28 dead cats, 106 emaciated found in U-Haul van in California
Merced County's Sheriff's Office said a deputy responded early Sunday evening to a request to check on cats in a U-Haul, which was parked at a Taco Bell in the city of Santa Nella.
The deputy initially saw nearly two dozen cats in distress through the van's windshield, the sheriff's office said. Animal control officers responded and helped locate the rest inside the van, where no water or food was found.
Cats observed through the windshield of a parked U-Haul van in Merced County on June 29, 2025
Merced County Sheriff's Office
The Merced County Animal Shelter took custody of all the cats — ranging from one week to eight years old — and the Atwater Veterinary Center was assisting with medical treatment.
Jeannie Maxon, 69, from Long Beach, was identified as the cats' owner. Maxon was arrested and booked into the Merced County Jail, where she faces 93 counts of animal cruelty, the sheriff's office said.
Dozens of cats, some dead and others emaciated, were found in a parked U-Haul van in Central California on June 29, 2025, the Merced County Sheriff's Office said.
Merced County Sheriff's Office
For anyone interested in cat adoption, the sheriff's office said details would be released at a later date.
"On a warm day, temperatures inside a car can soar to extreme levels in just a few minutes, even with the windows open. This can lead to heatstroke, dehydration, and even death of the animal left inside," the sheriff's office said. "Please ensure that when you're traveling with your pet, they're provided with a cool place to stay, offering plenty of shade, lots of water, and food."
Santa Nella is located about 43 miles southwest of the city of Merced and about 43 miles south of Modesto.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
33 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Explosion at a California fireworks warehouse sets off fires and forces evacuations
ESPARTO, Calif. (AP) — An explosion at a fireworks warehouse in northern California caused several fires, sending black smoke into the air and forcing evacuations, authorities said. There were no immediate reports of injuries. People were urged to avoid the area of Esparto and Madison for several days following the Tuesday night explosion, which set off multiple fireworks and caused a large fire that led to other spot fires and collapsed the building. 'The fire will take time to cool, and once it does, explosive experts must safely enter the site to assess and secure the area,' the Yolo County Sheriff's Office said in a news release. The cause of the explosion was under investigation, the office said. The fire had reached 78 acres (32 hectares) as of Tuesday night, the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection said. Esparto is in a rural area about 40 miles (64 kilometers) northwest of Sacramento. 'We do believe this location is owned by an active pyrotechnic license holder,' Deputy State Fire Marshal Kara Garrett told KXTV. She added: 'This type of incident is very rare, as facilities like this are required to not only follow our stringent California pyrotechnic requirements, but also federal explosive storage requirements.'
CNN
37 minutes ago
- CNN
Fireworks warehouse explodes in California
Fire crews responded to a large explosion at a fireworks warehouse in California on July 1st. Several explosions could be seen from the building, which sparked additional spot fires. The sheriff's office said a one-mile evacuation order was put in place around the area where the fire was burning.
Fast Company
an hour ago
- Fast Company
Lululemon claims Costco knocked off its designs. Online, the big-box retailer has already won
On June 27, Lululemon filed a lawsuit alleging that Costco has infringed on its copyright with several 'knockoff' athleisure products. It's just the latest chapter in a story of dupe design that's plagued Lululemon for years. According to documents filed with the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, Lululemon takes issue with a number of Costco products that it says are intended to mimic its popular designs, including the $128 Define jacket, the $118 Scuba oversize half-zip hoodie, and the $128 ABC trouser. The documents lay out an in-depth explanation for Lululemon's identification of these 'dupes,' pointing to details like the ornamental lines on the front of the Define jacket and the construction of the ABC pants' back seam as examples of intellectual property copied by Costco in its own line of jackets and pants. As details of the lawsuit emerge, the overwhelming majority of commenters on social media are landing firmly on Costco's side of this debate. It seems that dupe design culture is becoming so normalized that many consumers view it as standard practice. Lululemon and the rise of dupe culture In recent years, dupe design culture has been taking over the way we shop. From makeup brand copycats to luxury furniture look-alikes and fragrance knockoffs, it's likely that if you've been in the market for a higher-end product recently you've stumbled across a cheaper version of said product that seems suspiciously familiar. For Lululemon, this cycle is turning into a tale as old as time. On TikTok, the hashtag #lululemondupe currently yields more than 11,000 videos; videos of affordable dupes of Lululemon products routinely garner hundreds of thousands of views. Lululemon points to this trend in its suit against Costco. 'There is even a hashtag 'LululemonDupes' on social media platforms such as TikTok that social media influencers use when promoting these copycat products,' the documents read. 'The Infringing Products create an improper association with [Lululemon's] authentic products.' According to the U.S. Copyright Office, copyright infringement occurs 'when a copyrighted work is reproduced, distributed, performed, publicly displayed, or made into a derivative work without the permission of the copyright owner.' That can look different depending on the industry, but in the fashion world it generally protects patented clothing designs that are artistic rather than utilitarian in nature. For example, Lululemon argues in its lawsuit that the ornamental features of the Define jacket are 'not essential to the function of the product,' meaning those features are not a 'competitive necessity' for other companies' apparel products, and therefore should belong to Lululemon alone. This isn't the first time Lululemon has stood up against alleged copycats. Back in 2021, the brand filed a lawsuit against Peloton—a former collaborator— arguing that the fitness company had stolen its women's athleisure designs, a claim that was ultimately settled out of court in 2022. Lululemon then took a softer tack against dupes in 2023, when it hosted an event encouraging consumers with Lululemon dupes to trade them in for the real thing. 'It's a trend we don't see going away anytime soon. So we decided to actually lean in and embrace it, rather than pretend it's not there,' Nikki Neuburger, Lululemon's chief brand officer, told Fast Company at the time. The internet sides with Costco Now Lululemon is once again objecting to what it sees as infringing designs, but in the court of public opinion, it appears the brand has already lost. On TikTok, one video from the user @thatssority explained Lululemon's argument that Costco's alleged infringing products might cause customer confusion. Per the actual legal filing, 'Upon information and belief, some customers incorrectly believe these Infringing Products are authentic lululemon apparel while still other customers specifically purchase the Infringing Products because they are difficult to distinguish from authentic lululemon products.' (Potential customer confusion is often the basis for trademark infringement litigation as well.) Several commenters took issue with Lululemon's assertion that Costco's products might be confused for theirs: 'Not a single person has ever been confused about if they're buying lulu or kirkland,' one comment with more than 30,000 likes reads. 'Boycott lululemon because I don't play about Costco,' another adds.
