Cooperative society uses names of actors to lure, dupe investors
According to inspector, Shahbad police station, Brijesh Rai, local agent of the society Amar Singh filed an FIR against 16 people, including Talpade, under sections 419 (cheating by impersonation), 420 (fraud), 406 (criminal breach of trust), 504 (insult) and 506 (criminal intimidation) of the old Indian Penal Code (IPC).
Fifteen accused named in the FIR include Ram Rajput, Gaurav Verma. Krishna Dixit, Faheemullah Khan, Raziullah Khan, Sanat Rajput, Uttam Kumar Singh, Samir Agarwal and his wife Sania Agarwal, Mumbai-based fund manager RK Shetty, Sanjay Mudgal, Pankaj Agarwal, Shahab Hashim and Zulfikar Ahmad, Rai said.
However, according to the inspector, initial investigation suggested that Shreyas Talpade had nothing to do with the society. He said the society operators would claim association with Bollywood actors to attract investors. They had also used the name of another Bollywood actor Alok Nath, which was also mentioned in a separate FIR lodged in Lucknow's Gomti Nagar Extension police station.
In his complaint, Amar Singh stated that the society initially offered him the role of centre manager for its Hardoi unit and lured him into investing family funds in return for attractive returns. Believing the claims, Singh said he helped raise over ₹1 crore from friends, relatives, and others since 2022. He said the society operators insulted him and threatened him with dire consequences when he asked them to return the money on the completion of its maturity period.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
12 minutes ago
- News18
'Cryptic Reasoning': SC Sets Aside HC Order On Bail To Murder Accused For Carrying Victim To Hospital
The High Court, however, allowed the said applications by way of the common impugned order of November 14, 2024, thereby enlarging the respondents on bail The Supreme Court has said the Punjab and Haryana High Court's order allowing bail to two persons in a murder case, by a cryptic reasoning and having noted they have carried the victim to the hospital after the incident, holding that the trial court has rightly noted the said aspect and declined to grant relief to them. A bench of Justices B V Nagarathna and Satish Chandra Sharma said the respondent-accused have been alleged to have committed the offence under Section 302 of the IPC. It may be a fact that they may have carried the injured victim, who later died, to the hospital but he was actually brought dead to the hospital. This fact will have to be considered de hors from the fact as to who actually had committed the offence in the first place in the instant case. 'In the circumstances, we find that the order of the High Court calls for interference and therefore, the same is set aside. Consequently, the order of the Sessions Court is restored," the bench said. By the impugned order, the High Court has set aside the order of the Trial Court declining to grant regular bail to the respondents herein and consequently, has allowed the petitions for bail. An FIR was registered on March 22, 2023 under Sections 302, 323, 148, 149 (Sections 148 and 149 deleted and Sections 34, 427, 120B added later on) of the Indian Penal Code at Police Station Nangal, District Rupnagar. The said FIR was registered based on the statement given by the complainant-appellant Baljinder Singh alias Aman against accused No. 1 – Mandeep Singh alias Bhoda and accused No.2- Narinder Kumar alias Nindi. The appellant alleged that he received a telephonic call at about 11.30 p.m. to the effect that the respondents, accompanied by 7-8 other persons, were using filthy language against the appellant and trespassed onto his land by dismantling the barbed wire fencing on his property. He claimed that after receiving the said call, the appellant along with his driver Anil (deceased), Deepak Kumar and Chowkidar Bahadur Singh had gone to the appellant's land at Taraf Majri in his Land Cruiser vehicle when the respondents rammed their Fortuner car into the car of the appellant. When the appellant came out from his car, accused No. 1 hit the deceased with their car and threw him down. It was alleged that all the accused persons were armed with wooden sticks when they stepped out of their car. Accused No.1 gave a wooden stick blow on the head of the deceased whereas accused No.2 inflicted injuries to the deceased and other persons accompanying the appellant. The appellant witnessed the entire occurrence but fearing for his life, fled the scene and later discovered that the respondents took the deceased to the hospital where he was found to be dead. The respondents were arrested in connection with FIR on March 23, 2023 and were sent to judicial custody. The Inspector General (IG) Rupnagar Range, Rupnagar, on receipt of complaint from Dev Raj (father of accused No. 2) transferred the investigation in the present matter to Ms Darpan Ahluwalia, IPS, Assistant Superintendent of Police, Sub Division Dera Bassi, District SAS Nagar, Mohali. A charge sheet was submitted by the SHO, Police Station Nangal before the competent court on June 20, 2023. The JMIC, Rupnagar took cognizance and the matter was committed to Additional Sessions Judge, Rupnagar for trial and adjudication. Thereafter, a supplementary charge sheet was filed on October 09, 2023 based on subsequent investigation conducted by Assistant Superintendent of Police, Dera Bassi, District SAS Nagar. On a petition filed by the respondents under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, the High Court dismissed it on July 16, 2024. However, an order was passed in interim restraining the trial court from proceeding further. This order remained in operation. The respondents filed separate bail applications before the trial court which came to be dismissed by orders on May 21, 2024 and May 24, 2024 respectively, finding that accused No. 1 is a habitual offender as eight other criminal cases have also been registered against him and keeping in view the gravity of the offences in this case and the heinous crime alleged to have been committed by them. The High Court, however, allowed the said applications by way of the common impugned order of November 14, 2024, thereby enlarging the respondents on bail. Being aggrieved, the appellant-complainant has preferred the instant appeal before this court. Challenging the order, the appellant contended that the impugned order is lacking in reasons for granting relief of bail to the respondents herein inasmuch as paragraph 12 of the impugned order only records the submissions in a cryptic manner, the reasoning given in paragraphs 13 and 14 and consequently, the relief of bail was granted to the respondents herein. He submitted that the reasons are erroneous in as they do not make merit a case for grant of bail. The counsel said the respondents have been, inter alia, alleged to have committed the offence under Section 302 IPC, the manner in which the offence was committed itself is gruesome and was planned and executed in a manner which reflects that there was a criminal conspiracy amongst the accused. The appellant said the respondents were in jail for a period of one year and eight months; the chargesheet had been filed and the supplementary chargesheet had also been filed. His counsel said the respondents-accused have been granted the relief of bail and on the other hand, there is a stay of trial. The said orders would require interference at the hands of this court inasmuch as the respondents herein have criminal antecedents and they are not entitled to the relief of bail having regard to the manner in which the deceased was put to death. The State counsel supported the case of the appellant-complainant herein and therefore, having regard to the merits of the case, appropriate orders may be made in these appeals. Defending the High Court's order, the respondents counsel said the fact the accused themselves carried the deceased to the hospital and saw to it that he was given treatment immediately showed that there was no criminal intent in their mind; they further submitted that the High Court has recorded in detail the submissions of the counsel for the respective parties and has come to a right conclusion and hence there is no merit in these appeals and the same may be dismissed. Allowing the appeal, the bench directed the respondent-accused to surrender before the Court of the Jurisdictional Magistrate or the concerned Police Station since they have been on bail pursuant to the impugned order. About the Author Sanya Talwar Sanya Talwar, Editor at Lawbeat, has been heading the organisation since its inception. After practising in courts for over four years, she discovered her affinity for legal journalism. She has worked More Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from politics to crime and society. Stay informed with the latest India news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: July 02, 2025, 21:12 IST News india 'Cryptic Reasoning': SC Sets Aside HC Order On Bail To Murder Accused For Carrying Victim To Hospital
Hans India
26 minutes ago
- Hans India
Illegal mining under political shield? ED targets Mishra-led syndicate in new filing
Ranchi: The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has filed its fifth supplementary prosecution complaint in the Sahibganj illegal mining and extortion case, further tightening its net around the alleged syndicate masterminded by Pankaj Mishra, a close aide of the Jharkhand Chief Minister. The complaint, filed before the Special PMLA Court in Ranchi on June 30, names eight individuals and two companies as fresh accused in the money laundering probe, says the agency's press release issued on Wednesday. With this, a total of 19 individuals and entities have been arraigned across six prosecution complaints — one original and five supplementary — in connection with the case, which involves proceeds of crime estimated at over Rs 1,000 crore. Among the newly named accused is Rajesh Yadav alias Dahu Yadav, allegedly a key enforcer in the network who oversaw the illegal transport of stone across the Ganga river, said the release. According to the ED, Yadav also financed a fraudulent ferry tender to aid large-scale smuggling of minerals. He is currently absconding. Another accused, Heera Lal Bhagat, is alleged to have operated illegal mining activities through his firm M/s Jai Maa Bhavani Stone Works. ED officials recovered over Rs 3.13 crore in unaccounted cash from his premises, believed to be direct proceeds of the illicit operations. The complaint also highlights the role of Nimay Chandra Shil, who allegedly conspired with Pankaj Mishra and his wife to fraudulently secure a mining lease in exchange for a 50 per cent profit-sharing deal. Corporate complicity has also come under the scanner. The ED has named M/s Marine Infralink Logistics Pvt. Ltd. and its director Yash Jalan for allegedly providing the vessel M.V. Infralink-III, used for transporting illegally mined stone, said the release. The company reportedly received Rs 2.75 crore sourced from the syndicate's criminal proceeds. The ED's investigation began after an FIR registered by Jharkhand Police against Mishra and his associates under various IPC and Arms Act provisions. The probe under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) revealed a politically protected cartel monopolising mining and mineral transport in the Sahibganj region. So far, the ED has seized and frozen assets including Rs 5.34 crore in cash, an inland vessel, five industrial stone crushers, multiple vehicles, and bank balances exceeding Rs 13.32 crore.
Time of India
30 minutes ago
- Time of India
Bail jumper in 2004 MBBS admission racket held after 20 years
New Delhi: A 63-year-old civil engineer turned fraudster who jumped bail and evaded arrest for two decades was apprehended by Delhi Police's Crime Branch. Rajesh Rajput was part of a gang that lured parents through newspaper advertisements, promising MBBS admissions under management quota in reputed medical colleges. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Rajput, a resident of Saharanpur in Uttar Pradesh, was declared a proclaimed offender in 2006 in a cheating case registered with Economic Offences Wing (EOW) of Delhi Police. "In 2004, he and his associates allegedly duped a doctor from Odisha of Rs 4 lakh on the pretext of securing an MBBS seat for his son through management quota," DCP (crime) Harsh Indora said. The Odisha-based doctor fell into the trap and paid the amount, only to realise he was conned. "A case was registered at Shalimar Bagh police station and later transferred to the EOW for investigation. Rajput was initially arrested but absconded soon after securing bail, failing to appear for court proceedings. He was subsequently declared a proclaimed offender in February 2006," DCP Indora added. Crime Branch team received a tip-off about Rajput's whereabouts. On July 1, the team conducted a pre-dawn operation to Saharanpur and managed to locate Rajput at his home. "Initially, he denied his identity, but during sustained interrogation at Crime Branch office in Delhi, he confessed. His identity was confirmed through cross-checks with police station Shalimar Bagh and the EOW," a senior police officer said.
