Honda Isn't Going to Like the Mazda CX-50's Superb Steering
Most vehicles outside of sports cars fail to deliver great steering, but the Mazda CX-50 is shockingly good. I recall driving it for the first time shortly after its debut, and I was gobsmacked at how good it was. Of course, Mazda has focused on the driving experience for a long time, but the CX-50 raises the bar even higher than the MX-5 Miata. When contrasted with Honda, another brand famous for infusing its cars and SUVs with great steering, the Mazda CX-50 should make them nervous.
For years, Honda has earned praise for producing vehicles that blend precision steering with engaging driving dynamics. For numerous reasons, models like the Civic and CR-V are benchmarks in their segments and have been for some time. They offer sharp, predictable steering and handling that connect drivers to the road. Even a model like the efficient Civic Hybrid is surprisingly connected and rewarding to drive.
The CX-50's closest competitor from Honda in terms of output, size, and style is the CR-V. The current CR-V's steering is deftly tuned for both precise and compliant handling, while the ride remains smooth, instilling the driving experience with composure and confidence. While it's unlikely that the CX-50 will ever sell in the same numbers as the CR-V, there's reason for Honda to take notice.
The Honda CR-V is one of the best-selling crossovers in North America, and for good reason: it offers excellent space efficiency, comfort, and driving dynamics that surpass most rivals. The CR-V's dual-pinion electric power steering setup (with a variable ratio of about 12.3:1 near the center) provides quick responses and relatively light effort - traits Honda fans have come to expect.
The Mazda CX-50 utilizes an electric power-assisted steering (EPAS) system, a technology prevalent in the industry, but this one stands out thanks to careful tuning by Mazda engineers that delivers a remarkably linear and communicative feel. The steering ratio is quick enough to provide a near-immediate response to driver inputs without feeling twitchy on the highway. It also has impressive steering feedback, a characteristic that's absent in even sporty vehicles. Feedback is where the steering wheel communicates road forces and road surfaces between the front tires and the driver's hands. Knowing how the tires are gripping the road and what that surface feels like equates to a good steering rack. The CX-50 excels at this.
Another contributor to the CX-50's great steering is the weight, or how heavy the steering feels when turning. The CX-50's steering weight is quite heavy, and some might not like that, but it's paired with excellent corner weight build-up, the part where effort progressively builds as both corner entry speed and front tire load increase. Good sports cars have this, and the CX-50 feels just like that. Mazda engineers focused on minimizing friction and unnecessary damping within the steering system to reduce artificial heaviness. A vehicle can have weighty steering, but it can sometimes feel overboosted and artificial. The feeling is otherworldly for a mainstream, affordable crossover, and it exists in every CX-50 trim level, regardless of the engine choice.
The CX-50's torsionally rigid chassis also deserves mention. The use of ultra-high-strength steel in key areas, particularly around the cowl and floor, enhances the body's resistance to flex, allowing the suspension and steering to work more predictably under load.
While the CX-50 features MacPherson strut front suspension and a torsion beam rear suspension, neither of which is exceptional in the industry, Mazda has calibrated the setup so well that it provides exceptional stability and great turn-in precision. You can go over undulating pavement without upsetting it and then point and shoot it into and out of a corner with aplomb. On top of that, Mazda's G-Vectoring Control Plus further aids cornering by subtly adjusting engine torque to shift weight properly.
The 2024 Mazda CX-50 sits on Mazda's Small Product Group platform, which it shares with the Mazda3 and CX-30, both with excellent steering and handling. But the CX-50 isn't just a lifted hatchback in disguise. It's been designed with a wider track than the CX-5, a longer wheelbase, and reinforced body structures to handle both on-road dynamics and light off-road use. With its muscular fenders, low roofline, and purposeful stance, the CX-50 looks athletic, and the experience from behind the wheel is even more rewarding than the CX-50's appearance communicates.
Under the hood, buyers can choose between two versions of Mazda's 2.5-liter inline-four engine: a naturally aspirated variant producing 187 horsepower and 186 lb-ft of torque or the preferred 2.5-liter turbocharged engine that churns out up to 256 horsepower and 320 lb-ft of torque on 93-octane fuel (or 227 horsepower and 310 lb-ft on regular 87-octane). Both pair with a six-speed automatic transmission and standard i-Activ all-wheel drive. While those numbers are solid, it's the steering that truly defines the CX-50's dynamic character.
The CR-V is one of the better compact crossovers to drive, but the CX-50 feels more natural, sportier, and more rewarding. Where the CR-V's steering is accurate, it can feel isolated and overly boosted at times, filtering out feedback. It also lacks the excellent corner weight build-up of the CX-50. The CX-50's system keeps drivers more informed, letting them feel small adjustments in grip levels without intrusive kickback. On winding backroads, the Mazda simply feels more alive and confidence-inspiring, even though both vehicles are similarly sized and weighted.
This unique trait of the CX-50 appeals to car buyers who want practicality without sacrificing driver engagement. The CX-50 is just that much better at it than every other competitor at its price and better than some sporty coupes, sedans, and premium fare. Honda's reputation for driver-focused engineering in mainstream vehicles faces a legitimate challenge from the CX-50, a smaller automaker punching well above its weight. The CX-50 isn't going to threaten the CR-V in terms of sales volume (400,000+ for the CR-V in 2024), but the CX-50 increased by more than 64% in sales in 2024 compared to the year before.
The CR-V is great in so many ways, but it's also ubiquitous. The CX-50 isn't just different in its appearance inside and out, but it's also better to drive than the CR-V, thanks to some of the best, most communicative steering in the automotive industry. Mazda's commitment to delivering a more authentic, connected steering experience in a segment dominated by numbness and over-assist is refreshing. While the CR-V will undoubtedly continue to sell in huge numbers, it's clear that enthusiasts looking for more tactile feedback and engagement will increasingly see the CX-50 as the better driver's crossover. It's the one we'd put in our own garage.
Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Motor 1
11 hours ago
- Motor 1
‘You're Gonna Cost Yourselves Thousands:' Expert Reveals the Real Reason You Can't Custom Order a Toyota. Is There a Workaround?
A car expert is warning shoppers that if you're trying to custom-order a Toyota (or Honda), you're wasting your time, and possibly thousands of dollars. Vehicle purchase consultant Tomi Mikula (@tomislavmikula) claims the issue isn't demand, but the allocation system that gives dealers little to no control over builds. 'If you've even considered buying a Toyota or a Honda, you'll probably run into crazy wait times, like a two-and-a-half-year waitlist on a 4Runner TRD Pro, or a year waitlist on a Sienna, or a six-to-eight-month wait list on a Grand Highlander,' he said in the clip that's been viewed more than 220,000 times. According to Mikula, Toyota and Honda don't offer true custom ordering, unlike some competitors. While manufacturers like BMW and Ford allow buyers to spec vehicles from the ground up, with dealerships submitting those configurations directly to the factory, Toyota and Honda primarily rely on an allocation system , which pre-assigns vehicles to dealers based on historical sales data and regional demand. Rather than submitting individual customer builds to the factory, Toyota dealers receive batches of pre-configured vehicles every two weeks. Buyers can 'build' a car on the Toyota website, but that doesn't mean the factory will make it. As Mikula puts it: While some dealers may request changes to their allocation, Mikula claims those requests are often denied, especially for popular trims or color combinations. Toyota has publicly acknowledged the use of this allocation model in past dealership communications. Waitlists Can Be Misleading The result, Mikula says, is that many Toyota and Honda buyers are unknowingly placed in a queue that may never deliver what they want. For example, he said Toyota's 4Runner TRD Pro, Sienna, and Grand Highlander are all in high demand, with online estimates of wait times ranging from six months to two years depending on the region and configuration. But allocation-based matching means that if your preferred build doesn't show up in the next batch, or a salesperson overlooks your request, you're likely to be skipped . Worse, Mikula says, sales staff may prioritize buyers who walk in ready to sign, over customers already on a deposit list. Dealers Have Little Incentive to Prioritize You According to Mikula, one reason the system leads to long wait times is that there's no centralized way to match every customer's preferences to incoming cars. It's up to dealership staff to manually sort deposit lists against incoming allocation lists. Errors, forgetfulness, or simple laziness can result in missed customers. 'I can tell you the amount of times that I've heard horror stories from dealerships that just lost their name on a list completely,' he said. BMW and Others Offer True Customization By contrast, automakers like BMW, Mercedes-Benz, and Ford offer build-to-order systems that give dealerships 'slots' with the factory. Customers can spec a car exactly how they want—paint color, interior trim, packages, even wheel design—and the factory builds that configuration. Brands like Ford and Ram encourage factory ordering via Build & Price tools, and customers often receive a Vehicle Identification Number (VIN) within weeks. That VIN ties to the exact vehicle being built, and buyers can track it through production. Mikula's advice: 'You do not want to put a deposit on a car unless you can actually get a VIN and a window sticker.' How to Protect Yourself as a Buyer To avoid frustration, Mikula recommends a few tips for Toyota and Honda shoppers: Don't assume the website's 'Build' tool leads to a factory order. It's often just a wishlist. Ask for a VIN and window sticker before placing a deposit. Clarify your flexibility. If you're OK with alternative colors or missing one minor feature, let the dealer know—don't get skipped. Negotiate pricing up front. Dealers have more leverage once you've waited six months and are emotionally invested in the vehicle. Shop around. Some dealers manage allocation lists better than others. Mikula says his average Sienna client waits 30–60 days, while the national average is 8+ months. We've reached out to Mikula for comment. We'll be sure to update this article if we hear back. Now Trending 'What in the World Should I Do?': Woman Takes Her Chevrolet Into the Body Shop to Fix a Dent. Then She Gets It Back 'We Never Did That at My Shop:' AutoZone Worker Says it 'Hurts His Soul' Whenever a Customer Requires Him to Do This. Why? Get the best news, reviews, columns, and more delivered straight to your inbox, daily. back Sign up For more information, read our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use . Share this Story Facebook X LinkedIn Flipboard Reddit WhatsApp E-Mail Got a tip for us? Email: tips@ Join the conversation ( )

Miami Herald
16 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Toyota's New Engine Family: Here's Why Rivals Should Worry
Many of today's powertrain developments are in the electric vehicle (EV) realm, but Toyota is expanding the limits of gas-powered engines. The automaker's next-gen engine lineup includes 1.5-liter and 2.0-liter sizes, which are entirely different from its previous internal combustion engines (ICE), leveraging more lightweight and compact designs. Toyota's new 1.5-liter achieves a 10% weight and volume reduction compared to the company's current 1.5-liter, while the new 2.0-liter offers similar gains to the existing 2.4-liter. In turn, Toyota is able to increase fuel economy and lower emissions without sacrificing power. Still, this next-gen engine family's efficiency extends beyond increased mileage and reduced emissions into areas like vehicle segment versatility. Let's take a closer look at how Toyota is giving its rivals increased competition with the innovation of its latest engine lineup. Flexibility is a focal point of Toyota's next-gen engine family, with the ability to mount longitudinally or transversely and be placed at a vehicle's front or rear. This flexibility supports the development of future, sportier Toyotas, plus the seamless implementation of all-wheel drive (AWD), RWD, and FWD layouts. Toyota can utilize the 1.5-liter engine to suit classes such as compact cars and hybrids, while the 2.0-liter turbo could fit larger trucks, SUVs, and sports models. "With these engines, each of the three companies [Toyota, Subaru, Mazda] will aim to optimize the integration with motors, batteries, and other electric drive units," Toyota said in a statement, according to The Daily Star. Toyota, which owns about a fifth of Subaru and roughly 5% of Mazda, added that its next-generation ICE engine lineup will help decarbonize ICEs by making them compatible with alternative fuel sources, such as e-fuels (synthetic fuels) and biofuels. While smaller engines often evoke thoughts of slower cars, their installation in upcoming Toyotas enables lower hoods, which enhances crucial performance factors such as aerodynamics and contributes to improved fuel economy. The engines' design flexibility also opens the door to Toyota reviving fan-favorite performance vehicles like the MR2 and streamlining the development of the upcoming Celica. American drivers could even see the engines in Gazoo Racing models like the GR Corolla and GR86. According to Toyota engineers who spoke with German publication Auto Motor und Sport, the 2.0-liter is easily capable of exceeding the 400-450-horsepower figure of the mid-engine GR Yaris M concept, or over 600 horsepower with a larger turbocharger. Toyota's desire to expand the limits of ICEs arrives at a time when many automakers are reducing their investment in the technology. This decision from Toyota, along with its collaborators Subaru and Mazda, could pay off in a significant way by appealing to drivers who are not yet ready for full electrification, whether for reasons like lack of charging infrastructure or personal taste, but still seek improved efficiency. Drivers can also look forward to this ICE technology offering the ability to increase sports car mileage and reduce emissions while enhancing power. Many automakers have decided to stretch ICE production into the 2030s, but Toyota and its partners appear to have a leg up on competitors with this next-gen engine lineup offering innovation in the areas that matter most. Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Miami Herald
a day ago
- Miami Herald
HF‑11 Hypercar Revs to 12,000 RPM and Swaps Between Gas and Electric
In a world dominated by hybrid hypercars built by billion-dollar conglomerates, the Oil Stain Lab HF‑11 is a welcome oddity. It's the creation of two Ukrainian-American brothers, Nikita and Iliya Bridan - ex-Honda, Cadillac and Genesis designers - who decided the only way to scratch their creative itch was to build a 12,000 rpm, dual-drivetrain, 2,000-pound hypercar out of sheer 25 will be made. Each one costs at least $1.85 million, or $2.3 million if you want both powertrains. The HF‑11 is about choice. Buyers can spec a 4.6-liter naturally aspirated flat-six making 600 hp, or step up to the unhinged 5.0-liter twin-turbo flat-six good for a staggering 1,200 hp - all mounted in the middle of a carbon monocoque and sending power to the rear wheels. Both are available with a six-speed manual or a seven-speed sequential box. That alone would be enough for most small-volume this isn't most Stain Lab is also building a fully electric version with around 850 hp, and here's the twist: thanks to a modular subframe system, owners can swap between the ICE and EV powertrains. That's right - one car, two wildly different personalities, depending on the day, track, or mood. Despite the turbocharged flat-six having "just" six cylinders, it's designed to scream all the way to 12,000 rpm. When combined with the car's 910 kg weight, the HF‑11 promises a power-to-weight ratio that puts it well ahead of the Bugatti Chiron and toe-to-toe with the Gordon Murray claims remain vague - understandable for a car still in development - but 0–60mph in the low 3s seems conservative. Top speed? Unofficially, well beyond 200mph. Step into the HF-11 and you'll find a cockpit that looks like it was designed by a watchmaker having a nervous breakdown inside an F1 wind tunnel. The entire cabin is draped in carbon weave, from the exposed monocoque to the sculpted centre console - not just for weight savings, but sheer visual drama. There's no touchscreen, no voice assistant, and certainly no cupholders. What you get instead is a bank of heavy-duty toggle switches, rotary dials, and knurled metal knobs straight out of a Cold War fighter shifter itself is a skeletal work of art: part titanium sculpture, part ballistic missile trigger. Above it, the triple-pod analogue dash recalls classic Porsche GT racers, but everything else feels raw, functional, and unapologetically mechanical. Even the starter switch appears to be mounted inside a billet aluminium pod held together with titanium struts. It's less interior, more suede where you need it and structure where you don't. The HF-11 doesn't try to coddle you. It tries to connect you - to the drivetrain, to the chassis, and to the road. If you want ambient lighting and a Spotify playlist, look elsewhere. This thing was built to be felt, not filtered. The HF‑11's styling feels familiar but alien. It riffs on classic Porsche silhouettes - there are shades of Carrera GT, 962, even 917 - but everything is dialed up to 11. Giant rear diffusers, razor-edge front wings, and track-ready aero components all scream performance. Yet, inside, it's raw, stripped-back, and mechanical. Think Group C meets bespoke hot rod. What makes the HF‑11 more than a concept car with delusions of grandeur is the pedigree behind it. The Bridan twins were involved in cars that sold in the millions, but they're chasing purity now. Their mission: build the "ultimate human-scale hypercar," one with minimal electronics, obsessive focus, and mechanical already made waves with the viral Half-11, a chopped-up Porsche homage that earned cult status. The HF‑11 is its spiritual evolution - faster, crazier, and far more isn't just an ambitious spec sheet. It's two engineers turning decades of experience and design frustration into an unfiltered, track-ready love letter to speed. And whether it sells out or implodes spectacularly, it deserves to be noticed. Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.