logo
Air India plane crash to 'internal decapitation' - 5 times people cheated death

Air India plane crash to 'internal decapitation' - 5 times people cheated death

Daily Mirror21-06-2025

WARNING: DISTRESSING CONTENT. As the story of the story of Air India Flight 171 survivor Vishwash Ramesh leaves people stunned, the Mirror takes a look at five other cases of individuals who have survived against all odds
People from all around the world have been fascinated by the story of Vishwash Ramesh, the British passenger who walked away from the site of the Air India Flight 171 with just a few minor injuries.
The 40-year-old Londoner had been on the doomed Boeing jet when it crashed shortly after taking off from Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport in western India. It was initially assumed that all 242 people onboard had perished, but then, Vishwash emerged from the wreckage, revealing how the section of the plane he had been seated in landed on the ground, rather than hitting the roof of a building.

Tragically, it's believed Vishwash, who had been travelling with his brother Ajay Kumar Ramesh, 45, is the sole survivor of a disaster which has sent shockwaves across the world. A total of 270 bodies were recovered from the crash site over the weekend, 241 of which had been on the plane when it nosedived into a medical college in a residential area of Ahmedabad. The other victims would have been on the ground when the terror unfolded.

As remarkable as Vishwash's story undoubtedly is, he isn't the only person to have survived when all hope appeared to have been lost. Here, the Mirror takes a look at five instances when individuals appeared to cheat death itself under extraordinary circumstances.
Shannon Malloy
On January 25, 2007, a Nebraska resident by the name of Shannon Malloy suffered 'internal decapitation' after a car crash sent her slamming into the dashboard. The then 30-year-old woman was left without control over her own head after her skull became separated from her spine, but amazingly survived the horror incident without paralysis.
In an interview with Denver station KMGH-TV, Dr. Gary Ghiselli, an orthopaedic spine surgeon from the Denver Spine Centre, revealed that he had never seen such an injury in a person still living. Shannon's loved ones were advised that they should prepare for the worst, but, to the wonder of medics, she stayed alive long enough for screws to be inserted in her head and neck, while a halo was attached to minimise movement.
Shannon recalled: "My skull slipped off my neck about five times. Every time they tried to screw this to my head, I would slip.'
As well as her neck injury, Shannon suffered a fractured skull, a bleed to the brain, and nerve damage, which left her cross-eyed. Medics view the fact that she was able to survive at all as a "miracle". Dr Ghiselli remarked: "It really is a miracle. I've seen this type of injury once before. Unfortunately, the patient didn't make it. It's a miracle that Shannon survived the actual accident. It's a miracle that she's made the progress she has."

Vesna Vulovic
On January 26, 1972, the doomed JAT Yugoslav Airlines Flight 367, which had been travelling between Stockholm in Sweden and Belgrade in Serbia, exploded above the mountains of the Czech Republic, breaking into three pieces.
The Czechoslovak Civil Aviation Authority later determined that this was caused by a briefcase bomb which had been placed in the baggage compartment; however, no arrests were ever made.

Almost all of those who'd been onboard that day, some 27 passengers and crew, died in the catastrophe. To the astonishment of all those who read about the story at the time, however, one young woman managed to survive against all odds - a 23-year-old flight attendant by the name of Vesna Vulovic.
Vesna plunged 33,333 feet (10,160 metres; 6.31 miles) to the snowy ground below, a feat that would later earn her a Guinness World Record for the highest fall she had ever survived without a parachute. Her terrified screams thankfully reached the ears of heroic woodsman Bruno Honke, who rescued her from the debris field.
The stewardess was taken to the hospital, where she slipped into a coma for 10 days. It was found that she'd suffered a fractured skull, two crushed vertebrae, and breaks to her pelvis, ribs and both legs. Her survival naturally left doctors baffled, and it was concluded that her being pinned down by a food cart at the tail end of the fuselage had ultimately offered her some protection.

Although initially paralysed from the waist down, Vesna went on to make a near-full recovery and became something of a celebrity and symbol of resilience in Serbia. Many, understandably, also viewed her as extremely lucky. She once told The New York Times: "People always want to sit next to me on the plane."
Ludger Sylbaris
On May 7, 1902, labourer Ludger Sylbaris was thrown into a solitary cell in a prison in the vibrant port city of Saint-Pierre, Martinique, then referred to as the 'Paris of the West Indies', after getting himself into a brawl. Although at the time, it was no doubt vexing to be trapped in a half-underground cell, this positioning ultimately proved fortuitous, with the events that transpired next ultimately earning him the nickname "the man who lived through Doomsday".

As Ludger languished in his dungeon-like cell, with a narrow slit in the door offering the only view out, the Mt. Pelée volcano, which loomed over the cosmopolitan city, exploded, killing almost 30,000 residents. There was no escape for those caught in the 1,075-degree pressure wave, which destroyed every building, ship, and human being in its path.
Even those who sought refuge in shelters were not safe, with their lungs burned from the inside out as oxygen was replaced with lethal gases. In his isolated stone cell, Ludger was afforded a degree of protection that those walking free sadly didn't have.
As detailed by Historic Mysteries, Ludger did suffer horrific burns after the inside of his cell rapidly heated up to 1000 degrees. However, he was able to avoid breathing in the toxic air by urinating on his clothes and using them to plug up the door grating.

It would be four long days before rescuers came to his aid. By then, Saint-Pierre was in ruins, with only a handful of survivors having weathered the destruction. With the city where he'd lived and worked now a ghost town, Ludger was forced to begin again. He went on to find celebrity status after joining up with the Barnum & Bailey circus, where punters were captivated by his incredible tale of survival.
Martunis
Little Martunis was just seven years old when he survived the 2004 Boxing Day Tsunami, which saw a 30 m (100 ft) high wave wreak devastation along coastal areas of Indonesia, Sri Lanka, India, and Thailand.

At least 225,000 people across 11 countries died in the tragedy, including Martunis' own mother and sisters. Recalling that terrible day in December 2024, 20 years on, Martunis remembered: 'I was playing football with my friends when suddenly an earthquake struck.
"I rushed home and gathered with my mother, older sister, and younger sister, and we hugged each other. Then someone shouted that the sea water was rising and I ran together with my mother, my little sister and older sister."
The family desperately attempted to escape in a pickup truck, but when it overturned, they got separated. Martunis, now 27, shared: "At that moment, I picked up my little sister and handed her to my mother.

"I also picked up my older sister and helped her when she was drowning in the water. I tried to lift my sisters who were drowning, but we got separated. "I found myself on a mattress. As the mattress started to sink, I grabbed onto a school bench, but that also sank.
"Then I saw a coconut. I hugged it like hugging a football until I climbed onto another mattress. I passed out several times... I was drowning. Suddenly, I found myself on a big tree and was carried towards the sea.
"When I woke up, I didn't see a single person anymore. I couldn't find anyone who was alive. I just saw a lot of corpses around me. I was lost in the mangrove swamp for 21 days, trying to find food.

"Sometimes I found biscuits and also some other food, like instant noodles, bottled water, as well as other drinks. On day 20, I ran out of food and had to drink rainwater."
Eventually, Martunis was found on a beach by a Sky News TV crew, and taken to the hospital. By this point, he was dehydrated, malnourished and covered in mosquito bites, but miraculously, alive.
He was thankfully reunited with his father, Sarbini, on the hospital wards, thanks to Save The Children through their Family Tracking and Reunification programme.

The counterfeit Portugal football top Martunis had been wearing at the time of his rescue brought his story to the attention of professional footballers, including Cristiano Ronaldo, who reportedly paid for Martunis' education.
Martunis even went on to enjoy significant footballing success in his own right and went on to sign an academy contract for Ronaldo's old club, Sporting Lisbon.
Alcides Mareno

On the morning of December 7, 2007, window cleaner Alcides Moreno and his younger brother Edgar took the lift to the top floor of the 47-storey Solow Tower building in Manhattan, New York City. Just as they stepped out onto the scaffold to wash the glass, the cables holding the 16ft wide (4.9m) washing platform in place "slipped from their attachment point", as per the United States Department of Labour accident report.
Sadly, Edgar, 30, fell instantly to his death, striking the top of a wall at an estimated speed of 124 mph. Alcides, then 37, clung tightly to the aluminium platform, which acted almost like an airborne surfboard, slowing his descent. When emergency services went to rescue Alcides from a heap of twisted metal, he was still breathing and even made attempts to stand up, BBC News later reported.

Alcides' injuries were severe, and he had to undergo 16 different operations to repair the extensive damage to his body, including his kidneys, brain, bones, and lungs. He also received 24 pints of blood and 19 pints of plasma, enough to replace all his blood twice over.
Experts were left amazed that Alcides had lived to tell the tale. As reported by the New York Post, Dr. Sheldon Teperman, director of trauma and critical-care surgery at Jacobi Medical Centre in The Bronx, made the following comments at the time: 'Fifty per cent of people who fall four to five stories die. By the time you reach 10 or 11 stories, just about everyone dies. This guy absolutely should have died.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Kids 'may end up with smaller brains' after spending time in front of TVs
Kids 'may end up with smaller brains' after spending time in front of TVs

Daily Mirror

time7 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

Kids 'may end up with smaller brains' after spending time in front of TVs

Children addicted to TV and phone screens could end up with smaller brains, according to scientists who analysed thousands of youngsters Youngsters glued to TV screens could end up with smaller brains and lower intelligence, scientists say. Parents are being warned to limit children's screen time after a study found children who watched television and used smartphones, tablets and computers, had lower IQs. While children who exercised in their spare time were likely to be more intelligent and had a larger brain volume, according to the research. ‌ 'Although certain digital activities (educational games) may yield cognitive benefits, overall evidence indicates that excessive passive and multitasking screen behaviours undermine cognitive development,' the study in the journal Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, said. ‌ The study used databases from across Europe that contained information from thousands of children on IQ, screen use and physical exercise. They analysed the data to find the link between leisure time habits, intelligence and intracranial volume (ICV) - a marker for brain size. Larger ICV has been linked to superior intelligence. Children's screen time use has rocketed in recent years with the average amount of time British children aged five to 15 spend on screens rising from nine hours a week in 2009 to 15 hours a week in 2018. According to the World Health Organization, children need to sit less and play more. They believe there should be no screen time for children under one year of age. ‌ For those aged two years, screen time should be no more than one hour a day and 'less is better'. The researchers looking at the IQ link, who are based in China, said their results provide further evidence that excessive screen time has a lifelong impact on children's brain development. 'These findings highlight the critical need to manage and regulate children's media use while also promoting increased physical activity,' they wrote in the journal Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience. While there can be benefits, including building friendships and improving learning, negative effects include online bullying, exposure to violence and pornography, lower levels of physical activity and eye strain. ‌ Sir Cary Cooper, a psychology professor at the University of Manchester, told the Mail on Sunday: "Children are using these devices and they are not learning social and non-verbal skills that we pick up from interacting, face-to-face, with other people." The NHS suggests no screen time, except for video calling caregivers and family for babies, while they say there should be a limit of one hour a day for those aged two to five. ‌ For school children aged six to 12 years they say up to two hours of screen time per day and for teenagers aged 13 plus, no more than two hours per day. The NHS advice is: 'Limit the amount of time your child spends on inactive pastimes such as watching television, playing video games and playing on electronic devices. 'There's no hard and fast advice on how much is too much, but experts say children should have no more than 2 hours of screen time each day. 'And remove all screens (including mobile phones) from their bedroom at night.'

Furious Covid-19 bereaved demand justice for care homes ‘disgrace'
Furious Covid-19 bereaved demand justice for care homes ‘disgrace'

Daily Mirror

time8 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

Furious Covid-19 bereaved demand justice for care homes ‘disgrace'

The Covid-19 Inquiry will on Monday hear from relatives prevented from saying their final goodbyes to loved ones in care homes, while parties were being held in Downing Street Families are demanding that politicians are held to account after describing their heartbreaking final moments with loved ones. This week the UK Covid-19 Inquiry will look at the impact of the pandemic on care homes and how social distancing guidelines meant many relatives were prevented from saying their final goodbyes. Families have told of their anger that ex-PM Boris Johnson 's government had at the same time been holding parties in Downing Street and flouting social distancing rules. The first wave of the pandemic saw the virus sweep through care homes as untested residents were sent there from struggling hospitals. ‌ ‌ During the first peak between March and June 2020 66,000 people died in care homes, with a third of those deaths attributed to Covid-19. Sharon Cook's parents were care home residents in Hinckley, Leicestershire, and died a week apart in 2020. Sharon, 60, told the Mirror: 'There was no even waving through the window for us because they were on the second floor. 'When we found out the government were having parties it just felt like we were being disrespected. You have to put your grief on hold because you're dealing with your anger because your loss is being disrespected. Then we had all the denials and all these countless thousands of deaths were kind of being written off as some sort of typing error. That government was a disgrace.' Sharon's mum Joan, aged 85, fell ill and had to be taken to hospital and a few days later tested positive for Covid and passed away. Her dad Alf Cook, 87, was a Parkinson's sufferer and was given the news in his care home. ‌ Sharon explained: 'Dad had been very much looked after by mum in the care home and suddenly she wasn't there. I think sometimes he thought he was the problem, not the pandemic, and that everyone was wearing masks because of him. 'I'm an only child and I was all he had but at that point there were no more visits. I was really upset about that because I just felt he needed me. He didn't take long then he died. I did wonder if he just gave up because I wasn't allowed in. You just get swamped by grief.' The Mirror revealed in November 2021 that gatherings had taken place in Downing Street when London was under tier 3 restrictions during 2020. They included a number of leaving parties and a Christmas party on December 18. ‌ Louise Baker, from Aberdeen, told the Mirror her father Sandy Adam died at his care home two days before the infamous Christmas party. Louise, 49, said: 'Before lockdown dad would come round our house every Sunday for dinner. He had dementia but it wasn't that far progressed that he didn't know who we were. 'After lockdown none of it made sense to him. Initially we could just shout in through a small gap in his tilt window but he was very hard of hearing. We couldn't hug him. I was extremely angry because we found out one of those parties in Downing Street coincided with my dad's death. I'm absolutely furious.' ‌ Sandy, a retired dentist, had been allowed a meeting on the car park with Louise before his death at the age of 81 but they were not allowed within five metres of each other. She explained: 'It was so difficult because he felt the cold quite acutely and he was really grumpy. You weren't allowed to hug and like to do anything normal and he couldn't hear us. He just sat there with his arms folded.' Sharon and Louise's accounts will be played today in an impact film at the start of Module 6 in front of inquiry chair Baroness Heather Hallett. ‌ Louise added: 'In the next pandemic there has to be a balance struck between the protection of the both people who are vulnerable to infections and their right to dignity and the right to human contact and their right to family life. I'm not pretending I have any of these answers but we need to find a balance. "There needs to be a recognition of the damage being done by the deprivation that people were experiencing, that level of isolation and the removal of basic rites of passage, like being able to see your loved one's body in their coffin.' ‌ Among the key government decisions being discussed at the inquiry from this week will be that in March 2020 to rapidly discharge hospital patients into care homes without testing or a requirement for them to isolate. A 2022 High Court judgement that ruled the policy was unlawful as it failed to take into account the risk to elderly and vulnerable care home residents of asymptomatic transmission of the virus. Between early March and early June 2020, nearly 20,000 care home residents in England and Wales died with Covid-19. That's about a third of all care home deaths during that period. ‌ Many bereaved care home families, including Sharon Cook, say their loved ones had Do Not Resuscitate - so called DNRs - placed on them against their wishes. Sharon said politicians should be held to account for their handling of the pandemic and subject to criminal proceedings if found to be negligent. She said: 'There needs to be greater accountability. I often say that if it was a pilot that had acted so recklessly and cost people their lives unnecessarily, or if it was a surgeon, there wouldn't be any question about, they would be interrogated and summoned to court. So why are politicians any different? ‌ 'It's not right that people with this much power can treat it with such little respect, have such devastating outcomes and no consequences.' Covid-19 Bereaved Families for Justice UK has written an open letter to the inquiry chair Baroness Hallett objecting to the fact that ex-PM Boris Johnson will not appear before the latest module about the social care sector. Jean Adamson, a spokesperson for Covid-19 Bereaved Families for Justice UK, said: 'Bereaved families have waited years for this moment. The care module is one of the most important parts of the Inquiry. It will examine how and why thousands of people were left unprotected in care homes and in the community, and why so many died without support, without dignity, and without accountability. ‌ 'But we are seriously concerned about the way this module is being handled. It is unacceptable that Boris Johnson and other key decision-makers will not be called to give evidence.' A Lancet study later found that during the first wave of the pandemic care homes residents were 17 times more likely to die compared to private home residents of a similar age. This compared to a ten times higher risk before the pandemic, as people in residential care are generally more frail and unwell. ‌ Covid bereaved families are expected to gather outside the opening of Module 6 of the inquiry today. The £200 million inquiry was set up to examine the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic, the UK's response to it and to learn lessons for the next pandemic. Its latest module on the social care sector will take place at Dorland House in Paddington, west London. Ben Connah, Secretary at the UK Covid-19 Inquiry, said: 'Sharon and Louise's stories are so powerful. Sadly, their experiences are not unique. Tens of thousands of people living in care lost their lives to Covid during the pandemic. 'This is why it is so important that the UK Covid-19 Inquiry spends the next five weeks investigating how the virus affected the care sector. Questions will be asked in public of key politicians, scientists, healthcare professionals and other experts. Our Chair, Baroness Heather Hallett, will get answers. 'We will begin with powerful evidence from bereaved individuals. Their experiences are front and centre of our hearings this week. 'The inquiry is making speedy progress. The country must learn the lessons of the last pandemic as quickly as possible - because we all know there will be another one.' This week the inquiry will investigate the impact of the pandemic on the publicly and privately funded adult social care sector in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. It will start with opening statements from core participants and impact evidence from bereaved individuals before an appearance from former Health Secretary Matt Hancock on Wednesday.

Six ice lollies under 100 calories – and the ones to swerve if you're dieting
Six ice lollies under 100 calories – and the ones to swerve if you're dieting

Telegraph

time9 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Six ice lollies under 100 calories – and the ones to swerve if you're dieting

Whether it's a classic choc ice taking you back to childhood summers on a windswept British beach; the nation's favourite, the Magnum; or the one I crave on a hot summer's day, a fruity Solero, there are ice lollies for all moods. But in these health-conscious days, with everything we know about the dangers of added sugars, not only to our waistline but to our hearts, are there better options out there? Should we all be throwing out the Magnums and embracing the newer, reduced-sugar ice lollies which come with indulgent brownie pieces and a 'rich fudge swirl' yet contain only 90 calories? Are the versions with real fruit purée and less sugar any better? With the help of our experts, it's time to put the nation's favourites, and some of the 'healthy' upstarts, to the test. Our reviewers, registered nutritionist Eli Brecher and consultant dietitian Rebecca McManamon, put their taste-bud-led biases to the side for this analysis. Instead, they ranked the ice lollies objectively, based on health metrics including nutritional information, calories and ingredients. According to a YouGov poll, the Magnum is the UK's favourite ice lolly and it's not hard to see why with its velvety ice cream and signature cracking chocolate. However, it's bad news for fans of the moreish treat as our experts rate it one of the worst of the bunch. With 231 calories, 20g of sugar and almost 10g of saturated fat per stick, Brecher advises people to 'save it to enjoy on occasions, rather than making it a regular summer snack'. Per stick: 231kcal, saturated fat 9.8g, carbohydrates 23g, of which sugars 20g, protein 2.5g, salt 0.09g Nobbly Bobbly Ice Cream Bar 'The combination of a chocolate coating plus sugary sprinkles is double trouble from a nutritional perspective,' Brecher says. The Nobbly Bobbly packs a high sugary punch with 16.9g per stick, and provides little protein or fibre. In fact, Brecher struggles to find anything positive to say about it. Per stick: 166kcal, saturated fat 4.5g, carbohydrates 21g, of which sugars 16.9g, protein 1.3g, salt 0.07g Calippo Orange Ice Lolly With 17g per serving, the Calippo is one of the highest sugar ice lollies on this list, Brecher notes. It also contains 'almost no fibre or protein'. However, it's low in fat and calories. McManamon advises Calippo fans to opt for the mini option if possible, which is slightly lower in sugar. Fab Strawberry Ice Lolly With layers of strawberry and vanilla ice lolly and a satisfying chocolate coating, the Fab is a firm favourite among the UK's under-50s. It contains slightly less sugar than a Twister, although still a significant amount. 'It's very low in protein, fibre and satiating nutrients,' Brecher says, 'and also contains added sugar and artificial ingredients.' Per stick: 75kcal, saturated fat 1g, carbohydrates 12.5g, of which sugars 10g, protein 0.3g, salt 0.03g This has a decent protein content thanks to the vanilla ice cream; however, it's high in saturated fat, according to NHS recommendations, containing far more than 5g per 100g. 'It's higher in calories than the Magnum and could lead to weight gain if eaten regularly,' McManamon says. It is slightly lower in sugar, but still contains a significant amount of your daily recommended intake. Per stick: 244kcal, saturated fat 14g, carbohydrates 22g, of which sugars 18g, protein 2.2g, salt 0.09g Twister Ice Lolly A firm favourite among children and young people, the Twister is relatively low in calories. However, it contains 12g of sugar, 'which is high for its size,' Brecher says. The NHS recommends adults have no more than 30g of free sugars a day, and children have no more than 24g, so just one Twister puts you well on the path towards your daily allowance. Again, McManamon says to opt for the mini version if possible, which contains 6.5g of sugar. Per stick: 70kcal, saturated fat 0.3g, carbohydrates 16g, of which sugars 12g, protein <0.5g, salt 0.02g Mini Milk Ice Cream Lolly A classic favourite among small children, Mini Milks are one of the healthiest options, says McManamon. One lolly provides just 30 calories, is made with fresh milk, and contains 36 per cent of a child's recommended daily allowance of calcium, 'meaning it's the only ice cream that offers a nutritional benefit,' McManamon concludes. Solero Exotic Ice Cream Stick The Solero contains real fruit purée and juice, with most of its sugar coming from these sources, making it one of the healthier options, Brecher says. At just 98 calories per serving, and filled with creamy vanilla ice cream, it's a satiating treat, best for adults who 'want a more luxurious ice cream or dessert' without the high sugar content of the chocolate-based lollies, McManamon says. Per stick: 98kcal, saturated fat 1.9g, carbohydrates 17g, of which sugars 12g, protein 1.1g, salt 0.06g What about the 'healthy' alternatives? Halo Top Gooey Brownie Stick This provides a good amount of protein, Brecher says, and has a moderate calorie content. However, it contains sweeteners and additives which 'may disrupt the gut microbiome and lead to digestive symptoms like bloating in some people'. Per stick: 90kcal, saturated fat 1.6g, carbohydrates 12g, of which sugars 9.9g, protein 2.9g, salt 0.19g Halo Top Peanut Butter Swirl Stick This is a 'lighter dessert option with a moderate amount of calories,' Brecher says. However, its sugar content is verging on the high side, despite it being marketed as a healthier option, and, again, it includes sweeteners and additives, which may interfere with gut health. Per stick: 100kcal, saturated fat 1.4g, carbohydrates 9.6g, of which sugars 7.8g, protein 3.9g, salt 0.18g Expert verdict: What's a good healthy alternative? As our analysis proves, it's difficult to find a truly 'healthy' ice lolly with many popular variations being high in calories and sugar, and low in protein and fibre. Our experts agree that the Mini Milk and Solero are the best of the bunch, with the Magnum, Nobbly Bobbly and Feast among the worst offenders. While Brecher believes ice lollies can still form part of a balanced diet, she recommends making a batch of frozen yogurt lollies when you're craving a sweet refreshing treat. Simply blend Greek yogurt with fresh berries and a drizzle of honey or maple syrup. Pour the mixture into ice lolly moulds, pop a wooden stick in each one and freeze. 'These provide natural probiotics, protein and heart-healthy fats,' Brecher concludes, 'while being lower-sugar than shop-bought options, with zero ultra-processed ingredients.' A win all round.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store