logo
Tariffs Are Weighing Heavily on the Industry, But Shoe Price Increases Have Been Minimal — So Far

Tariffs Are Weighing Heavily on the Industry, But Shoe Price Increases Have Been Minimal — So Far

Yahoo17-07-2025
Price increases are on the way.
Expectations concerning higher costs form the tariff impact on many consumer discretionary items including apparel and shoes haven't yet gained substantial traction on the sales floor.
More from WWD
Tariffs at 30 Percent Would Be a Tipping Point for European Furniture- and Lighting-makers
Kohl's Upping the Ante on Footwear During Critical Back-to-School Season
Urban Outfitters Announces First Annual UO Haul Sale Targeting Gen Z Amid Back-to-school Season
That not surprising, according to an Goldman Sachs report from July 8 headed by Jan Hatzius, chief economist and head of global investment research. He said the largest tariff hikes went into effect in early April and goods already shipped were exempt. Moreover, the 'front-loading of imports and uncertainty over whether tariffs would stick may have also helped to delay increases in consumer prices,' the report said.
A separate Goldman report from July 11 led by economist Joseph Briggs said that tariff passthroughs to consumer prices so far seem more limited than in the 2018-2019 trade war when Trump was first in office. He noted that it might be too early to assess the full, adding that tariff payments can be delayed for up to 1.5 months and that any front-loading of imports likely delayed price increases.
For now, consumers are still spending at retail.
The U.S. Census Bureau on Thursday said retail sales for June rose 0.6 percent to $720.1 billion from May's revised $715.5 billion, which reflects a 0.9 percent dip. Total retail sales for April 2025 through June 2025 were up 4.1 percent versus the same year-ago period.
U.S. President Donald Trump's broad global reciprocal tariff plan was disclosed on April 2. Data points from the report showed that apparel and accessories stores rose 0.9 percent in June to $26.34 billion, on an adjusted basis, which reflects season variation and holidays but not price changes. Sales at shoe stores were not available for June, but data indicates that sales rose 1.5 percent to $3.21 billion in May from $3.16 billion in April, on an adjusted basis.
'June consumer spending was solid, with retail sales ex auto and gas up 4.1 percent relative to last year, similar to the recent trend,' noted David Silverman, senior director at Fitch Ratings. 'Fitch continues to expect a sales moderation as the year progresses given the impact of somewhat moderating consumer health and reaction to the evolving tariff policy, despite the continued strength in recent months.'
As for back-to-school product and promotions, Silverman noted: 'As expected, many of the largest retailers are targeting limited price inflation, as they manage their supply chain to offset the impact of tariffs and potentially absorb some of the increase to maintain pricing positions. Smaller retailers will be less able to mitigate and absorb tariffs, which could cause a widening price discrepancy over time.'
Which Shoes Are More Expensive?
A report from Telsey Advisory Group (TAG) tracked the prices of a cross section of apparel, shoes and home products since April, when reciprocal tariffs were first announced by Trump. In the July 8 report, a Sam Edelman Felicia ballet flat priced at $100 remained at the same price without change since April. That was also true of a Steve Madden Klayton Bootie, priced at $119.95, as well as a Vans Old Skool Shoe at $70. An Ugg Tazz II shoe saw a $5 increase, or 3.6 percent increase, to $145 from week ago prices, while a Hoka Bondi 9 sneaker also rose $5, or 2.9 percent, to $175.
In other sneaker news, there was no price change for Adidas Samba OG, which has been $100 since April. There were week-over-week price changes for two On shoes. The Cloud 6 rose $10, or 6.7 percent, to $160, and the Cloudtilt was up $10, or 6.3 percent, to $170. The Nike Vomero 18 didn't see a week-over-week increase, but did have a price increase of $5, or 3.3 percent, to $155 at some point since April. That increase likely occurred on June 1, when Nike began raising prices on select items. Also holding steady since April was an Asics Gel-1130, priced at $100 at Foot Locker, as well as a New Balance 1960 sneaker at $150, also sold at Foot Locker.
Those shoe increases appear minimal, when compared to some apparel spikes.
Among the week-over-week price increases, a Victoria's Secret Pink fleece campus sweatpant rose $24.95, or 71.3 percent, to $59.95, while a Victoria's Secret Bombshell push-up bra was up $19.95, or 66.5 percent, to $49.95 and a Tommy Hilfiger men's regular fit stretch polo shirt saw a $5.26 increase, or 19.5 percent, to $32.25. The TAG check also noted that the Tommy Hilfiger polo shirt saw an earlier price increase sometime between April and July 8 of $2.26, or 7.5 percent.
In addition, the $2,130.00 Louis Vuitton Neverfull MM bag didn't see a week-over-week price change in the July 8 report, but the price was raised by $100, or 4.9 percent, at some point between April and July 8. That was also true for a girls' Cat & Jack legging from Target, which didn't see a week-over-week change, but did see a price uptick of $1.50, or 33.3 percent, to $6 over the same four-month period.
And while some apparel items saw a price change — such as an Adidas Firebird Loose track pant, down $15 week-over-week, or 20 percent, to $60, and a Calvin Klein men's cotton stretch 3-pack briefs, down $9.50, or 20 percent, to $38 at some point since TAG began keeping an eye on pricing in April — that wasn't true of any of the footwear products on the research firm's tracking list.
The Road Ahead
Price points thus far are likely to shift upwards going forward. And once that occurs on a broad range of everyday goods, that's when consumer fatigue is expected to set in, according to consumer experts from financial advisory firm EY.
'While the June retail sales data is encouraging and points to modest upside risk to our consumer spending growth estimate of 1.5 percent annualized in Q2, consumers have yet to experience the full impact of price increases,' said EY-Parthenon senior economist Lydia Boussour. She expects that continued tariff and policy volatility, coupled with a slowing labor market and rising inflation, will result in the easing of consumers' personal consumption expenditures from '2.8 percent in 2024 to 1.9 percent in 2025, and 1.4 percent in 2026.'
'June's numbers show how consumers are prioritizing online retailers and apparel, but the remainder of the summer and back-to-school season could prove more fragile than expected,' EY Americas retail sector leader Mark Chambers said. 'Retailers are weathering the storm when it comes to inventory management and supply chain flexibility with tariffs, but the latest numbers indicate they are so far managing price expectations and still delivering what consumers are looking for.'
Crocs CEO Andrew Rees in May told investors at the firm's first quarter earnings conference call that the company expects the shoe 'industry to go up in terms of price' due to added costs, whether from tariffs or other factors. He also noted that the company has been 'super strategic' on pricing, with some 'very targeted price increases' to mitigate selective issues. But Rees also said that Crocs was in a 'wait-and-see mode,' waiting to see what happens with tariff rates, among other factors, to determine how to manage future pricing.
And Steven Madden Ltd. CEO Edward Rosenfeld said in his first quarter earnings conference call that the shoe firm has been 'moving swiftly to adapt to the changing landscape,' including a focus on mitigating near-term impacts of tariff. Tools at its disposal included a shift in where some shoes are produced, as well as 'selectively' raising prices to both consumers and wholesale customers for fall items.
Best of WWD
All the Retailers That Nike Left and Then Went Back
Mikey Madison's Elegant Red Carpet Shoe Style [PHOTOS]
Julia Fox's Sleekest and Boldest Shoe Looks Over the Years [Photos]
Se produjo un error al recuperar la información
Inicia sesión para acceder a tu portafolio
Se produjo un error al recuperar la información
Se produjo un error al recuperar la información
Se produjo un error al recuperar la información
Se produjo un error al recuperar la información
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US, China to launch new talks on tariff truce extension, easing path for Trump-Xi meeting
US, China to launch new talks on tariff truce extension, easing path for Trump-Xi meeting

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

US, China to launch new talks on tariff truce extension, easing path for Trump-Xi meeting

By David Lawder STOCKHOLM (Reuters) -Top U.S. and Chinese economic officials will resume talks in Stockholm on Monday to try to tackle longstanding economic disputes at the centre of a trade war between the world's top two economies, aiming to extend a truce by three months and keeping sharply higher tariffs at bay. China is facing an August 12 deadline to reach a durable tariff agreement with President Donald Trump's administration, after Beijing and Washington reached preliminary deals in May and June to end weeks of escalating tit-for-tat tariffs and a cut-off of rare earth minerals. Without an agreement, global supply chains could face renewed turmoil from U.S. duties snapping back to triple-digit levels that would amount to a bilateral trade embargo. The Stockholm talks come hot on the heels of Trump's biggest trade deal yet with the European Union on Sunday for a 15% tariff on most EU goods exports to the U.S., including autos. The bloc will also buy $750 billion worth of American energy and make $600 billion worth of U.S. investments in coming years. No similar breakthrough is expected in the U.S.-China talks but trade analysts said that another 90-day extension of a tariff and export control truce struck in mid-May was likely. An extension of that length would prevent further escalation and facilitate planning for a potential meeting between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping in late October or early November. A U.S. Treasury spokesperson declined comment on a South China Morning Post report quoting unnamed sources as saying the two sides would refrain from introducing new tariffs or other steps that could escalate the trade war for another 90 days. Trump's administration is poised to impose new sectoral tariffs that will impact China within weeks, including on semiconductors, pharmaceuticals, ship-to-shore cranes and other products. "We're very close to a deal with China. We really sort of made a deal with China, but we'll see how that goes," Trump told reporters on Sunday before European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen struck their tariff deal. DEEPER ISSUES Previous U.S.-China trade talks in Geneva and London in May and June focused on bringing U.S. and Chinese retaliatory tariffs down from triple-digit levels and restoring the flow of rare earth minerals halted by China and Nvidia's H20 AI chips and other goods halted by the United States. So far, the talks have not delved into broader economic issues. They include U.S. complaints that China's state-led, export-driven model is flooding world markets with cheap goods, and Beijing's complaints that U.S. national security export controls on tech goods seek to stunt Chinese growth. "Geneva and London were really just about trying to get the relationship back on track so that they could, at some point, actually negotiate about the issues which animate the disagreement between the countries in the first place," said Scott Kennedy, a China economics expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington. "I'd be surprised if there is an early harvest on some of these things but an extension of the ceasefire for another 90 days seems to be the most likely outcome," Kennedy said. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has already flagged a deadline extension and has said he wants China to rebalance its economy away from exports to more domestic consumption -- a decades-long goal for U.S. policymakers. Analysts say the U.S.-China negotiations are far more complex than those with other Asian countries and will require more time. China's grip on the global market for rare earth minerals and magnets, used in everything from military hardware to car windshield wiper motors, has proved to be an effective leverage point on U.S. industries. TRUMP-XI MEETING? In the background of the talks is speculation about a possible meeting between Trump and Xi in late October. Trump has said he will decide soon on a landmark trip to China, and a new flare-up of tariffs and export controls would likely derail planning. Sun Chenghao, a fellow at Tsinghua University's Center for International Security and Strategy in Beijing, said that a Trump-Xi summit would be an opportunity for the U.S. to lower the 20% tariffs on Chinese goods related to fentanyl. In exchange, he said the Chinese side could make good on its 2020 pledge to increase purchases of U.S. farm products and other goods. "The future prospect of the heads of state summit is very beneficial to the negotiations because everyone wants to reach an agreement or pave the way in advance," Sun said. Still, China will likely request a reduction of multi-layered U.S. tariffs totaling 55% on most goods and further easing of U.S. high-tech export controls, analysts said. Beijing has argued that such purchases would help reduce the U.S. trade deficit with China, which reached $295.5 billion in 2024.

Hong Kong's CK Hutchison seeks Chinese investor to join Panama Ports deal
Hong Kong's CK Hutchison seeks Chinese investor to join Panama Ports deal

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Hong Kong's CK Hutchison seeks Chinese investor to join Panama Ports deal

HONG KONG (AP) — A Hong Kong conglomerate that's selling ports at the Panama Canal said Monday it may seek a Chinese investor to join a consortium of buyers, a move that could please Beijing but bring more U.S. scrutiny to the geopolitically fraught deal. CK Hutchison Holdings' initial plan to sell its port assets to a group that includes U.S. investment firm BlackRock Inc. pleased President Donald Trump, who has alleged that China interferes with the critical shipping lane's operations in Panama. However, they apparently angered Beijing and drew a review from Chinese anti-monopoly authorities. A Beijing-backed newspaper posted scathing commentaries about the deal, with one describing it as a betrayal of all Chinese. Beijing's offices overseeing Hong Kong affairs have reposted some of these commentaries, widely seen as an indication of Chinese leaders' stance. A Hutchison subsidiary has operated ports at both ends of the Panama Canal since 1997. After months of uncertainty brought by tensions between Washington and Beijing, Hutchison said in a statement that the exclusive negotiations period with the consortium has expired. However, it added 'the Group remains in discussions with members of the consortium with a view to inviting major strategic investor from the PRC to join as a significant member of the consortium,' referring to the People's Republic of China. It said they needed to change the membership of the consortium and the structure of the transaction for the deal to be able to pass reviews by 'all relevant authorities." The awkward position Hutchison found itself in for months highlights the challenges Hong Kong business elites face in navigating Beijing's expectations of national loyalty, especially when relations between China and the United States are strained. Hong Kong has overhauled its electoral system to ensure the city is run by 'patriots.' CK Hutchison is owned by the family of Hong Kong's richest man, Li Ka-shing. It announced March 4 that it would sell all its shares in Hutchison Port Holdings and in Hutchison Port Group Holdings to the consortium that also includes BlackRock subsidiary Global Infrastructure Partners and Terminal Investment Limited, a subsidiary of the Mediterranean Shipping Company. In May, Hutchinson co-managing director, Dominic Lai told shareholders that Terminal Investment was the main investor. Its parent company is led by Italian shipping scion Diego Aponte, whose family reportedly has a longstanding relationship with Li's. The initial deal, valued at nearly $23 billion including $5 billion in debt, would have given the consortium control over 43 ports in 23 countries, including the ports of Balboa and Cristobal, located at either end of the canal. That agreement also required approval from Panama's government. The deadline for their exclusive negotiation period ended on July 27. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data

Brookfield, Birch Hill Snag Canadian Mortgage Firm in $2.1 Billion Deal
Brookfield, Birch Hill Snag Canadian Mortgage Firm in $2.1 Billion Deal

Bloomberg

time29 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Brookfield, Birch Hill Snag Canadian Mortgage Firm in $2.1 Billion Deal

Brookfield Asset Management and a private equity partner reached a friendly deal to take over First National Financial Corp., a mortgage company backed by Canadian billionaire Stephen Smith, for about C$2.9 billion ($2.1 billion). Funds managed by Brookfield and Toronto-based Birch Hill Equity Partners Management Inc. agreed to pay C$48 a share in cash for First National, an originator of commercial and residential mortgages. That's a 13% premium to where the shares closed Friday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store