logo
From takeoff to crash: The 98-second life of doomed Air India flight

From takeoff to crash: The 98-second life of doomed Air India flight

India Today6 days ago
The Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau's 15-page preliminary investigation report details the fateful 98 seconds of AI171, the London-bound flight from Ahmedabad — from the takeoff roll to the moment the Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner crashed outside the airport boundary wall — in which 241 people on board were killed, with only one survivor.The flight took off at 1:38 pm after receiving take-off clearance. The AI 171 Dreamliner was just 32 seconds in the air, before it eventually crashed. By 1:38 pm, one of the engines had reached a speed of 284 km/h during the takeoff roll. Within the next two seconds, the aircraft achieved Vr speed — the rotation speed — at 287 km/h, according to the preliminary investigation report. Following that, the aircraft lifted off, meaning the wheels left the ground four seconds later.advertisementOver the next three seconds, the aircraft recorded a maximum airspeed of 334 km/h. Immediately afterward, both engines shut down, prompting the deployment of the RAT (Ram Air Turbine) as the aircraft began losing altitude.
RATs are deployed in the event of a dual engine failure or a loss of electrical or hydraulic power.However, aviation experts noted that RAT deployment is often ineffective at lower altitudes, particularly during takeoff, due to insufficient airflow required to power the turbine at low speeds.Key Time Stamps05:47 UTC – Aircraft arrived in Ahmedabad (from Delhi, flight AI423)06:40 UTC – Aircraft released for flight after tech check06:25 UTC – Crew underwent preflight Breath Analyser test — found fit07:05 UTC (12:35 IST) – Crew seen arriving at the boarding gate via CCTV07:48:38 UTC – Aircraft departed from Bay 3407:55:15 UTC – Received taxi clearance07:56:08 UTC – Began taxi08:07:33 UTC – Take-off clearance issued08:07:37 UTC – Aircraft began take-off roll08:08:33 UTC – V1 speed (153 Kts IAS) achieved08:08:35 UTC – Vr speed (155 Kts) achieved08:08:39 UTC – Aircraft lifted off (air/ground sensors show air mode)08:08:42 UTC – Max recorded airspeed: 180 Kts IASImmediately after: Engine 1 & 2 fuel cutoff switches moved to CUTOFF08:08:47 UTC – RAT (Ram Air Turbine) deployed; aircraft losing altitude08:08:52 UTC – Engine 1 fuel cutoff moved back to RUN08:08:54 UTC – APU Inlet Door began opening (Auto Start logic)08:08:56 UTC – Engine 2 fuel cutoff moved back to RUN08:09:05 UTC – MAYDAY call made08:09:11 UTC – EAFR recording stops, flight crashesFive seconds later, Engine 1's fuel cutoff switch was moved back to the RUN position, indicating signs of recovery, the report stated, citing data from the Enhanced Airborne Flight Recorder (EAFR).The APU inlet door began to open two seconds later, triggered by the auto-start logic. Engine 2 also began to stabilise within the following two seconds.The report stated that while Engine 1 began to recover after its core speed deceleration stopped, Engine 2, although able to relight, could not arrest its core speed deceleration.advertisementThe MAYDAY call was made at 1:39 pm (08:09:05 UTC). Six seconds later, at 08:09:11 UTC, the EAFR stopped recording, according to the report.When the Air Traffic Control officer enquired about the MAYDAY call, there was no response, as the aircraft was observed crashing outside the airport boundary at that moment, the report noted.- EndsMust Watch
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

AAIB slams media, urges them to stop speculating on AI-171 crash
AAIB slams media, urges them to stop speculating on AI-171 crash

Mint

time15 minutes ago

  • Mint

AAIB slams media, urges them to stop speculating on AI-171 crash

The Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) on Thursday slammed speculative media reports, including those from international news outlets such as The Wall Street Journal and The Air Current, regarding the London-bound Air India (AI) flight that crashed soon after lift-off from Ahmedabad on 12 June. The bureau urged the public and media organizations alike to refrain from drawing premature conclusions based on its initial probe into the AI-operated Boeing 787 Dreamliner plane crash in which more than 240 people perished, calling such actions as irresponsible and insensitive to the victims' families. 'It has come to our attention that certain sections of the international media are repeatedly attempting to draw conclusions through selective and unverified reporting. Such actions are irresponsible, especially while the investigation remains ongoing,' the AAIB said. Emphasizing its flawless record of investigation, the AAIB said that it is probing the Air India plane crash in a rigourous and professional manner in accordance with the rules of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), a UN body. 'While the accident of this dimension has drawn public attention and shock, however, it needs to be appreciated that this is not the time to create public anxiety or angst towards safety of Indian Aviation Industry, particularly on the basis of unfounded facts,' said AAIB in its appeal. It added, 'AAIB works in accordance with the Aircraft (Investigation of Accidents and Incidents) Rules, 2017, and is responsible for fulfilling the obligations of the Government of India towards ICAO Annex 13. AAIB has a flawless record in investigating 92 Accidents and 111 Serious incidents since its inception in 2012.' Since the accident, international media organizations like the Wall Street Journal (WSJ), The Air Current, among others, have been putting out information around the crash. The Wall Street Journal's report, in particular, on possible issue with fuel switch of the Boeing Dreamliner aircraft, 24 hours prior to AAIB releasing the preliminary report, has drawn criticism. On Thursday, the American publication put out yet another source-based news report on the AI-171 crash. The report said that Captain Sumeet Sabharwal likely switched off the fuel supply. 'A black-box recording of dialogue between the flight's two pilots indicates it was the captain who turned off switches that controlled fuel flowing to the plane's two engines, according to people familiar with U.S. officials' early assessment of evidence uncovered in the crash investigation,' the WSJ report said. Calling out international media publications, the AAIB said it is essential to respect the sensitivity of the loss faced by family members of deceased passengers, crew and other deceased persons on ground. AAIB further said that the purpose of the preliminary report was to provide information about what happened. The investigation by AAIB is underway and the final investigation report will come out with root causes and recommendations. Pilot associations on Thursday expressed shock and disappointment on speculative news reports. Airline Pilots' Association India (ALPA) said it is deeply concerned by the commentary and attempts to assign blame to the deceased AI-171 pilots. 'Pilots are trained professionals who carry the responsibility of hundreds of lives with dedication and dignity. The crew of AI-171 made every possible effort till the end. They deserve respect, not unfounded character judgments,' said ALPA India. Federation of Indian Pilots (FIP) and ALPA India have also urged the Union aviation ministry to have pilot representation in the investigation. FIP also asked the government to reassess possible technical misinterpretation or mechanical faults in Air India's Boeing 787-8 aircraft.

AI crash probe should also focus on possible fault in stabilizer: Expert
AI crash probe should also focus on possible fault in stabilizer: Expert

Business Standard

timean hour ago

  • Business Standard

AI crash probe should also focus on possible fault in stabilizer: Expert

A veteran pilot and aviation consultant has suggested that investigators should also focus on a possible fault in flight AI171's stabilizer, which he believes could have created conditions for the plane's crash, albeit due to an unintended mistake by the pilot. Air India flight 171, which crashed moments after taking off from Ahmedabad, killing 241 on board and 19 on the ground, had arrived from Delhi before its onward journey to London Gatwick on June 12. The crew reported a fault with the stabilizer to engineers in Ahmedabad who fixed it, according to a preliminary report into the investigation released on July 12. Aviation expert Captain Ehsan Khalid told PTI that investigators should also check the flight data recorder for stabilizer inputs data, in case it was not fixed properly and created conditions for the crash during the takeoff roll of the Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner. The stabilizer is part of the aircraft's tail and helps in pitching up and down its nose on command from the pilot. Khalid has flown Airbus and Boeing planes, including Boeing 737. He said if a fault crops up in the stabilizer during takeoff roll, the pilot flying has to perform the following memorised routine: take one hand off the control column, reach down and turn off the stabilizer control switches located under the thrust lever assembly. As it happens, the orange switches are right next to the fuel control switches, which have become the focus of the investigation and much speculation into the crash. Khalid suggested that there is a possibility the first officer, who was flying the plane, turned off the fuel to both engines by mistake while intending to cut off the stabilizer, even though both switches feel different to touch. During takeoff, the pilot does not look anywhere except straight ahead to ensure the plane is climbing safely, he said. "I have a problem with the Boeing philosophy. It's the pilot flying who is required to turn off the stabilizer in case of a fault and not the other pilot," he said. In its preliminary report on the Boeing 787-8 crash, the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) said the fuel supply to both engines of the plane was cut off within a gap of one second, causing confusion in the cockpit soon after takeoff. "In the cockpit voice recording, one of the pilots is heard asking the other why did he cut off. The other pilot responded that he did not do so," the report said. According to Khalid, the entire cockpit voice recording could have been made public by the AAIB and if that was released, "these speculations or insinuations or smear campaign would not have been there because a pilot, as a community, feels that they are the goalkeeper of flight safety". He also said the AAIB report has given rise to more speculations, which were not there before. Khalid also noted that an electrical malfunction could also have resulted in the aircraft's fuel switches being cut off soon after takeoff. "While it is also true that the switch may be in one position and that position may be 1 and the second position is 0 in electrical terms... (then) 0 to 1 or 1 to 0 (position) could have transitioned because of an electrical malfunction or a signal malfunction while the switch could be at the same point. "That is why I think AAIB, in their own judgment, were very careful in not using the word that fuel switches were moved. They could have used it. It is not that they do not know about it," he said. Amid speculations that pilot error could have caused the crash, the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) on Thursday said it is too early to reach any definite conclusions on the Air India plane crash as the probe is still on and urged everyone to refrain from spreading premature narratives that risk undermining the integrity of the investigative process amid speculations. Various pilot associations have raised concerns about the AAIB report and have urged all parties to refrain from speculations. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

"International Media Reports Irresponsible": Air India Crash Investigator
"International Media Reports Irresponsible": Air India Crash Investigator

NDTV

timean hour ago

  • NDTV

"International Media Reports Irresponsible": Air India Crash Investigator

New Delhi: The Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau on Thursday slammed international media publications for "selective", "unverified", and "irresponsible" reporting about the Air India Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner plane crash in Ahmedabad on June 12, in which 274 people were killed. The AAIB also criticised foreign media for fomenting 'anxiety about safety of Indian airlines'. The strong statement followed a report by American publication Wall Street Journal that cited the AAIB's preliminary report and claimed audio from the cockpit voice recorder showed the senior pilot, Captain Sumeet Sabharwal, cut fuel to the engines, causing a mid-air loss of thrust and the crash. In a brief but sharply-worded statement this afternoon, the AAIB called out the publication's reportage, and that of other international media, over such speculaiton, and said, "Such actions are irresponsible... especially while the investigation remains ongoing. We urge the public the media to refrain from spreading premature narratives that risk undermining the integrity of the investigative process." The bureau also asked for patience while it completes and releases the final report. "The purpose of AAIB's preliminary report is to provide information on 'WHAT' happened... the report has to be seen in this light. At this stage, it is too early to reach a conclusion." "The investigation is not complete. The final report will come out... AAIB appeals to all concerned to await publication of the final report, after completion of the Investigation." The AAIB also stressed the need for compassion when reporting on this tragic incident. "It is essential to respect losses faced by family members of deceased passengers, crew, and other persons on the ground... it needs to be appreciated that this is not the time to create public anxiety or angst towards safety of Indian airlines," the bureau said firmly. The WSJ report had also been fiercely condemned by the Federation of Indian Pilots, the chief of which spoke to NDTV and junked the claim as "baseless". He also vowed legal action. FIP chief CS Randhawa told NDTV the crash investigator's preliminary report - which was released last week - makes no mention of the pilots having turned off the fuel supply, and only stated the switches moved from 'RUNOFF' to 'CUT", in the space of a second. The WSJ had claimed the recording of the pilots - the audio was never released - revealed the First Officer, i.e., Clive Kunder, asked Captain Sabharwal why he moved the fuel supply toggles from the 'RUNOFF' to the 'CUT' position seconds after the plane lifted off from the runway. "The report (i.e., the AAIB preliminary report) didn't say whether turning off the switches might have been accidental or deliberate," the WSJ said in its article. That sentence was seen as an attempt to blame the dead pilots for the crash, particularly since the fuel control switches are designed to stay immobile unless actively toggled by the pilot. In the aftermath of the AAIB's initial report, domestic airlines operating Boeing jets were instructed to conduct checks on switches that regulate fuel supply to the engines. This was made mandatory for all India-registered Boeing planes, the Director-General of Civil Aviation said. On Wednesday Air India said it had finished the checks and found "no issues".

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store