Afghanistan: UN Experts Welcome Arrest Warrants For Senior Taliban Leaders
'These arrest warrants mark a critical step forward for justice for the people of Afghanistan, especially women and girls, who, for nearly four years, have borne the brunt of the Taliban's institutionalised system of gender discrimination, oppression, domination, and persecution,' the experts said.
'It sends an important message that impunity will not last forever. To the victims and survivors, this action is a powerful affirmation that the international community sees, hears, and believes them. Their brave calls for action are at last being answered.'
The experts reminded States Parties to the Rome Statute of their obligation to help bring the wanted men to justice, and called for increased political, diplomatic, and financial support for the Court and its ongoing investigations.
'The ICC is a key pillar in a broader system of accountability and plays a crucial role in ensuring accountability for the most serious international crimes,' they said. 'We call on all States and in particular ICC Member States, to safeguard and support the Court and its independence and meet their obligations under the Rome Statute.'
The experts called for strengthened and sustained support for other, complementary initiatives to ensure accountability for gross human rights violations and international crimes in the country, as well as greater support for the people of Afghanistan. They particularly stressed the importance of a principled and coordinated strategy rooted in human rights.
'These arrest warrants must also send a clear message to Member States that there should be no normalisation of a regime which so explicitly denies the fundamental rights and dignity of more than half of the country's population,' the experts said. 'To those who seek to lend legitimacy to the Taliban we make it clear: you stand on the wrong side of history.'
*The experts:
Richard Bennett, Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Afghanistan;
Margaret Satterthwaite, Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers;
Laura Nyirinkindi (Chair), Claudia Flores (Vice-Chair), Dorothy Estrada Tanck, Ivana Krstić, and Haina Lu, Working group on discrimination against women and girls;
Nahla Haidar, Chair of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women;
Graeme Reid, Independent Expert on protection against violence and discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity;
Reem Alsalem, Special Rapporteur on violence against women and girls, its causes and consequences;
Bernard Duhaime, Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth, justice, reparation and guarantees of non-recurrence
Special Rapporteurs/Independent Experts/Working Groups are independent human rights experts appointed by the United Nations Human Rights Council. Together, these experts are referred to as the Special Procedures of the Human Rights Council. Special Procedures experts work on a voluntary basis; they are not UN staff and do not receive a salary for their work. While the UN Human Rights office acts as the secretariat for Special Procedures, the experts serve in their individual capacity and are independent fromany government or organization, including OHCHR and the UN. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the UN or OHCHR.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
a day ago
- Scoop
Afghanistan: UN Experts Welcome Arrest Warrants For Senior Taliban Leaders
GENEVA (11 July 2025) – Human rights experts* today welcomed the announcement by the Pre-Trial Chamber of the International Criminal Court (ICC) to issue arrest warrants against two senior Taliban leaders - Haibatullah Akhundzada and Abdul Hakim Haqqani - due to their alleged responsibility for the crime against humanity of persecution on gender and political grounds. 'These arrest warrants mark a critical step forward for justice for the people of Afghanistan, especially women and girls, who, for nearly four years, have borne the brunt of the Taliban's institutionalised system of gender discrimination, oppression, domination, and persecution,' the experts said. 'It sends an important message that impunity will not last forever. To the victims and survivors, this action is a powerful affirmation that the international community sees, hears, and believes them. Their brave calls for action are at last being answered.' The experts reminded States Parties to the Rome Statute of their obligation to help bring the wanted men to justice, and called for increased political, diplomatic, and financial support for the Court and its ongoing investigations. 'The ICC is a key pillar in a broader system of accountability and plays a crucial role in ensuring accountability for the most serious international crimes,' they said. 'We call on all States and in particular ICC Member States, to safeguard and support the Court and its independence and meet their obligations under the Rome Statute.' The experts called for strengthened and sustained support for other, complementary initiatives to ensure accountability for gross human rights violations and international crimes in the country, as well as greater support for the people of Afghanistan. They particularly stressed the importance of a principled and coordinated strategy rooted in human rights. 'These arrest warrants must also send a clear message to Member States that there should be no normalisation of a regime which so explicitly denies the fundamental rights and dignity of more than half of the country's population,' the experts said. 'To those who seek to lend legitimacy to the Taliban we make it clear: you stand on the wrong side of history.' *The experts: Richard Bennett, Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Afghanistan; Margaret Satterthwaite, Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers; Laura Nyirinkindi (Chair), Claudia Flores (Vice-Chair), Dorothy Estrada Tanck, Ivana Krstić, and Haina Lu, Working group on discrimination against women and girls; Nahla Haidar, Chair of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women; Graeme Reid, Independent Expert on protection against violence and discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity; Reem Alsalem, Special Rapporteur on violence against women and girls, its causes and consequences; Bernard Duhaime, Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth, justice, reparation and guarantees of non-recurrence Special Rapporteurs/Independent Experts/Working Groups are independent human rights experts appointed by the United Nations Human Rights Council. Together, these experts are referred to as the Special Procedures of the Human Rights Council. Special Procedures experts work on a voluntary basis; they are not UN staff and do not receive a salary for their work. While the UN Human Rights office acts as the secretariat for Special Procedures, the experts serve in their individual capacity and are independent fromany government or organization, including OHCHR and the UN. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the UN or OHCHR.
Scoop
3 days ago
- Scoop
UN Calls For Reversal Of US Sanctions On Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese
10 July 2025 They're calling for the decision to be reversed, warning it could undermine the wider international human rights system. The sanctions were announced by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Wednesday under a Presidential Executive Order. Mr. Rubio alleged that Ms. Albanese had 'directly engaged with the International Criminal Court(ICC) in efforts to investigate, arrest, detain, or prosecute nationals of the United States or Israel, without the consent of those two countries,' which he called a 'gross infringement' on national sovereignty. The US and Israel are not parties to the Rome Statute, the international treaty that established the ICC. Dangerous precedent and unacceptable Reacting to the announcement, UN Spokesperson Stéphane Dujarric said that the imposition of sanctions on Special Rapporteurs sets a 'dangerous precedent.' ' The use of unilateral sanctions against Special Rapporteurs or any other UN expert or official is unacceptable,' he said on Thursday at his regular news briefing in New York. He also highlighted the independent mandate and role of the Special Rapporteurs, noting that Member States 'are perfectly entitled to their views and to disagree with' the experts' reports. 'But we encourage them to engage with the UN's human rights architecture,' he added. Call for reversal In a statement issued on Thursday, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk called for the 'prompt reversal' of the sanctions against the Human Rights Council-appointed Special Rapporteur 'in response to work she has undertaken under the mandate' she is tasked with. ' Even in face of fierce disagreement, UN Member States should engage substantively and constructively, rather than resort to punitive measures,' he said. The UN rights chief also called for an end to attacks and threats against mandate holders appointed by the council, as well as key institutions like the ICC. ' The solution is not less, but more, debate and dialogue on the very real human rights concerns they address,' Mr. Türk urged. Cooperation, not reprisal Jürg Lauber, President of the UN Human Rights Council, also voiced regret over the punitive move by the US. In a statement, he highlighted that Special Rapporteurs 'are an essential instrument' in fulfilling the Council's mandate and urged all nations to 'fully cooperate' with them. ' I call on all UN Member States…to refrain from any acts of intimidation or reprisal against them,' he said. Independent Special Rapporteurs Special Rapporteurs are appointed under what is known as the Special Procedures of the Human Rights Council. They are independent experts appointed to monitor and report on human rights issues worldwide. These experts serve in their personal capacity, are not UN staff and receive no financial remuneration for their work. They regularly report to the Geneva-based council as well as to the UN General Assembly in New York. In addition to the mandate on the occupied Palestinian territory, mandates exist to monitor human rights in countries such as Iran, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea and Afghanistan. In all there are 46thematicand 14 differentcountry-basedmandates.
Newsroom
5 days ago
- Newsroom
What the Covid-19 inquiry is teaching us
Comment: As the dust continues to settle from the peak pandemic years, New Zealand is taking a long, hard look in the mirror. The first phase of the Royal Commission of Inquiry into Covid-19 Lessons Learned has been delivered, and it offers an unflinching account of our preparedness, decisions, and blind spots. The second phase is underway, tasked with interrogating the specifics: vaccination equity, disinformation, and the long shadow Covid cast across our communities. The power – and price – of going early The inquiry acknowledges that our early, bold elimination strategy was effective at saving lives. Compared with many other nations, New Zealand avoided mass deaths and overwhelmed hospitals. But it came with real costs: social isolation, educational disruption, economic harm, and deep psychological strain, especially in communities already living with inequity. For some, the border closures and MIQ system became a symbol of safety; for others, of exclusion and despair. A pandemic plan built for the wrong pandemic New Zealand's pre-Covid pandemic plans were largely geared towards influenza. This wasn't a case of simply dusting off an out-of-date playbook. The virus we faced was a novel coronavirus – more contagious, less predictable, and politically destabilising. Critical systems, from intensive care unit capacity to personal protective equipment logistics, weren't scaled or connected in the way a 21st century pandemic demanded. We weren't alone in that, but being unprepared is not something we should now excuse as inevitable. Who was heard – and who wasn't Perhaps one of the most damning findings is how poorly the early response incorporated Te Tiriti o Waitangi obligations. Māori and Pacific voices were sidelined in national decision-making. Community providers who had the trust, the reach, and the relationships to respond effectively were often bypassed or underused. The equity gap didn't start with Covid-19, but the pandemic made it wider and more visible. The communication conundrum Early in the pandemic, New Zealand's public health messaging was lauded globally for its clarity and empathy. But the commission noted that as time went on, messaging became increasingly centralised and inflexible. Tailored communications for diverse populations were often absent. At times when nuance and dialogue were needed, the approach defaulted to broadcast mode rather than engagement. What phase 2 must tackle The second phase of the inquiry, now underway, is where the real grit begins. It will scrutinise the rollout of vaccines, particularly whether equity was achieved or merely promised. It will delve into vaccine mandates and their effects on public trust. It will explore the long-term health, economic, and educational impacts of our Covid-19 response. It will ask hard questions about the use of emergency powers and the resilience (or fragility) of our health systems. Perhaps most importantly, it will examine how trust was won, lost, and exploited. The rise of misinformation and targeted disinformation isn't just a curious byproduct of the pandemic era – it's a feature of our new public health landscape. If we fail to address it, we're not just failing to learn – we're inviting history to repeat itself. Why it matters Do we really need another report? Haven't we moved on? But in science, as in governance, learning from mistakes isn't optional – it's essential. The very act of reflection is a declaration that we take public health seriously, that we value lives lost and saved, and that we are willing to face uncomfortable truths to be better prepared next time. Pandemics will come again. Whether sparked by zoonotic spillover, synthetic biology, or climate-driven vector shifts, the next crisis is not a matter of if but when. The Royal Commission won't give us all the answers – but it can make sure we ask better questions and build a more inclusive, agile, and evidence-based response. In the end, the value of this inquiry isn't just in what it reports, but in whether we listen.
