Scientist says Big Bang theory is wrong... as they reveal how universe REALLY began
One scientist suggests that the cosmos grew through numerous rapid-fire bursts rather than a single, massive explosion.
This alternative explanation, published by professor Richard Lieu of The University of Alabama in Huntsville, challenges one of the most foundational, long-standing theories in all of cosmology.
Lieu argues that each of these bursts, known as 'temporal singularities,' blasted new matter and energy out into space, which become planets, stars, galaxies, and everything in-between.
The Big Bang theory, by comparison, proposes that the universe began as an infinitely small, hot point of densely packed matter and energy.
That point then exploded into a flood of matter and energy that rapidly expanding, and is still expanding today, though the cause of the initial explosion remains unknown.
This has been the prevailing explanation for the origin of the universe since the 1960s. But despite its prominence, this theory is challenged by new investigations into concepts like dark matter and dark energy, which invisible particles scientists believe fill the universe.
The Big Bang model cannot work without the presence of these elusive particles. But so far, scientists have not been able to prove that they exist.
Lieu believes his theory overcomes this limitation, offering a new framework for the birth of the universe that does not require dark matter or dark energy.
The temporal singularities proposed in his new paper, published in the journal Classical and Quantum Gravity, aren't confined to a single explosive beginning (like the Big Bang).
Rather, they have continued sending bursts of energy and matter out into the cosmos throughout history.
Their collective impact has pushed the universe to expand and flooded it with the materials that make up all the cosmic structures we see today.
These random bursts happen rarely and quickly, dissipating before they can be detected by current technologies like telescopes, according to Lieu.
This theory could explain the structure of the universe we see today, and why it's expanding rapidly, without the need for dark matter or dark energy.
According to the Big Bang theory, dark matter is the invisible scaffolding that holds all the structures of the cosmos in place, while dark energy is the undetectable force that is pushing the universe to expand faster and faster.
Unless we assume that these mysterious substances exist, this theory begins to fall apart.
Without dark matter, the early universe wouldn't have had enough gravitational pull for galaxies and galaxy clusters to form so soon after the Big Bang, as modern observations suggest they did.
Dark energy is needed to explain why observations show the universe's expansion rate is increasing, with scientists theorizing that it acts as a repulsive force pushing the cosmos to stretch out faster and faster.
To sum up, assuming these pulling and pushing forces exist is essential to making the Big Bang theory match what we actually see in the universe.
Lieu has attempted to rework the model of the universe so that it aligns with the known laws of physics and the observable universe without relying on forces we have not been able to directly prove.
But while his temporal singularities offer an intriguing alternative, this theory comes with its own limitations.
For one, these fleeting bursts are, by definition, unobservable. Much like dark matter and dark energy, there's no direct evidence to support their existence.
What's more, there is far more indirect evidence to support dark matter and dark energy than temporal singularities.
Lieu's theory also fails to explain what causes temporal singularities, and it still needs to be validated with experimental evidence.
To accomplish the latter, he plans to use ground-based telescopes to look for 'jumps' in redshift, a phenomenon where light from a distant object shifts toward the red end of the visible light spectrum as it moves further away.
Astronomers use redshift to calculate the expansion rate of the universe, and 'jumps' in redshift could support Lieu's claim that brief bursts of energy are driving the universe's expansion.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
6 days ago
- The Independent
New evidence suggests we're living inside a giant void
Cosmologists have discovered new evidence from the early universe that suggests we are living in a giant void. After studying sound waves from the initial moments of the universe – essentially the sound of the Big Bang – researchers from the University of Portsmouth and the University of St Andrews found that the Earth and the Milky Way are likely situated within a low density cosmic void. The findings could explain one of the most puzzling and enduring problems in cosmology, known as 'Hubble tension'. This problem arises from the speed at which the universe is expanding, which varies depending on which technique is used to measure it. 'A potential solution to this inconsistency is that our galaxy is close to the centre of a large, local void,' said Dr Indranil Banik from the University of Portsmouth. 'It would cause matter to be pulled by gravity towards the higher density exterior of the void, leading to the void becoming emptier with time. As the void is emptying out, the velocity of objects away from us would be larger than if the void were not there. This, therefore, gives the appearance of a faster local expansion rate." This cosmic void has a density roughly 20 per cent lower than the universe's average matter density, explaining why our galaxy is expanding faster than the rest of the cosmos. The scientists studied measurements of sound waves from the early universe, known as Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAOs), collected over the last 20 years to reach their conclusion. 'Our results suggest that a universe with a local void is about 100 million times more likely than a cosmos without one,' said Dr Banik. 'This means the likelihood of a universe without a void fitting these data is equivalent to a fair coin landing heads 13 times in a row.' The findings were published in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, in a study titled 'Testing the local void hypothesis using baryon acoustic oscillation measurements over the last 20 years'.
Daily Mirror
08-07-2025
- Daily Mirror
'Death date' of the universe unveiled as scientists say clock ticking for Earth
Physicists from Cornell University and Shanghai Jiao Tong University have detailed how the universe will come to an end and how it will be like a 'reverse Big Bang' A 'death date' for the universe has been revealed as a new study has claimed that the universe will begin to shrink seven billion years from now. Scientists have stated that the clock is ticking for planet Earth after it reached its peak size, and things will start to contract until 'everything collapses back into a single point'. The theory has just been published by physicists from Cornell University and Shanghai Jiao Tong University. The catastrophic event has been dubbed the Big Crunch - and likened to a reverse Big Bang. They studied data from various astronomical surveys including the Dark Energy Survey and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument. But it seems the universe will take quite some time to shrink. The so called Big Crunch will take place in approximately 34 billion years, so there's plenty of time to get your affairs in order. But anyone still around by that point faces a tricky time - the universe will expand like a "rubber band", they outline, causing everything to "snap back together". According to other research, there could be nobody left to experience it. Earth will be "engulfed by our dying sun" in approximately seven billion years. But Sir Isaac Newton predicted we've got not much time left at all - he said the world will end in 2060 in a chilling letter scrawled above a maths calculation more than 300 years ago. The renowned scientist, who discovered gravity and invented calculus, wrote about a second coming of Christ in just over four decades time - marking an end to life as we know it in 2060. Newton wrote this ominous warning on a letter slip in 1704. Born in 1643, Newton was considered an insightful theologian who had a life-long interest in the existence of God and religion. He based a lot of his religious writings on his readings of the Bible and believed in biblical visions of the Apocalypse — especially the Battle of Armageddon. Writing under the alias 'Jehovah Sanctus Unus' predicted the world would "reset" at 2060 at which point the Earth will once again become 'the Kingdom of God', the Daily Mail reports. Newton wrote: "So then the time times & half a time are 42 months or 1260 days or three years & an half, recconing twelve months to a yeare & 30 days to a month as was done in the Calendar of the primitive year. "And the days of short lived Beasts being put for the years of lived kingdoms, the period of 1260 days, if dated from the complete conquest of the three kings A.C. 800, will end A.C. 2060. It may end later, but I see no reason for its ending sooner." In another prediction referencing the date 2060, Newton stated: "This I mention not to assert when the time of the end shall be, but to put a stop to the rash conjectures of fanciful men who are frequently predicting the time of the end, [and] by doing so bring the sacred prophecies into discredit as often as their predictions fail. Christ comes as a thief in the night, [and] it is not for us to know the times [and] seasons [which] God hath put into his own breast."
Metro
08-07-2025
- Metro
Scientists now believe Earth is sunken near the centre of a giant cosmic void
Ever felt like you're living in the centre of a desolate wilderness, with everything speeding away from you…? You could be right! Cosmologically speaking, that is. Scientists think they have found evidence that the Milky Way, our galactic neighbourbood, is in a part of the universe which is uncommonly empty. They say we might be in a big void called an 'underdensity', where there are some other galaxies, but less than you'd find elsewhere. Imagine the difference between living in a detached flat on a hillside in rural Scotland, and renting a flat in central London. The idea that the universe is not evenly spread out could explain why it seems like galaxies are speeding away from each other at a faster speed nearby than what we would expect from observiing the early universe. This is a puzzle that has been perplexing astrophysicists, and is known as the Hubble Tension. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video New research presented to the Royal Astromonical Society's National Astronomy Meeting suggested the 'void' as a potential explanation. Dr Indranil Banik, of the University of Portsmouth, said data comes from measuring baryon acoustic oscillations (AKA, the 'sound of the Big Bang'). If you don't know what baryon acoustic oscillations are, fair enough. They are like frozen ripples in the distribution of matter, created by sound waves moving through a hot plasma of particles at the very beginning of time. Dr Banik said: 'They act as a standard ruler, whose angular size we can use to chart the cosmic expansion history.' For decades, scientists have been pondering whether we could live in a big empty area of the universe. But the idea is controversial because it challenges what we think we know about space, which suggests matter should be more evenly spread out. If we really are floating in the middle of a bubble of nothingness, it is thought to be around 20% less dense than the universe as a whole, and a billion light years in radius. Explaining why a void might distort our idea of how quicky the universe is speeding away, Dr Banik said: 'It would cause matter to be pulled by gravity towards the higher density exterior of the void, leading to the void becoming emptier with time.' Matter being pulled away to the edge would move faster than if it were not in a void, but we wouldn't realise. Scientists have various ways to measure age in cosmic terms, including 'redshift' which measure how much light has stretched (as it stretches, it shifts towards the red end of the spectrum). Dr Banik said the gravitational effect of a void would be expected to increase the redshift, and distort its relation with the BAO angular scale (the 'cosmic ruler'). More Trending He said that by considering all the available measurements of these ancient ripples over the last 20 years, 'we showed that a void model is about one hundred million times more likely than a void-free model' when looking at parameters fitting oberservations taken by the Planck satellite. Researchers will now compare their model with other ways of estimating the universe's expansion. This is still just a theory, and one problem with it could be that the Hubble Tension has not only been observed on a local level, and so could suggest a more fundamental misunderstanding. But if the theory is right, the eventual heat death of all existence could be further away than we thought. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: These 6 traits make you cool — but one mistake cancels them all out MORE: This week's low-hanging Buck Moon will show a strange illusion on the horizon MORE: Here's how to see the Delta Aquariid meteor shower just around the corner
