Republicans still have an Epstein dilemma. Now they have to face voters.

USA Today

22-07-2025

Drama over Jeffrey Epstein continues to plague lawmakers as they prep for August recess and an opportunity to reconnect in person with constituents.
WASHINGTON – Republican lawmakers continue to debate a response to the Jeffrey Epstein dilemma that has roiled the MAGA base and equally frustrated President Donald Trump – while the 2026 midterm elections loom as a potential outlet for their voters to take out some of that vitriol.
There are no easy answers to a complicated and dated criminal case from which an ample number of conspiracy theories have emerged. Some were touted by members of Trump's administration before their government employment.
The debate around the disgraced financier and the Justice Department's recent review of his case, which found no evidence of a highly speculated client list or that Epstein had not committed suicide in 2019, has left Republicans in Congress between a Trump rock and MAGA hard place.
More: Family feud: Trump at odds with MAGA movement on multiple fronts
'A very large group of Americans that have been concerned about this issue, that thought the administration or thought that Republicans were issuing a promise in good faith, are now realizing that perhaps they aren't operating as honestly as they had perhaps appeared,' Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-New York, told USA TODAY.
'The erosion of trust is something that once you lose, it's very difficult to come back,' she added.
Tensions over how to address the Epstein case have engulfed the GOP-led House and threatened to backlog other legislative priorities.
This week, the House Oversight Committee agreed to subpoena testimony from Ghislaine Maxwell, a longtime Epstein aide serving a 20-year prison sentence for conspiring with the financier. At the same time, pressure to address the Epstein scandal before the entire House prompted Speaker Mike Johnson, R-Louisiana, to cut the chamber's schedule short and send lawmakers home a day early for their beloved summer breaks that serve as a vital opportunity to reconnect in person with constituents.
Adding to the drama is Trump, who has a long personal history with Epstein and who has asked members of his party to move on from the issue while calling his supporters who do not 'weaklings.'
Business not as usual
Drama over the handling of Epstein's case review, which many GOP supporters are calling insufficient, butted into business on Capitol Hill as lawmakers worked to pass Trump's push for $9 billion in spending cuts to public broadcasting and foreign aid.
Even after House leadership managed to temporarily quell dissent and see the budget measure through, lawmakers returned to Washington this week with some as irate as ever.
'I would like the House to follow order, (that) would be really nice,' Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Georgia, told USA TODAY. 'We should probably be voting on all our appropriation bills and we're not. So, there's a lot of things I would like to see done.'
Johnson said on July 21 there would not be a vote on anything Epstein-related, saying he wants to give the Trump administration 'space' to address the issue first. His comment underscored how House operations are at something of a standstill with attention still caught on a controversial, years-old criminal case.
'I think he's scared. I think he's terrified,' Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Kentucky, said of Johnson on July 21.
Massie has spearheaded a bipartisan effort with Rep. Ro Khanna, D-California, to force the administration's hand in publicizing files.
Republican voters were 'promised this, they expected this, and it's not happening,' Massie said. 'But at the same time, he feels an allegiance to President Trump, who's gone against the MAGA base on this. So I think he's torn.'
Lawmakers brace for reception back home
Disputes in the House are unfolding ahead of the five-week break from Washington.
Lawmakers will head home to their states and districts, and Republicans are expecting to face some scrutiny from disgruntled constituents.
A Reuters/Ipsos poll taken July 15-16 found 69% of Americans believe the federal government is hiding details about Epstein's clients. Trump's popularity has taken a hit. A Quinnipiac University poll around the same time found 63% of voters disapprove of how his administration is handling the issue.
Republicans this year have already faced heated town halls back home, prompting leadership to encourage members to quit holding events.
'There are a lot of people here in the swamp who think that, 'Oh, well if we spend five weeks on vacation, the pressure for this will dissipate,'' Massie said. 'I don't think it's going to dissipate. I think it's going to build.'
2026 midterms loom ahead
Could the pressure build to next year's midterms? Potentially.
"Democrats didn't put the Epstein matter into the public domain," House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said in a press conference on July 14. "This was a conspiracy that Donald Trump, (Attorney General) Pam Bondi and these MAGA extremists have been fanning the flames of for the last several years, and now the chickens are coming to roost.'
Democrats already have the historical edge next November as the party that does not hold the White House typically performs better in midterm elections. Both Democratic and Republican presidents suffered stinging defeats that led to them losing one or both chambers of Congress during the 1994, 2006, 2010, 2018 and 2022 campaign cycles.
For the 2026 elections, Democrats say they plan to hit their GOP opponents with recent controversial moves, including Trump's sweeping tax, policy and spending bill that could affect millions of Americans' Medicaid coverage, as well as the cuts to public broadcasting and global programs.
Epstein may be one more name on their list of talking points ‒ and Republicans such as Massie are sounding the alarm now.
'It will follow each individual Republican through the midterms. It will follow people into their primaries,' Massie said. 'Did you support transparency and justice or did you come up here, get elected and fall into the swamp?'