Adding a ‘SPLASH of COLOUR' with Words.
It may be somewhat of a challenge you see, for a non-English speaker to recognise the true meaning of a comment that someone is 'showing their true colours now.' The actual meaning is that the person has revealed their true manner, nature or character now. This usually occurs due to a change in their circumstances or relationship. It has nothing to do with what colour the person is, is wearing, or any part of their appearance, but is a metaphor for their manner, the way they treat or react to people; their nature, the way they behave towards others; or their character, their distinctive mental and moral qualities.
The word 'colour,' in fact has a genuine diversity within the English language that is probably not helped, in language learning, by the fact that the word is spelled differently in the Americas, with the spelling of 'color,' not at all indicative of any difference in meaning. 'Colour' and 'color' mean the same thing but are drawn from different origins and in the matter of the differences in linguistic standardisation on the two sides of the Atlantic, the derivations result from whether the words have Latin or French origin.
America, seeking even subtle forms of independence in the early 19th century, eagerly embraced the spelling differences published by the American lexicographer Noah Webster in his 1828 dictionary. There are hundreds of words, not only spelled differently 'on either side of the pond,' which is itself a metaphor describing the Atlantic Ocean as a pond and referring to the two (American and United Kingdom) civilisations without naming them, in an absolute example of how identifying the differentiation between idioms and colloquialisms can challenge the language learner.
The reality is that they don't have to and can take comfort in the fact that beyond a lesson or two, they will find that 'knowing' the difference is less important than understanding that this amazing language is, in common use, as likely to be figurative, as literal. Familiarisation is the only way to both understand, absorb and utilise even some of the idioms and colloquialisms they will encounter in life. However, that familiarisation will be greatly enhanced by embracing metaphors and synonyms, which sounds dreary, but can be fun.
The distinction, linguistically, is that an idiom has a non-literal meaning, while a colloquialism is a phrase that is likely to be in common usage, based upon regional specificity. Now there is no way that an English language learner would identify the Atlantic as a 'pond,' because in fact, it's a massive great ocean, so the use of the word 'pond' is clearly not literal, making it an idiom. Wouldn't you agree? Yet, the reference to 'either side of the pond,' is also clearly a unique distinction, most likely made by someone from either the States, or the British Isles, therefore regional, therefore more correctly a colloquialism, correct? Such are the joys of this amazing language, which, used well, or heard and understood well, and with an extensive enough vocabulary, can add so much colour, there's that word again, to any discussion or conversation. Wait a minute! What's the difference between a discussion and a conversation? Is there a difference? Yes! A discussion is probably more formal, more structured, focused, usually on a specific issue, between several people and will usually have stated objectives. Whereas, on the other hand, a conversation is generally informal, usually between two people, usually personal, often private, humorous, anecdotal and more intimate, a 'shared' experience.
I know, you're thinking 'It's alright for you. You're English.' And you are right of course, but within any language lies lifelong personal enrichment and that can't be bad... Can it?
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Observer
14-07-2025
- Observer
France's military pigeons race in memory of brave predecessors
MONT VALÉRIEN: These days, French military pigeon number 193-529 is no longer needed to carry tiny messages during war-time communication blackouts. But the racing bird serves as a reminder of the brave service of its predecessors in World Wars I and II; and the 1870 siege of Paris. Inside Europe's last military pigeon loft, Sergeant Sylvain cradled 193-529, an alert feathered athlete with an iridescent green neck. "He's a carrier pigeon, like the ones who served in World Wars I and II", said Sylvain, withholding his surname for security purposes. "But today he races", added the member of the armed forces, whose grandfather was also a pigeon fancier. In Mont Valerien outside Paris, Sylvain flits between dovecotes, tending to some 200 pigeons — cleaning their shelters and making sure they have enough to eat. These days, they only use their navigating skills when they are released during competitions, military ceremonies, or demonstrations for visitors, he said. Humans have been using homing pigeons since Antiquity, but the French military started using them as a communication tool during the Franco-Prussian war of 1870 after the Prussians besieged Paris. In October that year, the interior minister boarded a hot-air balloon to flee the French capital. Around a month later, the French military had elaborated a messenger pigeon plan to communicate with people still in the city, according to a French government account. Patriotic Parisians donated more than 300 pigeons to the war effort, which were loaded into the wicker baskets of hot-air balloons and transported southwards to the city of Tours. Upon arrival they were fitted with small tubes containing 3 to 4 cm (1 to 1.5 inch) of microfilm on which minute messages had been inscribed, called "pigeongrams". They were then released as close to the capital as possible so they could carry them back inside. Only around 50 pigeons made it. Parisians who found the pigeons then placed the microfilm between sheets of glass and, using a magic lantern — an early type of image projector, projected it onto a large screen to read it. They transcribed the contents and delivered the message to its intended recipient. During the two world wars, pigeons were used again when "modern means of communication reached their limits", such as "bombardments ripping down telephone lines", Sylvain said. During World War II, a French pigeon helped alert Allies that six German U-boats were undergoing maintenance in the French port of Bordeaux, leading to aerial raids that destroyed four of them, Sylvain said. The pigeon, nicknamed "Maquisard" like some members of the French Resistance, received an award. A British pigeon too made headlines. Gustav, a homing pigeon in the British Royal Air Force, travelled 240 km (150 miles) back across the Channel to break the first news of the D-Day landings in June 1944, according to the Imperial War Museum. He carried a message from a war correspondent and was also awarded a medal. — AFP
Observer
10-07-2025
- Observer
When teaching teaches you: Lessons beyond the lecture
Have you ever stopped to consider what you are learning from the very act of teaching? Amid the flurry of assignments, exams, and relentless administrative demands, this essential question often gets buried beneath daily routines. Yet, it is perhaps the most profound question an educator can ask — particularly in higher education, where our role extends beyond simply imparting knowledge to shaping lives and nurturing future thinkers. John Dewey, the great American philosopher and educational reformer, emphasised that true learning arises from the interplay of experience and reflection. Teaching is not merely a transfer of information from one mind to another; it is a shared journey where both teacher and student grow together. When educators fail to consider what they are learning from their own teaching, the classroom risks becoming a static space, disconnected from the dynamism of real intellectual discovery. Today's universities and colleges are increasingly driven by rigid schedules, performance metrics, and administrative checklists. Assignments, mid-term tests, and final exams pile up not always as carefully crafted learning opportunities but as institutional requirements to measure progress and justify outcomes. Have these assessments been thoughtfully aligned with the actual learning needs and aspirations of students? Or are they designed to fulfill accreditation and reporting obligations rather than cultivate genuine understanding? Academics frequently find themselves struggling to balance their core mission — teaching and mentoring students — with a growing mountain of administrative demands. According to Marginson (2016), administrative duties can consume up to one-third of an academic's workload. As a result, opportunities for in-depth dialogue and personalised feedback diminish. The rich, formative feedback that John Hattie (2009) identifies as a major driver of student achievement often gets reduced to brief, generic comments. Students desire meaningful feedback that guides them, challenges them, and validates their efforts. When this is sacrificed for document uploads and compliance checks, it signals a troubling shift in our priorities. Furthermore, what is more important: investing time to teach with depth and authenticity, or uploading hundreds of documents within tight deadlines? This tension highlights a deeper question about the purpose of higher education. Are we primarily caretakers of bureaucratic processes, or are we mentors entrusted with developing critical thinkers and responsible citizens? Ramsden (2003) argued that effective teaching is not simply about delivering content but creating an environment where students see themselves as capable and curious learners. From the student perspective, universities should be spaces of exploration and intellectual challenge. Yet, when overwhelmed by continuous assessment and a focus on grades, students often shift from a learning mindset to a survival mindset. Biggs and Tang (2011) introduced the concept of constructive alignment, stressing that teaching activities, learning outcomes, and assessments should work together in harmony. When misaligned, they create confusion and disengagement rather than curiosity and growth. For educators, genuine learning from teaching emerges through listening deeply to students' questions, reflecting on classroom dynamics, and embracing moments when students push us to reconsider our perspectives. Stephen Brookfield (1995) reminds us that teachers learn most about their craft when they examine their assumptions and remain open to student feedback. Every lecture, discussion, and office hour encounter offers an opportunity for reciprocal growth. Educational leadership theorists such as Fullan (2007) also highlight that sustainable educational improvement depends on fostering a culture of continuous learning among teachers. When faculty are encouraged to reflect on their own teaching practices, they become more adaptable, innovative, and empathetic. This culture, however, cannot flourish when educators are overburdened by administrative tasks that dilute their focus and passion. If we truly want to cultivate a vibrant academic community, we must re-examine the structures that govern our work. Reducing unnecessary administrative burdens, creating space for genuine feedback, and valuing reflective practice are crucial steps. We must remember that our primary responsibility is not to systems or schedules but to the students who entrust us with their learning journeys. Ultimately, the most impactful teaching occurs when educators themselves remain lifelong learners — constantly evolving, questioning, and growing alongside their students. By asking, 'What am I learning from what I am teaching?' we honour the essence of education as a shared voyage of discovery rather than a mechanical transaction of knowledge. As teachers, the courage to reflect and the willingness to learn anew are perhaps the greatest lessons we can embed and impart. Mohammed Anwar Al Balushi The writer is a senior lecturer at Middle East College
Muscat Daily
09-07-2025
- Muscat Daily
Summer skills programme launched in Suhar, Khaboura & Shinas
Suhar – As part of its efforts to nurture young talent, Ministry of Labour (MoL), represented by the vocational colleges in Suhar, Khaboura and Shinas, has launched a series of specialised training programmes for school students in cooperation with North Batinah Governor's Office. Called Our Summer: Skills and Creativity, the programmes aim to equip students with practical skills that enhance their talents and prepare them for real-life situations. The programmes provide an interactive environment where participants can exchange ideas, experiences and questions. A ministry official stated that the series reflects the ministry's vision to support the younger generation by developing their capabilities through hands-on vocational training. The programmes taking place at Shinas Vocational College are focused on the fundamentals of the English language, basics of electricity and physics, drawing, refrigeration and air conditioning, welding, and fabrication. Khaboura Vocational College is conducting training in 3D model design, printing and assembly, marine safety, distress response and safe navigation. Suhar Vocational College is offering sessions on home water maintenance, wood design and shaping, painting, and decoration. The training programmes are part of MoL's broader aim to prepare students for the future by bridging the gap between academic learning and the technical skills required in the labour market.
