Social Security's go-broke date pushed up in new report
The report projected that the program's Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) fund would be able to cover '100 percent of total scheduled benefits until 2033,' while the Disability Insurance (DI) trust fund is estimated to be able to pay '100 percent of total scheduled benefits through at least 2099.'
But when the projections are combined, the resulting fund is estimated to only be able to cover '100 percent of total scheduled benefits until 2034, one year earlier than reported last year.' Once the reserves are depleted, the report estimates the total fund income would be able to pay 81 percent of scheduled benefits.
The report said the depletion dates for the funds had advanced by about three-quarters compared with the previous year's projections.
The report cited last year's passage of the Social Security Fairness Act as a key factor behind the shift in the funds' projected depletion dates.
The bipartisan bill, which former President Biden signed into law in January, repealed two tax rules that proponents say have unfairly reduced benefits for many Americans who also receive government pensions.
But many experts sounded the alarm over its expected price tag and raised questions of fairness around the legislation.
The new report said on Wednesday that the repeal of the tax rules 'increased projected Social Security benefit levels for some workers, relative to projected benefit levels in last year's report,' while singling out the legislation's impact as 'the primary contributor to the change' in the combined trust fund depletion date this year.
Two other factors the board pointed to were the trustees' extension of the 'assumed period of recovery from historically low levels of fertility by 10 years' and its lowering of 'the assumed long-term share of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) that accrues to workers in the form of labor compensation.'
Medicare's hospital insurance trust fund is running out of money, and is scheduled to be depleted in 2033, three years earlier than reported last year, according to the program's trustees.
The Hospital Insurance (HI) Trust Fund will be able to pay 100 percent of total scheduled benefits until 2033. At that point, it will only be sufficient to pay 89 percent of total scheduled benefits.
The change is due to higher-than-expected spending on hospice and inpatient care in the earlier years of the projection, the report said.
Medicare trustees have sounded the alarm on the Hospital Trust Fund for years, though the warnings have mostly been ignored by Congress, as lawmakers view Medicare reforms as a political third rail.
The trustees recommended Congress increase the standard payroll tax rate or reduce Medicare spending to address future shortfalls.
Nathaniel Weixel contributed.
Updated at 5:07 p.m. EDT
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
16 minutes ago
- New York Post
House Republicans to question ex-Biden chief of staff about alleged mental decline cover-up after stunning revelation
WASHINGTON — The House Oversight Committee will bring in four more ex-White House aides for questioning about the alleged cover-up of former President Joe Biden's mental decline — including the 46th president's last chief of staff, Jeff Zients, who was recently revealed to have approved last-minute pardons. Zients, former White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, former deputy press secretary Andrew Bates and former White House Counsel's Office senior adviser Ian Sams have all been asked to sit for transcribed interviews, according to a committee aide. Last-day clemencies, which included preemptive pardons for Biden family members, had been authorized by Zients in a Jan. 19, 2025, email, hours before the 46th president would leave the White House. Advertisement 3 Jeff Zients is among those that will be questioned about the alleged cover-up of former President Joe Biden's mental decline, AP 'I approve the use of the autopen for the execution of all of the following pardons,' Zients wrote in the missive at 10:31 p.m. that day, according to The New York Times. Biden maintained in an interview with the outlet that he 'made every decision' on 25 warrants for pardons and commutations between last December and January. Advertisement So far, the Oversight panel has interviewed five Biden aides — two of whom took the Fifth Amendment and declined to answer any questions about the purported shielding of the president's diminished mental faculties. 3 Oversight Chairman James Comer said that the probe is uncovering 'a historic scandal.' AP 3 Biden maintained that he 'made every decision' on 25 warrants for pardons and commutations between last December and January. AP Oversight Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) has declared the probe is uncovering 'a historic scandal' and railed against the decision by Biden's former personal physician Kevin O'Connor and first lady Jill Biden's top aide Anthony Bernal to invoke their right against self-incrimination.
The Hill
16 minutes ago
- The Hill
Team Congress gets rain-shortened win in Congressional Women's Softball Game
Team Congress didn't let a 4th-inning rain cancellation dampen their excitement about a 5-3 lead over the Bad News Babes in Wednesday night's Congressional Women's Softball Game. 'We are so excited and, you know, we obviously would have loved to continue playing and beat the press by even more,' Rep. Hillary Scholten (D-Mich.). 'I think it's pretty clear we would have continued the pounding this year.' Mica Soellner, congressional reporter for Punchbowl News, lamented a missed opportunity for the media team. 'You know it's disappointing with the weather, but overall, it was a pretty good game,' she said. 'We definitely could have made a comeback.' The 17th annual Congressional Women's Softball Game pits members of Congress against D.C. journalists to raise funds for the Young Survival Coalition (YSC). The YSC is dedicated to helping young women affected by breast cancer by providing resources and support. Diedra Burns, a breast cancer survivor who is now in remission, was represented on the field by Rep. Julie Johnson (D-Texas). 'Wow, it means a lot because I went through my journey last year, diagnosis, chemo, radiation,' she said. 'This has been a great week.' The game raised over $650,000 for the coalition. Since 2009, the event has raised over $4.3 million for the YSC. 'It really is an opportunity for us to highlight the Young Survival Coalition,' said Rep. Stephanie Bice (R-Okla.), 'I have a friend who experienced the very thing, and so, for me, it's a bit personal. It's a fun night.' At the beginning of the game, the organizers paid tribute to late Rep. Mia Love (R-Utah), the first Black Republican woman elected to Congress, who passed away from brain cancer in March. Her son and daughter received the Hall of Fame award on her behalf as a former member of Team Congress. The lawmakers faced off against their media foes for the first time at Audi Field, a significant upgrade from elementary schools where it was hosted years prior. 'It's so exciting that we're at Audi Field this year,' said Bridget Bowman, political reporter at NBC. 'I've seen the game grow a lot since I first started playing almost ten years ago.' The enthusiastic crowd was clearly skewed towards Congress, who had not claimed victory since 2022. At first, it was a tight game. In the second inning, the score was 2-1 for Team Congress. Then, Rep. Sharice Davids (D-Kan.) drove in two runs to bring the score 4-1. By the end of the third inning, Team Congress had widened their lead to 5-1. The Bad News Babes struck back with two runs in the fourth inning. But Rep. Lisa McClain (R-Mich.) put a stop to their surge with spectacular defense and the game was cancelled before the media members could do any more damage. This year, the game featured 24 congresswomen from both sides of the aisle and 14 different media outlets represented on the field. 'Playing against the members is a great experience because we're often talking to them about serious, heavy, complicated things,' said Jen Bendery, senior politics reporter for HuffPost. 'This is a nice way to hit pause for a moment and come out here and actually talk to each other like normal people.' 'This is the best day of the year for Capitol Hill,' said the Bad News Babes coach, Abby Livingston, reporter for Puck News. 'I always bet on the Bad News Babes.' Speaking before the game, Rep. Maxime Dexter (D-Ore.) correctly predicted the outcome. 'I think we're going to win and we're going to win with style,' she said. Team Congress had seven rookies this year and a new pitcher, Rep. Kathy Castor (D-Fla.), who won the team's MVP award for its 2025 outing. The media babes gave its award to Katie Lobosco, reporter for Tax Notes. The Rookie of the Year award was presented to Rep. Julie Fedorchak (R-N.D.), while the most improved player went to Cicely Wedgeworth, editor at the New York Times. Finally, the most spirit award was given to CNN's Briana Keilar, pitcher for the Bad News Babes and Rep. Hillary Scholten (D-Mich.). Other members of Congress were there to support their colleagues, including Speaker Emeritus Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and minority leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.). The Congressional Women's Softball Game began in 2009, when Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.) announced her fight against breast cancer. Starting the second year, the lawmakers asked members of the D.C. press corps to take them on, starting a tradition 17 years and counting. 'I feel like we all had really good energy out there. This is a time in history where I'll take all the good vibes I can get and getting good vibes while we're raising money for a good cause and winning, can't beat it!' said Davis, the Kansas Democrat.
The Hill
16 minutes ago
- The Hill
America's public data needs rescuing from Trump
America's public data is part of our country's critical infrastructure, every bit as important as our highways, bridges, railways, and dams. Roughly 300,000 public federal datasets, including GPS, weather, Census, and economic data, are an essential resource for policymakers, companies, state and local governments, and ordinary Americans. Now the Trump administration is disrupting our data infrastructure in unprecedented ways. Data experts across the country are alarmed by these changes, but they're also seeing the opportunity for positive change. The months ahead will determine whether we end up with an unreliable, inaccurate and deeply flawed data ecosystem, or a new infrastructure that is better and stronger than what we had before. The administration began making changes to America's data systems within a month of the inauguration. It began by deleting government websites and datasets, which an ad hoc army of 'data rescuers' scrambled to save. In the last five months, the changes to data infrastructure have gone deeper. The administration has cut staffing and funding for data-providing agencies, altered or dropped specific surveys and data collections, disbanded advisory committees for the Census Bureau and other agencies that collect data, laid the groundwork for major changes to long-established data programs and removed data relating to sexual orientation and gender identity. On July 3, The Lancet published research finding that 114 of 232 federal public health datasets studied, or 49 percent, 'were substantially altered,' primarily in how they referred to gender and sex. My nonprofit organization has just published a white paper on the current challenges and opportunities for America's data infrastructure. Drawing on more than 200 sources and numerous discussions with data experts, we found a growing movement to reinvent America's data infrastructure, not just preserve it. Advocates are simultaneously trying to rescue datasets and data programs while also envisioning something greater: a national data ecosystem that is more accessible, accurate, complete and secure. Here are some of the best emerging opportunities to shape America's data future. Working with Congress. The Foundations for Evidence-Based Policymaking Act (the Evidence Act), which President Trump signed into law in 2019, embodied a strong bipartisan commitment to public data for public use. In May, Rep. William Timmons (R-S.C.) introduced a bipartisan resolution to convene a new Commission on Evidence-Based Policymaking like the one that shaped the Evidence Act. There is an opportunity to build on the Evidence Act by strengthening the processes required to alter major data collections, writing more precise specifications for the most high-value data programs, creating clear guidelines for making government data AI-ready and more. Reinventing federal data governance. The president's budget for 2026 recommends consolidating three statistical agencies: Census, the Bureau of Economic Analysis, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Many statisticians support this proposal and see it as an opportunity to make further, long-needed changes. The American Statistical Association has launched a project on Modernizing the Federal Statistical System with recommendations to come by the end of the year. Other expert groups could explore additional opportunities for structural reform. Working with the states. States already collect data for national statistics on health, education and more, but variations in methods and data quality can make that data hard to use. Ongoing efforts to standardize state data could make it more reliable and leave the country less dependent on federal data collections. Forming new collaborations. People and organizations that care about America's data are working together in new ways. For example, the Population Reference Bureau has launched a Federal Data Forum to promote information sharing and collaboration. Several foundation collaboratives are supporting projects to improve national data sources, both across the board and in sectors including science and health. We have launched a U.S. Data Action Hub, with about 70 resources so far, to track the growing number of organizations and initiatives working to protect America's data. Reinventing data advocacy. Advocates are realizing that they have to make a stronger case for public support to preserve, fund and improve vital data sources. America's Essential Data is compiling examples of data used by police officers, students, ranchers and business owners, among others. The Census Project has stepped up its advocacy for the American Community Survey, an indispensable resource for businesses and entrepreneurs as well as state, local and tribal governments. Other groups are advocating for funding to support labor statistics and health statistics. Efforts like these are creating new coalitions that can protect our current data infrastructure, push for future improvements and provide evidence for lawsuits to protect essential data, like the recently successful lawsuits brought by physicians and organic farmers. Developing new data sources. Data scientists are exploring alternatives to the federal data that's now at risk. They're looking for new ways to analyze national and state administrative data, which tracks government transactions and records, to gain new insights into the population. Crowdsourcing and citizen science projects can engage the public in creating new data sources. And AI has opened new opportunities to create structured, usable data based on internet searches, mobile applications and social media. America's data systems are facing a crisis, but like any crisis, this one can open up new possibilities. Federal data serves a huge constituency that ultimately includes every American. By thinking creatively and working together, we can preserve the country's most important data resources, improve what needs to be made better and ultimately create the robust, reliable data ecosystem America deserves.
