logo
Tocilizumab Delays: A Barrier in Giant Cell Arteritis Care?

Tocilizumab Delays: A Barrier in Giant Cell Arteritis Care?

Medscape7 hours ago
TOPLINE:
Patients with giant cell arteritis started tocilizumab therapy an average of 43 days after diagnosis, partly because of delays in insurance approval.
METHODOLOGY:
Overall, 82 patients (average age, 73 years; 60% women; 87% White individuals) newly diagnosed with giant cell arteritis at the University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, between November 2017 and August 2024 were prescribed 162 mg of subcutaneous tocilizumab.
Data on demographics, insurance type, and detailed timelines for medication request, approval, and initiation were collected.
When available, cost data for tocilizumab were obtained from insurance quotes, along with information on prior authorization requirements, copay assistance, and medication coverage.
The time from the initial tocilizumab request to insurance approval and medication start was analyzed, and costs by insurance payer were compared.
TAKEAWAY:
Delays in approval for and administration of tocilizumab therapy for newly diagnosed giant cell arteritis increase the risk for vision loss, glucocorticoid exposure, and side effects.
The average time from tocilizumab request to the start of treatment was 43 days; from request to insurance approval, 17 days; and from approval to medication start, 30 days.
Out-of-pocket costs for tocilizumab averaged $1399 for Medicare patients, $823 for those with Medicare Advantage, $211 for those with commercial insurance, and $0 for Medicaid (P < .01).
Commercially insured patients used copay cards more often than other payers (P < .01); Medicare or Medicare Advantage patients had a higher utilization of medication coverage from drug manufacturers (P = .04).
IN PRACTICE:
'During the study period, there was only one FDA-approved medication for GCA [giant cell arteritis], yet the high cost and delays to medication start remained high. Understanding the delays, costs, and factors that prevent timely therapy is critical to rheumatologic and geriatric care,' the authors of the study wrote.
'[T]he results offer important insights into the administrative and financial frustrations related to securing biologic approval and coverage, which has been documented in other conditions,' experts wrote in an editorial.
SOURCE:
This study was led by Dominique Feterman Jimenez, MD, University of Washington, Seattle. It was published online on March 15, 2025, in The Journal of Rheumatology.
LIMITATIONS:
The single-center design may limit the generalizability of the findings beyond Washington State because insurance plans vary by state. The predominance of patients with Medicare may also limit applicability of the findings. The small sample size restricted the ability to analyze differences among various Medicare supplemental plans.
DISCLOSURES:
One author disclosed receiving support from a Rheumatology Research Foundation Investigator Award. The authors declared having no conflicts of interest.
This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Connecticut wants to make generic GLP-1s. Will RFK Jr. lend a hand?
Connecticut wants to make generic GLP-1s. Will RFK Jr. lend a hand?

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Connecticut wants to make generic GLP-1s. Will RFK Jr. lend a hand?

Connecticut passed a new law last week in an effort to lower its spending on weight-loss drugs for its state insurance program — HUSKY Health, which includes Medicaid and CHIP enrollees — and it could help other states do the same if it succeeds. The bill, signed by Gov. Ned Lamont on July 8, focuses on efforts to control drug prices but has a section dedicated to generic GLP-1 drugs, similar to Novo Nordisk's (NVO) Ozempic and Wegovy and Eli Lilly's (LLY) Mounjaro and Zepbound. Combined, the four drugs have been ballooning the state's spending — contributing costs of $140 million in fiscal year 2024 — a problem plaguing many states. Some states have chosen to restrict or limit who can be prescribed the drugs, while others have stopped covering them altogether. Connecticut expanded coverage in 2023. The new law calls for the Commissioner of Social Services to petition the US Health and Human Services Department (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to exercise the federal government's right to own the patents of GLP-1s and contract with generic manufacturers to produce a version of the drugs in exchange for royalties that Connecticut says it will pay. "The commissioner may enter into a consortium with officials in other states in contracting with such manufacturer for such drugs," according to the state's new law. State Sen. Matt Lesser, who introduced the bill, told Yahoo Finance that other states, both red and blue, have already expressed interest. He said the state has 30 days to submit the petition. "The governor and Sec. Kennedy have known each other for a very long time. So I don't know what conversations they may or may not have had. But, I think we're also having some early conversations," Lesser said of the state's social services commission. HHS did not reply to a request for comment from Yahoo Finance. The power to claim ownership of the patent comes from a section in the US Patent Code, 28 US 1498, which is described by experts as similar to eminent domain. If RFK Jr. accepts Connecticut's request, the drugmakers would be compensated based on a benchmark closer to production costs, not to market rates, according to Robin Feldman, a professor of law and director of the Center for Innovation at the University of California, San Francisco. "So recent cases are royalties of 10% or 7.5%," Feldman told Yahoo Finance. Lamont, meanwhile, signaled caution when signing the bill last week. "While well-intentioned, this provision may present an overreach of Section 1498, which was intended to provide a remedy for patent holders for when the federal government uses patented inventions for its own purposes," he said. "The administration will work collaboratively with the industry, healthcare professionals, and advocates to ensure that provision is implemented as appropriate under federal law." The strategy faces some uncertainty, but it could be coming at just the right time, according to some experts. Connecticut's effort comes as prices have begun to ease in the wake of increased supply from drugmakers Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly. Both are offering vials at cheaper prices than injectables in direct-to-consumer avenues to counter the massive compounding market. Former Novo Nordisk CEO Lars Jørgensen previously told Yahoo Finance that the compounding market is "approximately as big as our own business." Compounders were initially allowed to provide the copycats without FDA approval when the drugs were in short supply. The FDA has since ended the shortages, but some compounders continue to produce the cheaper copycats, claiming they have protections for "personalized medicine." That debate is making its way through the court system and is currently in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. Lesser said Connecticut considered compounding but wasn't comfortable with the lack of FDA approval for the products. In addition to lower prices, Novo Nordisk's drugs are facing the end of their exclusivity period, which is regulated by the FDA. This is separate from the patents protected by the US Patent Office. While the patents expire in 2031, the FDA exclusivity has already partially expired for semaglutide in recent years On top of all that, generic competition is already on the horizon in Canada, which means a manufacturer is currently setting up production and getting approval from a comparable regulatory body to the FDA, according to Rachel Sachs, a professor of innovation policy and patent law at Washington University in St. Louis. That could also be useful if states decide to import from Canada — and would be quicker than the FDA process to contract with a US-based facility. "So this is a sort of sweet spot for those products, where it would be a particularly impactful time for the (patent) law to be used," Sachs said. The law Connecticut wants HHS to invoke has been used in the past. In 2017, Louisiana invoked the same law to try to get Hepatitis C drugs at a lower cost. At the time, more than 35,000 Medicaid enrollees using the drugs were costing the state $764 million. The drugmaker, Gilead Sciences (GILD), ultimately struck a deal with Louisiana to implement an "innovative payment model," which capped the state's costs. And post-9/11, when there was an anthrax scare, the US government invoked the law to stockpile Bayer's (BAYRY) drug Cipro. Bayer ultimately agreed to lower its price. Recently, North Carolina tried a different strategy by leveraging its relationships with Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly, which had manufacturing operations in the state last year. It was unsuccessful and had to cut coverage for state employees while keeping coverage for Medicaid beneficiaries. The state petitioned HHS and then-Secretary Xavier Becerra to negotiate lower prices on its behalf but stopped short of invoking the patent law, though some advocacy groups suggested it at the time. It's why experts and advocates are closely watching how RFK Jr. responds to this petition. But so far, the Trump administration has made no progress in its efforts to curb costs, according to Amy Kapczynski, a professor at Yale Law School and expert on intellectual property rights. "The Trump Administration has been weak in addressing drug pricing as a problem, undermining some of the gains of the recent Biden bill to lower drug prices for Medicare," she told Yahoo Finance. "They may not want to do this, and argue that they can't — but really, I see it as a question of political will." UCSF's Feldman echoed a similar sentiment, adding that the situation could end well for the drugmakers too. "There should be a deal to be made that provides very handsome returns for the companies who have brought (these drugs) to society, but in a way that's sustainable and doesn't break the bank," she said. — Anjalee Khemlani is the senior health reporter at Yahoo Finance, covering all things pharma, insurance, provider services, digital health, PBMs, and health policy and politics. That includes GLP-1s, of course. Follow Anjalee as AnjKhem on social media platforms X, LinkedIn, and Bluesky @AnjKhem. Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest health industry news and events impacting stock prices

Independent / Provider-Sponsored Plans' Administrative Expenses Decelerate in 2024
Independent / Provider-Sponsored Plans' Administrative Expenses Decelerate in 2024

Yahoo

time44 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Independent / Provider-Sponsored Plans' Administrative Expenses Decelerate in 2024

PHILADELPHIA, July 15, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Holding product mix constant, Independent / Provider-Sponsored plans' per member costs grew by 6.2% in 2024 compared with 8.4% in 2023. The growth in Medicare Advantage and decline in Medicaid membership led to as reported growth of 9.5%, compared with 10.5% in 2023. Median PMPM costs for all reporting plans was $55.67 PMPM. While most Sales and Marketing functions decelerated, the plans emphasized Customer Services, Actuarial and Rating and Underwriting. There was also notable growth in Information systems, and acceleration in Medical Management. Staffing ratios, compensation and outsourcing increased. The results are summarized in Plan Management Navigator, posted at The Navigator draws from the 2025 Independent / Provider-Sponsored plan edition of the Sherlock Benchmarks. It analyzes and details results from in-depth surveys of 12 IPS Plans serving 8.7 million members, a high share of such health plans and especially of the members served by this industry segment. We will discuss the results via a free web conference on Wednesday, July 16th, from 2:00 PM to 3:00 PM Eastern Daylight Time. Douglas Sherlock will offer a brief presentation, followed by questions and answers. To participate in the web conference, please register at Once registered, dial-in information and a link to connect will be provided in a confirmation email. The Sherlock Benchmarks are the health plan industry's "gold standard" metrics of administrative activities, costs and operational drivers. They reflect 28 consecutive years and more than 1,000 health plan years of experience. Health plans use the Sherlock Benchmarks to determine whether their administrative costs are optimal and to prioritize improvements among numerous specific activities. Other applications include informing strategic corporate planning and cost-benefit analyses. This year, collectively, Benchmark participants serve 58 million Americans in Blue and other universes. Other universes include Blue Cross Blue Shield plans, Medicare plans and Medicaid plans. Health plan users of the Sherlock Benchmarks serve over 170 million members since June 2022. Sherlock Company ( based in Gwynedd Valley, Pennsylvania, provides informed solutions for health plan financial management. Since its founding in 1987, Sherlock Company has been known for its impartiality and technical competence in service to its clients. View source version on Contacts Douglas B. Sherlock, CFA215-628-2289sherlock@

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store