The Ocean Still Holds Mysteries. That's Why We Must Save It
When the world's first marine reserves were established in the 1920s, Jacques Cousteau was an adolescent. The deepest we could dive was about 500 ft. Humans were beginning to imagine what could be beneath the surface, what discoveries lay waiting, and what might deserve protecting.
Nearly a century later, we've made a lot of progress. The ocean is the center of the world economy, providing food, labor, transportation, tourism, and so much more. It has brought us promising treatments for disease, animal-inspired engineering and robotics, and even the basis for space exploration technology. Inspired by the U.N. Decade of Ocean Science—which launched a 10-year push for action in 2021—marine researchers, philanthropists, and political leaders worldwide aim to map the entire seafloor and identify 100,000 new species by 2030. And at the United Nations Ocean Conference (UNOC) earlier this month, the global community made progress on financial commitments for preservation, support for pausing deep-sea mining, expanding marine protected areas—with French Polynesia notably vowing to protect 900,000 square kilometers of sea—and on the High Seas Treaty to protect marine life in international waters.
And yet, much remains to be discovered about our ocean and its role in sustaining all life on Earth—and much remains to be done to protect it. To build on the momentum of UNOC, ocean conservation—through robust marine protected areas and other measures—must continue to advance, alongside exploration and research. And until the next conference in 2028, while governments must lead the way, every sector of society has a role in saving the seas.
Read more: Fishing Communities in the Philippines Are Fighting for their Future as Waters Rise
Over the past two decades, evidence has repeatedly shown that protecting the ocean supports not only the planet but also all of us who rely on it. One recent study found that protecting swaths of ocean increases catch for valuable fish, including large migratory species like bigeye and yellowfin tuna, which alone support $40 billion in global business. Another report showed that marine protected areas not only help rebuild fish stock, they also drive higher income and food security for nearby coastal communities.
Despite the evidence, and despite our advances toward better stewardship, however, we are facing strong headwinds: from reversals on protected areas to warming ocean waters.
Governments, international and civil society organizations, and philanthropies like the Schmidt Ocean Institute, Schmidt Sciences, Dona Bertarelli Philanthropy, and the Bertarelli Foundation, which we help lead, are stepping up to support ocean exploration and protection efforts—and it's working. Public-private sector partnerships will be essential in moving the needle from ocean science to ocean action.
The waters surrounding the Galapagos Islands provide an example of what's possible through long-term partnership across sectors. Famed for their endemic plant and animal life that inspired Charles Darwin's theory of evolution, the islands' waters were first granted legal protection 50 years ago. Today, the reserve, managed by the Ecuadorian government in consultation with local fishers and scientists, allows for fishing and tourism while keeping stricter rules in more sensitive areas. Ecuador recently added more than 23,000 square miles to the protected waters, working in partnership with Costa Rica, Colombia, and Panama. In a deal supported by Dona Bertarelli Philanthropy through Pew Bertarelli Ocean Legacy and other partners, Ecuador converted $1.6 billion of its existing commercial debt into a $656 million loan that will provide $12 million in financing for marine conservation activities each year, in perpetuity. Complementing this work, the Bertarelli Philanthropy also supported the development of the Global Fishing Watch Marine Manager, which provides open-source, interactive data on the Galapagos area, and worldwide, to support conservation, policy, and research.
Read more: The World Isn't Valuing Oceans Properly
Indeed, scientists are still uncovering new findings around the Galapagos. The Schmidt Ocean Institute's philanthropic research vessel Falkor (too) undertook two expeditions around the islands in 2023 and encountered two large, pristine coral reefs as well as a hydrothermal vent field—all previously unknown to humankind, all livestreamed for free on YouTube to anyone who wished to watch. As with the Global Fishing Watch Marine Manager, the livestream offers an intimate connection with the ocean for a global audience—a far cry from the days when only a few humans had the chance to explore, and at no great depth. Both the reefs and vents offer clues about the still dramatically under-researched deep sea and the role it plays in keeping the broader ocean, and indeed the entire planet, healthy.
The Galapagos aren't the only place where marine protected areas (MPA) have benefited both people and the planet. A recent study of 59 MPAs established by California—which created a network of reserves in 1999—saw more and larger fish across the entire network, particularly in species sought by fisheries. This was true despite the MPAs being diverse in how they choose to ban or limit activities like fishing, shipping, and tourism—though stronger and longer lasting protections correlated with more significant results.
The more we explore and protect the ocean, the more we reap the benefits, whether in the form of economic returns or scientific breakthroughs. Advancing conservation—through MPAs as well as a host of complementary policies and data collection efforts—supports economies and scientific research in a virtuous cycle. The world has come a long way from just a century ago, when we could only see as far into the ocean as the sun allowed. As philanthropists, we seek to contribute to a better understanding of the ocean through science and data—the groundwork for accountability and action. We call on the policymakers, experts, and advocates—and everyone who is enthralled by the sea—to remember that the more we search and the more we find, the closer we come to a healthy ocean and a healthy planet.
Dona Bertarelli is executive chair of Dona Bertarelli Philanthropy and co-chair of the Bertarelli Foundation. Wendy Schmidt is co-founder and president of the Schmidt Ocean Institute and co-founder of Schmidt Sciences.
Contact us at letters@time.com.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
a day ago
- Forbes
Don't Miss This Weekend's Sky Show — Venus And A Stunning Star Cluster
Venus and the Pleiades as seen from Beijing, China, on April 3, 2020 (Costfoto/Barcroft Media via ... More Getty Images) Early risers on Saturday, July 5, are in for a pre-dawn treat — Venus shining brightly as the 'Morning Star' close to the glittering Pleiades star cluster. Two of the most stunning sights in naked-eye astronomy will shine together just before sunrise. Here's everything you need to know about when and where to see them. Where And When To Look To see the duo, head outside about an hour before sunrise and look east. Venus, shining brightly at magnitude -4.1, will be unmistakable even in the growing twilight. Venus will be just beneath the Pleiades (also known as the Seven Sisters and Messier 45), one of the closest open clusters of stars to the solar system. It's about 444 light-years from the solar system. What You'll See Look below-left of Venus — directly beneath the Pleiades — and you may be able to make out a V-shape of stars centered on one bright reddish star. The star is Aldebaran, a red supergiant star and the brightest in the constellation Tauris, the bull. Its name means 'the follower' because it appears to follow the Pleiades through the night sky. It's also known as the 'eye of the bull.' Both the Pleiades and Aldebaran are typically thought of as winter objects. They're currently making a brief pre-dawn appearance and will soon be lost in the daytime sky until fall. Between Venus and the Pleiades will be the planet Uranus, though it's far too dim to be seen without a telescope. Saturday, July 5: Venus And The Pleiades Observing Tips Most people immediately think of a telescope when they think about astronomy. It's not necessary for this event. You'll see much more just by using your naked eyes. However, a pair of binoculars is always useful when stargazing, allowing you to zoom in on the Pleiades, not only to see more of its over 1,000 stars but also the incredible nebulosity between the stars. That light is a passing molecular cloud of gas and dust being lit up by the stars of the Pleiades. Choose an observing location with a clear, unobstructed view to the eastern horizon, if possible, away from city lights — though light pollution makes zero difference when observing planets. Pleiades open star cluster with nebula (Messier 45) in constellation of Taurus photographed with ... More high quality amateur telescope. What's Next In The Night Sky Look to the southern sky from about 45 minutes after sunset on Sunday, July 6, and you'll see a bright waxing gibbous moon shining close to the famous summer constellation Scorpius, the scorpion. Return 24 hours later, and it will be closer to Antares, the brightest star in Scorpius. For exact timings, use a sunrise and sunset calculator for where you are, Stellarium Web for a sky chart and Night Sky Tonight: Visible Planets at Your Location for positions and rise/set times for planets. Wishing you clear skies and wide eyes.
National Geographic
3 days ago
- National Geographic
Could T. rex swim? Kinda
Evidence suggests dinosaurs like tyrannosaurs were probably best suited to a version of the doggy paddle. Despite what's depicted in movies and books, the real Tyrannosaurus rex was likely an awkward swimmer at best. Illustration by Fotokita, Getty Images When Michael Crichton released the novel Jurassic Park in 1990, he included a terrifying chase through one of the park's ponds. Fictional paleontologist Alan Grant, looking after kids Lex and Tim, tries to sneak by a dozing Tyrannosaurus rex and motor across a lake away from the dinosaur. The T. rex follows, swimming after them like 'the biggest crocodile in the world.' The scene stood out so much that it's been revamped for the new movie Jurassic World: Rebirth. But while tyrannosaurs might swim in movies and books, could they swim in real life? Carnivorous dinosaurs are not generally thought of as good swimmers. During much of the 20th century, in fact, paleontologists wrongly assumed that herbivorous dinosaurs ran into rivers and lakes to avoid the jaws of T. rex, Allosaurus, and other predators. No one had found any direct evidence that such carnivores could swim. But the discovery of dinosaur swim tracks at fossil sites around the world have indicated that theropod dinosaurs—the group that contains T. rex, birds, and their relatives—were more aquatically adept than suspected and may have even done their own version of the doggy paddle. At one 200 million-year-old fossil site in southern Utah, paleontologists have found over 2,500 scratches and traces made by small carnivorous dinosaurs swimming across a Jurassic lake. Over 120 million years ago, a larger theropod dinosaur swam through the shallows in what's now La Rioja, Spain. Another fossil site found in La Rioja has even allowed paleontologists to begin distinguishing between different types of swimming traces left by theropods kicking through the water, indicating that swimming was not unusual for feathery, sharp-toothed dinosaurs. To date, no one has found swim traces from a tyrannosaur. Paleontologists have found some rare tyrannosaur footprints, but not direct evidence of swimming. Still, University College London paleontologist Cassius Morrison notes, today, 'the majority of animals can swim' even without specific aquatic adaptations, and the fossil evidence of other swimming theropods suggests that big tyrannosaurs could, too. The question is how they would have done it. (Could dinosaurs swim? This fossil revives an age-old debate.) What did tyrannosaur swimming look like? Mature T. rex were very large animals. The biggest reached more than 40 feet in length and weighed over nine tons. Hefty as that is, however, nine tons is relatively light for such a big animal. The secret is that tyrannosaurs, like many dinosaurs, had a complex system of air sacs that branched out from its respiratory system and infiltrated the dinosaur's bones, just like in birds today. The air sacs allowed the dinosaur to be a little lighter without sacrificing strength, allowed the animal to breathe more efficiently, and, in the water, to float a little more easily. Magazine for all ages starting at $25/year The effects of dinosaur air sacs on swimming ability has been underscored by the bones of another giant carnivore and Jurassic Park alum—the croc-snouted, sail-backed Spinosaurus. While researchers debate how much time the paddle-tailed dinosaur spent in the water, fossil evidence suggests it had extra-dense bones. These heavier bones helped the dinosaur avoid being too buoyant, so that it could more easily use its muscle power to move through the water rather than actively working to stay submerged like we do when we go under water with lungs full of air. (Read more about Spinosaurus' penguin-like bones.) Spinosaurus had a skeleton adapted to dealing with the buoyancy of the air sacs, but other dinosaurs without such dense bones would have only been capable of a more unstable doggy paddle. Giant long-necked dinosaurs, for example, have been described as 'tipsy punters' that were relatively unstable in the water and could kick off the bottom but not swim the way a crocodile does. For the same reason, T. rex probably wouldn't be able to completely disappear beneath a lake's surface and burst out with open jaws, like in the movies. And even though the dinosaur's arms were too small and lacked the range of motion for a swim stroke, the same is true of many other carnivorous dinosaurs that left swim traces behind. The emerging picture is that T. rex was probably a strong, if unsteady, swimmer. The available evidence hints that a swimming T. rex would float near the surface of a body of water, using its powerful legs to kick along to cross. Did T. rex stalk prey in the water? T. rex's swimming abilities would have inevitably shaped its hunting strategy. In 2023, University of the Republic of Uruguay paleontologist R. Ernesto Blanco modeled how quickly T. rex could move through the water. He proposed that the tyrant lizard would have been too slow to catch prey like the duckbill Edmontosaurus and the ostrich-like Struthiomimus on dry land but could move faster while wading or swimming in shallow water. 'Depending on the water depth, T. rex would have different ways of propulsion,' Blanco says. In deep enough water, T. rex could have swum with most of its body under the surface, but more often the dinosaur likely waded or 'punted' off the bottom as the swim traces of other theropods indicate. Perhaps, Blanco suggested, T. rex preferred to hunt along shorelines where herbivores trying to escape in the water would have been slowed down and more vulnerable. Other experts are not yet convinced that T. rex preferred hunting and feeding along shorelines. The bulk of the evidence so far points to the reptiles ambushing prey on land and breaking any carcasses it could find down into splinters with its impressive jaw strength. Finding swim traces, tyrannosaur poop with aquatic animal remains, or other fossil evidence could help test the idea further. Nevertheless, splashing around in the water seems within the range of what T. rex could do during its Cretaceous days. Swimming—even awkwardly—was a useful ability in ancient lowland habitats that likely resembled the wetlands and swamps along the coast of the Gulf of Mexico today. Being able to cross such waterways and wet habitats would have been advantageous to big tyrannosaurs, and it's likely the dinosaurs did so at times. 'With current evidence available to us,' Morrison says, 'I would suggest that swimming may have been a way for Tyrannosaurus to navigate its environment.' The answer to why T. rex crossed the lake, in other words, may have been that lunch was on the other side.
New York Post
4 days ago
- New York Post
US states with the highest dementia rates revealed — did yours make the list?
Home is where the heart is — but it also might be where your memory slips away. A sweeping new study found that dementia rates vary drastically across the US in ways that can't be explained by traditional risk factors. The research suggests that where you live could play a significant role in whether you develop the memory-robbing disease later in life, opening new doors for targeted prevention efforts. 3 One in 10 Americans ages 65 and older is living with dementia. Getty Images/iStockphoto Dementia is a growing public health concern that affects more than 6 million Americans and causes over 100,000 deaths each year, according to the National Institutes of Health. Looking ahead, researchers predict new dementia cases in the US will double over the next 40 years — increasing from roughly 514,000 in 2020 to nearly 1 million by 2060. That means Americans over 55 face a 42% lifetime risk of being diagnosed. But could your zip code hold the key to lowering those odds? Dementia hot spots Researchers at UC San Francisco (UCSF) analyzed health data from more than 1.2 million veterans aged 65 and older, courtesy of the Veterans Health Administration. Over an average of 12 years, the team tracked who developed the disease — then compared the numbers by location. The Mid-Atlantic had the lowest dementia rate, with just 11.2 cases per 1,000 people annually. But other parts of the country saw significantly higher risks: The Southeast — Kentucky, Tennessee, Alabama and Mississippi — had a 25% higher dementia diagnosis rate compared to the Mid-Atlantic. The Northwest and Rocky Mountains were 23% higher. The South saw an 18% increase. The Southwest trailed with a 13% higher rate. The South Atlantic and Midwest regions were about 12% higher. The Northeast and Great Lakes had a 7% increase. Notably, the regional differences couldn't be explained when researchers factored in common risk factors like age, race, heart disease or rural versus urban living. 3 The biggest risk factor for dementia is aging, but where you live also might play a role. Monkey Business – The study does have some limitations. The authors only looked at veterans, who are mostly male and may not reflect the general population. This group also faces unique risks, like traumatic brain injury and PTSD, which could impact their odds. Still, the results were clear: where you live matters. 'The study underscores the need to understand regional differences in dementia and the importance of region-specific prevention and intervention efforts,' Dr. Kristine Yaffe, senior author of the study and director of the Center for Population Brain Health at UCSF, said in a statement. Next, the researchers aim to uncover what's driving these geographic gaps. 'Quality of education, early life conditions and environmental exposures may be key factors,' said Dr. Christina Dintica, first author of the study and a UCSF postdoctoral scholar. Fight back against forgetting While UCSF digs into why some places have higher dementia rates, you don't have to wait to protect your brain. 3 Lifestyle changes like more physical activity could help prevent dementia. Kay Abrahams/ – Studies suggest that nearly 45% of dementia cases can be prevented or delayed — with experts outlining five simple steps you can take right now to lower your risk. First, get moving. Regular physical activity doesn't just keep your body in shape — it sharpens your mind too. Aim for 150 minutes of moderate aerobic activity a week, plus muscle-strengthening sessions twice weekly. Beyond exercise, managing your health is crucial. Preventing or controlling diabetes is key because too much sugar in your blood can damage vital organs — including your brain. Along those lines, keeping your blood pressure under control is equally important. High blood pressure harms blood vessels and cuts blood flow to the brain, increasing your risk of stroke and memory loss. Your hearing also plays a role. Taking steps to prevent hearing loss — or getting treatment if you already have it — matters because hearing loss can make your brain work harder, draining resources needed for memory and thinking. Finally, try to limit or avoid drinking and smoking. Excessive alcohol can cause high blood pressure and brain injury, while smoking increases the risk of dementia, including Alzheimer's disease.
