flexible' Chinese competitors for years. The company, which once looked like the future, has been characterised of late by strategic missteps, complacency, and missed opportunities. It has been a long time since Nissan's confident forward thinking corporate rhetoric has matched reality. Partly as a result of its tarnished reputation, the reaction to Nissan's plight here in Japan has been mixed. Emblematic companies are expected to do the country proud not embarrass it and Nissan has done rather too much of the latter in recent years. The Carlos Ghosn affair was especially wounding. Once seen as the company's likely saviour, his 'great escape' from police custody inside a musical instrument box in 2019 was as farcical as it was humiliating. There is a feeling here that the company is its own worst enemy and may be beyond saving. The Japanese government tried to intervene to salvage Nissan with support for a once unthinkable merger with Honda and the courting of Elon Musk as a potential saviour. Both schemes failed, possibly because the principles took a look at Nissan's books and drove off at speed. Some sympathy is due perhaps, at least for Nissan in the UK, where the huge difficulties resulting from the ever-changing diktats of climate-obsessed governments (Conservative and Labour) have put the industry under great strain. The wholly unnecessary set of circumstances that has led the UK to have among the highest industrial energy prices in the world makes plants like Sunderland vulnerable when its owners are struggling in a fiercely competitive market. It would be a massive reputational embarrassment for Nissan if it were to withdraw or dramatically scale back its operations in Sunderland, and no one is suggesting that such an eventuality is imminent. Still, it might be wise to think of this week's announcement as a warning and a clarion call for sensible policy making. One would hope that the Energy Secretary Ed Miliband is listening carefully.


NBC News
10 hours ago
- NBC News
Apple sues former Vision Pro employee for allegedly stealing 'thousands of documents' before joining Snap
Apple has accused a former engineer for its Vision Pro headset computer of stealing company trade secrets before starting a new job at Snap, according to a lawsuit filed in California last week. In the June 24 court filing, Apple accuses Di Liu, a senior design engineer, of downloading thousands of documents in his final days at the Cupertino company last year and saving them to his personal cloud accounts. This lawsuit is the latest example of Apple publicly going after a former employee for leaking internal information. Apple is an intensely secretive company, and lawsuits like this one highlight how the iPhone maker exercises tight control over its internal information, even if it has to pursue legal action against former staff. Apple alleges that Liu didn't inform the company when he resigned late last year that he was headed to Snap, a competitor and maker of smart glasses. As a result, Apple did not shut off his access to accounts and allowed him a customary two-week transition period, which he used to download company files, according to the lawsuit. 'Worse still, the review of Mr. Liu's Apple-issued work laptop also shows that while maintaining access to Apple's Proprietary Information under false pretenses, he used his Apple credentials to exfiltrate thousands of documents containing Proprietary Information from Apple's secure file storage systems,' the iPhone maker's lawyers said in the filing. Many of the files downloaded by Liu had codenames for Apple projects and described the company's technology, product design and supply chain, according to the lawsuit. Apple says that all employees agree to keep Apple files confidential and that Liu broke confidentiality agreements he made when he joined. Liu worked for Apple between 2017 and 2024, according to the lawsuit. Liu worked on Apple's Vision Pro headset as a system product design engineer, per the filing. Liu did not respond to a request for comment from CNBC. Apple lawyers wrote that Liu could use the trade secrets in his work at Snap. Apple is not suing Snap, and the social media company did not respond to a request for comment. 'The overlap between Apple's Proprietary Information that Mr. Liu retained and Snap's AR products (for which Mr. Liu is a 'product design engineer') suggests that Mr. Liu intends to use Apple's Proprietary Information at Snap,' according to the filing. Apple is seeking damages and for Liu to have his devices inspected by a forensic examiner to make sure all the trade secrets are deleted. The iPhone maker has sued several former employees in recent years for taking files when they left the company. Apple settled with former engineer Simon Lancaster in 2022 over providing information to a journalist. Apple also sued a former employee, Andrew Aude, in 2024 over leaking details to the media. That lawsuit was dismissed after Aude apologized. The Cupertino company sued Rivos, a chip startup staffed by former Apple semiconductor employees, over its intellectual property, and settled in 2024. Additionally at least three former Apple employees have also been arrested and accused by the government of taking company secrets and giving them to China-linked organizations. One pled guilty and was sentenced to four months in prison, and two are still in proceedings.


Scottish Sun
11 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
China building giant ‘military city' fortress ten times bigger than the Pentagon with nuclear-proof bunker ready for WW3
The base does not exist according to Chinese government websites XI'S CITADEL China building giant 'military city' fortress ten times bigger than the Pentagon with nuclear-proof bunker ready for WW3 Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) CHINA is secretly constructing a massive new military fortress ten times bigger than the Pentagon. The "Beijing Military City" is kitted with a doomsday bunker ready for WW3 and could serve as a wartime command centre, according to US intelligence. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 6 A high-res satellite picture showing the enormous base which has spring Credit: Maxar Technologies 6 The huge new base aligns with the Chinese People's Liberation Army's goal to reform the military by 2027 Credit: AP 6 The Pentagon is famously the world's largest office building - but will be dwarfed by the new facility which is more than 4km across. It occupies a sprawling site about 20 miles southwest of the capital Beijing. There is no visible military presence around the complex, but US intelligence officials believe it is designed to play a key role in China's future military endeavours. Xi Jinping is rapidly building up a nuclear arsenal which, in a decade's time, could rival that of the US. With nuclear armament comes the need for more robust protection against nukes from other nations - hence the bunker beneath the fortress. The construction of the complex was first reported by the Financial Times, with satellite pictures showing its development. In February 2022, the site was filled with residential buildings and large areas of open land in an area north of the Chonqing Reservoir. A year later, it could be seen that the site had largely been cleared out in preparation for a massive construction project - which appeared to kick off in mid-2024. By the June of that year, the site had been completely overhauled wit a new system of surrounding tunnels and roads. According to the Chinese government, the new facility does not exist. China unveils tiny terrifying mosquito-sized drone to be used for spying & 'special missions' as they sneak into homes There is no official mention of the construction project, and the Chinese embassy claims no knowledge of it. But the watertight restrictions around the site suggests otherwise. Access is strictly prohibited, and all drones and cameras are banned. Hiking trails near to the site have also been erased to avoid any prying eyes. A former senior US intelligence official told the FT that the new command centre could replace China's existing military headquarters dating from the Cold War. The source said: "The size, scale, and partially buried characteristics of the new facility suggest it will replace the Western Hills complex as the primary wartime command facility." 6 Chinese fighter jets lining up on the flight deck of the Shandong aircraft carrier in June Credit: AFP 6 Taiwan Coast Guard special forces on a speedboat training exercise Credit: Getty Renny Babiarz, a former imagery analyst at the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, told the paper that satellite images appeared to show about 100 cranes working away at the site. With deep underground tunnels and spaces reinforced in concrete, a China researcher told the FT that the complex had "all the hallmarks of a sensitive military facility". They said: "Nearly 10 times bigger than the Pentagon, it's fitting for Xi Jinping's ambitions to surpass the US. "This fortress only serves one purpose, which is to act as a doomsday bunker for China's increasingly sophisticated and capable military." The new base suggests that China has growing military ambitions, and aligns with the Chinese People's Liberation Army's goal to reform the military by 2027.