logo
Rugby World Cups aren't adding up for major unions and there is no easy fix

Rugby World Cups aren't adding up for major unions and there is no easy fix

The Guardian15-04-2025
The starting gun has been fired on the race to host the 2035 and 2039 Rugby World Cup tournaments. Expressions of interest have been made: Spain's proposal has piqued interest, Italy's too, while the Middle East stalks along as the elephant in the room. The idea of going back to Japan within 20 years of a first World Cup in Asia is a popular proposition.
News came over the weekend, however, that South Africa has all but ruled out a bid for either edition of the tournament. South Africa threw its hat into the ring in 2011, 2015, 2019 and 2023 but was overlooked on each occasion and the SA Rugby president, Mark Alexander, was brutally honest when asked about the prospect of doing so again.
'It just brings so many other challenges to the country,' he said. 'People think it is just a sports event but so many other things have to be activated. I will tell [SA Rugby] not to do this. We are a third-world country. Our economy is not strong and we have to act responsibly. I know sport does a lot for social cohesion but I think it would be unfair on [the] government to put up guarantees.'
It is a desperate shame that the winners of the past two World Cups do not consider it financially viable to bid and the 2023 bidding process looks all the more ham-fisted now.
To recap, World Rugby introduced a process whereby a technical review of the candidates would lead to recommendation by the governing body's board. South Africa emerged as the recommended bidder but World Rugby's council ignored the recommendation and in an anonymous vote, opted for France, whose bid was based on a promise to prevent 'the death of rugby' with its financial clout.
Reflecting on the decision during South Africa's autumn tour, the centre Damian de Allende said: 'It's heartbreaking, it was in our hands and it got taken away from us. I know we won the World Cup last year but it would have been a lot more special to have hosted it and won it. I get a bit sad speaking about it because I don't know when we will host another World Cup.'
Is there any other sport in which three highest-ranked nations may feasibly never host a future World Cup? South Africa and New Zealand have won the last five World Cups between them and contested the most recent final. But at this stage it is also hard to see the tournament returning to New Zealand. The union's chief executive, Mark Robinson, admitted as much in 2022, saying it would be 'really challenging'. He rowed back on those comments a year later but with the 2027 World Cup expanding to 24 teams, New Zealand doesn't have the infrastructure to mount a realistic bid.
In Ireland's case, they were the third horse in the race for the 2023 tournament but came up short, crucially failing to gain the backing of Scotland – a neighbourly snub that still rankles. As revealed by the Guardian, a united home nations bid for the 2031 World Cup was proposed but soon shelved because, it is said, agreement on where to stage the final could not be reached.
Instead, in six years, the World Cup breaks new ground in the US. Australia – with its wealth of impressive stadiums – hosts the next edition but it is 2031 occupying minds at World Rugby at present. Executives wanted the British & Irish Lions to play in Las Vegas on the way to Australia this summer and may be heartened by the suggestion they could stop off in Sin City in 2029, on the way to New Zealand. England's fixture in Washington, in July, and another clash between the All Blacks and Ireland in Chicago later this year is further evidence of spreading the gospel.
Because World Rugby is under pressure to deliver. The 2023 World Cup proved costly for France – an expected net loss of €13m (£11.1m), according to a damning report over mismanagement released earlier this month by the French court of audit – but for World Rugby it generated record-breaking revenues of €500m (£429m).
Still, when the Irish union released its accounts last November, reporting an €18.4m (£15.8m) deficit, the chief executive, Kevin Potts, was strident in his view that the cost of competing in a World Cup, exacerbated by losing autumn internationals revenue, is a problem. 'It [the World Cup] is a value transfer from the unions to the tournament,' he said.
'We get some funding over the following years out of World Rugby but it doesn't match what it costs us. It's also being used to develop the game globally. It's not working and World Rugby are aware that we and other unions are challenged by this and we need to look, is there a better way? We certainly can't continue to have World Cups every four years that are having such a major impact in that year on our finances.'
That view was echoed by the Rugby Football Union chief executive, Bill Sweeney, after record losses were announced at a similar time. 'We're right in the middle of this conversation,' Sweeney told the Business of Sport podcast. 'We feel that in many ways you could say that the losses we make in that fourth year are subsidising the investment by World Rugby into the growth of the emerging nations because the revenue shift for us is about £45m in that fourth year, we make a big loss in that fourth year.
'It's the same for the other unions as well, so the Six Nations and Sanzaar are saying this doesn't make any sense. The blue riband event where we're generating an awful lot of value, we're getting a very small percentage of the overall profit being generated from that event. I can see it from World Rugby's point of view because they're saying, 'our remit is to grow the game globally', so we've got to invest in emerging markets but at the moment it is creating some real financial hardship and difficulties for the tier one unions.'
It is quite the conversation but as Sweeney suggests, how can World Rugby justify cutting funding of the have-nots to give more to the haves? The only viable solution appears to be to ensure World Cups generate more revenue, hence the American gold rush before a likely return to Europe in 2035. The smart money is on Japan in 2039 after 2019 was, at the time, the most lucrative tournament in history.
It also brings us back to the elephant in the room. Suffice it to say, World Rugby will pay close attention to the Nations Championship finals in 2028, which are slated for Qatar. But the Middle East could not stage a World Cup in the traditional September-October slot due to heat and domestic leagues would have something to say about moving it to winter. Equally, the Six Nations has been intransigent to moving dates in the past and World Rugby would struggle to countenance a tournament in which the hosts do not take part. At present the Gulf nations are nowhere near competitive enough.
All that said, against the backdrop outlined by Potts and Sweeney, the response to the Middle East question by World Rugby's chief executive, Alan Gilpin, makes all the more sense. 'Any region that wants to invest in the game, we're going to take those conversations seriously.'
Northampton's Henry Pollock has emerged as the popular candidate to fulfil the role of potential British & Irish Lions bolter – a concept that is anachronistic yet sums up why there is still so much to love about these quadrennial tours. The head coach, Andy Farrell, was not at Franklin's Gardens to watch his performance against Castres last Saturday, however. Instead, after taking in another Leinster demolition job on Friday night, he made his way to Galway for Connacht's Challenge Cup clash against Racing 92. Perhaps he was casting an eye over Bundee Aki, maybe having a look at Mack Hansen. The irresistible narrative is that he was running the rule over his son Owen, scoping out whether the 33-year-old is back to form after a lengthy injury layoff. Or maybe Andy Farrell was at Connacht simply as a father, enjoying the simple pleasure of watching his son in action. Either way, with only three more weekends of fixtures before Farrell names his squad, the intrigue is set to skyrocket.
England outlasted Ireland to stay on course for the grand slam in the Women's Six Nations, reports Sarah Rendell.
Northampton set up a Champions Cup rematch with Leinster after an emphatic win against Castre, writes Robert Kitson.
And Bath's quest for trophies stepped up with a dominant Challenge Cup victory against Gloucester. Daniel Gallan was watching.
England will host Scotland at Welford Road on Saturday in the Women's Six Nations – so let's take a trip back to 1999, when the two teams met in the Five Nations, at Richmond RFC. England won 34-7 on their way to the grand slam.
To subscribe to the Breakdown, just visit this page and follow the instructions.
And sign up for The Recap, the best of our sports writing from the past seven days, delivered to your inbox every Friday at noon BST.a
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Wiegman 'not for sale at any price', says FA chief
Wiegman 'not for sale at any price', says FA chief

BBC News

timea few seconds ago

  • BBC News

Wiegman 'not for sale at any price', says FA chief

England manager Sarina Wiegman is "not for sale at any price", says Football Association chief executive Mark is the only manager in the men's or women's game to have reached the final at all five major tournaments she has coached led the Netherlands to the Euro 2017 title and the World Cup final in 2019, before doing the same with England at Euro 2022, and the 2023 World 55-year-old is seeking to become the third manager to win three consecutive women's Euros titles after Germany duo Gero Bisanz (1989, 1991, 1995) and Tina Theune (1997, 2001, 2005)."I want to pay tribute to Sarina. I think her record individually is phenomenal," said Bullingham, speaking before Sunday's Euro 2025 final against Spain (17:00 BST)."When I spoke to [the media] before the tournament I said we were lucky to have her and I still feel that way. I think she has been incredible."Her record of managing in five tournaments and reaching five finals is phenomenal. I don't believe anyone has been anywhere near that in the past and it will be really hard to do that in the future. "She's a really special coach and we're delighted to have her with us."Asked if the FA are concerned that Wiegman might look elsewhere if she was to be successful again on Sunday, and if it would be hard to persuade her to stay, Bullingham said: "Not hard at all. We are committed to her until 2027 and she is committed to us. We have a new [coaching] team coming in for her. "We haven't quite started working on the plans for [the 2027 World Cup] but I know her focus, hopefully after success on Sunday, will shift quite quickly to that." 'We are lucky to have her' England fans have developed a new chant for Wiegman during Euro 2025, replacing the word 'tequila' with 'Sarina' in the song from a 1950s American rock and roll band called The have also been shirts made and banners produced with the words: 'In Sarina We Trust'.But there has also been criticism of Wiegman's starting XI in the defeat by France, her tactics in the tense, quarter-final win over Sweden and the general lateness of her substitutions. Are England fans taking her for granted?"That's hard for me to comment on. What I would say is we have a really special coach and we should all recognise that," said Bullingham."I do think her tournament record is incredible but I also see the work she has done with players - the relationships and connections she builds in camps. "She is just a cool head and the way she transmits that onto the pitch... She looks like the coolest person in the stadium."I have no doubts that helps in critical moments. I can only give my opinion, but she is a really special coach and we are lucky to have her."Bullingham says there are countries that have got world-class players in their squad who have not enjoyed as much success as Wiegman's teams because she is "special".Asked why she has been so successful, Bullingham added: "Often she's performed so well at the highest level, keeping that calm composure, keeping the connection with the players and managing the games really well."Every single member of staff coming into this camp felt valued by her, knew exactly what their role was and how they could be part of an overall team. "[She] really stressed that everyone was in it together. It is critical and I think she's really helped build a very, very strong culture." Why is Wiegman not on parity with Tuchel? Bullingham was asked why Wiegman's salary was not on parity with England men's boss Thomas Tuchel despite recent FA have not released details on Wiegman's salary but TNT Sports claims she is on an annual wage of £400,000, plus potential performance-related who was appointed England men's manager in January, is on a reported £5m annual salary as part of his 18-month contract. "I think she is obviously operating in a different market," Bullingham told BBC Sport."If you think about how we regard the importance of each role, we think they are equally important. The fact we have her locked down until 2027 is fantastic. "We're obviously happy with the job she's doing and I've always said she can do any job in world football but we're delighted she's with us and with the Lionesses."

How does scoring work in baseball?
How does scoring work in baseball?

BBC News

timea few seconds ago

  • BBC News

How does scoring work in baseball?

In baseball, the team who has scored the most runs in their nine innings of batting is the winner.A run is scored every time a player successfully runs through and touches all four bases without having their shot caught, being struck out, being tagged or the ball reaches the base before the batter running towards it example, should a player hit a home run and other players are waiting on a base when the home run is hit, the amount of runs scored off the shot is how many players were waiting on base plus the player who hit the home team batting first will bat until three of their batters have been dismissed. When this occurs, the second team will then bat until they lose three the team batting first is batting, it is known as the top of the innings. When the team batting second is batting, it is known as the bottom of the nine innings have been completed the match will end and the team with the most runs after nine innings is declared the the event of both teams being tied for runs after nine innings, extra innings are played to determine a article is the latest from BBC Sport's Ask Me Anything team. What is Ask Me Anything? Ask Me Anything is a service dedicated to answering your want to reward your time by telling you things you do not know and reminding you of things you team will find out everything you need to know and be able to call upon a network of contacts including our experts and will be answering your questions from the heart of the BBC Sport newsroom, and going behind the scenes at some of the world's biggest sporting coverage will span the BBC Sport website, app, social media and YouTube accounts, plus BBC TV and radio. More questions answered... What are the rules about bad light in Test cricket?Which Premier League players could feature at Afcon?When are the Women's Rugby World Cup squads announced?What is the format for F1 sprint races in 2025?

FA insist Lionesses boss Sarina Wiegman is not available for any price, as England mastermind gears up for yet another final
FA insist Lionesses boss Sarina Wiegman is not available for any price, as England mastermind gears up for yet another final

Daily Mail​

timea few seconds ago

  • Daily Mail​

FA insist Lionesses boss Sarina Wiegman is not available for any price, as England mastermind gears up for yet another final

FA chief executive Mark Bullingham declared that Lionesses manager Sarina Wiegman is not available to a rival nation at any price, should England retain their European title on Sunday and others call him to try and poach her. Asked at the England hotel on Thursday what his response would be to a rival CEO ringing up and asking 'how many millions have we got to pay for Sarina?', Bullingham replied: 'She's not for sale. Not at any price.' Bullingham's decision to declare before the European Championships that Wiegman would be retained as manager whatever the outcome came close to seeming an error of judgement, when Sweden took England to penalties and the relative minnows from Italy were 30 seconds away from beating them in Tuesday's semi-final. But a third successive final for England under Wiegman, whose FA salary is understood to be around £1.25million a year, has justified the chief executive's confidence. Bullingham fell short on Thursday of suggesting that Wiegman might come under consideration for the job of manager of the England men's team when Thomas Tuchel 's contract expires after next summer's World Cup. Wiegman's own deal runs to the end of the Women's World Cup in Brazil, the following summer. He said: 'My answer is the same now as it was in 2023. The starting point is it is almost disrespectful to assume the men's job is more senior to the women's. That is not the way we view it. I said two years ago Sarina could do any job in football, she is an amazing talent and we are delighted to have her running the women's team through to 2027.' Bullingham indicated that planning to replace Wiegman – if her contract was not extended – would begin in 2026. 'I'm pretty focused on Sunday,' he said, when asked when the recruitment process would start. 'But generally you're looking at ideally a tournament cycle out, if not a year out, that's when you'd know roughly whether the coach wants to carry on. 'But we haven't had any of those discussions yet. We haven't quite started working on the plans for [post] 2027. I know her focus, hopefully after success on Sunday, will shift quite quickly to 2027.' Social media platforms yet to apologise or trigger racial abuse investigation By Ian Herbert and Tara Anson-Walsh FA chief executive Bullingham also revealed on Thursday that social media platforms have made no contact with him to apologise or suggest they are investigating the racial abuse of England player Jess Carter. Bullingham said little has changed since Marcus Rashford, Jadon Sancho and Bukayo Saka faced despicable abuse after missing penalties at the men's Euros three years ago and indicated that he expects communications regulator Ofcom to use new legislation to take action against platforms. The FA would not reveal which platforms was use posted racial to England defender Carter, citing the confidentiality of their work with police. It is understood that there was more than one. But with the possibility of a black player like 19-year-old star striker Michelle Agyemang taking a spot kick in Sunday's final against Spain, Bullingham expressed his frustration with the lack of progress since Gareth Southgate's black players were abused at the 2021 Euros. He said: 'We haven't seen the progress we'd like to have seen. We did think things would improve [after 2021] and we lobbied very hard together with Kick it Out and other representatives in football to make sure the Online Harms Act came through. I think we would have liked it to have been stronger in some cases. 'I think now it's incumbent on Ofcom to make sure they really do bring those responsible for running social media platforms to account. I haven't seen huge progress in the last couple of years. We would like to see it now.' Bullingham said that the FA would be pursuing 'different tools' to reduce the abuse. One option would be to boycott platforms, like Twitter and Instagram, which allow the abuse to get through. But the Lionesses, who do not command huge salaries like the men, have found important commercial value in those platforms as promotional channels. Manager Sarina Wiegman has said she leaves it to players to decide how much they want to be on social media – and midfielder Keira Walsh has been off it for months. Wiegman said: 'We make principles of how to use social media when and I would never say you're not allowed to use social media because that's not how I work. We want to set standards, but I think coaching is about helping developments but also giving players responsibility – from being dependent to independent and let help players make their own decisions.' Despite claiming to have AI technology to prevent users posting racist messages to players, the platforms are allowing the material to get through. 'There has been a lot of focus on taking down content and I think they could be better at taking down content,' Bullingham said. 'But, more importantly, they could be much better at preventing it as well and then aiding prosecution when it happens. So they need to be better.' The problem is exacerbated by the fact that at least half of the abuse players are facing comes from outside the UK. Tackling overseas abuse entails involving governing bodies like UEFA and FIFA. Bullingham said the FA had been working with them.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store