Chris Brown pleads not guilty to alleged bottle attack at London nightclub
The 36-year-old singer is accused of assaulting the music producer Abraham Diaw at the Tape nightclub in Mayfair in February 2023 in an incident that has been described as "unprovoked" by prosecutors.
Brown also faces charges of assault occasioning actual bodily harm and having an offensive weapon in the form of a tequila bottle relating to the same incident and both charges were added to his indictment ahead of Friday morning's (20.06.25) hearing at Southwark Crown Court - which came just hours after he had performed at Cardiff's Principality Stadium as part of his Breezy Bowl XX World Tour.
The Beautiful People hitmaker will return to court on July 11 to enter pleas to those charges before facing trial on October 26, 2026.
Brown confirmed his name and date of birth at the hearing before entering his plea, stating: "Not guilty ma'am."
The music star's co-defendant Omololu Akinlolu - an American national who performs under the name HoodyBaby - also entered a not guilty plea to the charge of grievous bodily harm.
Brown was arrested in Manchester last month after his arrival in the UK to prepare for a series of European dates on his world tour .
The R+B star was held in custody for nearly a week before he was released after agreeing to pay a £5 million security fee to the court.
The security fee is a financial guarantee to ensure he returns to court and Brown could be asked to forfeit the money should he breach his bail conditions.
Judge Tony Baumgartner confirmed that the singer would be allowed to continue his world tour and the UK leg started last weekend.
During his gig in Manchester last Sunday (15.06.25), Brown thanked fans "for coming and supporting me".
The Go Crazy singer quipped: "And thank you to the jail. It was really nice."
Brown's tour - which marks the 20th anniversary of his eponymous debut album - continues with two gigs at the Tottenham Hotspur Stadium in London this weekend and his next court hearing will take place once the European dates are complete.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
I lived my dream on US talk shows – the axing of Colbert's Late Show is about one thing
When I first got to Hollywood in 2011, I had a movie-like experience. I was picked up from the airport by my friend in a red '70s convertible and driven straight to a stand-up comedy night where I performed a set that landed me a job writing for The Tonight Show with Jay Leno. Having just come from the Melbourne open-mic comedy scene, it seemed surreal that I could all of a sudden land a job on the longest-running late-night talk show in the history of television. If I had stayed in Australia, the best I could hope for would be a gig on brekkie radio – no offence to Kyle and Jackie O. Such is the allure of showbiz in the US. You can turn up and become a star, or you can be caught cheating on your wife at a Coldplay concert. Anything can happen. But over 15 years of working in American television, I've discovered how those showbiz dreams are underpinned by an old boys' club – men (mostly) in suits who all went to the same college, competing for status and bonuses big enough to buy yachts. These business execs aren't patrons of the arts. They're not champions of political causes. They're businesspeople who could just as well be in construction or tech or, if they're really daring, health insurance. This underbelly has now come to the surface with Stephen Colbert's announcement that The Late Show has been cancelled by CBS. The decision came days after Colbert criticised the network for settling a $US16 million lawsuit with President Donald Trump, calling it a 'big fat bribe'. It's speculated that such dissent from Colbert had to be stifled by CBS, to help them secure federal approval of their planned $US8 billion merger with Skydance Media. The network denies this, stating the cancellation of The Late Show was 'purely a financial decision against a challenging backdrop in late night' – an explanation that would be far more plausible if Colbert wasn't winning the ratings in his time slot and hosting the only late-night talk show in recent years to grow viewers. For the writers, the performers and the audiences of late night, these shows are a sacred emblem of the first amendment. This is where Johnny Carson cracked wise about Nixon during the Watergate scandal; where Leno ripped into Bill Clinton for his affair; where David Letterman had a regular segment mocking George W. Bush for being downright dumb. All of these presidents copped it on the chin because any indication they wanted the mockery stifled would be an affront to the Constitution. That doesn't seem to be the case with the current administration, which has a glass jaw when it comes to criticism. Colbert himself put it best: 'Donald Trump has the thinnest skin in politics. If you just whisper 'Obama' near him, he bruises like a peach in a wind tunnel.' Loading I can only speculate with the rest of the internet about why this cancellation of a popular, prominent Trump critic happened at this time. But I do have experience rubbing shoulders with the decision-makers at these networks. I've sat in the guest lounge at The Tonight Show (where I would pray my jokes would get big laughs) while network execs stood around talking about golf instead of even watching the show they commissioned. They always seemed to be in their own world, competing over their hobbies, their private jets, their business deals, or the calibre of celebrities they secured for projects. Unlike the writers of these shows, they never spoke about politics. They didn't seem to care if jokes were left- or right-leaning. They just wanted good ratings to further their own careers.
The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
I lived my dream on US talk shows – the axing of Colbert's Late Show is about one thing
When I first got to Hollywood in 2011, I had a movie-like experience. I was picked up from the airport by my friend in a red '70s convertible and driven straight to a stand-up comedy night where I performed a set that landed me a job writing for The Tonight Show with Jay Leno. Having just come from the Melbourne open-mic comedy scene, it seemed surreal that I could all of a sudden land a job on the longest-running late-night talk show in the history of television. If I had stayed in Australia, the best I could hope for would be a gig on brekkie radio – no offence to Kyle and Jackie O. Such is the allure of showbiz in the US. You can turn up and become a star, or you can be caught cheating on your wife at a Coldplay concert. Anything can happen. But over 15 years of working in American television, I've discovered how those showbiz dreams are underpinned by an old boys' club – men (mostly) in suits who all went to the same college, competing for status and bonuses big enough to buy yachts. These business execs aren't patrons of the arts. They're not champions of political causes. They're businesspeople who could just as well be in construction or tech or, if they're really daring, health insurance. This underbelly has now come to the surface with Stephen Colbert's announcement that The Late Show has been cancelled by CBS. The decision came days after Colbert criticised the network for settling a $US16 million lawsuit with President Donald Trump, calling it a 'big fat bribe'. It's speculated that such dissent from Colbert had to be stifled by CBS, to help them secure federal approval of their planned $US8 billion merger with Skydance Media. The network denies this, stating the cancellation of The Late Show was 'purely a financial decision against a challenging backdrop in late night' – an explanation that would be far more plausible if Colbert wasn't winning the ratings in his time slot and hosting the only late-night talk show in recent years to grow viewers. For the writers, the performers and the audiences of late night, these shows are a sacred emblem of the first amendment. This is where Johnny Carson cracked wise about Nixon during the Watergate scandal; where Leno ripped into Bill Clinton for his affair; where David Letterman had a regular segment mocking George W. Bush for being downright dumb. All of these presidents copped it on the chin because any indication they wanted the mockery stifled would be an affront to the Constitution. That doesn't seem to be the case with the current administration, which has a glass jaw when it comes to criticism. Colbert himself put it best: 'Donald Trump has the thinnest skin in politics. If you just whisper 'Obama' near him, he bruises like a peach in a wind tunnel.' Loading I can only speculate with the rest of the internet about why this cancellation of a popular, prominent Trump critic happened at this time. But I do have experience rubbing shoulders with the decision-makers at these networks. I've sat in the guest lounge at The Tonight Show (where I would pray my jokes would get big laughs) while network execs stood around talking about golf instead of even watching the show they commissioned. They always seemed to be in their own world, competing over their hobbies, their private jets, their business deals, or the calibre of celebrities they secured for projects. Unlike the writers of these shows, they never spoke about politics. They didn't seem to care if jokes were left- or right-leaning. They just wanted good ratings to further their own careers.
Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
Comedian lampoons Zohran Mamdani winning over the Jewish vote in NYC
Sky News host Rita Panahi reacts to a video by comedian Ami Kozak, commenting on Zohran Mamdani's success in winning over the Jewish New Yorker vote. 'How did this anti-American, anti-Israeli, economically illiterate, hard left socialist win the support of so many Jews?' Ms Panahi said. 'Well, comic Ami Kozak has the answer.'
