Putra Heights gas pipeline fire: MCA calls for RCI, says residents 'deserve the truth'
This is after the police had, on July 1, classified the incident as No Further Action (NFA) following criminal investigations that found no element of negligence or sabotage.
'Over three months have passed since the tragic gas pipeline explosion in Putra Heights, which destroyed over 80 homes and displaced hundreds of residents,' stated its vice president Datuk Ir. Lawrence Low.
'Yet recently, police concluded the case with an NFA classification—an announcement that left victims shocked and the public justifiably disheartened.
'As representatives of the people, we are deeply concerned that such a swift conclusion risks undermining public confidence in our justice system.'
According to Low, Malaysians are not asking for closure by formality but are asking for truth, responsibility and justice, adding that if the current investigation cannot provide these answers, a more credible and authoritative body must step in.
'Community associations in the affected areas have voiced serious doubts about the transparency of the investigation. Their calls for an independent review must be taken seriously,' he continued.
'This was not an isolated event—it raises grave questions about national safety. With over 2,680 kilometres of gas pipelines beneath our towns and cities, how many more hazards remain undetected?
'The victims deserve to know why this happened, who is accountable, and what steps are being taken to prevent a recurrence.'
Low said while the party welcomes Selangor Menteri Besar Datuk Seri Amirudin Shari's move to establish a state-level committee, the scale of this disaster goes beyond state borders with implications touching national energy security and regulatory oversight.
'Therefore, we respectfully urge the Prime Minister to recommend, with His Majesty's consent, to establish of an RCI,' he said.
'The RCI must be independent, transparent, and led by experts in law, engineering, and disaster management. Its findings should be made fully accessible to the public and reported directly to the Yang di-Pertuan Agong.'
To move forward, MCA further proposed five urgent measures:
Establish the RCI to investigate the explosion and recommend systemic reforms; Release all technical and forensic reports and form a technical task force team consisting of geological and geotechnical specialists to assess the affected and surrounding infrastructure; Provide legal support to victims to pursue compensation and safeguard their rights; Create a national dialogue platform to connect Petronas, local authorities, and residents; and Launch a transparent system to track each household's recovery and compensation progress.
'Residents in places like USJ and Subang Jaya now live in fear, unsure if their homes sit above the next disaster. We cannot allow silence or bureaucracy to deepen that fear. We must act—firmly, fairly, and with the victims at the heart of every decision,' Low stressed.
Earlier today, Amirudin was quoted by Bernama as saying that the committee would comprise representatives from the state and federal governments, Petronas and relevant technical agencies to examine the findings of the full investigation report into the fire, which was submitted by the police and the Department of Occupational Safety and Health (DOSH) on June 26.
He also said the committee would also propose follow-up measures to be undertaken by the government, including from a legal perspective and other related matters, after examining the report.
The blaze and explosion on April 1 destroyed 81 houses with structural damage exceeding 40%, partially destroyed another 81 and affected 57 without burning, while 218 houses were unaffected, including those in Kampung Tengah, Puchong. ‒ July 4, 2025
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Focus Malaysia
3 hours ago
- Focus Malaysia
Tun M crowns Anwar 'Father of Invisible FDI' as billions remain out of sight
FORMER prime minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad has dubbed Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim the 'Bapa FDI' or 'Father of Foreign Direct Investment', in a biting Facebook post yesterday (July 4). Welcoming Italy's announced RM8.13bil investment, Dr Mahathir quipped, 'Wait for France and Brazil, more billions coming.' He claimed RM680bil in FDI has been declared under Anwar but sarcastically noted that Malaysians 'cannot see it because the factories are invisible'. He added, 'We want more visits to foreign countries so that more invisible FDI will come.' Dr Mahathir concluded that while the wealthy pay less tax, the poor ultimately suffer from these grand but hollow announcements. On taxes, Dr Mahathir teased: 'In the meantime, Mahakaya has to pay tax. Not the Mahamiskin. Somehow indirectly the miskin suffers.' Last week, Anwar announced that Malaysia secured RM8.13bil in potential investments during his three-day official visit to Italy. The deals cover petrochemicals, machinery, electronics, and oil and gas services. Anwar also discussed defence purchases, including maritime patrol aircraft, helicopters, and naval vessels from Italy. He met Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni to strengthen ties in energy, renewable sectors, and defence and urged recognition of Malaysia's sustainable palm oil certification. Additionally, he pushed for progress on the Malaysia-EU Free Trade Agreement. Anwar's European tour will continue with visits to France and Brazil to further boost trade and economic cooperation. — July 5, 2025
Free Malaysia Today
3 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Malaysia, France reaffirm call for Gaza ceasefire
Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim and French President Emmanuel Macron at the press conference held outside the Elysee Palace in Paris. (Bernama pic) PARIS : Malaysia and France on Friday reaffirmed their stand for a ceasefire in Gaza and for humanitarian aid to get through. The call was made by French President Emmanuel Macron and Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim during a press conference at the Elysee Palace here. Macron said both he and Anwar agreed that a permanent ceasefire must take place in Gaza, adding that the release of hostages must also be implemented. He said a two-state solution is the best way to resolve the issue of Palestine-Israel. 'We are working with several parties, among them Saudi (Arabia), towards this. For now, Israel must allow for aid to reach Gaza,' he said. At the press conference held before their bilateral meeting, Anwar praised Macron for his passion to try and resolve the conflict in Gaza. 'Of course, we have condemned the continued bombings and atrocities inflicted upon civilians, women and children. And it's a shame that the international community is not able to resolve this,' he said. 'So, your initiative was supported by us. No question about peace, and if it takes two sides to secure peace, I agree with you. That's why we have also committed to the two-state solution.' Anwar said Malaysia also condemns the Israeli aggression on Iran and will continue to support France's efforts to bring peace in the Middle East. 'I don't think we can deny the issue of the use of nuclear for peaceful means. Nuclear non-proliferation, proliferation, or even power, cannot be seen to be selective,' he said. 'If you say no to Iran, (and) you say yes to Israel, we have a problem; try and resolve that. But I agree with you, we must impress upon Iran to use this for peaceful methods and peaceful means and allow for inspection, which they have given a commitment.' Macron said Iran must unequivocally reaffirm its support for the Non-Proliferation Treaty and withdraw its law limiting cooperation with the IAEA. He said Iran must also agree to a deal that will lead to the end of uranium enrichment in Iran, while allowing the country to benefit from the peaceful uses of nuclear energy. 'This has been the focus of my discussions with the Iranian president, as well as with Russian President Vladimir Putin and, just yesterday, with American President Donald Trump. I will continue talks in the coming days with other members of the Security Council. 'We also want an immediate ceasefire in Ukraine. 'We condemn just as firmly the attacks on civilian populations. This war of aggression launched by Russia has consequences far beyond Europe. We are now seeing this with the deployment of North Korean soldiers on European soil,' he said.
Malay Mail
4 hours ago
- Malay Mail
All must understand horizontal and vertical integration of Asean — Phar Kim Being and Luthfy Hamzah
JULY 5 — As Malaysia's Asean Chairmanship under Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim reaches its midpoint in 2025, a more rigorous appraisal is necessary. Malaysia's efforts, including championing Timor Leste's entry into Asean and orchestrating the successful Asean-GCC-China Economic Summit from May 23 to 27, have drawn wide praise. But the real question remains: what structural reforms or regional frameworks have been solidified to ensure Asean's strategic direction is not only symbolic, but sustainable? Too often, Asean's Group Chairmanship has been assessed through a ceremonial lens — the number of summits hosted, joint communiqués released, or bilaterals scheduled. These are valid barometers, but insufficient. The more substantive measure should be how well the Chair understands and executes horizontal and vertical integration of Asean's regional architecture. All analysts must apply these metrics too, rather than focus solely on perennial issues such as tensions between Thailand and Cambodia or the South China Sea. These challenges will always be present for Asean and the related summits to address. A more scientific approach lies in understanding the horizontal and vertical integration of Asean. Horizontal expansion: Lessons from the past Since its founding on August 8, 1967, Asean's trajectory has been defined by periodic expansions. Brunei Darussalam joined in 1984, marking the second major phase of Asean's evolution after the original five members: Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore and Thailand. Brunei, with its stable polity and hydrocarbon wealth, added value to Asean without posing internal or sub-systemic challenges. But the subsequent inclusion of Cambodia, Myanmar, Laos and Vietnam (CMLV) between 1997 and 1999 — often praised as the third horizontal expansion — brought deeper and more enduring complications. Despite the noble intentions of 'One Vision, One Identity, One Community,' the development gap between maritime Southeast Asia and continental Indochina remains unresolved. The Myanmar conundrum alone continues to haunt Asean. Each Group Chair, including Malaysia in 2025, inherits the same headache. The Five-Point Consensus forged in Jakarta during Brunei's 2021 chairmanship remains unfulfilled, especially its first commitment: a cessation of violence. In 2025, the Group Chair, namely Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, has had to employ quiet diplomacy, leveraging Thailand's channels to engage both Senior General Min Aung Hlaing and hold a separate online dialogue with the National Unity Government (NUG) of Myanmar. Though there were indications of the Tatmadaw's willingness to consider a longer ceasefire process, Malaysia was unfairly criticised for 'legitimising' the military junta — a criticism that ignores the humanitarian collapse inside Myanmar, compounded by a devastating earthquake and the rise of cybercriminal syndicates. Indeed, the rise of 'scamdemics' — criminal activities involving fraud, online scams, and forced labour in digital slavery — has become an alarming security and reputational threat to Asean. The United Nations now estimates these cross-border operations generate nearly US$70 billion annually. With operations rooted along the porous frontiers of Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, and increasingly northern Thailand, these groups have undermined regional tourism and trust. Eighty to ninety per cent of mainland Chinese tourists now shun Thailand, especially Bangkok and Chiang Mai, citing safety concerns — an invisible but potent cost to Asean's brand equity. Another horizontal expansion: PNG? Indonesia's President Prabowo Subianto recently suggested at the Asean Summit in Kuala Lumpur that Papua New Guinea (PNG) could be embraced into Asean in the future. PNG, after all, has long been an observer of the Asean Regional Forum — a status shared by Timor Leste. This could potentially mark Asean's fourth horizontal expansion, pushing the bloc further into the Pacific. PNG shares land borders with Indonesia's Papua province. However, before enlarging the tent again, Asean must first ensure the house is in order. This is where vertical integration becomes the essential litmus test for a mature and future-ready Asean. Since its founding on August 8, 1967, Asean's trajectory has been defined by periodic expansions. — AFP pic Vertical integration: The real test of Asean Centrality The Asean Charter, adopted in 2008, enshrines the principle of Asean Centrality — the notion that Asean must lead in shaping the region's norms, policies, and institutional interactions. However, the substance of this centrality lies not in speeches or summitry, but in the actual vertical integration of institutions and systems. For example, AseanPOL must evolve beyond annual meetings into a transnational enforcement mechanism. It should resemble INTERPOL in its interoperability, facilitating real-time cooperation among national police forces to counter transnational crimes, human trafficking, cyber fraud, and illegal contraband. The recent surge in digital slavery and trafficking scams has exposed glaring holes in Asean's policing capabilities and inter-agency coordination. Similarly, strategic infrastructure such as the Asean Power Grid and the Trans-Asean Railway Network — both longstanding items on Asean's master plans — cannot succeed without policy alignment and skilled labour mobility. These megaprojects require a liberalised flow of blue- and white-collar workers across Asean borders. But current barriers, including immigration bottlenecks, labour certification issues, and mutual recognition gaps, continue to inhibit such mobility. Moreover, vertical integration demands digital interconnectivity. Asean aspires to be a single digital market, and Malaysia aims to be its AI-driven digital hub. This requires seamless internet backbone connections, cybersecurity protocols, and regulatory harmonisation across the region. In today's Fourth Industrial Revolution, data is power — and Asean must secure and synchronise its digital governance accordingly. Here, Malaysia has a real chance to lead. As Group Chair, it must accelerate Asean's mastery of the six As of the digital age: Artificial Intelligence, Automation, Algorithm, Apps-driven economy, Augmented Reality, and Analysis of Big Data. From blueprint to execution Much of this agenda is already embedded in Asean's various roadmaps: the Asean Master Plan on Connectivity 2010, the Asean 2025: Forging Ahead Together blueprint, and the Kuala Lumpur Declaration on Asean 2045. But these plans must now be matched by political will and policy execution. Hosting 330 meetings annually does not guarantee progress. Asean must shift from being a conference community to a community of action. That shift begins with recognising that horizontal expansion without vertical consolidation only deepens the bloc's structural weakness. In contrast, meaningful vertical integration — from security cooperation and human capital development to infrastructure and digital harmonisation — can deliver the 'People-Oriented, People-Centred' Asean that every Chair claims to support. Preparing the ground for future chairs As Malaysia prepares to hand over the Group Chair role to the Philippines in 2026, and then Singapore in 2027, the legacy it leaves matters. If Malaysia's chairmanship is remembered solely for ceremonial milestones or photo opportunities, then Asean has missed another chance for renewal. But if Malaysia can demonstrate that deep institutional reforms and regional integration strategies were seeded and cultivated in 2025, then it would have set a powerful precedent — not just for Asean's future, but for the credibility of Asean's Group Chairmanship itself. Ultimately, Asean cannot afford to remain a loosely integrated bloc held together by communiqués and camaraderie. It must evolve — by design, not by crisis. And that evolution depends on chairmanships that understand the delicate but urgent balance between expanding the bloc horizontally and integrating it vertically. * Phar Kim Beng, PhD, is the Director of the Institute of Internationalisation and Asean Studies (IINTAS) at IIUM, and Lutfy Hamzah is a Senior Research Fellow at IINTAS. ** This is the personal opinion of the writers or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
