Experts sound alarm as supermarket shelves face shortages of key staple foods: 'Many farmers are already moving'
According to Wales Online, some of those effects are already being felt in the form of increasing scarcity and higher prices. The article noted that a high-end chocolate bunny made by Lindt has already gone from £2.99 to £4.25 ($4 to $5.64) in just five years. If trends continue, that luxury rabbit's price will jump to £6.04 ($8) by the end of the decade.
It's not just imported goods that will be affected; local produce is also under threat. Milder seasonal weather will threaten supplies of carrots, parsnips, broccoli, and other winter crops. British supermarkets are anticipating "tight periods for broccoli supply later this spring."
Because chocolate and coffee are grown in areas vulnerable to rising temperatures and extreme weather, their long-term availability is under threat. Europe relies heavily on West Africa for its cocoa imports. Côte d'Ivoire and Ghana alone provide about half of the world's supply. Ghana is already experiencing extreme weather conditions. Dangerous heat waves and volatile rainfall do not make for stable agricultural output.
Coffee is another staple that may well become a rare luxury in the near future if trends continue, as coffee beans can only be grown in certain climates. The Coffee Belt is tightening, and the 70 or so coffee-growing nations are often vulnerable to political instability. Dr. Morgaine Gaye told Wales Online: "Many farmers are already moving to higher elevations or switching crops, which means coffee will no longer be grown in some areas."
There's no silver bullet for combating food insecurity, but there is a range of options to mitigate the problem. Promising innovations can help reduce waste and boost production while moving toward more sustainable growth models. Additionally, individual actions like shopping smarter, growing your own food, and taking local action can all help reduce pressure on the global food supply.
Do you worry about how much food you throw away?
Definitely
Sometimes
Not really
Never
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
Join our free newsletter for easy tips to save more and waste less, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
These Asian nations have the most powerful passports. Here's where the US falls
In an updated ranking of the world's most powerful passports, the U.S. dropped to its lowest position ever. According to the latest Henley Passport Index released on Tuesday, July 22, Singaporeans continue to hold the most powerful passport for visa-free access to 193 out of 227 global destinations – the most of any citizenship. For more than 20 years, investment firm Henley & Partners has ranked passport strength based on how many destinations its holders can enter without a visa, based on data from the International Air Transport Association. This year, filling out the top three most powerful passports are those issued by Japan and South Korea, followed by those in the European Union. However, both the U.K. and U.S. fell several spots, continuing downward trend. This year, the U.S. landed in 10th place. It was first in 2014. Some passports made significant leaps in the index, such as India jumping from 85th to 77th in just six months for visa-free travel to 59 destinations. Over the past decade, more than 80 passports have risen at least 10 spots – showcasing a global shift in mobility and openness, according to Henley & Partners, which specializes in obtaining residency and citizenship through investment. "The consolidation we're seeing at the top underscores that access is earned – and must be maintained – through active and strategic diplomacy," said Dr. Christian H. Kaelin, inventor of the passport-index concept, in a statement. "Nations that proactively negotiate visa waivers and nurture reciprocal agreements continue to rise, while the opposite applies to those that are less engaged in such efforts." How powerful is the US passport? Tied with Lithuania and Iceland for 10th place, the U.S. passport offers visa-free access to 182 out of 227 destinations. Over the past decade, its strength has declined, making it the second-biggest faller on the index after Venezuela. A quickly changing political landscape, including policies like more restrictive entry, has contributed to the U.S. passport's loss of power, especially as more Americans seek citizenship elsewhere. "Americans are now leading the demand worldwide for alternative residence and citizenship options, with British nationals also among the top five globally," said Dr. Juerg Steffen, CEO at Henley & Partners, in a statement. "As the U.S. and U.K. adopt increasingly inward-looking policies, we're witnessing a marked rise in interest from their citizens seeking greater global access and security." Most powerful passport ranking Here are the most powerful passports in the world, according to the Henley Passport Index:
an hour ago
UK Supreme Court quashes convictions of 2 bank traders after deciding their trials were unfair
LONDON -- Britain's Supreme Court on Wednesday quashed the convictions of two financial market traders accused of manipulating benchmark interest rates in one of the biggest scandals to come out of the global financial crisis in 2008. The charges against Tom Hayes, a former Citigroup and UBS trader, and Carlo Palombo, who worked for Barclays, centered around alleged efforts to influence the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate, or Libor, and its euro currency equivalent Euribor, which were used to set the interest rates on trillions of dollars of loans and other financial products around the world. The court ruled that the convictions of Hayes and Palombo were unfair because the judges in their separate cases gave inaccurate instructions to jurors. That effectively prevented jurors from considering the key question of whether the traders had acted dishonestly. 'That misdirection undermined the fairness of the trial,' Judge George Leggatt wrote in an 82-page decision backed by all five members of the panel that heard the case. Hayes was convicted in August 2015 and sentenced to a maximum of 14 years in prison, which was later reduced to 11 years. Palombo, convicted in March 2019, was sentenced to four years in prison. Both men were released in 2021. 'It destroyed my family, I missed most of my son's childhood,' Hayes told the BBC. 'For so long I've been an international fugitive … and now I can move on with my life, or try to,' he added. The decision came after the U.S. Second Circuit Court of Appeal in 2022 overturned the convictions of two traders charged with similar crimes in the United States. Hayes and Palombo, whose appeals were repeatedly rejected by British judges, were allowed to take their case to the U.K. Supreme Court after that ruling. The U.K.'s Serious Fraud Office began investigating alleged efforts to manipulate Libor in 2012. That ultimately led to the conviction of nine bankers. 'We have considered this judgment and the full circumstances carefully and determined it would not be in the public interest for us to seek a retrial,' the SFO said in response to the Supreme Court ruling. Libor and Euribor were critical benchmarks that were once used to set the interest rates on everything from business loans to home mortgages and credit card debts. As a result, they also became central to more complex financial transactions such as those used by banks and businesses to bet on interest rate fluctuations. The benchmarks were vulnerable to manipulation because they were set by banks that could profit from swings in interest rates. Each day, major international banks were asked to submit the interest rate at which they could borrow money from other banks. An average of those submissions was then used to set the daily Libor and Euribor rates. During the financial crisis, regulators became aware that some banks were making artificially low Libor submissions to make their institutions seem more creditworthy. Some traders also sought to influence the submissions made by their banks as even small moves in the benchmark rates could boost their profits. Those risks became even more pronounced during the financial crisis, when lending dried up and bankers had to base their daily submissions on a subjective assessment of the market rather than actual loans.
Washington Post
3 hours ago
- Washington Post
UK regulator seeks special status for Apple and Google that could mandate changes for Big Tech
LONDON — Britain's antitrust watchdog has proposed labeling Google's and Apple's mobile ecosystems with 'strategic market status,' which would mandate changes at the Big Tech companies to improve competition. The Competition and Markets Authority's announcement Wednesday follows separate investigations it opened at the start of the year into Google's Android and Apple's iOS, using newly acquired digital market regulations designed to protect consumers and businesses from unfair practices by Big Tech companies. The watchdog said Apple and Google hold an 'effective duopoly,' with 90-100% of mobile devices in Britain running on either mobile platform. Its investigation found a range of concerns affecting businesses and consumers such as unpredictable app reviews, inconsistent app store search rankings and commissions on in-app purchases of as much as 30%. The CMA also unveiled separate 'roadmaps' for each company outlining possible measures to improve competition, including 'fair and transparent' app reviews and app store rankings to give British app developers 'certainty.' The watchdog also recommends letting app developers 'steer' users to channels outside of app stores where users can make purchases, mirroring similar efforts by the European Union. Google called the watchdog's decision 'disappointing and unwarranted,' and said Android has saved app developers money because they didn't have to adapt to different operating models for each smartphone. It's 'crucial that any new regulation is evidence-based, proportionate and does not become a roadblock to growth in the U.K.,' the company's senior director of competition, Oliver Bethell, said. Apple said it was worried the CMA's moves could pose increase risks for users and jeopardize the U.K.'s 'developer economy.' 'We're concerned the rules the U.K. is now considering would undermine the privacy and security protections that our users have come to expect, hamper our ability to innovate, and force us to give away our technology for free to foreign competitors,' Apple said in a statement. 'We will continue to engage with the regulator to make sure they fully understand these risks.' The regulator is seeking feedback on its proposal and has until Oct. 22 to make a final decision.
