Decathlon plans $3 billion of sourcing from India by 2030
This move aims to serve both the domestic and international markets. Currently, Decathlon's sourcing value from India, both for domestic and overseas markets, stands at $480 million.
In terms of volume, India accounts for 8% of Decathlon's global sourcing quantities, with a goal to increase this to 15% by 2030.
Additionally, the retailer plans to double its Indian business by 2023. Decathlon currently operates 132 stores across 55 cities in India with plans to expand its retail footprint to over 90 cities by 2030.
India has already established itself as one of Decathlon's top-four manufacturing markets.
Frederic Merlevede, head of Decathlon production, said, "Our long-term investment in India reflects the deep trust we've built with our partners and the strong potential we see in key categories like footwear, fitness equipment, and beyond."
India is already an active part of Decathlon's global manufacturing. For instance, 35% of all umbrellas for global Decathlon are produced in India. Additionally, India accounts for more than 20% of Decathlon's global textile share and is a chosen country for co-developing woven and knit products for worldwide distribution. India is also a major exporter of rugby balls for Decathlon, with 60% of the global supply being 'Made in India'.
Currently, Decathlon produces 100 million units of sports goods from India. Over the next five to ten years, the company has outlined plans to increase its focus on the production of footwear, cricket products, technical sports balls, technical textiles, kids' sporting accessories, metal sports equipment, fitness equipment, electronics, technical sports products, alloy-carbon bicycle frames, and swimming inflatables.
The company will continue to partner with third-party manufacturers rather than operating its own factories.
'We are diversifying the range of products sourced from India. Across each range there is also an industry behind, so this can really create a big positive impact in terms of job creation. Today we source textile industries such as sports footwear, textiles, polymer injection, wood making of cricket bats, backpacks, outdoor badminton equipment etc. We have scaled across a lot of category of products in India, like backpacks, bicycles, cricket products, badminton, rackets, gloves, socks, caps etc—we feel very confident with the supplier panel we have in India, and the future looks robust for us with all these category of products,' Deepak D'Souza, head of Decathlon India production, told Mint in an interview.
Meanwhile, over 70% of the quantities sold in India in 2025 are locally made, and this figure is expected to rise to 90% by 2030.
The French retailer first began procuring goods from India in 2000. Punjab and Uttar Pradesh are large sports goods manufacturing hubs.
Merlevede said that India's manufacturing capabilities, which were less developed a decade ago, have improved.
'When the product becomes available, the manufacturing gets extremely competitive, and we are willing to take this opportunity to export this product to our different markets. Also, there is a discussion between Europe and India for a free trade agreement—it could be a welcome positive for Decathlon. In some way it could be an accelerator," he said in an interview with Mint.
Decathlon's production ecosystem in India includes 113 third-party manufacturing sites, 83 suppliers, and 7 production offices.
The company is also deepening its focus on culturally rooted sports like yoga and cricket, with the latter being entirely conceptualized and manufactured in India. Decathlon aims to create more than 300,000 new job opportunities within its direct and indirect workforce as part of this growth journey.
The sports goods retailer operates 1,700 stores worldwide.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
12 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Committed to fair, balanced deal, says India after Trump announces 25% tariffs
India remains intensely engaged with the US to clinch the comprehensive bilateral trade agreement by autumn 2025 despite President Donald Trump's announcement of 25% tariffs plus penalties starting August 1, people aware of the matter said on Wednesday. Piyush Goyal, India's commerce and industry minister, during a Bloomberg Television interview in London, UK, on Thursday, July 24, 2025. (Bloomberg) In a brief statement, the commerce ministry said it had 'taken note' of Trump's statement and was studying its implications while reaffirming India's commitment to a 'fair, balanced and mutually beneficial' trade deal that protects farmers, entrepreneurs and small businesses. 'The government attaches the utmost importance to protecting and promoting the welfare of our farmers, entrepreneurs, and MSMEs,' the ministry said, adding that it 'will take all steps necessary to secure our national interest, as has been the case with other trade agreements including the latest Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement with the UK.' Indian officials and experts pushed back against Trump's characterisation of excessive trade barriers, arguing that his focus on goods trade deficit ignores the broader economic relationship where the US earns tens of billions more annually from services, education, and defence deals, and cited New Delhi's recent free trade agreements with developed economies such as Australia and the UK to demonstrate India's willingness to open up its market with protections for its vulnerable populations . People familiar with the negotiations said New Delhi expects Washington to follow Trump's announcement with a formal letter that would be analysed and responded to appropriately. The Indian negotiating team – which has held five rounds of in-person discussions with its American counterparts -- will in the meantime continue talks for a balanced deal, they added. One of the people aware of the matter pushed back against Trump's characterisation of India as maintaining excessive trade barriers, citing the recently signed free trade agreements with other developed economies including Australia and the United Kingdom where tariffs on most items were slashed. 'Hence, President Trump's generalisation that Indian tariffs are far too high, is not correct,' the person said. 'FTAs are win-win, and not one-sided.' The person highlighted Trump's focus on goods trade surplus while ignoring broader economic ties, saying: 'President Trump has said in a post on Truth Social – 'We have a massive trade deficit with India!!!' – which is just one side of the picture. Bilateral economic relationship is not only goods trade, it also includes trade in services, investments and other significant contributions to the US economy made by Indians.' According to government data, India had a $41.18 billion trade surplus with the US in 2024-25, exporting goods worth $86.51 billion and importing $45.33 billion of American merchandise. However, the people cited above argued this represented only a part of the bilateral relationship. The US gains significant revenue from financial, digital and e-commerce services, fees from students studying in America and defence deals, a second person explained. 'Such cooperation in services and contributions of Indians in American businesses have immense potential for further growth through BTA and other strategic cooperation, provided the US is not fixated with tariffs, and particularly with India's sensitive sectors, which are vital for the survival of millions of Indian subsistence farmers,' the person added. Ajay Srivastava, founder of Global Trade Research Initiative, said the US 'quietly rakes in $80-85 billion every year from India through education, digital services, financial operations, intellectual property royalties, and arms sales.' 'These massive earnings don't show up in the narrow goods trade statistics. When you factor them in, the US isn't running a deficit with India at all, it's sitting on a $35-40 billion surplus,' Srivastava added. The second person aware of the matter said India was negotiating a comprehensive bilateral trade agreement that included not just goods but 'other key sectors such as services, investments, non-tariff barriers, IPRs and customs facilitation.' 'We hope that a successful deal would help in balancing bilateral economic cooperation and prompt the Trump administration to remove reciprocal and punitive tariffs,' the person said. Industry leaders expressed concern about the tariff announcement's timing amid ongoing negotiations. Medical Technology Association of India chairman Pavan Choudary called Trump's move 'economically shortsighted and strategically misguided.' 'As a sovereign nation, India makes independent choices in defence and energy based on national interest and long-term strategic priorities. Attempting to punish these decisions through coercive trade measures is not only inappropriate but also counterproductive,' Choudary said. Agneshwar Sen, trade policy leader at EY India, warned the 25% tariff could directly affect key sectors including marine products, pharmaceuticals, textiles, leather and automobiles where bilateral trade had been 'especially robust.' However, Sen remained optimistic about ongoing negotiations, noting both countries were 'positively engaged' with the US team expected in India on August 24 for the sixth round of talks. 'I am confident that, considering our shared interests and history of cooperation, the two sides will be able to address these contentious issues constructively,' he said. Opposition slams Modi government Opposition parties criticised the government over the developments . Congress general secretary Jairam Ramesh said Prime Minister Modi should 'take inspiration from former prime minister Indira Gandhi and stand up to the president of the United States.' 'All that 'taarif' between him and 'Howdy Modi' has meant little,' Ramesh said, referring to Modi's 2019 rally with Trump in Houston. 'Mr Modi thought that if he kept quiet on the insults that the US President has hurled on India... India would get special treatment at the hands of President Trump. Clearly that has NOT happened.' Rashtriya Janata Dal MP Manoj Jha said his party was 'not very happy that it has happened under the rule of Prime Minister Modi,' while Communist Party of India MP P Sandosh Kumar described the tariffs as 'another insult to India.' DMK leader Tiruchi Siva demanded the prime minister answer questions about the tariffs in Parliament, saying lawmakers had 'not been taken into confidence.'
Economic Times
12 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Trumpland: What if the world turned US trade war back on America?
AI image Tariff' Trump has announced a 25% levy on Indian goods entering US starting tomorrow, coupled with a penalty for India's continued oil and defence purchases from Russia. Prefixing his announcement on Truth Social with 'while India is a friend', the US president has sought to punish India for asserting sovereign choices in trade and foreign policy. With friends like this, who needs friends? The irony is poetic: the self-declared custodian of free trade is now its most protectionist offender. Economics is built around the principle of movement: of goods, capital, labour and data. This isn't just ideology, it's the physics of prosperity. Yet, the US, once the world's most vocal advocate for free markets, is, in the form of Trumpland, its most disruptive force. From semiconductor export bans and weaponised sanctions to unilateral tariffs and extraterritorial dictates, Trumpland has turned the global economy into a minefield of exceptions, exclusions and coercion. So, here's the question that can now be asked aloud: what if the rest of the world sanctioned the US? What if countries collectively paused the flow of rare earths, APIs, industrial machinery, telecom infrastructure, even data? Could the US survive the very conditions it imposes on others? In 2024, US goods imports hit a record $3.3 tn, while exports reached $2.1 tn, pushing goods trade deficit to $1.2 tn, a 14% increase from the previous year. Even after including services like finance and travel, total trade deficit stood at $918 bn, up 17%, the second highest on record. Trade gap with China grew to $295 bn, a clear sign of ongoing reliance. Beyond China, the US remains critically dependent on imports for over 221 essential goods, including microchips and battery components, with foreign sourcing levels between 90% and 100%. China supplies 70% of rare earths, and dominates the global graphite supply chain. Other key materials like lithium and cobalt are also heavily imported from countries like Chile, Canada and Argentina. In total, just four trading partners — China, the EU, Mexico and Canada — each account for more than 10% of US import value. These are not discretionary purchases, but foundational components of American industry. The US is not merely part of global supply chains, but also structurally dependent on them, never mind all that talk of decoupling and University's Budget Lab assessed that the US' 2025 tariff surge has raised its average effective tariff rate to 22.5%, the highest since 1909. This policy shift has led to a 2.3% rise in consumer prices, costing the average household $3,800 annually. Lower-income families are hit hardest, with those in the second income decile losing $1,700 a GDP growth is expected to drop by 0.9 percentage points in 2025. Long-term output is projected to remain 0.6% smaller, a permanent loss of around $180 bn a year. Exports have declined by 18.1%. Prices for essentials have spiked, with apparel up 17%, food nearly 3% higher, and new cars costing an extra $4,000 on from protecting the economy, Trump tariffs are eroding household income, slowing growth and adversely affecting America's economic Walter Scheidel explains in his 2017 book, The Great Leveler, entrenched systems rarely reform themselves through negotiation alone. Meaningful redistribution often follows rupture rather than consensus. So, what might rupture look like today? Imagine the world's major exporters including Europe, China, India, Asean and Latin America agreeing to a coordinated pause in shipments to the US. No semiconductors, no APIs, no telecom equipment. In a matter of weeks, American production lines would slow, inflation would surge, and financial markets would be rattled. It would serve as a powerful reminder that the US economy is not insulated by exceptionalism. It operates on the consent and cooperation of the rest of the world. This isn't about restoring balance. It's a call to deliberately hit the US economy where it hurts, to expose the double standards that define today's global order. In any functioning market, domestic or global, rules matter not only because they enable exchange but also because they constrain abuse. Participation in global trade is characterised by the principle of mutualism and benefits will flow only as long as responsibilities are this fundamental point, the US' economic bullying undermines not just the trust but the very ethos of the current global economic system. The world, India included, now faces a pivotal question. Should it continue to accommodate this exception, or begin to act as a collective? A coordinated stand by global exporters, in defence of systemic integrity, would affirm that globalisation is not the privilege of a single actor but the shared project of many. If the international order is to survive, it must demonstrate that no participant is above its rules. Trumpland may yet learn that the system the US helped create can continue to evolve without its dominance. And that the invisible hand, if constrained long enough, may simply withdraw its reach from the United States. (Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. Regulators promote exchanges; can they stifle one? Watch IEX Jane St: How an options trader smelt a rat when others raised a toast TCS job cuts may not stop at 12,000; its bench policy threatens more From near bankruptcy to blockbuster drug: How Khorakiwala turned around Wockhardt Stock Radar: SBI Life rebounds after testing 50-DEMA; could hit fresh record highs above Rs 2,000 – check target & stop loss These 10 banking stocks can give more than 25% returns in 1 year, according to analysts Two Trades for Today: A metals stock for an over 6% gain, a large-cap chemicals maker for about 7% upmove F&O Radar| Deploy Broken Wing in LIC Housing Finance to benefit from bearish outlook
The Hindu
12 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Lakshya, Ayush, Tharun and Rakshitha enter second round of Macau Open
Indian shuttlers Lakshya Sen, Ayush Shetty and Tharun Mannepalli progressed to the second round of the men's singles competition at the Macau Open Super 300 badminton tournament after registering fine wins here on Wednesday. Lakshya, the Commonwealth Games champion, brushed aside Korea's Jeon Hyeok Jin 21-8 21-14, while world No. 31 Ayush eased past Chinese Taipei's Huang Yu Kai 21-10 21-11. Tharun defeated fellow Indian Manraj Singh 21-19 21-13. Lakshya will next face Indonesia's Chico Aura Dwi Wardoyo, Ayush will take on Malaysia's Justin Hoh, while Tharun has set up a second-round clash with top seed Lee Cheuk Yiu of Hong Kong. In women's singles, Rakshitha Ramraj emerged as the only Indian to make the cut for the second round after beating Thailand's Pornpicha Choeikeewong 18-21 21-17 22-20 in 63 minutes. In mixed doubles, fifth seeds Dhruv Kapila and Tanisha Crasto, ranked 18th in the world, outclassed Thailand's Ratchapol Makkasasithorn and Nattamon Laisuan 21-10 21-15 in a brisk 26-minute encounter. In an all-Indian men's doubles clash, P Krishnamurthy Roy and S Pratheek K prevailed 21-18 21-19 over D Konthoujam and Amaan Mohammad to enter the second round. However, India's HS Prannoy made an early exit after losing 21-18 15-21 15-21 to Indonesia's Yohanes Saut Marcellyno in the men's singles opening round. It was also end of the road for Sathish Kumar Karunakaran, who went down to Malaysia's Justin Hoh 19-21 12-21 in a 37-minute pre-quarterfinal match. Rithvik Sanjeevi Satish Kumar sank without a trace, losing 16-21 8-21 to Chico in another match. In women's singles, Unnati Hooda — who had stunned two-time Olympic medallist PV Sindhu at the China Open last week — fought hard before going down 21-16 19-21 17-21 to Denmark's Julie Dawall Jakobsen in 59 minutes. Anupama Upadhyaya also found the going tough against Japan's Riko Gunji, losing 16-21 10-21. Sankar Subramanian and Aakarshi Kashyap suffered first-round defeats, losing 18-21 14-21 to China's Hu Zhe An and 14-21 16-21 to Japan's Nozomi Okuhara respectively, in men's and women's singles. Kiran George was no match for Hong Kong's Ng Ka Long Angus, losing 15-21 10-21 in 31 minutes. Anmol Kharb put up a spirited performance before going down 21-23 11-21 to Thailand's Busanan Ongbamrungphan. Former junior world No. 1 Tasnim Mir was outclassed 6-21 14-21 by Tokyo Olympic champion Chen Yu Fei in just 27 minutes. In mixed doubles, Thandrangini Hema Nagendra Babu and Priya Konjengbam lost 11-21 14-21 to Thailand's Phuwanat Horbanluekit and Fungfa Korpthammakit. Ayush Agarwal and Shruti Mishra also bowed out in the opening round, going down 10-21 11-21 to Indonesia's Rehan Naufal Kusharjanto and Gloria Emanuelle Widjaja. India suffered another setback in mixed doubles, with the 34th-ranked pair of Rohan Kapoor and Ruthvika Shivani Gadde losing to Chinese Taipei's Wu Guan Xun and Lee Chia Hsin 20-22 17-21 in a 37-minute contest.
