logo
TD questions why security staff not deployed on Dublin northside public transport

TD questions why security staff not deployed on Dublin northside public transport

Irish Times22-05-2025
A northside
Dublin
TD has questioned why security personnel have been deployed on public transport on the city's southside but not on services north of the Liffey.
Fine Gael
Dublin Bay North TD Naoise Ó Muirí highlighted the disparity as he spoke of the 'urgent need for security personnel on public transport services in north Dublin, in particular during evening hours'.
Speaking in the Dáil, he called for the deployment of An Garda Síochána or security personnel on Dart and bus services as part of the community-safety programme and said 'it is an issue of growing concern, particularly in areas such as Raheny, Donaghmede, Belmayne and Clongriffin'.
Mr Ó Muirí said 'there is a question mark as to why the southside's services are manned but the northside's services are not'.
READ MORE
His party colleague Cllr Supriya Singh had consistently raised the issue and 'we have had a steady stream of incidents, including violent attacks at both Raheny and Clongriffin Dart stations within the past year.
'These are not isolated incidents. They reflect a pattern of escalating antisocial behaviour that if we do not address the behaviour, it will erode public confidence in the safety of our transport system.'
Mr Ó Muirí said: 'this affects everyone but particularly women, older people and those travelling alone in the evening time. How can we encourage women to switch to or even use public transport if they do not feel safe? It is a public service and a safety issue.'
Safety on public transport 'must be treated as a basic right not a privilege', he said. They had written to the National Transport Authority (NTA) 'but to date there appears to be little or no tangible progress'.
'Meanwhile, security personnel have been deployed on some southside routes last year. Why the delay on the northside of the city? When will we see a proper security presence on the ground, on buses and on trains in our communities,' he asked.
Minister of State Jerry Buttimer acknowledged that 'antisocial behaviour on our public transport system needs to be addressed. It has been tolerated for far too long.'
But he said a great deal of work had been done to address the issue including the establishment of a public transport safety working group.
He said, however, 'it is important to note that decisions regarding the policing of public transport and the allocation of Garda resources are matters for the Minister of Justice and the Garda Commissioner.
'The allocation of security staff employed by the various operators, such as Dublin Bus, Irish Rail, and Transdev, are matters for the operators.'
Mr Buttimer said the Government is committed to establishing a transport security force under the under the NTA 'which would operate and have similar powers to airport police and customs officers', but it requires the development of legislation and the 'deliberative process' on this is 'in the preliminary stages'.
Mr Buttimer said he would raise the question of security personnel with the NTA and the Department of Transport and would come back to Mr Ó Muirí 'with the timeline for the northside personnel'.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Every Irish person contributes €53.20 a month to the EU. We should be prepared to pay more
Every Irish person contributes €53.20 a month to the EU. We should be prepared to pay more

Irish Times

time4 minutes ago

  • Irish Times

Every Irish person contributes €53.20 a month to the EU. We should be prepared to pay more

The European Commission's publication of its draft of the union's €2 trillion 2028-2034 budget, the Multiannual Financial Framework ( MFF ), once again opens up a tortuous two years of likely acrimonious budget negotiations. Twenty seven states and the European Parliament must unanimously agree – in talks as complicated as four-dimensional chess – a new package of political imperatives, from defence, immigration, climate change, industrial innovation and inflation to safeguarding historic programmes such as CAP and cohesion. By all appearances, this will be an utterly impossible reconciliation. Helping to steer a path towards it will be the onerous central challenge of next year's Irish presidency . And complicating that challenge for cash-strapped Dublin negotiators will be a plethora of threats to programmes that are particularly important to us to us – CAP; changes to delivery mechanisms; new demands such as defence; and arguments about the scale of increasing burdens on budget net contributors. In truth, according to Zsolt Darvas from think tank Bruegel , MFF spending needs to double to finance the climate transition and pay off its Covid-19 debts. His views echo those in an important report last year from former Italian prime minister Mario Draghi, calling for an additional €800 billion a year of private- and public-sector investment to revive Europe's economic competitiveness. READ MORE The commission's budget is more modest, some €1.816 trillion (plus €165 billion in pandemic recovery debt repayments), up from the current 1.1 per cent of union gross national income to 1.15 per cent. And all at a time when member states are all adamant they will not pay a penny more, although commission president Ursula von der Leyen insists unconvincingly their contributions do not need to go up. [ The Irish Times view on the EU budget: major barriers to getting an agreement Opens in new window ] Irish farmers should be pleased to see direct income payments to farmers ring-fenced. However, agricultural economists here worry that rural development and environmental support payments are to be hived off into a broader regional fund pot and are likely to be squeezed – similar to the cohesion fund for poorer regions, which was once an important Irish staple. MEPs from the regions are also already screaming blue murder at the 'renationalisation' or centralisation of regional funding – 27 national plans would replace more than 500 current programmes. They are alarmed it would substantially reduce regional autonomy and funding which makes up more than one-third of the current budget. Von der Leyen's juggling trick also involves fancy footwork in respect of expanding the union's 'own resources' – or funding from non-member state sources. Such taxation needs to be targeted so that it does not impinge on the domestic tax base and revenues of governments. Most controversially this time is the suggestion of levying a tax on companies with a net annual turnover of at least €100 million. This is expected to generate only €6.8 billion but is already facing determined opposition. Speaking like an Irish finance minister, Germany's chancellor Friedrich Merz has warned that 'there is no question of the EU taxing companies, as the EU has no legal basis for this'. Other proposed new 'own resources' include taxes targeting electric waste (around €15 billion annually), tobacco products/companies (€11.2 billion), a carbon border tax (€1.4 billion), and a tax on revenues generated by emissions trading (€9.6 billion). EU capitals will also worry how the new budget would affect the politically sensitive difference between national contributions and receipts. [ Proposed €2tn EU budget would increase funding for defence Opens in new window ] From 1973 to 2018 Ireland was a net recipient, in nominal terms, of more than €40 billion in EU funds. By 2023, 10 countries, including Ireland, were net contributors, and 17 were net beneficiaries. Top of the net contributors were Germany (€19.8 billion), France (€9.3 billion), with Ireland in eighth place (€1.3 billion). Poland was the top net beneficiary, receiving €7.1 billion. Ireland was second in net contribution per head, at €240 per person. Courtesy of our growing relative wealth (measured dubiously by 'GDP per cap') we displaced Luxembourg in 2024 in paying the most to the EU budget on a gross per capita basis – with every Irish person contributing some €53.20 a month to the union's coffers compared to the EU average of €25.20 and Germans' €29.70. Bulgarians contributed €10.70 a month. Net cash contributions have been seized on by many national politicians and the press as evidence that the countries of the supposedly indolent south are unfairly milking the system at the expense of fiscally responsible northerners. But the real benefits of membership to the countries of the north amount to far more than can be measured by such direct transfer figures. Apart from the progressive aims of redressing EU-wide economic imbalances, helping poorer neighbours and levelling the playing field, the EU provides huge indirect and non-cash benefits disproportionately to net contributing members such as Ireland. These include financial rewards from the European Central Bank in maintaining financial stability and financial returns, valuable access to the single market and research grants through the Horizon programme. Making the political case for increasing our contribution yet again will not be easy but it must be done.

Delay of law proposal adds to uncertainty around redress for clerical abuse survivors
Delay of law proposal adds to uncertainty around redress for clerical abuse survivors

Irish Times

time4 minutes ago

  • Irish Times

Delay of law proposal adds to uncertainty around redress for clerical abuse survivors

A proposal for a law that would allow religious organisations to be held liable for abuse by their members will not be considered by the Government until 2027 at the earliest. Many religious organisations are unincorporated bodies. This means they as entities cannot be sued and their assets may be beyond the reach of the courts if and when one of their members are found liable for damages against child sex abuse survivors. Individual members of such religious bodies can face legal action, but case law shows it can be difficult to legally pursue the organisation itself for redress. There are concerns about how the State will recoup redress funds from religious bodies for a scheme being considered for survivors of sexual abuse in schools. READ MORE If set up, it would likely be the largest and most expensive redress scheme in the history of the State. Since 2022, the Law Reform Commission (LRC) has been considering whether the Government should legislate to give unincorporated associations, such as voluntary religious orders, their own legal personality or set out another way by which they may be held liable. Minister for Education Helen McEntee has said: 'The Government will review any recommendations made by the commission in its final report, with a view to introducing any necessary legislative or administrative changes in due course.' However, a spokesman for the LRC said its report on changing the legal status of bodies such as religious organisations will not be ready before the end of next year. 'The report about the liability of unincorporated associations is being scoped at present. We do not yet have a completion date but we do not expect it to be published before the end of 2026,' the spokesman said. Labour Party leader Ivana Bacik has expressed concern about whether a delay in progressing such a law would stymie the ability of the Government to access religious organisations' assets, or the lay-run trusts that their assets may have been transferred to. Ms Bacik said her party is trying to bring forward a Bill that would allow civil proceedings to be taken against unincorporated bodies like religious orders. It would allow any damages awarded in such cases to be recovered from a religious organisation or from 'associated' trusts. The same law, if passed, would also add a one-year extension to the normal limitation period provided for in the statutes of limitations. The Labour Party leader said this was to allow any proceedings that the Bill would cover to be brought within 12 months of it being enacted. She recently personally handed a copy of the Bill to the Attorney General. Given the upcoming Commission of Investigation into historic abuse in schools, the Government cannot afford to 'sit back and wait' for the LRC report to finish, she said.

Halt in decline of Garda resignations sparks concern
Halt in decline of Garda resignations sparks concern

Irish Times

time4 minutes ago

  • Irish Times

Halt in decline of Garda resignations sparks concern

A decline in the number of resignations from An Garda Síochána recorded last year has halted, dashing hopes that the high level of early departures from the force was part of a short-term trend during the Covid pandemic years. For decades, the number of gardaí leaving the force before being eligible to retire on full pensions was low. However, it jumped from 69 in 2020 to 171 in 2023, a near-250 per cent increase. Last year, resignations declined by about 20 per cent, to 138, though that decline has not continued in the first six months of this year, when there were 68 resignations. If that pace continued for the remainder of the year, the total would be the same as last year's. Shortages of personnel continue to hamper police work across the State, from responding to emergencies to investigating crimes. READ MORE However, the Garda has insisted the level of resignations is much lower than in other sectors and far below that in other police forces. 'Despite the extensive commentary and public narrative on a crisis on resignations in An Garda Síochána, the resignation rate remains at approximately 1 per cent,' Garda Headquarters said in reply to queries. It said this is far below the rate in other police services, citing a figure of up to 10 per cent in the UK, and the private sector, where it said the rate was 10 to 20 per cent. The force said some of those who had left were subject to internal discipline and opted to resign from the organisation rather than be dismissed. Twelve gardaí who had previously resigned were reattested in recent months and applications from others seeking to rejoin are under consideration. [ Garda resignations surge to record high in 2023 Opens in new window ] The Association of Garda Sergeants and Inspectors (AGSI) said the Government is already set to miss its recruitment targets less than a year into office. The Garda Representative Association (GRA) said the next Garda commissioner, due to be appointed on Tuesday, must address 'high levels' of resignations. Recruitment has begun to increase the strength of the Garda over the past 12 months, to 14,300 at present. However, that remains below the target of 15,000 minimum, with the long-term aim of growing to 18,000. The number of resignations is a concern because recruitment to the force has been sluggish since the Garda College in Templemore, Co Tipperary, reopened after being forced to close during the pandemic. Though there is capacity at the college to take in four 200-strong classes of recruits per year, classes have been smaller, with 630 recruits starting training last year. [ Garda numbers set for significant decline, sergeants and inspectors warn Opens in new window ] Some of those offered places have moved on to take other jobs, or have emigrated, by the time their applications to join the Garda have been approved and their start date for Templemore is set. Garda Headquarters has vowed to streamline that process; other ideas to bolster recruitment include satellite garda training centres, home study, and directly hiring specialists with the required skills. The trainee allowance is now €354 per week, almost double the rate in 2023. The maximum age for new recruits has increased from 35 to 50.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store