Many UTI hospital admissions could be prevented, according to experts
Admissions increased by 9% during the year compared with the previous 12 months, according to the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA).
UTIs can affect the bladder, urethra or kidneys, and can include symptoms such as pain while peeing, blood in the pee, and pain in the tummy or back.
The infections are usually caused by bacteria from poo entering the urinary tract.
UKHSA analysis of the Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) database found there were 189,759 hospital admissions relating to UTIs in England in 2023/24.
This resulted in 1.2 million NHS bed days, averaging six bed days per infection.
However, a third of UTI patients were in hospital for less than a day, meaning other treatment options could be considered, according to the UKHSA.
Dr Colin Brown, deputy director at UKHSA responsible for antibiotic resistance, said: 'Urinary tract infections are a major cause of hospitalisations in this country, but many could be prevented.'
The figures also show hospital admissions for UTIs increased up by 9% in 2023/24 compared with the previous year.
However, levels are still below those seen before the Covid-19 pandemic.
More than half of all UTI admissions (52.7%) included in the data were patients aged over 70, and more than six in 10 (61.8%) were women.
Women were nearly five times more likely to need hospital treatment for a UTI in people under the age of 50.
To avoid catching a UTI, experts advise people to drink enough fluid regularly, avoid holding in pee, wash daily, keep the genital areas clean and dry and wipe from front to back when on the toilet to avoid bacteria spreading.
Dr Brown said: 'We know that the most serious consequences that come from UTIs are more common in people over the age of 50 so we are reminding this group in particular to be aware of the ways they can help reduce their risk of getting poorly.
'Drinking enough fluids is so important, as well as avoiding holding onto pee. If you have frequent UTIs, talk to your healthcare provider about treatments that may help prevent further infections.
'If you have a UTI and your symptoms get worse, please call your GP or 111, or go to your nearest A&E, to seek assistance as UTIs can develop into more serious, life-threatening infections.'
Dr Brown also stressed that preventing UTIs is important to tackle antibiotic resistance, as they are often treated with antibiotics.
'Reducing the number of UTI infections means bacteria has less chance to develop this resistance, helping keep antibiotics working for longer,' he said.
Professor Matt Inada-Kim, national clinical director for infections management and antimicrobial resistance at NHS England, said: 'Urinary tract infections are an increasingly common reason for becoming ill at home and in hospitals.
'They are more serious in older patients and, in particular, those with catheters but they can occur at any age and are not often related to poor hygiene.
'Antimicrobial resistance continues to grow and it is vital that we do everything we can to manage urinary infections through prevention, education and providing easy access to healthcare, including diagnostic tests and appropriate treatment.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ITV News
an hour ago
- ITV News
'Unforgiveable': Damning report finds death of learning disabled man was 'entirely preventable'
The inquest into the death of Myles Scriven in Huddersfield found multiple opportunities to save his life were missed, as ITV News Investigations Editor Dan Hewitt reports A coroner has issued a damning report against an NHS hospital trust following the entirely preventable death of a 31-year-old autistic man with learning disabilities, branding the attitude of doctors 'dismissive and complacent'. The inquest into the death of Myles Scriven in Huddersfield found multiple opportunities to save his life were missed by staff at Huddersfield Royal Infirmary and his GP practice, after he died from an entirely treatable blood clot in his leg. Myles' uncle Paul Scriven, who is a Liberal Democrat peer in the House of Lords, told ITV News his nephew's death is "unforgivable", and accused the Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Trust of being "more concerned with defending its reputation than preventing the deaths of people with learning disabilities". Lord Scriven said Myles' death must be a watershed moment in how people with learning disabilities are treated in the health service. Myles became unwell in late 2022 with shortness of breath and a blood clot in his leg. He was prescribed Rivaroxaban - a blood thinning medication - but despite taking the pill every day as prescribed, months later he was still unwell. A consultant haematologist recommended switching Myles' medication to a different blood thinner - Warfarin - but Myles' doctor instead assumed Myles was not taking the drug and opted to keep Myles on Rivaroxaban. When in April 2023, Myles was again suffering with shortness of breath, his GP surgery offered him a telephone consultation, despite Myles' stated issues with communication. Myles was struggling to breathe normally but he was not referred to A&E, and instead was told to stay at home. The following day, Myles collapsed and was rushed to hospital, where he later died from a pulmonary embolism. Despite his family flagging with healthcare professionals that he had a learning disability and was autistic, and would require help to make medical or treatment decisions, his two uncles - who were his stated medical advocates - were never contacted by the hospital or GP either in late 2022 or spring 2023. 'For all intents and purposes, other than his learning disability and autism, Myles was physically well,' said David Black, Paul's husband and Myles' uncle. 'There's lots of different things that can be done, but unfortunately these opportunities were never afforded to Myles, merely because he wasn't believed and because he was learning disabled and autistic, he wasn't really able to engage in decisions about his treatment.' On July 11, 2025, the coroner in Bradford found that both a lack of adjustment for Myles' learning disability and autism and neglect contributed to his death. He found healthcare professionals had a 'complacent and dismissive attitude towards Myles and his learning disability', clinicians were 'blind' to his needs, and did not make sufficient reasonable adjustments for his disability. Speaking in his first television interview to ITV News about Myles' death, Lord Scriven said "there is no doubt" that Myles would still be alive if he did not have a learning disability. 'Hearing that this was preventable - that Myles could have been saved on at least three occasions - was really, really difficult,' he said. 'If we had been called, we would have been able to support Myles in making a decision that would have probably saved his life.' During the inquest, the NHS Trust tried to argue Myles did have mental capacity to make his own decisions regarding his medical treatment. 'David knew Myles for 28 years of his life. I carried Myles in the first few hours of his life, and I carried him on my shoulder in his coffin to his grave,' said Lord Scriven. 'He didn't have capacity. They were trying to tell us that people who had been with him for ten minutes knew him better than us.' 'It is unforgivable.' 'It was trying to save their reputation rather than reflecting and trying to save peoples' lives with learning disabilities.' Official data shows that men with a learning disability die 20 years earlier than the general population in the UK. Women with a learning disability die on average 23 years younger. Professor Sara Ryan researches social care with a specialism in learning disabilities and autism. Her own son, Connor Sparrowhawk, who was learning disabled, autistic and had epilepsy, died in 2013 whilst in the care of an NHS assessment facility. 'I was struck by how similar Myles' death was to Connor's in that he died through the most woeful failings of healthcare,' she told ITV News. 'Connor was left to drown in a bath in a hospital unit, and he had diagnosed epilepsy.' 'We have to remember that people with learning disabilities aren't ill,' Professor Ryan said. 'There's no reason why people should be dying so early. You have got a tsunami of evidence that says we know why people are dying, we know how people are dying, and we are doing nothing about it.' Outside Bradford Coroner's Court, Myles' uncles reflected on the judgement. 'It was very raw listening to the full list of times Myles could have been saved.' 'We now want to do something positive in the legacy of Myles. To say that Myles' death will not be in vain, and other families do not have to go through what we've been through,' Paul said. Brendan Brown, Chief Executive, Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Foundation Trust, said: 'My sincere condolences go out to Myles' family and his loved ones. We have formally apologised to Myles' family, but we fully acknowledge that no apology can compensate for the profound impact of what has occurred, nor for the failings identified within the Trust. "We accept the coroner's findings in full. We will ensure these are used to build upon the changes made as a result of the Trust's internal review and the clinical lessons learned from Myles' sad death. 'We acknowledge the concerns that there is more which we could have done to involve Myles' family in his care and are acting on this as a Trust.'
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Can ADHD really be diagnosed with a simple 18-question test? We ask the experts
There are now 2.6 million people in the UK with ADHD – and diagnoses are on the rise. Looking at 18 years of anonymised NHS patient records, researchers at University College London noted a 20-fold increase in the diagnosis of ADHD in adult men, and 15-fold in women. Meanwhile, demand for a diagnosis has soared by more than 400 per cent since the pandemic, according to figures from the ADHD Foundation. As those looking for an ADHD diagnosis face a wait as long as eight years on the NHS, the two-minute Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS), which asks individuals to answer 18 questions themselves, has become widely used. But when Oxford University made the decision to use it to grant extra exam time to almost all students who got a positive result, it called to question the efficacy of the quick test. The students underwent a 90-minute assessment by an unqualified expert after the initial screening but still, it opened a heated discussion about whether the ASRS test was fit for purpose. There are two main concerns surrounding this test: One being that the ease at which people are accessing it is contributing to the fact that doctors are being inundated with diagnosis requests from people who believe they have ADHD. And secondly, if people know that a positive result on the ASRS test could lead to extra time in exams, or to being eligible for benefits, then there could be incentives to answer a certain way. What exactly is the ASRS test? Written in 2005, the self-reporting test was devised by the World Health Organisation (WHO) and experts from Harvard Medical School. It is generally used as an initial screening for ADHD and is widely used by the NHS and private clinicians. The test is only meant to be used as an initial screening and to assess whether a further assessment by a specialist clinician is necessary. 'It was designed to screen for what we call ADHD traits. The main purpose is to flag those patients to primary care providers like GPs, who might want to refer them to secondary care where a more thorough assessment can be done. It's not meant to be used alone for a diagnosis,' says Dr Alessio Bellato, clinical psychologist and lecturer in neurodiversity and mental health at the University of Southampton. With no blood test or objective criteria, ADHD is tricky to diagnose – and sometimes open to abuse. 'ADHD is a constellation of behaviours, but there's no specific gene or signal in the brain that we know about, so we have to rely on observations,' says Dr Bellato. 'The presence of symptoms alone is not enough for a clinical diagnosis; they must have negative consequences that are clinically impactful in everyday life, like maybe the person can't hold down a job or perform at university.' Ideally, a diagnosis should include extensive clinical interviews and evidence of impairment across more than one area of life, according to NICE (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence). So what's the theory behind this two-minute test for ADHD and is there still a place for it? Concerns over diagnosing ADHD with a two-minute test Dr Bellato believes the ASRS test, provided it's used correctly, is a useful tool for initial screening and referrals. 'As of today, it's the best screening tool we have – it's supported by the WHO and designed and developed by researchers from reputable institutions. We have to be realistic about the time GPs have, and ADHD assessment is not their job,' he says. But it isn't perfect. Since ADHD is being widely talked about amongst friends and on social media, most people now understand what boxes to tick on the test, and in some older versions of the test, the answers with the highest scores are also obvious because they're shaded grey. Dr Marios Adamou is a consultant psychiatrist with the adult ADHD and Autism Service, South West Yorkshire Partnership Foundation Trust. He's concerned that too many people are referred by GPs for an assessment after completing the test and are adding to already lengthy waiting lists. 'It used to be useful in the UK, but I don't think it's useful now. People are coming in and demanding a diagnosis because they have already diagnosed themselves,' he says. In his trust, they've recently started to trial a new system. 'GPs contact us and we complete a one-hour face-to-face interview for a referral,' he says, saying that the trial has significantly reduced referrals. Although some clinicians and politicians have claimed that ADHD is being over diagnosed, experts rightly point to the fact that, although it is estimated that around 2.8 per cent of adults have ADHD in the UK, only around 0.32 per cent currently have an ADHD diagnosis, although numbers are rising. How the ASRS test works The test has 18 questions linked to the criteria for diagnosing ADHD, which is set out in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, also known as DSM-5. The manual classifies ADHD into three types: predominantly inattentive, hyperactive-impulsive and combined. None of these types are inherently more severe; it simply depends on how ADHD shows up in each individual. People with predominantly inattentive ADHD may struggle with focus, forgetfulness, procrastination, concentration and following through on tasks. Those with the hyperactive-impulsive type are more likely to experience restlessness, impulsivity and difficulty sitting still. The combined type includes significant symptoms from both categories. The ASRS test asks questions that help to identify traits of each type of ADHD outlined in the DSM-5. So part A of the test contains six questions that cover both symptoms of inattentiveness and hyperactivity-impulsivity. Part B has a further 12 questions that provide additional clues for clinicians and asks a broader set of questions about how severe the symptoms are and the impact on people's lives. Experts think that the criteria – and the questions – are due an update though, in light of how much researchers are beginning to understand about ADHD. 'The DSM was created decades ago and is constantly updated by clinicians who also involve the public. Right now, signs of emotional dysregulation are not part of the diagnostic criteria, but when we move to DSM-6, I expect we might see that change,' says Dr Bellato. Questions about inattentiveness With ADHD, inattentiveness looks like difficulties focusing on details, organisation, remembering appointments, procrastination, making mistakes, losing things and struggling with concentration. So the ASRS also asks several questions about those things as well as their impact on life, like staying focused at work when doing a boring task, having difficulty concentrating on what people are saying to you or being distracted by noise or activity. 'Attention is a cognitive function, so what we are looking for here is someone with impaired function. If you're honest when you fill it out these questions could signal an attention problem. Of course, there could be other causes like depression, anxiety, alcohol disorder and trauma,' says Dr Adamou. For an ADHD diagnosis, inattention would usually need to have been present since childhood and be pervasive across multiple areas, like work and home. When it comes to ADHD, inattention and procrastination are often linked to the demands of the task; if it's boring, it can be impossible to get started, but if it's stimulating, ADHD people can hyperfocus for a long time. 'There are theories that say that lack of motivation in people with ADHD is due to altered neurotransmitters, including dopamine. This means that doing things that are not really engaging or exciting are much more challenging than they should be, then if something is exciting, they over focus, which is a trait that overlaps with autism,' says Dr Bellato. Questions about hyperactivity and impulsivity 'Hyperactivity is mostly applicable to children,' says Dr Bellato. 'It's the child with ADHD who can't sit still, who is always active, in a way that is excessive for their age. Impulsivity, on the other hand, is related to difficulties in inhibiting a response – for example, let's say, you provoke me and I will react immediately in an inappropriate way. ADHD is very closely related to aggression, and people often struggle with inhibiting their responses which aren't socially acceptable.' So the test also includes several questions that speak to the hyperactive and impulsive nature of ADHD. For adults, these can be physical hyperactive symptoms like difficulties sitting still or staying seated in meetings, feeling constantly restless or fidgety, unable to unwind or relax, or being overly compelled to do things as if being 'driven by a motor'. The questions also aim to measure how the impulsive behaviours relate to inner difficulties, asking whether people often interrupt others and finish their sentences, talk too much and find it difficult to wait their turn. Scoring the test A score between zero to nine indicates a low likelihood of ADHD, between 10-13; a moderate likelihood, 14-17; a high likelihood and 18-24; a very high likelihood. The questions that score highly can also indicate the ADHD subtype, which could be hyperactivity-impulsivity, inattentive or combined. Only the first six questions in Part A of the test are scored, and in 2024, the scoring system was updated to provide more nuance. Each question has a multiple-choice answer of Never/Sometimes/Often and Very Often, with a score ranging from zero to four points for each. Questions seven to 18 are answered in the same way but they're not included in the total score. They're simply used by clinicians to get a more detailed picture of how much of an impact the traits are having on an individual's life. Researchers are continuing to work on better diagnosis methods for ADHD, but in the meantime, Dr Bellato believes the ASRS can be helpful, provided it's used correctly as a first step and not a standalone diagnostic tool. As Dr. Bellato puts it, 'It's not the tool that's the problem, it's how the tool is used.' Where can I find the ADHD Self-Report Scale test? The updated ASRS test is freely available online. You can find a user-friendly version on the website of the charity ADHD UK, the updated version on the Psychology Tools website, and the original version on the ADD website. Experts advise answering the questions honestly and without overthinking your answers. A positive score is a sign to seek further clinical assessment, not a diagnosis of ADHD. Experts recommend sharing your results with a GP, who can refer you for a formal ADHD assessment if appropriate. The test can be a useful tool and a helpful first step if you have a history of symptoms, a family history or other mental health symptoms. But he emphasises that people shouldn't forget 'this is a self-reporting tool, so any non-honest reply will affect the final results, and each individual might have different opinions about how to define something occurring 'rarely' or 'sometimes'. It is always important to talk to your GP or clinical practitioner and only an expert and trained clinician can diagnose ADHD and it might be that follow up assessments rule out ADHD,' says Dr Bellato.
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Labour won't be in government long enough to witness the mess their NHS plan is creating
Having been brought up in a Welsh coal mining village where Aneurin Bevan was regarded as deity, and where generations of my family had been staunchly-socialist coal miners, I am desperate for the NHS to succeed. I worked in the NHS for almost 45 years, 30 of those as a cancer surgeon. My generation saw the NHS at its best. However, some aspects of the recently published ten-year plan for the NHS leave me confused and astonished. How many experienced clinicians were involved in the planning? We have been told that the plan was rewritten multiple times and by several teams of writers. I am left wondering how many of those people had ever worked at the bedside or had any clinical background. The authors have paternalistically assumed that patients would prefer to have treatment locally by an untested method of care, rather than stay under specialist hospital supervision. The change is being imposed by managers who assume that they know best. Yes, we need to reduce waste and increase productivity in the NHS but some of the planned reforms are based naively on ideology and expectation rather than on pragmatism and data. Top of my list of reforms destined to fail is the 'neighbourhood health service'. This is the plan to move patient diagnosis and management from hospitals into the community by providing a six-day per week, 12 hours per day local service. The new clinics will be multi-disciplinary with thousands of new GPs working with pharmacists, social workers, paramedics, palliative care nurses, physiotherapists and other health workers. These mega-clinics will also apparently provide employment support and even coaches to advise on jobs. In other words, the ten-year plan is anticipated to reduce the 7.4 million patients waiting for hospital tests and treatment artificially, by referring most back to GPs. This sounds like a magical plan to cure multiple problems but is nothing more than the creation of yet another expensive bureaucracy to trump even the 2012 Lansley 'reforms'. We've finally found where Rachel Reeves's £29 billion is being funnelled. Why won't it work? Because the core skill required for success is a functioning and efficient general practice, a service which is visibly failing. We know from a Health Select Committee report in 2022 that almost 60 per cent of GPs work three days per week or less. Although some GPs remain committed to the cause, sadly, as a service, their persistent failure to provide timely appointments and especially continuity of care appear insurmountable and incompatible with the requirements of the ten-year plan. Furthermore. GPs are not trained for the work required of them by the ten-year plan. The NHS is intended to become GP-centric which will make great demands on their limited breadth of knowledge. Hospital consultants train for at least six years while GP training is for three years, two of which are spent in general practice. Their training programme will need to expand to include several years of hospital subspeciality experience, a reality which has been ignored. And where will the thousands of new GPs come from? British medical students who have completed placements in general practice and having seen the problems, are reluctant to consider it as a career. We know that already, 55 per cent of GP trainees are International Medical Graduates recruited from low-income countries. Is this what we want? This leads on to another certain failure of the plan where it is predicted that within ten years, only one in ten doctors will be recruited from abroad. This is an impossible task given the present starting point. In 2024, the General Medical Council registered 9,285 UK-trained doctors and 19,279 doctors who had trained abroad. To close this production gap would need at least six new medical schools which is not mentioned in the plan, and which will not happen, at least not in the timescale. Although the current situation is untenable, we are taking a risky step into the unknown, it having been assumed that there is no other solution to the problems in the NHS. In ten years' time, this government and this Health Secretary will not be around to answer for the costly errors they have created.
