Library workers deserve protection, not prosecution
Georgians have access to a public library in every county in the state, adding up to more than 400 public library branches. In 2024, Georgia's library cardholders borrowed more than 11.7 million items from their local public libraries, an increase of 407,500 items borrowed compared to the year before. This is made possible by library workers who ensure materials are accessible, maintain various collections, assist patrons, and handle the behind-the-scenes work to keep the checkout systems running smoothly. Despite this, these crucial professionals now face unwarranted threat of criminal prosecution because of what's happening at the Georgia Legislature. Senate Bill 74 would strip library workers at all public libraries (i.e., county, university, K-12, and community libraries) of protection from criminal prosecution if they 'knowingly' distribute material that is deemed 'harmful to minors.' This phrase is defined in Georgia Code § 16-12-102 based loosely on the U.S. Supreme Court's 'obscenity' definition.
The legislation's practical effect would be to criminalize library workers for simply doing their job.
For example, for library workers to avoid prosecution under SB 74, they would have to be familiar with the complete content of the hundreds of thousands of titles contained in their library collections and make a good faith effort to keep media containing any portion that could be deemed 'harmful' out of the hands of any person under 18. It is not feasible for library workers to maintain such encyclopedic knowledge of their collections, nor for them to determine what is 'harmful' for each minor library patron they encounter.
As any parent can tell you, what is 'harmful' for a kindergartener may be entirely suitable for a high school junior, yet SB 74 takes no account of these age distinctions. Moreover, with the availability of library reading rooms and the advent of self-checkout machines, library workers are not going to be privy to the materials that each person under the age of 18 is browsing or checking out. In the words of one career librarian in the state, 'Making an assurance that minors would never have any contact with objectionable material would be nearly impossible without keeping anyone under the age of 18 away from all library resources.'
This would have a chilling effect on what materials libraries carry in their collections and result in unanticipated restrictions on young people using libraries.
Georgia's library workers already give a great deal of thought to age-appropriate content. There are existing selection processes that require that materials added to library collections meet certain criteria for quality, relevance, and value. Whether a book is scientific, literary, historical, or religious, it goes through a vetting process by professional library workers, who consider factors like author credibility, readership interest, and educational merit.
Even if a book is considered controversial, its presence in a library suggests it has been determined by library professionals to merit inclusion in the collection for public access, discussion, or preservation. Criminalizing library workers for enabling patrons to check out books disregards the professional judgement exercised by trained library workers in assembling their collections and thwarts the fundamental role libraries play in people's access to information.
The legislation echoes the past. Georgia has a long history of attempting to use state power to restrict access to information under the pretense of protecting the public. In December 1829, Georgia passed anti-literacy laws, criminalizing teachers for educating enslaved Black people. Later, segregated libraries limited access to information for Black and White readers. The legislation is a modern-day restriction of access to knowledge based on a government-imposed definition of 'harmful' materials influenced by the government's disfavor of certain topics or viewpoints.
Other states that have passed bills similar to SB 74 have faced and lost costly legal battles. In Arkansas, for instance, in July 2023 a federal judge temporarily blocked provisions that could imprison library workers for providing 'harmful' materials to minors. Then, in December 2024, a federal judge ruled those provisions unconstitutional, permanently blocking the implementation of certain provisions. If SB 74 passes, Georgia taxpayers could end up footing the bill for inevitable legal challenges — court battles the state is likely to lose.
Managing which materials young people access from their public libraries is best and most appropriately handled by parents and their kids making their own family- and age-specific decisions, not the government.
With more than 11 million checkouts in 2024—a surge compared to 2023—Georgians have made it clear: Public libraries are a needed resource for diverse and valuable information. By making it possible to criminally prosecute library workers, SB 74 threatens to chill access by reducing both the variety of materials on the shelves and the ability of young people to access it.
Library workers need your support. Call or email your local legislator and demand they oppose SB 74. Donate, volunteer, or simply visit your local library—because library workers deserve protection, not prosecution.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
23 minutes ago
- Newsweek
What Really Happened to Liberal Men? Why Are They Leaving the Democratic Party?
Something is quietly happening in American politics: a noticeable number of traditional liberal men are drifting away from the Democratic Party. These aren't far-right converts or angry trolls online. They're everyday guys—teachers, tech workers, dads, artists—who once voted blue without hesitation. And now, many of them are either sitting elections out or reluctantly voting Republican. What changed? At the heart of this shift is a growing discomfort with how masculinity is talked about on the left. For a while now, terms like "toxic masculinity" have dominated progressive conversations. The original idea behind it—critiquing aggressive or harmful male behavior—was fair and necessary. But somewhere along the line, the term morphed into a broader cultural critique that often paints masculinity itself as dangerous or outdated. Horizontal photo of a Democratic Party flag with a stylized donkey on top of the U.S. flag. Horizontal photo of a Democratic Party flag with a stylized donkey on top of the U.S. flag. Getty Images Many men who've identified with liberal values for years now feel like they're being told that being male is an obstacle. Traits like confidence, competitiveness, risk-taking, or wanting to provide for a family—things that used to be seen as strengths—are now viewed by some progressive voices as relics of the patriarchy. Furthermore, liberal men often feel unfairly generalized by prominent liberal women. Blanket statements like "Men are the problem," ignore that many men face real financial, emotional, and social struggles. It's left a lot of men asking: "If my identity and values are unwelcome here, why am I still voting for this party?" Another major reason for the shift is the rise of lawfare—the use of legal tools and institutions to target individuals, especially men, in ways that feel more political or ideological than fair. Whether it's family court systems that feel stacked against fathers or highly publicized sexual assault cases where guilt is assumed before facts are in, many liberal men feel like due process is being replaced by social punishment. That creates a lot of unease. The #MeToo movement was an important and overdue reckoning. No one should downplay how necessary it was to hold abusers accountable. But many men now feel like the pendulum has swung too far. They're afraid of being falsely accused, of having a clumsy date or a poorly worded joke ruin their career or social standing. That fear is real, and it's impacting how men relate to women in professional and personal settings. Ironically, it's also hurting women, who are finding men more hesitant to engage, hire, mentor, or even speak freely with. Cancel culture adds to the anxiety. In a world where a single misstep—or even a misunderstood comment from years ago—can get you publicly shamed or fired, a lot of men have chosen to simply opt out of certain conversations, workplaces, dating rituals, or social groups. They're pulling back, not because they hate progress, but because they're tired of feeling like they're always one sentence away from disaster. So how do Democrats win these men back? First, it starts by making room for positive masculinity again. That doesn't mean turning back the clock to some 1950s ideal. It means recognizing that men and women are different—and that's a good thing. Men have their own strengths, just like women do. We should be able to celebrate courage, protection, responsibility, and leadership without suspicion or shame. The party also needs to move toward a fairer legal culture. Men need to know they'll get a fair hearing in courtrooms, HR departments, and public opinion. That doesn't mean ignoring victims or softening on accountability—it means making sure that justice is based on evidence, not assumptions. And instead of constantly attacking each other online, Democrats could encourage more honest conversations about dating, relationships, and gender dynamics in general. A lot of people are confused about how to interact in today's social climate, and men especially feel like they're navigating a minefield. Giving people room to ask questions and make mistakes without ruining their lives is a sign of a mature, compassionate society—not a regressive one. Most importantly, Democrats need to realize that losing liberal men isn't just a cultural issue—it's a political one. These men are still out there, still voting, still caring about big-picture issues like climate change and economic justice. But if they feel dismissed or disrespected, they'll take their votes elsewhere—or just stay home. Neither outcome helps liberals. Rebuilding that trust doesn't require giving up on feminism or equality. It just requires a shift in tone and approach. It means treating men not as threats, but as partners in building a better world. If the Democratic Party can do that—if it can speak to men not just as a voting bloc, but as human beings with complex identities and real concerns—then a lot of those lost voters might just come home. Zoltan Istvan writes and speaks on transhumanism, artificial intelligence, and the future. He is raising two young daughters with his wife in San Francisco. The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.
Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
‘We came to contribute': End of Venezuelan TPS threatens South Florida economy
Two months after the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the Trump administration's authority to end deportation protections for Venezuelans, businesses in South Florida, home to the largest Venezuelan population in the U.S., are feeling the strain. 'How do you tell an employee they have to go back to Venezuela? Those who left didn't leave because they wanted to—they left out of necessity,' said Mario J. Benedetti, a Venezuelan-American owner of multiple car dealerships in South Florida who employs a hundred fellow Venezuelans. 'If our country hadn't gone through such a political and economic crisis, we'd still be there.' Benedetti, 61, a naturalized U.S. citizen, is a third-generation car dealer whose family began selling vehicles in eastern Venezuela over a century ago. He left the country in 2009 to start over in South Florida. Since then, he has built and expanded a network of car dealerships representing Toyota and Kia, along with a certified body shop servicing those automotive brands. A third of Benedetti's 325 employees are Venezuelan — including five with Temporary Protected Status, 63 asylum seekers, and 32 U.S. residents. Benedetti said the only option for him is to help them secure legal immigration status. He is now exploring employment-based labor certifications not only for TPS holders, but also for asylum seekers, who make up about 20% of his workforce. 'That's an economic burden I have to assume,' he said, adding that the administration's revocation of TPS has disrupted every aspect of his business, generating deep uncertainty—especially surrounding the expiration of work permits. The decision to end TPS, which provided work permits for many of the 607,000 Venezuelan who have the status, has sent shock waves through the Miami area and beyond. As the largest TPS migrant group in the U.S., Venezuelans make a significant economic impact, contributing an estimated $11.5 billion annually to the U.S. economy, according to the immigration reform nonprofit Venezuela was designated in 2021 for TPS — a temporary immigration status granted to nationals of countries facing unsafe conditions for return — due to a severe humanitarian crisis marked by political and economic instability, widespread human rights abuses, and high levels of violence. The Biden administration expanded TPS in 2023, and extended it through 2026. The Trump administration reversed the extension and the Supreme Court on May 19 upheld that decision, immediately stripping protections from roughly 350,000 people, with another 257,000 slated to lose their protected status on Sept. 10. Benedetti was among several Venezuelan business people who gathered last week at Florida International University for the launch of the Venezuelan Business Power survey — an initiative led by the Coral Gables-based Venezuelan-American Chamber of Commerce of the United States aimed at capturing a comprehensive picture of Venezuelan entrepreneurship in the U.S.. As one of the sponsors of the poll, Benedetti said the initiative seeks to challenge the negative stereotypes surrounding Venezuelan immigrants. 'For me, it's crucial that people understand Venezuelans are not criminals. We didn't come here to take from the state — we came to contribute, to help this country grow,' he said. 'The best way to show our gratitude for the opportunity the U.S. has given us is by giving back. We need to restore the dignity of Venezuelans, whose reputation has been unfairly attacked.' Chamber President Leonardo Trechi told the Herald that nearly every industry in South Florida — from automotive and finance to services — relies on Venezuelan workers. 'Many are specialized and highly trained,' he said. 'If they're laid off, it won't just harm those workers. It will hurt the companies that invested in them.' The chamber estimates that, based on national Hispanic entrepreneurship trends showing that 7% of Hispanics own businesses, there could be more than 70,000 Venezuelan-owned businesses across the country. These businesses are believed to employ over 420,000 people and contribute an estimated $63 billion annually to the U.S. economy through billing, wages, and overall impact on GDP. In South Florida, the food industry — a cultural and economic lifeline for Venezuelan immigrants — is already feeling the pain. From food trucks to brick-and-mortar restaurants, Venezuelan-owned eateries not only offer familiar cuisine but also provide jobs for fellow immigrants. Many owners, particularly those who hold TPS themselves, say they fear becoming targets for Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Florida is likely to bear the brunt of the fallout from the end of TPS. Nearly half of all Venezuelans who had deportation protections live in the state, according to economist Michael Clemens, a professor at George Mason University, who based his findings on U.S. Census Bureau data. Clemens estimates that a third of the roughly 350,000 people who have already lost TPS protections are in Florida. Many may have also lost their work permits. While some TPS holders remain legally authorized to work through other pending immigration processes, such as asylum claims, there is no public data confirming how many still have valid authorization. Clemens' analysis shows Venezuelan workers with TPS are heavily concentrated in service-based industries, with the hospitality and recreation sector employing the largest share, followed closely by the retail trade. Other major sectors include professional and scientific services, construction and health care and education. Unlike other migrant groups, Venezuelans are rarely employed in agriculture or rural jobs. He said there's a perception that jobs for waitresses, cleaners and cooks are easy to fill, but in reality those workers are indispensable. 'That's why research in the U.S. has found that mass deportation is followed by a reduction of business activities.' One in 10 Venezuelan TPS holders in the U.S. are self-employed, while half work for wages. The remainder are not currently employed, a group that includes children, retirees, students and others outside the work force. The end of TPS is being felt not only by families, but by entire industries and local governments across Florida. From Orlando to Miami, layoffs, legal uncertainty and business instability are on the rise. Major companies like Disney laid off 45 Venezuelan employees following the Supreme Court's decision. A company spokesperson said affected workers were placed on leave with benefits to ensure compliance with immigration law. The Miami Herald spoke with 10 South Florida businesses owned by or catering to Venezuelans. Most asked not to be identified, fearing retaliation from immigration authorities. But they all echoed a shared concern: Venezuelans are not just employees — they're also customers. A sharp drop in consumer spending is already being felt, and many fear the ripple effects will deepen across multiple sectors, weakening the region's economy. Alexander Rueda, CEO of PANNA New Latino Food — a company founded in 2000 by a Venezuelan family in Weston and now a staple of Latin American cuisine in Broward County — said the impact goes beyond his workforce. 'More than a direct impact on our employees, the biggest impact is on the consumers,' he said. 'Consumer demand has changed; many are now diverting part of their budgets to immigration processes instead of dining out or spending as they used to.' Over the past 25 years, PANNA has grown from a small food stand inside a gas station into a thriving enterprise with five restaurants—three in Broward, one in Miami-Dade, and one in Orange County—as well as two food production factories in North Miami Beach and Miami Gardens. The company produces 4.6 tons of food daily for several brands and currently employs 246 people. In 2024, PANNA reported $46 million in annual sales and expected to exceed that in 2025. However, the revocation of TPS is beginning to take a toll on the company through declining consumer spending at its restaurants. Rueda said demand at PANNA's locations has fallen by 20% over the past three months. Rueda, 54, like Benedetti—a sponsor of the chamber's poll—emphasized that 'Venezuelans are more than the stigma tied to the Tren de Aragua gang,' he said, referring to the notorious criminal group. 'We are entrepreneurial, educated, and we contribute significantly to the economy.' Miami-Dade Mayor Daniella Levine Cava said she is 'deeply saddened' by the potential impact of the TPS termination on the more than 300,000 Venezuelans living in the county. 'This decision not only puts thousands of our neighbors and friends at risk,' she said, 'it punishes those who followed a legal process and are here contributing to our economy, our culture, and driving some of our most important industries.' The northwest Miami-Dade municipality of Doral — the U.S. city with the largest Venezuelan population, fondly known as 'Doralzuela' — is at at the epicenter of the crisis. A well-known Venezuelan bakery in Doral has grown from humble beginnings as a food truck, where it sold traditional sweets such as pan dulce, soft bread topped with sugar, and bombas rellenas , cream-filled puffs. The truck traveled across Miami-Dade, Broward, and Palm Beach counties, often stopping in cities with large Venezuelan communities, including Pembroke Pines and Weston—the latter nicknamed 'Westonzuela' for being one of the earliest hubs of Venezuelan settlement more than two decades ago. Today, the owner has expanded into a brick-and-mortar location in Doral. A TPS holder, he lives in the U.S. with his family. Before obtaining deportation protections in 2021, they had tried to apply for an investor visa. The Doral bakery owner is among the 12% of Venezuelans with TPS who are self-employed, contributing to the U.S. economy through small businesses, independent contracting and entrepreneurship, according to data from Clemens. Like thousands Venezuelans in the U.S., the Doral bakery owner has a pending asylum case, filed in 2018. After years waiting for an asylum interview, TPS provided his family with much-needed stability that is now slipping away. Despite the uncertainty, he keeps running his bakery and dreams of opening a second location in Weston. But he fears being forced to leave the U.S.. 'The promise of stability is disappearing,' he said. 'And with it, the American dream.' Returning to Venezuela is not an option for him. 'The country I left no longer exists,' he says, citing violent crime, the country's humanitarian crisis and political persecution. He fears for his family's safety as well as losing their livelihood. Their TPS protection could expire as early as September if a federal district court does not rule to extend deportation protections. Litigation is still ongoing in several federal courts, because the Supreme Court ruling did not address the actual merits of a lawsuit challenging the administration's revocation policy. The fear is spreading through government offices too. In Doral, Mayor Christi Fraga said the city has already had to terminate a Venezuelan employee in code enforcement whose work permit expired after the Supreme Court ruling. Several more city employees could face the same fate in September. Fraga, a Cuban-American Republican, warned of broader fallout: 'We'll likely see properties flood the market, driving down prices. Businesses may struggle to find workers or shut down. There's a real risk of people working illegally or ending up homeless.' About 40% of Doral's residents are of Venezuelan origin. Roughly 10,000 are now U.S. citizens, a third of the city's electorate, but many of their friends and relatives face growing legal uncertainty. 'This city's success is largely due to Venezuelan investment,' Fraga said. 'It mirrors what happened with Cuban immigrants in Miami.' City Council Member Rafael Pineyro, the only currently Venezuelan-born elected official in Doral, echoed the mayor's concerns. 'This has a knock-on effect that will impact not just Doral, but all of Miami-Dade,' he said. 'Business owners might be forced to sell their homes and businesses — everything they legally built while contributing to this community.' A Republican, Pineyro criticized the Trump administration's decision to end TPS for Venezuela, saying it was based on a mistaken assessment that conditions there had improved. 'Venezuela hasn't improved — it has regressed,' he said. 'The regime is more oppressive than ever.' As TPS protections unravel, thousands of Venezuelans in Florida and across the country face difficult choices: stay and risk being deported, try to find another legal path, or flee again. More than 66% of Venezuelans in the U.S.—a community now exceeding 903,000 people—were protected under TPS. Despite their growing numbers, Venezuelans remain among the least likely immigrant groups to be naturalized U.S. citizens. According to the Migration Policy Institute, a nonpartisan think tank, one key reason is that most Venezuelans are recent arrivals: 74% have come to the U.S. since 2010, compared to 35% of all immigrants. 'Venezuelans, like other immigrants, sit at the dinner table with American family members, and a significant number have U.S. citizen children,' Clemens said. 'That's why making life precarious for Venezuelans, and the potential removal of over 600,000 people, isn't just about disrupting immigrant lives. It risks a chilling effect that will reach into every corner of American society.'
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Russia hits Kyiv in missile and drone attack, killing 6 and wounding 52
Russia attacked Ukraine's capital with missiles and drones overnight, killing at least six people including a 6-year-old boy and wounding 52 others, authorities said Thursday. The casualties numbers were likely to rise, Kyiv City Military Administration head Tymur Tkachenko said. A large part of a nine-story residential building collapsed after it was struck, he said. Advertisement 5 Russia attacked Kyiv with missiles and drones overnight. REUTERS Rescue teams were at the scene searching for people trapped under the rubble. Yana Zhabborova, 35, a resident of the damaged building, woke up to the sound of thundering explosions, which blew off the doors and windows of her home. Advertisement 'It is just stress and shock that there is nothing left,' said Zhabborova, a mother of a 5-month-old infant and a 5-year-old child. Russia fired 309 Shahed and decoy drones, and eight Iskander-K cruise missiles overnight, the Ukrainian air force said. Ukrainian air defenses intercepted and jammed 288 strike drones and three missiles. Five missiles and 21 drones struck targets. Advertisement 5 Ukrainian rescuers worked to extinguish a fire at a residential building in Kyiv. UKRAINIAN EMERGENCY SERVICE/AFP via Getty Images Meanwhile, Russia's Ministry of Defense said Thursday that it had shot down 32 Ukrainian drones overnight. A drone attacked had sparked a blaze at an industrial site in Russia's Penza region, local Gov. Oleg Melnichenko said. He didn't immediately give further details other than to say that there were no casualties. Advertisement In the Volgograd region, some trains were also halted after drone wreckage fell on local railway infrastructure, state rail operator Russian Railways said. 5 Rescue teams searched for people trapped under the rubble. AP Russia's Defense Ministry also said that its forces took full control of the strategically important city of Chasiv Yar in Ukraine's eastern Donetsk region. Ukrainian officials, who typically don't confirm retreats, didn't immediately comment. Russian and Ukrainian troops have battled for control of Chasiv Yar for nearly 18 months. It includes a hilltop from which troops can attack other key points in the region that form the backbone of Ukraine's eastern defenses. 5 The overnight attack killed at least six people, including a 6-year-old boy. UKRAINIAN EMERGENCY SERVICE/AFP via Getty Images A report on Thursday from Ukraine's Army General Staff said there were seven clashes in Chasiv Yar in the past 24 hours. An attached map showed most of the town as being under Russian control. Advertisement DeepState, an open-source Ukrainian map widely used by the military and analysts, showed early Thursday that neighborhoods to the south and west of Chasiv Yar remained as so-called gray zones, or uncontrolled by either side. The attack targeted the Kyiv, Dnipro, Poltava, Sumy, Mykolaiv regions, with Ukraine's capital being the primary target, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy wrote on Telegram. 5 Two women embraced each other after they survived the overnight strikes. AP 'Today, the world once again saw Russia's answer to our desire for peace with America and Europe,' Zelenskyy said. 'New demonstrative killings. That is why peace without strength is impossible.' Advertisement He called on Ukraine's allies to follow through on defense commitments and pressure Moscow toward real negotiations. Plumes of smoke emanating from a partially damaged building and debris strewn on the ground. The force of the blast wave was powerful enough to leave clothes hanging limply from trees. At least 27 locations across Kyiv were hit by the attack, Tkachenko said, with the heaviest damage seen in the Solomianskyi and Sviatoshynskyi districts. Advertisement US President Donald Trump said Tuesday that he's giving Russian President Vladimir Putin a shorter deadline — Aug. 8 — for peace efforts to make progress, or Washington will impose punitive sanctions and tariffs. Western leaders have accused Putin of dragging his feet in US-led peace efforts in an attempt to capture more Ukrainian land.
