logo
Mahmoud Abbas has utterly failed to show leadership at a moment of crisis

Mahmoud Abbas has utterly failed to show leadership at a moment of crisis

Middle East Eye25-04-2025
Eighteen months into the ongoing genocide in Gaza, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas gave a speech before the Palestinian Central Council this week that - at least superficially - warrants serious attention.
His words highlight the depth of the Palestinian tragedy. Israel bears responsibility for the deaths of more than 50,000 Palestinians in Gaza and nearly a thousand more in the occupied West Bank; for the total destruction of Gaza, making its population refugees on their own land; and for the forced displacement of tens of thousands of Palestinians in the West Bank.
But Abbas once again chose to use his platform not to call for unity or resistance, but to launch a crude verbal assault on Hamas - this time using language reminiscent of street insults.
'Sons of dogs, just release whoever you're holding and be done with it,' Abbas said, referring to the Israeli hostages still remaining in Gaza. 'Shut down [Israel's] excuses and spare us.'
Criticism of Hamas, which is proscribed as a terrorist group in the UK and other countries, and its actions on 7 October 2023 is valid and necessary. There must be a critical and open intra-Palestinian discourse.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
But it is unacceptable that, in the face of the ongoing catastrophe in Gaza, Abbas's primary message is to condemn Hamas, without offering a vision or a plan for Palestinian unity - especially given the existential threats looming over the Palestinian people.
Worse still is his manipulation of historical facts to erase his own responsibility for the fragmentation of the Palestinian national movement. It was Abbas who undermined the results of the 2006 elections, supervised by international observers, after Hamas won a majority. The ensuing rift between Fatah and Hamas eventually led to Hamas's takeover of Gaza and the territory's geographic and political division from the West Bank.
Deepening alienation
Abbas shares equal blame for this split. Whether through agreeing to elections he had no intention of honouring, or by refusing to accept their outcome, his role in the crisis is undeniable.
Other Palestinian factions, such as the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine and the Palestinian National Initiative, boycotted the session in which Abbas spoke - a testament to the deepening alienation between the president and the broader Palestinian political spectrum.
Follow Middle East Eye's live coverage of the Israel-Palestine war
Public opinion echoes this sentiment. A September 2024 poll by the Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research found that in a hypothetical election between three candidates, only six percent of Palestinians would vote for Abbas, compared with 32 percent for Fatah's Marwan Barghouti and 31 percent for Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar, who was killed by Israeli forces weeks after the poll was conducted.
Even if one were to accept Abbas's narrative blaming Hamas for the Gaza schism, nearly 20 years have passed since the last election. During that time, successive Israeli governments - especially Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's - have strategically used the Palestinian split to prevent the establishment of a Palestinian state.
Abbas's narrative that Hamas is to blame for our current predicament absolves both Israel and himself from their shared responsibility in this national catastrophe
Why has Abbas not proposed a political plan for reconciliation? If the Palestinian Authority (PA) is meant to represent all Palestinians, then his failure to restore unity is a monumental dereliction of duty. Today, Palestinians are no longer split only into 1948 and 1967 groups; we now face a triple fragmentation of 1948 territories, the occupied West Bank and Gaza.
Abbas's speech reflects both an acknowledgment of the real and growing dangers facing Palestinians, and a deliberate denial of the realities on the ground, particularly in the occupied West Bank, before 7 October. This denial helps him avoid accountability for the failure of his political path, as Israel openly declared its intentions to annex and ethnically cleanse parts of the West Bank well before the Gaza war.
In 2022 alone, under the so-called 'unity government' of Yair Lapid and Naftali Bennett, more than 1,000 Palestinians in the occupied West Bank were displaced and around 150 were killed, including dozens of minors. Settlement expansion continued unabated. Palestinian prisoners suffered worsening conditions. Al-Aqsa Mosque remained under threat.
Regardless of the Palestinian political situation, Israel has veered sharply rightwards over the past decade. Despite close security coordination between the PA and Israel - with Palestinian security forces even raiding refugee camps - and Abbas offering no serious plan to counter settler violence, Israel has steadily moved to render the Palestinian issue obsolete through de facto annexation.
'No future in Palestine'
To understand Israel's strategy, one needs only to revisit a 2017 policy document by Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, which called to dismantle refugee camps, weaken the PA, encourage 'voluntary emigration' (a euphemism for expulsion), and break any chance of territorial contiguity for a Palestinian state.
The despair now visible across the occupied West Bank - with billboards and graffiti funded by Israeli campaigns declaring: 'You have no future in Palestine' - was envisioned long before 7 October.
Framing Israeli policies as mere reactions to 7 October flattens the discourse and allows Israel to justify its ongoing atrocities on the global stage. Even when a deal was within reach - including a Gaza ceasefire, a phased return of all hostages and an Israeli withdrawal of troops - Israel violated the terms. Hostage families themselves have accused Netanyahu of sabotaging the deal and endangering their loved ones.
Mahmoud Abbas is in his final act as betrayer of the Palestinian cause Read More »
Israel then uses these justifications to expel tens of thousands of people from the occupied West Bank, shut down Unrwa schools, and withhold the PA's tax funds. Abbas's narrative that Hamas is to blame for our current predicament absolves both Israel and himself from their shared responsibility in this national catastrophe.
What was even more puzzling about Abbas's speech was his call for Hamas to lay down its arms and hand over control of Gaza to the PA. In other words, the only legitimate arms would be those held by Palestinian security forces, and the PA would work with Egypt to rebuild Gaza.
It's not the proposal itself that is puzzling - on the contrary, it makes sense - but rather the expectation that Israel would allow Fatah or the PA to return to Gaza, given that Netanyahu himself declared as recently as February: 'On the day after the war in Gaza, there will be no Hamas and no Palestinian Authority.' He added that he was 'committed' to US President Donald Trump's plan 'to create a different Gaza'.
The Abbas speech was tragic, especially since he leads the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO), the historic body officially recognised as the representative of the Palestinian people. Once a unifying force, the PLO now presides over a fractured movement. The boycott of Abbas's council meeting by key factions reflects this unprecedented crisis.
In the face of real and imminent threats of mass expulsion, especially in Gaza but also in the occupied West Bank, Palestinians need their leaders to be unifiers, not dividers. Abbas had a platform to call for unity and resistance in the face of Israeli war crimes. Instead, he chose vilification and denial.
The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Israel sends team to Qatar for Gaza truce talks despite 'unacceptable' Hamas demands
Israel sends team to Qatar for Gaza truce talks despite 'unacceptable' Hamas demands

The National

time33 minutes ago

  • The National

Israel sends team to Qatar for Gaza truce talks despite 'unacceptable' Hamas demands

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said he was sending a negotiating team to Qatar on Sunday for Gaza truce talks, but rejected earlier demands made by Hamas. 'The changes that Hamas is seeking to make in the Qatari proposal were conveyed to us last night and are unacceptable to Israel,' said a statement from his office late on Saturday. 'In light of an assessment of the situation, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has directed that the invitation to proximity talks be accepted and that the contacts for the return of our hostages – on the basis of the Qatari proposal that Israel has agreed to – be continued,' the statement added. Mr Netanyahu is also set to depart for Washington on Sunday to meet US President Donald Trump, with Gaza expected to dominate discussions there. Mr Trump renewed the push to end the war in Gaza that has been raging for about 21 months. He has pledged to be firm on Mr Netanyahu and has expressed hope to use the momentum of the ceasefire between Israel and Iran to secure a truce in the Palestinian enclave. Hamas on Friday said it had given a 'positive' response to the US-backed framework that envisions a 60-day ceasefire that would see the return of several Israeli hostages. The Palestinian group is also seeking personal guarantees from Mr Trump that the war in Gaza will come to a complete end. 'We submitted our positive response to the mediators yesterday. A new round of negotiations is expected to begin, focusing on the core issues: Israeli withdrawal and an end to the war,' a Hamas official told The National on Saturday. The Hamas official said the deal on the table would see the group releasing 10 living Israeli hostages and returning the bodies of 18 others. The response by Hamas appeared not to signal an immediate end to hostilities, though. The group is seeking assurances from mediators that some additional demands will be met, sources told The National on Friday. The sources confirmed Hamas would convey its acceptance of the proposed deal along with a request for assurances from US, Egyptian and Qatari mediators about the implementation of some of its 'unpublicised' clauses. The ceasefire efforts come amid continuing Israeli attacks on Gaza and as Palestinians struggle for limited aid supplies. The US on Saturday blamed Hamas for an attack that injured two American aid workers from the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. The US and Israeli-backed GHF said that the injured Americans were receiving medical treatment and were in a stable condition with non-life-threatening injuries. 'The attack – which preliminary information indicates was carried out by two assailants who threw two grenades at the Americans – occurred at the conclusion of an otherwise successful distribution in which thousands of Gazans safely received food,' the GHF said. US State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce blamed 'Hamas terrorists' for the attack.

Roger Waters from Pink Floyd backs Palestine Action, denounces UK terror label
Roger Waters from Pink Floyd backs Palestine Action, denounces UK terror label

Middle East Eye

time5 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

Roger Waters from Pink Floyd backs Palestine Action, denounces UK terror label

English rock legend Roger Waters has publicly declared his support for the recently banned direct-action group Palestine Action, calling the UK government's decision to proscribe it as a 'terrorist organisation' a betrayal of justice and democracy. Speaking in a video recorded on 5 July, Waters, co-founder of Pink Floyd, accused the UK Parliament of being 'corrupted by agents of a genocidal foreign power,' referencing Israel. 'This is Independence Day, July the fifth, 2025. I declare my independence from the government of the UK,' said Waters, criticising the decision to criminalise support for Palestine Action. 'They are nonviolent. They are absolutely not terrorist in any way.' Palestine Action was officially designated a terrorist organisation by the British government on Saturday, a move that has drawn condemnation from human rights groups and activists. The group has targeted arms manufacturers linked to Israel, most notably Elbit Systems, which produces weapons used in Israel's military operations in Gaza. Waters defended the group's tactics as peaceful and justified, saying: 'They are a nonviolent protest organisation protesting the presence in the UK of Elbit Systems, an Israeli arms manufacturing organisation… I support Palestine Action and I always will because that is the right thing to do.' Referencing journalist George Monbiot's call for public defiance, Waters echoed the rallying cry: 'This is the 'I am Spartacus' moment… Good on everybody who is standing up everywhere and saying, 'I am Spartacus.' We will not be rolled over by this appalling Labour government in the United Kingdom.' The musician concluded with a stark message: 'Palestine Action is not a terrorist organisation. They are lying… that's all I have to say." Waters has long been outspoken on Palestinian rights and has previously faced backlash for his criticism of Israeli policies. His latest comments have further amplified calls for scrutiny over the UK's crackdown on pro-Palestine activism.

Discussions On Draft Joint Declaration At BRICS Summit Showing Sharp Divide
Discussions On Draft Joint Declaration At BRICS Summit Showing Sharp Divide

Arabian Post

time6 hours ago

  • Arabian Post

Discussions On Draft Joint Declaration At BRICS Summit Showing Sharp Divide

By Nitya Chakraborty On the eve of the 17th BRICS Summit scheduled at Rio de Janeiro in Brazil on July 6 and 7, the ongoing discussions among the senior officials of the member countries for the preparation of the draft joint declaration from the Summit, are showing big divergence of views on the two major issues- Trump's tariff war and the Israeli role in the latest war in West Asia. Right now, the tariff issue is the most important one of the majority of the BRICS members including India. The host country Brazil is interested in using strong words in the draft against President Trump's unilateral decision on reciprocal tariffs. The 90 day pause announced by the US President expires on July 9. Already, the US administration has started issuing letters to the trade partner countries who have till now not negotiated the deals. The BRICS declaration to be issued on July 7 will take into account the latest position after the issuing of letters and make its position clear in the draft decrying the unilateralism of the USA. Presently BRICS has eleven full members the first five China, Russia, Brazil, India and South Africa and the new six Egypt, Iran, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Ethiopia and Indonesia. Brazilian President Inacio de Silva Lula, better known as Lula is taking the leading role in the shaping of the declaration along with South Africa and other members. Indian officials are keen that a special mention is made of the threat of terror to India from Pakistan in the declaration in the context of the BRICS nations fight against terrorism. It is to be seen to what extent Prime Minister Narendra Modi can reshape the draft declaration and make it tuned to India's stand on terrorism and Pakistan. Chinese President Xi Jinping is not attending, China will be represented by the Prime Minister Li Quiang. Russian President Vladimir Putin will not be physically attending but there is a possibility that he will address the BRICS Summit through a video call. Iranian President is not attending but Iran is represented by a very senior minister. Iran has already mentioned that it wants the draft declaration to incorporate strong language against both Israel and USA. But Egyptian and Saudi officials have suggested restraint. Indications suggest that the draft has to be finalized at the Summit level as lot of divergences are expected to remain in the draft before its consideration by the Summit leaders. As regards India, the officials taking part in the discussions for draft declaration, are finding the situation a bit delicate. Indian officials are at the final stages of discussions on trade deal. President Trump has already said that the deal will be ready shortly. It can be ready even before July 9. So India's relationship with USA and the present geo political position do not permit the Indian side to take a strong position against the US on tariff issue. India and many other members do not want to name the USA as the villain in the final declaration. The possibility is the US or Trump will not be named but the opposition to the unilateral actions will be conveyed strongly. In fact, the reality is that it is just not India or Egypt, even China and Russia also are not favouring a strong anti-US declaration. China has already concluded its trade deal with the US while President Putin is depending on President Trump to bail him out of Ukraine crisis. Iran's forceful participation in the discussion has made the task of choosing right line on Middle East crisis tougher. Sources say that Iran has taken very one sided position pushing for a very critical stance against the USA which the other countries are finding difficult to agree. Brazilian officials are trying their best to work on a common ground on Middle East crisis. If the differences still remain, it is up to the Summit leaders to fine tune the draft and make it acceptable to all. BRICS comprises a mix of emerging and developing economies, each with unique strengths and challenges. China has the largest economy within the bloc, while India, Brazil, and Russia also hold significant economic weight. South Africa, while smaller in terms of GDP, plays a crucial role in the African continent. BRICS economies collectively account for nearly half of world's GDP, with its rate of economic growth surpassing the global average. Two BRICS members China and India are the drivers of the growth of global economy. BRICS has emerged as a counterweight to the dominance of traditional economic powers, contributing to a more multipolar world order. Economists hold the view that BRICS economic profile reflects a dynamic and influential force in the global economy, driven by the collective strength and diverse capabilities of the member nations. China is the second largest economy in the world after the top performer USA. India is expected to be the third largest economy after USA and China by GDP is projected to be $ 2.75 trillion by 2028 making it the eighth largest economy in the world. Russia, Indonesia and Saudi Arabia also have high prospects of growth. Prime Minister Narendra Modi has got an opportunity to dominate the proceedings at the Rio de Janeiro Summit as he leads the largest democracy in the world. Following the absence of President Xi Jinping, he will also be the most prominent head of state attending this Summit. It is to be seen how the Indian PM makes use of his clout to influence the deliberations and help in making the joint declaration favourable to Indian stand on terror and Pakistan. (IPA Service)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store