Kelantan spa owner burnt in acid attack, cops tracking third suspect and factory chemical source
Kelantan police chief Datuk Mohd Yusoff Mamat said the investigation is ongoing and authorities are confident the case will be resolved soon.
'We are looking into how the chemical was obtained, including whether it came from the rubber factory where both suspects worked,' he told Bernama today.
A man and a woman have been arrested and remanded until the end of the month. Police have not ruled out applying for an extension if the investigation is not completed by then.
Meanwhile, Bachok district police chief Supt Mohamad Ismail Jamaluddin said efforts are underway to locate a third suspect believed to have been involved in the attack.
'Based on closed-circuit television (CCTV) footage, the suspect is believed to still be in the state. He fled shortly after the other two were arrested,' he said.
The third suspect is believed to have close ties with the two detainees, aged 38 and 45, who were arrested at a rubber factory in Kuala Krai.
The attack took place on May 17, when a woman was splashed with a liquid, believed to be acid, by an unidentified assailant near a convenience store in Beris Kubur Besar, Tawang.
She sustained severe burns to her shoulders, back, arms and legs. The victim is currently in stable condition and receiving treatment at the Burn Treatment Unit of Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia in Kubang Kerian. — Bernama
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
9 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Management failures worsened January violence, says prison officer
A Taiping Prison officer told a Suhakam inquiry that the overall environment there was 'unfit for both staff and inmates'. (Facebook pic) KUALA LUMPUR : A Taiping prison officer has criticised the facility's management, saying poor leadership and the inexperience of junior officers contributed to the violent scenes during an inmate relocation exercise in January. Ahmad Rizal, a prison inspector, testifying at a Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (Suhakam) inquiry here today, said many younger officers were ill-equipped to handle high-risk situations and claimed the overall prison environment was 'unfit for both staff and inmates'. He said junior officers were 'not trained or ready' for high-tension operations such as the Jan 17 transfer of more than 100 inmates from Hall B to Hall E. 'I was shocked when I first arrived,' he said, describing the cells as dark and cramped, with barely a few feet of space in each room. Rizal urged Suhakam to recommend improvements to the living conditions at Taiping prison and to consider replacing officers whom he described as unfit to handle volatile situations. He said inmates at other prisons were less likely to lash out due to lower stress levels, citing a more humane environment. Rizal was referring to the root of the Jan 17 incident, where inmates resisted relocation to Hall E after complaining about the lack of proper toilets in the hall's cells. He also alleged that some staff were colluding with inmates to sell banned items. 'We can catch the inmates, but when it comes to officers, we don't have enough proof,' he said. Psychological toll and regrets When shown CCTV footage of the Jan 17 incident, Rizal admitted he lost control and said the experience took an emotional toll on him. 'I couldn't sleep for months. I cried as soon as I got home. I felt like I had failed my family. I was afraid I wouldn't be able to protect them,' he said. He added that he had been undergoing psychiatric treatment since March and is on medication for depression and insomnia. He said his symptoms began in 2023 but worsened during his time at the Taiping prison. He said he had repeatedly asked for a transfer away from high-risk duties, but that his requests were denied. Rizal made these remarks at the Suhakam inquiry into the alleged abuse of more than 100 inmates by around 60 wardens during the Jan 17 relocation. The commission is investigating claims of brutality that allegedly led to the death of one inmate and injuries to several others.
Free Malaysia Today
9 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Only ‘minimal force' used, says Taiping prison officer
Suhakam is holding a public inquiry into the alleged abuse of more than 100 inmates by about 60 wardens at Taiping prison on Jan 17. KUALA LUMPUR : A Taiping prison officer testifying in the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia's (Suhakam) inquiry into alleged rights abuse, described 'minimal force' as an action that does not lead to death. Hairie Jumri, who was shown CCTV footage of him repeatedly hitting inmates in an incident on Jan 17, claimed that he was emotionally unstable at the time, but insisted his actions fell within what he considered 'minimal force'. He said the action he and his fellow officers took had been triggered by the inmates who hurled profanities at them and threatened to harm their families. Questioned on whether repeated blows could still be considered minimal force, Hairie said the term was 'subjective'. Suhakam inquiry officer Simon Karunagaram asked the prisons enforcement assistant to define minimal force. Simon: Could you define what is 'minimal force'? Hairie: Not dead. Simon: Let's say I punch your eyes and they swell, your vision becomes blurry three days later, would that be minimal force? Hairie: Yes. Simon: In an image (from the CCTV footage), there was an inmate with blood on his head. Would you say that it was due to minimal action? Hairie: Maybe. Maybe he hit a pole. Maybe it was blood from someone else who knocked his head against a pole. Hairie also disagreed that excessive force had been inflicted on one of the inmates who died during the incident. Asked by Suhakam chairman Hishamudin Yunus why he kicked an inmate who already appeared weak, Hairie admitted that he was not in the right state of mind at the time. Hishamudin: Let's say you were stable and 'sane', you wouldn't do that? Hairie: Yes. Hishamudin: So your action was an action of someone who's not sane? Hairie: Yes. The inquiry into the alleged abuse of more than 100 inmates by about 60 wardens in the Jan 17 incident is scheduled to resume on Aug 6.
Free Malaysia Today
a day ago
- Free Malaysia Today
No prospecting licence issued to Farhash-linked firm, says Sabah land dept
Sabah lands and surveys department director Bernard Liew said allegations claiming that Bumi Suria Sdn Bhd had been awarded a mineral prospecting licence in Sabah are baseless. PETALING JAYA : The Sabah lands and surveys department maintains that no mineral prospecting licence had been issued to Bumi Suria Sdn Bhd, the company linked to businessman Farhash Wafa Salvador Rizal Mubarak. The department's director, Bernard Liew, said no prospecting licence was awarded to the company under the Sabah Mining Ordinance 1960 and that allegations claiming otherwise were baseless. He added that the department was the authoritative body governing mining in the Bornean state. 'Any mineral exploration activity in Sabah can only be conducted after obtaining a legitimate licence issued under Sections 6 and 8 of the Sabah Mining Ordinance. 'And this is subject to technical conditions and other relevant laws that are already in place. The department views seriously any statement made via the media that can mislead the public,' he said in a statement. MalaysiaNow previously reported that Sabah Mineral Management Sdn Bhd (SMM) had awarded Bumi Suria an exploration licence for coal mining. The report said it had been granted exclusive rights to explore and search for minerals on 70,000ha of forest reserve in Kalabakan and Gunung Rara near the Kalimantan border. In a statement to FMT, SMM CEO Natasha Sim said the state government agency was not a licence-awarding body, nor did it have jurisdiction to award or issue licences. On Monday, Farhash said his lawyers had served MalaysiaNow with a cease and desist letter, saying allegations that he owned Bumi Suria and that the company had been awarded a mineral prospecting or exploration licence in Sabah were false and defamatory. The lawyers said Farhash was merely a director and shareholder of Bumi Suria, and demanded that the article be removed from the website and all social media channels.
