
3,500-year-old grave reveals: change in Bronze Age history around 1500 BC in Central Europe
The multidisciplinary research, based on the Bronze Age cemetery excavated at Tiszafüred-Majoroshalom, which was used in both the Middle Bronze Age (Füzesabony culture) and the Late Bronze Age (Tumulus culture), allowed researchers to compare the subsistence strategies before and after the change of era.
The bioarchaeological investigation of the Bronze Age cemetery of Tiszafüred-Majoroshalom reveals new insights into an important period in Central European history.
Bronze Age life changed radically around 1500 BC in Central Europe. New research reveals that diets narrowed, millet was introduced, migration slowed, and social systems became looser, challenging old ideas about the nomadic Tumulus culture herders.
Scientists discover how bronze age people lived, ate, and moved around 1500 BC
According to Science Daily, an international research team—led by Tamás Hajdu, associate professor at the Department of Anthropology at ELTE, and Claudio Cavazzuti, senior assistant professor at the University of Bologna—has shown that around 1500 BC, radical changes occurred in people's lives: they ate and lived differently, and the social system was also reorganized.
The research, supported by the Hungarian National Research, Development and Innovation Office, examined whether the archaeologically observed settlement changes around 1500 BC indicated a lifestyle change—whether people began to follow a way of life based on animal husbandry and frequent migration instead of settled farming.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
180k traders turn to IC Markets for optimum CFD trading conditions
IC Markets
Sign Up
Undo
The team also sought to answer whether the spread of the Tumulus culture meant the arrival of new groups, or whether the local population continued their lives with only the material culture changing.
Outcomes of the archaeological results
Diet Changed:
Scientists studied ancient bones and found that during the Middle Bronze Age, people ate a wider variety of foods, and some had better access to meat and animal products than others. This showed a clear difference between rich and poor.
But in the Late Bronze Age, diets became more uniform but poorer. Most people ate similar things—mainly plant-based—and animal protein became less common in their meals.
Broomcorn Millet Was Introduced:
Researchers found evidence that broomcorn millet, a fast-growing, energy-rich grain, started being eaten around the start of the Late Bronze Age.
The cemetery at Tiszafüred shows the earliest known use of millet in Europe. This grain probably helped communities feed themselves more reliably, even if their diet became simpler.
Mobility Decreased:
People traveled and moved around less. By looking at the chemicals in people's teeth and bones, scientists discovered that fewer people moved into the area during the Late Bronze Age compared to earlier times.
In the Middle Bronze Age, some people living in Tiszafüred had come from nearby regions like the Upper Tisza area or the Carpathian Mountains.
But in the Late Bronze Age, most people were locals, and those who did move in likely came from farther away, such as Transdanubia or the Southern Carpathians.
Social Relations Changed:
Society became less structured. At the beginning of the Late Bronze Age, the long-used tell settlements were abandoned, and people lived in less centralized settlement networks.
This change created a looser, less organized social system, which is also reflected in dietary habits. According to microremains found in dental calculi and the aforementioned isotopic analyses, significantly less animal protein was consumed during this period than before. This contradicts the earlier idea that people belonging to the Tumulus culture were mainly engaged in animal husbandry
Also read | Rare birds return on restored wetland at Wicket Fen
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
CBSE class 10 science sample paper 2026: These 5 questions can be a game changer for students
CBSE class 10 science sample paper 2025 CBSE sample question paper 2026: With the CBSE Class 10 board exams around the corner, students often struggle to prioritise what to study in the vast Science syllabus. The 2025-26 sample paper released by CBSE offers valuable clues. Experts and teachers recommend focusing on high-yield, concept-driven questions that are likely to be repeated in similar formats. These questions not only test a student's understanding of fundamental principles but also integrate real-life applications, making them ideal for thorough revision. Students can access the official sample question paper released by CBSE by visiting the board's website, The same can also be downloaded by clicking on the link provided below. Direct link to download CBSE class 10 science sample question paper 2025 here . Important questions from CBSE class 10th science sample paper Based on the official sample paper, here are five such important questions, carefully selected from Biology, Chemistry and Physics, that every Class 10 student must master. These are not just likely to appear in exams, but also build a strong foundation for higher classes and competitive exams. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Up to 70% off | Libas Purple Days Sale Libas Undo Question: Puneet wanted to grow banana plants. (5 marks) Based on your knowledge on plant reproduction should he opt for seeds or any alternate method of reproduction. Justify your answer. Offsprings of a banana plant usually show very little variation. What causes variation and are variations good or bad? Justify. Question: A hydrocarbon with the formula CxHy undergoes complete combustion as shown in the following equation: 2CxHy + 9O2 → 6CO2 + 6H2O. (5 marks) What are the values of 'x' and 'y'? Give the chemical (IUPAC) name of the hydrocarbon. Draw its electron dot structure. Name the alcohol which on heating with conc. H2SO4 will produce the above hydrocarbon CxHy. Write a balanced chemical equation for the reaction of CxHy with hydrogen gas in presence of Nickel. Question: The arrangement of resistors shown in the figure below is connected to a battery.; The power dissipation in the 100 Ω resistor is 81 W. (5 marks) Calculate: the current in the circuit the reading in the voltmeter V2 the reading in the voltmeter V1 Question: In a genetic experiment, plants with pure round green seeds (RRyy) were crossed with plants with wrinkled yellow seeds (rrYY). (3 marks) Show the gametes formed when F1 was self-pollinated. A total of 144 seeds were produced which developed into saplings. Show the ratio in which these traits are independently inherited in these144 sapling. Question: Zarina worked as an apprentice in a factory where flashlights and solar cookers are made. She learnt to make the circuits, the design of the light-box and light concentrators of the solar cookers as well. She learnt the uses of lenses in making all those tools. Based on your understanding of lenses, answer the following questions. (4 marks) What kind of lenses are used in the flashlight and light concentrator of the solar-cooker? Give reasons for your choices in your answer for part A. Attempt either of the two subparts. An object is placed 40 cm away from a lens which is normally used in a solar-cooker. The image formed is twice the size of the object. Calculate the focal length of the lens. OR An object is placed 20 cm in front of a lens which is used in a flashlight, and the image is formed 10 cm away from the lens on the same side as the object. Calculate the focal length of the lens. TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us here . Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Why Elon Musk hates researchers and loves engineers — after he corrected xAI employee Aditya Gupta's hiring post
Elon Musk recently made waves by publicly correcting a hiring post from an xAI employee, Aditya Gupta, who initially sought to recruit both "researchers" and "engineers" for the artificial intelligence startup. Musk emphatically declared that the term "researcher" is outdated, pretentious, and fosters a problematic two-tier system within the engineering workforce. He insisted that at xAI—and also at SpaceX—everyone should simply be called "engineers." This shift reflects Musk's vision for a unified, accountable, and highly practical technical team, breaking away from traditional academic distinctions he views as unnecessary and even harmful to innovation and team cohesion. Elon Musk's perspective: Engineers over researchers Elon Musk has been vocal about his dislike for the title "researcher," which he frequently describes as a "relic of academia." In Musk's view, the label 'researcher' creates an artificial hierarchy within technical teams, suggesting that researchers are somehow distinct, or even less accountable, compared to engineers. He argues that this division weakens ownership, blurs responsibility, and fosters a separation that slows practical progress. Elon Musk reasons that in fast-paced technology companies like xAI and SpaceX , what matters most is the ability to build, iterate, and solve real-world problems—responsibilities encompassed by the role of an "engineer." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Learn More - How Donating Sperm May Boost Your Income SpellRock Undo By rejecting the researcher title, Musk aims to eliminate what he perceives as academic pretentiousness that can sometimes encourage theoretical work disconnected from product outcomes. He emphasizes that this distinction is not only outdated but counterproductive, introducing inefficiencies and hindering collaboration. As Musk noted, his insistence on the universal "engineer" title promotes a culture where every team member is equally accountable for delivering tangible, impactful results, fostering a meritocratic and results-driven environment. Practical engineering over theoretical research At xAI, Musk champions a workforce composed of builders and implementers rather than theorists. The company's mission to rapidly advance AI technologies, relying on cutting-edge methods like reinforcement learning and massive computing infrastructure, requires a practical, hands-on approach. Musk specifically points out that although SpaceX conducts groundbreaking technological research, it never labels any employees as 'researchers.' This reflects his belief that true innovation depends on rigorous engineering discipline, rapid prototyping, and direct problem-solving. This approach denotes a preference for those who can translate ideas into working systems efficiently, rather than spending extended time in exploratory research without definite product outcomes. In Musk's philosophy, eliminating the 'researcher' distinction accelerates the engineering feedback loop, promoting speed and accountability critical for breakthrough innovation. Impact on company culture and the AI industry Musk's correction of the xAI hiring post is more than a cosmetic change—it embodies his no-nonsense, high-accountability management style. By publicly enforcing uniform job titles, Musk sends a clear message that academic or theoretical fragmentation has no place in his companies. Experts interpret this move as symbolic of a broader Silicon Valley trend favoring flatter, integrated teams with streamlined roles to enhance agility and rapid product delivery. However, this shift has its critics. Some industry analysts warn that entirely removing the "researcher" role risks sidelining deep exploratory inquiry and ethical considerations essential in AI development—areas traditionally safeguarded by academic research freedoms. The balance between practical engineering and theoretical investigation remains a subject of debate. The ripple effects and future outlook Elon Musk's terminological shift is already influencing company cultures beyond xAI. SpaceX has long embraced this engineering-only framework, and other prominent AI companies like OpenAI and Anthropic are experimenting with novel job title structures to blur conventional boundaries between research and engineering roles. Musk's approach underscores his desire to build startups that push technological frontiers aggressively while maintaining crystal-clear lines of accountability and measurable output. Whether this 'engineer-only' model will foster faster innovation or create challenges in navigating the complex landscape of AI research remains to be seen. For now, Elon Musk has unequivocally communicated his stance: at xAI, there are no researchers—only engineers—united in building the future of artificial intelligence.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Americans eating ultra-processed foods like bread, soda, and noodles at higher risk of lung cancer, says new study
A large-scale US study has found that people who consume the highest amounts of ultra-processed foods (UPFs) are 41 per cent more likely to develop lung cancer than those who eat the least. This food category already makes up more than half of the average diet in the UK and the US. Published in the peer-reviewed journal Thorax , the study drew on data from the US Prostate , Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trials, which tracked 101,732 adults aged 55 to 74 over a decade. Also Read: Burger King menu change adds 4 cold foam coffees and 2 real juice sips; see flavors and calorie counts by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Learn More - How Donating Sperm May Support Your Income SpellRock Undo Researchers assessed their diets, categorizing foods from minimally processed to ultra-processed, and monitored cancer diagnoses until 2009 and deaths until 2018. Live Events UPFs, defined as industrially manufactured foods high in additives, preservatives, flavour enhancers, and low in nutritional value, include everyday items like sour cream, ice cream, instant noodles, breakfast cereals, soft drinks, frozen meals, and shop-bought pizzas. During the follow-up, 1,706 participants were diagnosed with lung cancer, 1,473 with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and 233 with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Even after accounting for known risk factors such as smoking and general diet quality, the risk of NSCLC was 37 per cent higher, and SCLC was 44 per cent higher among those who consumed the most UPFs. The researchers noted that while the study was observational and cannot prove causation, the findings contribute to a growing body of evidence. A 2024 BMJ meta-analysis had already linked UPFs to 32 adverse health outcomes, including heart disease, type 2 diabetes, poor mental health, and early mortality. Experts point to how UPFs alter the food matrix and may introduce harmful chemicals during processing or through packaging. Substances like acrolein, a toxic compound also found in cigarette smoke, can form in grilled sausages and caramelized products. While speaking to The Independent, Nutritionist Rob Hobson said the findings are a reminder of how the modern food environment prioritizes cheap, convenient, and aggressively marketed products. 'It's not about being perfect,' he added, 'but about making small shifts, cooking more from scratch, adding more whole foods, and becoming more aware of the UPFs in your diet.'