Aid to Gaza has been co-opted and weaponised
I think Premier Chris Minns needs to read the room better (' Pro-Palestine demonstration across Sydney Harbour Bridge to be blocked ', July 28). The Sydney Harbour Bridge carrying tens of thousands protesting against the starvation in Gaza would send a powerful image about Australians' attitudes about the current situation to the world. It would have far more impact than the words of politicians. What's the point of having such iconic locations that are immediately identifiable without being able to leverage them? Dale Bailey, St Leonards
It was with some distress that I saw reports of the opposition's Dan Tehan pulling the 'where are the facts?' card on Gaza. Is this the blood-stained hill the Liberal Party wish to take a stand on? Politics so often sweeps real human choices under the rug, saying 'that's politics', or 'someone needs to make the tough decisions', divesting themselves of any real choice in the matter. The tough decision would have been to support the government to do anything it can to find a solution whereby civilians do not get slaughtered, and preventing the creation of a new generation of vengeance-fuelled agents of change. A moral party should be helping disclose the facts together with the government. You want the facts? Then go looking for them together. Stop treating politics like a two-team football league. Be a team player for the country and a better world instead. James Cottam, Enmore
The opposition's insistence that criticism of the Israeli government be muted because it's all Hamas' fault sounds a lot like support for the infamous domestic violence excuse: 'Look what you made me do.' Tom Mangan, Woy Woy
Please allow me to make the point that Hamas is not forcing Israel to use the tactics being employed – it is Israel's policy. Israel has never in reality 'targeted' Hamas. Witness the fact the 'war' is still going after 21 months, which may well be the intention. John Christie, Oatley
Cost of addiction
Addicted to smoking, many pensioners who don't have access to illicit tobacco actually do put their addiction before their need for food (' Jail time and evictions: Labor announces crackdown on illegal tobacco ', July 28). This isn't of any concern apparently to state and federal governments, whose focus is on the criminal syndicates and 'dealers″ in this strong drug and the revenue taxed on its hooked users, which for a moderate habit, a pack a day, is more than $300 a week and for a heavy smoker as I used to be, 60 plus daily, now attracts $50,000 per annum. Nicotine is acknowledged to be as or more addictive than heroin. These crises are totally the predictable results of policies which have backfired and now appear to be soon to cause more misery as the crime enforcement is ramped up to try to redirect revenue away from criminals who exploit millions of addicts. Andrew Cohen, Glebe
The government and the anti-tobacco and vaping lobby groups are wasting their time. Draconian taxation and prohibition does not work. I can understand that they have the best of intentions, and have been chuffed that their jackbooted approach was considered the toughest in the world, but we live in a free country and a more mature, respectful approach to those who choose to smoke and vape is recommended. With a cut in taxes and the legalisation of vaping (including applying a lower level of taxation) the illicit trade would crumble and products would again be properly regulated. This is what every other developed, free country has done. Peter Barrett, Woonona
Calming cannabis
Cannabis is effectively legal. I have neither bought nor consumed it, but many people I know do it regularly (' The cannabis factory: How one doctor wrote 72,000 scripts in two years ', July 28). It is cheaper than alcohol and nicotine-derived products. It calms the user down and so reduces the level of violence and anxiety that are symptomatic of other drugs. True, it stays in the system longer and can still have long-term negative side-effects. But properly taxed and regulated, cannabis would be a better companion than Jack Daniels and Peter Stuyvesant. David Neilson, Araluen (NT)
Joyce wide of target
As part of his mission to demolish the net-zero emissions target, Barnaby Joyce declares that he wants people to have the cheapest forms of power generation, which he says are coal and nuclear (' Why Barnaby's war on net zero's already sunk ', July 26). If Barnaby were to have a look at the Open Electricity (National Electricity Market) website, he would soon see that renewables consistently come into the market at a cheaper price than coal. And given that most of our coal-fired power stations are reaching the end of their lives, it is even clearer that the price of coal-fired power will be way more expensive once the costs of building new power stations are factored in. Catherine Rossiter, Fadden (ACT)
Amid his ramblings on climate change, Barnaby Joyce did make a valid point. Even if Australia's domestic energy consumption involved 100 per cent zero emissions, this would have negligible effect on global warming. For Australia to achieve any significant effect, we would need to cease exports of our coal and gas. But the annual revenue from these sources is respectively about $55 billion and $90 billion dollars. Are we as a nation prepared to forego this money, and how would it affect our economy? Regarding net zero emissions, there may be times when the sun doesn't shine and the wind doesn't blow, meaning that we would occasionally need to fall back on gas temporarily to generate instant power. Perhaps total net zero is an illusion. Bruce Johnson, Lakewood
The writers to this letters page are constantly questioning why the voters of New England consistently elect Barnaby Joyce as an MP (Letters, July 28). The simple reason is that most people in New England electorate enjoy a standard of living that is better than the average Australian and, as such, vote conservatively, the way their parents and grandparents voted. Barnaby is simply the beneficiary of that tradition. John Maunder, Quirindi
Correspondent Neil Ormerod doesn't seem to understand the way the world works (Letters, July 27), and his analogy of coal being like heroin is taking it too far. At this point, the world needs fossil fuel. Countries around the world realise this. Has Neil heard of supply and demand? If we don't supply it, somebody else will. That is a fact. So Australia stopping exports will make absolutely zero difference, as will net zero make zero difference to the weather. Peter Phizacklea, Sydney
Modern myths
Ross Gittins tells us that the economics profession 'has never worried too much about ethics' (' When they say 'modelling', grab your bulldust detector ', July 28). This, surely, is a bit harsh. Really, the problem with the economics profession is that it has bought into two modern mythologies. These are that eternal growth is possible – it isn't – and that any benefits of improved productivity will flow through to working people – it won't. Until these myths are recognised and refuted, we will remain in this seemingly endless cycle of hand wringing. Greg Baker, Fitzroy Falls
Strip-search violations
Kate's story illustrates the dangers of this invasive, intimidating violation of personal safety (' No drugs found in 70,000-plus strip-searches ', July 28). In my view, strip-searches of adults, if deemed to be both absolutely necessary and completely lawful, should not as far as possible be carried out by police but by trained medical and trauma-informed care personnel. Moreover, police strip-searching of minors anywhere anytime is tantamount to institutionally sanctioned child abuse and should be totally banned. Meredith Williams, Baulkham Hills
History shows that prohibition doesn't work. Even the financial pseudo-prohibition of cigarettes is failing. Meanwhile, in Portugal, where drug possession has been decriminalised, drug use has not increased, but there has been a significant increase in people entering rehabilitation. Overdoses, deaths and drug-related offences have been dramatically reduced. Decriminalisation of drug possession/usage, drug-testing facilities and increased funding for rehabilitation does work, with further evidence in Oregon and Washington state trials in America. Our politicians need to stop worrying about how strong they appear and focus on what works. The carrot always beats the stick, especially with the young. Rowan Godwin, Rozelle
Could it be that the harms caused by police in using sniffer dogs and strip-searching young people are greater than those purportedly caused by the drugs themselves? Either way, I'd like to see the police searching people of all ages at the restaurant at the NSW Parliament. It would only take that to occur once and the practice would cease overnight. Well, Mr Minns? Shaun Davies, St Peters
The push to eliminate strip-searches is both wrong and dangerous. The number of people found with drugs is small because of the fear of being nabbed. The message that the use of illegal drugs is criminal is a good one. Roger Cedergreen, Kirrawee
Marina madness
It's great to see residents fighting to stop the extension of the Woolwich marina (' Outrage at bid to expand marina ' July 28). We lost the battle in Blackwattle Bay. The new fish market is being built in the bay instead of on the existing site. New marinas and extensions are appearing and recreational activities such as rowing and dragon boat racing are increasingly problematic. The bay is fast becoming a pond like Darling Harbour, surrounded by commercial interests. Keep up the good fight to stop it happening on your side of the harbour. Richard Spencer, Glebe
Higher ground
In July 2022, at the height of the devastating rains and floods that followed the Black Summer bushfires, there was a call for Warragamba Dam's wall to be raised by 14 metres. Perhaps, with what we have learned now, the call should have been for developers to raise houses built on the floodplains by 14 metres (Letters, July 28). My cottage on a tributary of the Hawkesbury River was built in 1953 as a family fishing retreat by someone who knew about water and how it behaves. Yes, the water rose alarmingly three years ago, but the older houses here were safe because they had been built well back from the river many years ago by people who knew their trade. Alexandra Szalay, Coba Point
All about size
It's hardly surprising that Springwood residents value convenience, choice and apparent competition (' Woolies plan splits suburb' ', July 28). However, closer reading of the DA exposes the following serious shortcomings: extra pedestrian crossings, a roundabout fenced against pedestrians, an extra two customer carparks and an underground truck loading bay. All this in a tiny section of road a mere 150 metres long which is also the only access road to two childcare centres and the community's cultural precinct (theatre, community hub, library, gallery). There is ample evidence that a development of such magnitude cannot fail to damage the businesses and prosperity of any community. Residents are not necessarily opposed to this proposal, but to the sheer scale of it. We just want the best outcome for Springwood.
Only the Blue Mountains residents know how to cut off their nose to spite their amenity. As a former resident of Leura for four years and then Springwood in the 80s and 90s, I remember fondly all the campaigns to keep development out of the Blue Mountains – Kmart in Katoomba, Fairmont Resort in Leura, Macca's in Blaxland. We lived in Springwood for eight of those years and how I would have loved a new Woolworths to walk up to, instead of having to drive to Winmalee, Katoomba or even Penrith Plaza to do more detailed shopping. There are many things I would have preferred not to have ever changed, but fortunately the splendid Blue Mountains themselves always knows how to outshine any crass developments. Reina French, Oak Flats
Local control best
I support Joanna Mendelssohn's support for council owned and operated childcare centres (Letters, July 27). This seems to be a field where good profits are assured – three large new centres have recently been built in my surrounding suburbs. This is a sector where council-owned and other non-profit agencies could have been encouraged. The federal Liberals had a fondness for small businesses and struck out in the profit-driven direction. Sadly, the cat is now out of the bag. David Rose, Nollamara (WA)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sydney Morning Herald
19 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Israel must open its eyes: Defeating Hamas does not require starving a single child
Compounding the problem, the method of distributing what little aid is available requires thousands of Palestinians to travel long distances, which imposes an extreme hardship on the most vulnerable people – the very old, the very sick and the very young. Palestinians also have to cross military lines, which creates its own risk of violence as thousands upon thousands of hungry civilians encounter heavily armed soldiers who are on high alert. In Iraq, I participated in humanitarian missions that involved far fewer people, and I can tell you that these missions can be remarkably tense. It takes extreme discipline to keep the peace. Consequently, even as the amount of aid has diminished, the number of violent incidents during aid distribution has skyrocketed. Hundreds of Palestinians in search of food have been killed, many of them by Israeli soldiers. So there is less aid, and it's harder and more dangerous to obtain. The decrease in aid would be dreadful on its own, but what makes it incalculably worse is the timing. Israel's aid blockade came after a year and a half of war, when Hamas is decimated, Gaza's government is largely dismantled and chaos reigns. The dominant power in Gaza is Israel, not Hamas, and Israel, not Hamas, is the only entity with both the power to control aid distribution and the ability to obtain and distribute aid in the Gaza Strip. There is no way for civilians in Gaza to feed themselves. They are utterly dependent on Israel, and Israel removed the United Nations from the aid distribution network without replacing it with an effective alternative. Anyone who has spent time fighting al-Qaida or the Islamic State or Hamas knows that those groups think civilian suffering advances their cause. They don't burrow into cities and wear civilian clothes and hide behind hospitals and mosques simply to conceal themselves; they do so knowing that any military response will also kill civilians. They want the world to see images of civilian death and suffering. So why is Israel giving Hamas what it wants? Hamas should lay down its arms. It should release every hostage. But Hamas' war crimes – including its murders, its hostage taking and its concealment among civilians and civilian buildings – do not relieve Israel of its own moral and legal obligations. This is a moment of short-term strength and long-term vulnerability for Israel. Its triumphs in its fights with Hamas, Hezbollah and Iran mean that its foes are militarily the weakest they've been in more than a generation. At the same time, however, European and US public support for Israel is in a state of collapse. Loading A May YouGov poll found that public support for Israel in Western Europe was the lowest it had ever recorded. A July Gallup poll found that only 32 per cent of Americans approved of Israel's military actions in Gaza. But don't take collapsing support for Israel as proof that nations support Hamas. On Tuesday, all 22 members of the Arab League and all 27 members of the European Union called on Hamas to disarm, release all remaining hostages and surrender control of Gaza. This was a vitally important step – a clear indication that key nations in the world utterly reject Hamas. It matters when President Donald Trump – the man who ordered US strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities – describes what's happening in Gaza as 'real starvation' and says, 'I told Israel, maybe they have to do it a different way'. Israel's defenders can rightfully complain that nations with far worse human rights violations receive far less scrutiny. Where are the protests, they ask, against North Korean gulags? Or against the Chinese oppression of the Uyghurs? But again, Israel has moral responsibilities, regardless of Western hypocrisy, and it still needs those Western friends. No nation – not even the United States – can thrive without allies, and Israel (despite its nuclear weapons) is far more vulnerable and dependent on international friendship than the United States or Britain or France. If Israel creates a lasting rift with its European allies and shatters the long-standing bipartisan American consensus on aiding Israel, then the long-term consequences could be grave. Loading It's easy to forget that it was President Barack Obama, a Democrat, who signed the largest-ever US military aid package with Israel – a $38 billion, 10-year deal that helped supply Israel with many of the weapons it has used in this war. It's easy to forget that President Joe Biden, a Democrat, twice deployed US forces to help defend Israel from Iranian drone and missile attacks. Is Israel better off if its alliance with America depends on whether a Republican is in the White House? Can it even count on Republican support in the long run? Putting aside for the moment the rise of antisemitism in the online right, 'America First' has never been a concept hospitable to foreign aid or alliances. One of the most frustrating aspects of our political discourse is the expectation that once you're identified on a side, you are somehow betraying your side if you speak up when it goes terribly wrong. Partisans are used to ignoring their opponents, but there might be a chance they will listen to their friends.

The Age
19 minutes ago
- The Age
Israel must open its eyes: Defeating Hamas does not require starving a single child
Compounding the problem, the method of distributing what little aid is available requires thousands of Palestinians to travel long distances, which imposes an extreme hardship on the most vulnerable people – the very old, the very sick and the very young. Palestinians also have to cross military lines, which creates its own risk of violence as thousands upon thousands of hungry civilians encounter heavily armed soldiers who are on high alert. In Iraq, I participated in humanitarian missions that involved far fewer people, and I can tell you that these missions can be remarkably tense. It takes extreme discipline to keep the peace. Consequently, even as the amount of aid has diminished, the number of violent incidents during aid distribution has skyrocketed. Hundreds of Palestinians in search of food have been killed, many of them by Israeli soldiers. So there is less aid, and it's harder and more dangerous to obtain. The decrease in aid would be dreadful on its own, but what makes it incalculably worse is the timing. Israel's aid blockade came after a year and a half of war, when Hamas is decimated, Gaza's government is largely dismantled and chaos reigns. The dominant power in Gaza is Israel, not Hamas, and Israel, not Hamas, is the only entity with both the power to control aid distribution and the ability to obtain and distribute aid in the Gaza Strip. There is no way for civilians in Gaza to feed themselves. They are utterly dependent on Israel, and Israel removed the United Nations from the aid distribution network without replacing it with an effective alternative. Anyone who has spent time fighting al-Qaida or the Islamic State or Hamas knows that those groups think civilian suffering advances their cause. They don't burrow into cities and wear civilian clothes and hide behind hospitals and mosques simply to conceal themselves; they do so knowing that any military response will also kill civilians. They want the world to see images of civilian death and suffering. So why is Israel giving Hamas what it wants? Hamas should lay down its arms. It should release every hostage. But Hamas' war crimes – including its murders, its hostage taking and its concealment among civilians and civilian buildings – do not relieve Israel of its own moral and legal obligations. This is a moment of short-term strength and long-term vulnerability for Israel. Its triumphs in its fights with Hamas, Hezbollah and Iran mean that its foes are militarily the weakest they've been in more than a generation. At the same time, however, European and US public support for Israel is in a state of collapse. Loading A May YouGov poll found that public support for Israel in Western Europe was the lowest it had ever recorded. A July Gallup poll found that only 32 per cent of Americans approved of Israel's military actions in Gaza. But don't take collapsing support for Israel as proof that nations support Hamas. On Tuesday, all 22 members of the Arab League and all 27 members of the European Union called on Hamas to disarm, release all remaining hostages and surrender control of Gaza. This was a vitally important step – a clear indication that key nations in the world utterly reject Hamas. It matters when President Donald Trump – the man who ordered US strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities – describes what's happening in Gaza as 'real starvation' and says, 'I told Israel, maybe they have to do it a different way'. Israel's defenders can rightfully complain that nations with far worse human rights violations receive far less scrutiny. Where are the protests, they ask, against North Korean gulags? Or against the Chinese oppression of the Uyghurs? But again, Israel has moral responsibilities, regardless of Western hypocrisy, and it still needs those Western friends. No nation – not even the United States – can thrive without allies, and Israel (despite its nuclear weapons) is far more vulnerable and dependent on international friendship than the United States or Britain or France. If Israel creates a lasting rift with its European allies and shatters the long-standing bipartisan American consensus on aiding Israel, then the long-term consequences could be grave. Loading It's easy to forget that it was President Barack Obama, a Democrat, who signed the largest-ever US military aid package with Israel – a $38 billion, 10-year deal that helped supply Israel with many of the weapons it has used in this war. It's easy to forget that President Joe Biden, a Democrat, twice deployed US forces to help defend Israel from Iranian drone and missile attacks. Is Israel better off if its alliance with America depends on whether a Republican is in the White House? Can it even count on Republican support in the long run? Putting aside for the moment the rise of antisemitism in the online right, 'America First' has never been a concept hospitable to foreign aid or alliances. One of the most frustrating aspects of our political discourse is the expectation that once you're identified on a side, you are somehow betraying your side if you speak up when it goes terribly wrong. Partisans are used to ignoring their opponents, but there might be a chance they will listen to their friends.

Sky News AU
19 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Australia's large protests will show the world ‘how strongly' people feel against Israel
Labor MP Ed Husic says politics will now 'catch up' and begin supporting a more pro-Palestine movement after the large Sydney protest. Thousands of pro-Palestinian protesters marched across the Sydney Harbour Bridge on Sunday. Mr Husic told Sky News Australia that the world has seen 'how strongly' people have come out against Israel.