Hong Kong's last active pro-democracy group to disband amid security crackdown
HONG KONG: Hong Kong's League of Social Democrats said on Sunday that it would disband amid "immense political pressure" from a five year-long national security crackdown, leaving the China-ruled city with no formal pro-democracy opposition presence.
The LSD becomes the third major opposition party to shutter in Hong Kong in the past two years.
Co-founded in 2006 by former lawmaker Leung Kwok-hung as a radical wing of the pro-democracy camp, the LSD is the last group in Hong Kong to stage small protests this year.
Mass public gatherings and marches spearheaded by political and civil society groups had been common in Hong Kong until 2020, but the threat of prosecution has largely shut down organised protests since.
China imposed a national security law on the former British colony in 2020, punishing offences like subversion with possible life imprisonment following mass pro-democracy protests in 2019.
A second set of laws, known as Article 23, was passed in 2024 by the city's pro-Beijing legislature covering crimes such as sedition and treason.
Current chair Chan Po-ying said the group had been "left with no choice" and after considering the safety of party members had decided to shutdown. Chan declined to specify what pressures they had faced.
"We have endured hardships of internal disputes and the near total imprisonment of our leadership while witnessing the erosion of civil society, the fading of grassroots voices, the omnipresence of red lines and the draconian suppression of dissent," Chan told reporters, while flanked by six other core members including Tsang Kin-shing, Dickson Chau, Raphael Wong, Figo Chan and Jimmy Sham.
In February, the Democratic Party, the city's largest and most popular opposition party, announced it would disband. Several senior members told Reuters they had been warned by Beijing that a failure to do so would mean serious consequences including possible arrests.
Earlier this month, China's top official on Hong Kong affairs, Xia Baolong, stressed national security work must continue as hostile forces were still interfering in the city.
"We must clearly see that the anti-China and Hong Kong chaos elements are still ruthless and are renewing various forms of soft resistance," Xia said in a speech in Hong Kong.
The League of Social Democrats is one of Hong Kong's smaller pro-democracy groups known for its more aggressive tactics and street protests in its advocacy of universal suffrage and grassroots causes including a universal pension scheme. In a 2016 incident, Leung threw a round object at former Hong Kong leader Leung Chun-ying inside the legislature.
Three LSD members were fined on June 12 by a magistrate for setting up a street booth where a blank black cloth was displayed and money was collected in public without official permission. Chan told reporters that the party had no assets to divest and no funds left after several of its bank accounts were shut down in 2023.
While never as popular as the more moderate Democratic Party and Civic Party, it gained three seats in a 2008 legislative election - its best showing.
The LSD's founder Leung, 69, was arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit subversion in 2021 in the landmark '47 Democrats' case. He is currently serving a sentence of six years and nine months in prison. Another member, Jimmy Sham, was also jailed in the same case and released in May.
The security laws have been criticised as a tool of repression by the U.S. and Britain, but China says they have restored stability with 332 people so far arrested under these laws.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Express
an hour ago
- Daily Express
RM100,000 allocation for 367 top SPM students in Kota Kinabalu: Chan
Published on: Tuesday, July 01, 2025 Published on: Tue, Jul 01, 2025 Text Size: Chan (sixth from left) praised Mohammad Arif (fifth from left) and Soh Yim Qin (fourth from right) for their excellent SPM results, calling them a source of pride for Chinese independent schools in Kota Kinabalu. Kota Kinabalu: Kota Kinabalu MP Datuk Chan Foong Hing allocated over RM100,000, this year, to reward 367 high-achieving students who excelled in the 2024 Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia (SPM) examination. This marks the second consecutive year the Kota Kinabalu Parliamentary Office has hosted the 'Anugerah Kecemerlangan SPM Madani' awards ceremony, which celebrates academic excellence and encourages students to continue striving for success. Chan, who is also Deputy Minister of Plantation and Commodities, reaffirmed that quality education is a right for every student, regardless of race, religion or socioeconomic status. He underscored the Madani Government's commitment to ensuring equal access to education that can truly change lives and uplift communities. 'As Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim has emphasised, quality education is the foundation of a Madani society. We must cultivate a generation that is not only knowledgeable but also morally grounded, in order to build an inclusive and competitive nation,' he said. 'As a member of the Madani administration, I fully support the Prime Minister's vision. We are committed to ensuring that no student is left behind – whether they come from B40 families, rural areas, or face physical and mental challenges.' The event was held at SJKC Chung Hwa Likas, last Saturday. Students who achieved between 6As and 11As received cash awards of RM250 to RM300 each. Among the recipients, 113 students scored 9As or above. Special awards were also presented for Best Male Student, Best Female Student, and Best Performing School. Notably, both the top male and female students were from Tshung Tsin Secondary School: Soh Yim Qin scored 10A+, while Mohammad Arif Mohammad Adam achieved 9A+ and 1A. Chan also welcomed the Madani Government's policy guaranteeing placement in the matriculation programme for all students who scored 10As and above in the 2024 SPM examination and applied for admission – regardless of race or background. He noted that this policy, introduced last year, reflects the government's commitment to fairness and equal opportunity in education. He added that the Kota Kinabalu Parliamentary Office will continue to work closely with the Sabah Education Department (PPD) and local schools to improve education infrastructure, provide support for at-risk students, and encourage greater involvement from the community and private sector in shaping the future of education. Last year, Chan allocated RM55,000 to reward 205 students in Kota Kinabalu who achieved excellent results in the 2023 SPM examination.
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Academic freedom under siege
HUMANS are an incredible species, having achieved extraordinary feats, especially in the past century. We reached space just six decades after the first powered flight. Today's smartphone has thousands of times more computational power than the machine that sent a man to the moon. With techniques dating back to the 10th century, we eventually eradicated smallpox. Measles vaccination accounts for 60% of lives saved and over the past 50 years, vaccines for 14 diseases have cut infant deaths by 40% globally and over 50% in Africa. To this day, vaccination remains the only effective treatment for rabies, which has a 100% fatality rate in the unvaccinated. This progress stems from scientific and technological advancement, made possible by nations setting aside differences to pursue knowledge together. Yet, the very system behind these breakthroughs – academic freedom backed by sustained funding – is now under siege. From US funding cuts to structural constraints in Malaysia, science faces mounting political and institutional pressures. Under President Donald Trump, research funding was slashed at will – putting the global scientific community at risk and reversing years of progress. The Harvard Gazette (2025) interviewed researchers affected by the funding freeze. Some warned their work would vanish entirely without continued support, including studies on tuberculosis immunity and gut neuron ageing, with implications for neurological diseases. This affects not only research progress but also the people involved, especially emerging talents. Although the cuts mainly affect US-based universities, the impact is global. US institutions anchor countless international research efforts, especially in climate science, global health and advanced technologies. Curtailing their work may delay progress and fragment the global knowledge ecosystem. These cuts, including the US$400 million (RM1.69 billion) withdrawn from Columbia University, aim to punish institutions for their diversity, equity and inclusion programmes and positions on Palestine, where ceasefire calls are framed as support for terrorism and labelled as anti-Semitic. This politically charged culture war, driven by conservatives hostile to science that challenges their worldview, is undermining research that could benefit humanity. And when academic freedom erodes, society will pay the price. Instead of fostering an inclusive, knowledge-based future, the Trump administration is pulling funding from research on climate change, equitable society and women in society. This ideological censorship threatens entire fields, with women's health being just one stark example of the consequences. Because women were long excluded from clinical trials, critical conditions such as heart attacks are often presented differently and go unrecognised, even by trained doctors. Pregnant women remain excluded from many studies today, leaving gaps in treatment safety and efficacy. Without inclusive, well-funded and politically independent research, these blind spots will persist, with serious consequences for public health. Can the global research community fill the vacuum left by what was once the world's leading funder? The challenge highlights just how deeply global science has relied on US institutions and why countries like Malaysia must now accelerate efforts to build their own research capabilities: financially, structurally and in terms of talent. This includes tackling brain drain. As highlighted by Emir Research, misalignment between higher education, industry demand and research incentives have driven skilled Malaysians abroad, weakening our innovation ecosystem just as global research and development (R&D) leadership shifts. Emir Research has previously noted that shifting global push-and-pull dynamics are prompting Chinese nationals to return home. While US hostility towards certain sciences has played a role, equally important are China's rising R&D investments and reforms aimed at attracting and retaining talent. While the US rolls back funding for climate and green energy research, China is accelerating – most notably with the world's first operational thorium-based nuclear reactor, offering more abundant fuel and lower proliferation risks. Despite concerns over human rights and transparency, China's sustained R&D drive stands in stark contrast to recent US trends. Meanwhile, the European Union has allocated €500 million to draw global scientific talent – signalling a broader recalibration of research leadership. In this fluid and opportune moment, Malaysia must not be left behind. This recalibration is about more than funding or geography; it is about values, structures and priorities. To stay competitive, we must urgently recalibrate our ecosystem. This demands stronger government commitment and a serious rethink of how academic institutions are governed and how academic freedom is upheld. Yet, it is never simple. According to Da (2022), 'academic freedom' is among the most misunderstood concepts in academia. And in Malaysia, it has clearly been curtailed. On the surface, Malaysian public universities have gained more autonomy compared to before, with our top university – Universiti Malaya – aiming to further reduce government reliance and become fully independent in governance, admissions, finance and academics. While this addresses part of the equation, academic freedom involves far more. Da systematically identified three key impediments to academic freedom: the Statutory Bodies (Discipline and Surcharge) Act (Act 605), weak institutional autonomy and external interference. UM's efforts focus on institutional autonomy, which is commendable but not enough. The government must do more to ensure academic staff have the support and freedom needed to achieve meaningful outcomes. Instead of restricting discourse through cautious regulation or indirect pressure, the government and universities should foster open and critical engagement. This will uphold academic freedom and nurture the analytical mindset essential for innovation and nation-building. The best way to cultivate future research talents is to let students question, think and discuss – not reduce them to passive memorisation in lecture halls. However, academic freedom alone is not enough. Without a system that turns investment into real-world results, research risks becoming a numbers game. This is why Emir Research has long advocated institutionalising the input-output-outcome-impact framework across Malaysia's R&D and policy ecosystem to ensure funding and talent lead to measurable innovation and societal impact. Research strategy must go beyond volume metrics and track commercialisation, policy relevance and public value. In October 2025, the Science, Technology and Innovation Ministry projected Malaysia's gross domestic expenditure on R&D to reach 2.5% in 2025 and 3.5% by 2030. Yet, Govindaraju et al (2020) found that while additional funding boosts publications and patents, overall efficiency remains weak due to poor innovation and value creation. Non-research universities often chase revenue, whereas research universities focus on low-hanging fruits to justify funding and meet performance metrics. This may help explain why Malaysia ranks among the top countries for academic paper retractions, suggesting that institutional pressure to publish – regardless of quality – could be distorting academic priorities. Academic integrity aside, these inefficiencies raise a fundamental issue: if Malaysia aims to join the ranks of innovation-driven nations, our research must serve society, not just institutional metrics. Crucially, a world-class research system cannot stand on a weak educational base. As stressed by Emir Research, any serious innovation agenda requires overhauling how we teach, assess and prepare future researchers. The system must equip students with not just technical skills but also critical thinking, multilingual fluency and interdisciplinary agility – the foundations of innovation in the 21st century. We cannot repeat the mistakes that triggered this global shift – cuts to funding, attacks on scientific integrity and the erosion of academic freedom. Nor can we continue business as usual amid shifting global dynamics. To thrive in this new landscape, Malaysia must recalibrate urgently and deliberately. We need a research system grounded in freedom, impact and structural integrity. This is not just a scientific imperative; it is a national one.
Malaysiakini
2 hours ago
- Malaysiakini
Rule of law and the struggle for judicial independence
'The rule of law means literally what it says: the rule of the law. Taken in its broadest sense, this means that people should obey the law and be ruled by it. 'But in political and legal theory, it has come to be read in a narrow sense that the government shall be ruled by the law and be subject to it. The ideal of the rule of law in this sense is often expressed by the phrase 'government by law and not by men'. 'Let me mention the independence of the judiciary very briefly, lest we forget its significance. The existence of courts and judges in every ordered society proves nothing: it is their quality, their independence, and their powers which matter… 'The rules concerning the independence of the judiciary are designed to guarantee that they will be free from extraneous pressures and independent of all authority save that of the law. They are, therefore, essential for the preservation of the rule of law.' - Sultan Azlan Shah, 1984. COMMENT | In August 1957, the Federation of Malaya became an independent nation, comprising 11 states. Its foundational document was a written Constitution, meticulously drafted by the Reid Commission and agreed upon by the British government, the nine hereditary rulers, and leaders representing the major ethnic groups in the country.
