logo
Motorola Razr (2025) vs Razr Ultra (2025): one is a pretty cover, the other is the whole package

Motorola Razr (2025) vs Razr Ultra (2025): one is a pretty cover, the other is the whole package

Phone Arena06-06-2025
But here's the real question: if you're looking at Motorola's foldable lineup, is the Ultra worth the Ultra price tagover the standard Razr? Or is the regular Razr good enough?
Let's dive in — spec sheets are fine, but how these phones feel, look, and perform in the hand matters more.
$200 off (13%) The Motorola Razr Ultra is here, and the official store has a splendid deal to help you celebrate it! For a limited time, you can buy the 1TB variant at the price of the 512GB model, which saves you $200. Select colors are available right now. Buy at Motorola
The Motorola Razr+ (2025) has finally been announced. You can buy the high-end flip phone with a Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chip at the Motorola Store. You can trade in an eligible device to score some savings. Buy at Motorola Don't want to pay top dollar for your next flip phone? Consider the Motorola Razr (2025), now available for purchase. The handset features a MediaTek Dimensity 7400X chip and sports AI features. Buy at Motorola
Motorola Razr 2025 vs Razr Ultra 2025 differences explained:
Table of Contents:
Design and Display
Performance and Software
Camera
Battery
Audio
Specs
Conclusion
Both Razrs follow the same DNA and come in as elegant lifestyle accessories first. This is due to Motorola always picking fresh colors in partnership with color expert Pantone. But it's not just the hues — Razr and Edge phones come with different stylish finishes on the back, not just the boring old glass. First, Motorola started dressing its phones in vegan leather. Now, the Ultra models also get wood or velvet covers, which is pretty neat!
But even if you go for the base Razr 2025, you will still get a faux leather-covered shell, or stylish latex wrapping. Depending on which color you choose, it'll have different patterns over it.
The Razr (2025) comes in:
Pantone Gibraltar Sea (dark blue)
Pantone Spring Bud (green)
Pantone Lightest Sky (cream)
Pantone Parfait Pink (pink)
The Razr Ultra is available in the following colors:
Pantone Scarab (black, with a leather/velvet back)
Pantone Rio Red
Pantone Mountain Trail (wooden back)
Pantone Cabaret Both phones feel pretty nice to handle and open / close. Motorola has been working on that hinge for a while now and it incorporates titanium elements that will hopefully make it last longer. It certainly feels sturdy and both phones open and close with pleasing snaps, and are able to hold the screen open at multiple angles.
You'd expect some trade-offs between models, but this these are quite close. The Razr Ultra has a 7.0-inch internal display with 165 Hz refresh rate, while the regular Razr "settles" for a 6.9-inch panel at 120 Hz. OLED panels, of course, with a few different color profiles to pick from — from natural and grounded, to punchy, vibrant and saturated.
Brightness? The Ultra edges ahead slightly with 2,400-ish nits at 20% APL vs the Razr's ~2,100. A 20% APL test measures a more "realistic" scenario for smartphone usage and those numbers here mean that these look excellent outdoors. Too bright to be outshone! But, if peak brightness is what interests you — the Razr 2025 specs say 3,000 nits peak, the Razr Ultra 2025 goes up to 4,500! (Peak brightness only measures a small portion of the screen for limited time)
A minimum of 2 nits is not an excellent bedside reader, and 2.4 is slightly worse. These won't be poking your eyes out per se, but you will probably avoid using them when the lights are off.
Then there's the cover screen. The Ultra's 4-inch external display is a whole productivity panel compared to the 3.6-inch one on the regular Razr. It looks better, too, with the entire upper shell of the Ultra housing a screen, instead of having a thick-ish bezel. Still, both are usable in the typical Motorola style — there are useful widgets to be found here, but you can launch full apps if you so desire. Android will re-scale them to fit (most of the time).
The fingerprint scanners on both phones are located in the power button — they work lightning fast on both, even if it's not the most optimal positioning.
Here's where things get spicy. The Razr Ultra is powered by the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Elite, backed by a hefty 16 GB of RAM and 512 GB storage out of the box.
The regular Razr? Well, it cuts some corners and ends up with the far less powerful MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, 8 GB RAM, and 256 GB storage.
Daily use? Both are OK, though if you engage with the AI more often, the Snapdragon definitely feels faster — of course. Once you start gaming, video editing, or multitasking like a maniac, the Ultra's extra horsepower becomes very real. The Motorola Razr 2025 is only here as your daily communicator, not the pocket computer experience.
And yeah, if you ever doubted it, the CPU benchmarks show that the Razr Ultra is up to 3 times faster — barely any surprise there. While the regular Razr's score looks quite bad in comparison, we do emphasize that it runs daily tasks just fine.
In the graphics department, the Ultra is three to five times better — depending on whether it's throttling or not. Considering it's a clamshell smartphone, we do find its thermals to be doing a pretty decent job at keeping it productive!
Motorola gave both Razrs a 50 MP main camera, but the Ultra doubles down with a 50 MP ultrawide, while the regular Razr gets… a 13 MP secondary sensor. It's also worth noting that these 50 MP main cameras are not the same — the Ultra's sensor is bigger than the one in the vanilla Razr, and you will spot that in the samples below.
On the front, the Razr Ultra triples down with yet another 50 MP camera, while the Razr (2025) has the still respectable 32 MP resolution for selfies. All that's left is to see how they do!
As can be seen from our camera score, that main camera makes quite the difference. Despite both being 50 MP, the base Razr fell short with more oversharpening and artifacts. Both ultra-wide cameras scored about the same, despite their vast differences in hardware. And both phones don't do well with zooming, though with different issues. Let's look at the samples:
Both cameras deal well with wide dynamics, but the Ultra does allow itself to amp up highlights just a bit more. Color reproduction from both is pretty down to earth and pleasant, with just a tinge of saturation to make that photo shareable on social media. However, when it comes to detail, the Ultra definitely takes it — fine details are visible, but soft and natural. Whereas the 50 MP snapper of the Razr (2025) presents a lot of oversharpening, even in the perfect lit conditions.
These phones don't have dedicated zoom cameras, so any magnification they give you is a digital crop-in. The Razr Ultra tops out at 30x, but you won't be using it — it's pretty degraded at that point. The Razr (2025) maxes out at 10x, and it's very fuzzy there, too. At 2x (the samples above), they are both quite usable. Though, the base Razr's tendency to oversharpen is amplified, while the Ultra photo still looks good.
Here's a comparison at 10x: As mentioned at the start of the camera section, their zooms are bad for different reasons. The base Razr has a lot of noise. The Razr Ultra photo looks "cleaner" at first glance because it applies a ton of noise reduction. As a result, the image becomes washed-out, painting-like. We won't be knocking these a lot — they are not zoom camera phones and not marketed as such.
The ultra-wide camera of the Ultra presents a bit more neon-y colors in the skies but definitely has a much better dynamic range and slightly better details. The ultra-wide of the Razr (2025) has more natural colors, but is darker, crushes shadows, and it shows a lot more HDR bloom than the one on the Razr Ultra does.
The selfie camera of the Razr (2025) is a bit too warm, a bit too red, and a bit too soft. Not bad in general, but when compared side-by-side, the Razr Ultra selfie looks more realistic and sharper.
The video quality of the Razr Ultra is hands-down just better. Colors are more realistic, details are slightly sharper, the stabilization is more... stable, and the microphone does a better job at noise reduction. The Razr (2025) video, in comparison, looks murky, the grass is a bit too saturated, the sky is a weird dark hue, and its microphone is noisier. It's still usable, but loses in this side-by-side.
The Motorola Razr Ultra has a slightly bigger body, which allows it to fit a slightly bigger battery — 4,700 mAh. That's not a huge difference from the 4,500 mAh cell of the base Razr (2025), however there's another factor to consider — the processors. The Snapdragon 8 Elite is built on a 3 nm process, which is more energy-efficient than the 4 nm process of the MediaTek Dimensity 7400X. But then again, the Dimensity should require less power, since it's not as big of a monster. So, we went into our tests with curiosity:
With a massive 24 hour endurance in our browsing test, the Razr Ultra shows that it can comfortably be a 2-day phone with casual use. Curiously, it fell behind in the video streaming test, where it should've scored another easy win. But then, at the gaming test, it lasted 3 hours longer than the base Razr, showing that even though that Snapdragon is a fire breather, the Ultra still makes good use of the energy it has on hand.
The Razr Ultra is also a bit faster to charge — 30 minutes on a 68 W charger got us up to 80%! The Razr (2025) supports 30 W charging and only got up to 60% in the same time frame. Still respectable and can get you out of a pickle if you forgot to charge.
The speakers of the Razr (2025) noticeably lack depth and bass, and they have a pronounced mid hump. So, videos with speech will come through, but you won't enjoy the soundtracks. Its vibration is not a click, but a tight buzz — still pretty satisfying, just noticebly different from flagships.
The Ultra, on the other hand, has surprisingly boomy speakers which put a smile on our face. Not to the level of an iPhone Pro Max or Galaxy Ultra, but definitely more usable. The haptic motor here is a click — quick, pronounced, and satisfying.
But if you want the best flip phone Motorola has ever made — no compromises, no 'if onlys' — the Razr Ultra (2025) is worth the splurge. Bigger, faster, sharper, bolder.
You get what you pay for — and in this case, what you pay for a pretty good camera, better speakers, a prettier external display, more premium finishes, and very fast performance.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

It's going to be even harder for DISH to give any real competition to AT&T, T-Mobile, and Verizon now
It's going to be even harder for DISH to give any real competition to AT&T, T-Mobile, and Verizon now

Phone Arena

timean hour ago

  • Phone Arena

It's going to be even harder for DISH to give any real competition to AT&T, T-Mobile, and Verizon now

EchoStar-owned DISH has long stopped being a threat to the Big Three — AT&T, T-Mobile, and Verizon, and the sale of UScellular will make it even more irrelevant. The Department of Justice (DoJ) aimed for DISH to become the fourth-largest carrier following Sprint's purchase by T-Mobile , but when it greenlit the acquisition of UScellular by T-Mobile recently, it noted that the transaction would make it even harder for a fourth national player to emerge. When the DoJ announced that it wouldn't stop T-Mobile from acquiring most of the wireless business of UScellular and some of its infrastructure, it also mentioned concerns about the effects of the deal on competition and further consolidation of spectrum in the hands of the Big Three. Despite the many concerns it had, the DoJ still gave the transaction a go-ahead because it realized that UScellular wouldn't be able to survive without help from T-Mobile . The deal has also been greenlit by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), which is hardly surprising, given T-Mobile abandoned its diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs to get it FCC wasn't expected to share the DoJ's concern, according to New Street Research policy analyst Blair Levin, as reported by Light Reading . After all, FCC Chairman Brendan Carr has not expressed any concern about spectrum aggregation during his tenure as FCC is investigating whether EchoStar, which owns DISH, is meeting its federal obligation by building out a 5G network using the spectrum it owns. If the company is found deficient in its commitment, it might be asked to sell its spectrum to the Big Three. —Blair Levin, New Street Research policy analyst, July 2025 US cable operators, which are shaping up to be a threat to the nation's largest wireless carriers, are unlikely to bid for EchoStar's spectrum, leaving the DoJ no choice but to auction it off to the Big Street Research analyst Jonathan Chaplin believes that cable companies, and not DISH, should be viewed as the country's fourth mobile operator. Though EchoStar once had a shot at becoming the fourth carrier, it no longer seems possible. —Jonathan Chaplin, New Street Research analyst, July 2025 Cable companies like Charter's Spectrum Mobile and Comcast's Xfinity Mobile are outperforming DISH's Boost Mobile and are something of disruptors. They use their Wi-Fi networks and CBRS-based networks to not rely too much on AT&T , T-Mobile , and Verizon , on whom they depend nonetheless to provide service through Mobile Virtual Network Operator (MVNO) agreements. That's because they don't have network infrastructure of their own. This allows them to keep costs in check. Cable operators provide mobile service to consumers at half the price of Verizon . At the same time, carriers now offer broadband service for less than what cable charges. EchoStar's chances of survival might start looking up if it signed an MVNO agreement with cable. EchoStar has in the past expressed willingness to do so, but it's not known if any concrete steps were taken to make this said, since EchoStar is in the process of building out its network, this might be difficult to pull off, unless it signs roaming agreements with AT&T and T-Mobile , which they might not agree to. As things stand now, T-Mobile , which is already the largest US wireless carrier, is on its way to becoming even more powerful. This is only going to embolden it to take more unpopular decisions. On the other hand, T-Mobile has the best network in the US and leads in most service metrics, and the purchase of UScellular will allow it to bring better service to consumers in rural areas. Maybe it really is the survival of the fittest. Switch to a 2-month Total 5G or 5G+ plan with Total Wireless and score this foldable deal. We may earn a commission if you make a purchase Check Out The Offer

Honor X70 vs. excavator and fire hose
Honor X70 vs. excavator and fire hose

GSM Arena

timean hour ago

  • GSM Arena

Honor X70 vs. excavator and fire hose

Honor is unveiling the X70 on July 15, and the brand has ramped up its teaser campaign for the phone now that it's mere hours away from becoming official. Have you ever wondered who'd win a confrontation between a yet-unannounced smartphone and a Sany SY205C-S excavator? Well, the video below will give you the answer. Spoiler alert: the phone is affixed to one of the excavator's bucket's teeth, and then the excavator does some good 'ol excavating, with the phone over there. At the end, after being exposed to a whole lot of dirt, it survives unscathed, as you'd expect. In the second part of the video, the phone is hit by the excavator's bucket, which makes it fly in the air for a while until it falls to the ground. Naturally, it's fine. And finally (and most insanely), it's 'pressed' by the excavator's bucket, once again making it through with no issues. Next up, a fire hose. This one's more straightforward - the fire hose shoots water directly at the phone, and it's fine thanks to its IP69 and IP69K water resistance ratings, even though other items aren't. The Honor X70 will have a record-breaking (for a mainstream smartphone) 8,300 mAh battery but will somehow still be less than 8mm thick and weigh less than 200g. It's going to boast a 6.79-inch 1200x2640 OLED screen, the Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 SoC at the helm, 12GB of RAM, 256GB of storage, and MagicOS 9 out of the box.

Leaked orange iPhone 17 Pro color feels like a breath of fresh air in new image
Leaked orange iPhone 17 Pro color feels like a breath of fresh air in new image

Phone Arena

time2 hours ago

  • Phone Arena

Leaked orange iPhone 17 Pro color feels like a breath of fresh air in new image

This year's iPhone 17 Pro series is likely introducing a vibrant new color option: orange. An insider has just shared a photo of the camera rings of the Pro models, and the orange ring feels like a much-needed breath of fresh context, the rings will continue to be colored the same as the chassis that they're stuck on, so this is a pretty accurate representation of what the new color will look like. Camera rings for the iPhone 17 Pro. | Image credit — Sonny Dickson In my opinion, the orange pops and stands out from the rest of the color options. According to similar previous reports, iPhone 17 Pro colors include the following: Black Gray Silver Dark blue Orange I'm glad that Apple seems to be taking a few more risks with the iPhone 17 Pro and the iPhone 17 Pro Max. There was also supposedly a light blue color option as well, which has reportedly been scrapped and given to the iPhone 17 Air instead. A light blue iPhone 17 Air will, in my opinion, heavily resemble a Pixel 8 Pro with the 'Bay' color option. Ultramarine on the base iPhone 16 was another stunning new addition. | Video credit — Apple According to other reports, the base model iPhone 17 will be seeing a fun new color as well: a long-awaited purple iPhone 17 option. In addition to the aforementioned light blue shade, the iPhone 17 Air will also have green and purple color options if the images of the rings are accurate. Desert Titanium on the iPhone 16 Pro was a very unique look in my eyes, and the orange for the iPhone 17 Pro will sort of continue that trend, albeit being a lot bolder. Of course, color options are hardly the biggest change for the new Pro lineup. The new models will see a revamped rear camera island, and the Air will be replacing the Plus model. Samsung is also offering something similar for the Galaxy S25 and S25 Plus: the online exclusive Coral Red color. However, it'll have to step up its game for the Galaxy S26 Ultra to compete with the orange iPhone 17 Pro. Secure your connection now at a bargain price! We may earn a commission if you make a purchase This offer is not available in your area.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store