Mother who lost arm and leg in 'devastating' Tube accident takes TfL to court
Sarah de Lagarde, who lost an arm and leg after falling on the train tracks and being hit by a tube, talks ITV News Reporter Jay Akbar as she takes TfL to court
A mother, who lost an arm and leg after falling on the train tracks and being hit by a tube, says she is "terrified" every time her daughters get the Underground, as she takes Transport for London to court.
In September 2022, Sarah de Lagarde, 47, slipped on a platform at High Barnet station, in north London, and fell down the gap between the train and the platform.
After being hit by two separate trains, she was taken to hospital and had to have an arm and a leg amputated, and now uses two prosthetic limbs.
She tells ITV News London it had a "devastating impact" on her life, with her husband and children becoming her carers.
While the payment claim is large, she says she would "trade anything to get her limbs back".
Mrs De Lagarde is bringing a legal claim against London Underground Ltd (LUL), which is part of Transport for London (TfL).
The first hearing in the case was held at the Royal Courts of Justice on Wednesday for breach of duty.
Speaking to ITV News London, she said she was bringing about the action as TfL is not doing enough to make the underground safe.
She said: "I really think that this is a bigger issue than just my case. This is affecting millions of commuters.
"I have two daughters who are of age to use public transport. I am absolutely terrified every time they go because I know the risks they're taking and I know that safety is a real issue. "
At the preliminary hearing, Judge Roger Eastman said an eight-week trial would likely take place at the beginning of 2027, with a further hearing due to take place in September this year.
He also said: 'I appreciate this is a very high value claim, potentially, and very serious claim.'James MacDonald, representing Mrs De Lagarde, told the court the case was 'not an ordinary personal injury case'.
In written submissions, he said the issues the trial judge will have to decide include whether LUL was in breach by not having a system in place to ensure that the Platform Train Interface (PTI) is monitored as passengers are getting off a train at a terminus station.
Another issue is whether LUL 'was in breach by virtue of its train operators not being trained to look for passengers on the tracks when entering a station'.
Prashant Popat KC, for LUL, said: 'We recognise that this is a tragic case, and the claimant sustained some horrific injuries.'
In written submissions, he added: 'The defendant denies these allegations.
'It also pleads contributory negligence.
'The parties are agreed that the case should proceed first towards a preliminary issue trial on liability. This would encompass breach of duty, causation and the issue of contributory negligence.'
A TfL spokesperson said: 'We are responding to a legal claim brought by Sarah de Lagarde. It is not appropriate to discuss details of our defence while this case is ongoing.
'Our thoughts continue to be with Sarah and her family following this terrible incident, and we will continue to make every possible effort to learn from any incident on the Tube network. Safety is our top priority and we will always place it at the forefront of our thinking.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time Out
a day ago
- Time Out
TfL just got one step closer to regulating loud and overpriced pedicabs
Love them or hate them, it's hard to miss the furry hot pink, neon flashing, eighties-pop blasting vehicles that roam around central London. Pedicabs are the only unregulated mode of transport in the city and, as a result, have been getting away with charging extortionate fares and playing music at disruptive volumes. But things could soon change. TfL began its mission to start regulating the rickshaws back in November 2023. In March last year, the Pedicab (London) Bill was passed, giving TfL the power to begin its clampdown. Now, it has said that it's going forward with its plan to crack down on pedicabs in the city, following a consultation that showed overwhelming public support. After collecting more than 7,600 responses, the consultation found that 75 percent of people feel unsafe when using a pedicab in London, 95 percent agree that drivers should be required to pass UK criminal background checks, 96 percent agree that their music should be controlled and 85 percent said fares were too expensive. TfL's proposed restrictions included drivers needing appropriate insurance, having to demonstrate that they understand their role and responsibilities, requiring a one-year pedicab driver's license, needing to meet a set of safety standards (such as criminal background checks) and regular vehicle inspections. Licensing requirements could also involve driver conduct, potentially restricting them playing loud music. Those proposals will now be reviewed with the results of consultation in mind and will go through another consultation with people within the pedicab industry later in the year. Will Norman, London's walking and cycling commissioner, said: 'Pedicabs should be a fun and sustainable way to explore what our city has to offer, but without regulation some drivers are behaving unsafely or anti-socially and charging extortionate prices. 'The Mayor and I have always been clear that regulation is needed to ensure pedicabs can operate safely in London, and this report shows that Londoners agree. We're looking forward to pressing on with next steps and further consultation, with a view to introducing regulation next year, as we build a fairer and safer London for everyone.' The full consultation report can be found here. If everything goes TfL's way, regulations could come into force next year. London's pedicabs on Time Out The fur-covered, music-blasting pedicabs and rickshaws have been a chaotic trait of central London's streets for years. Time Out covered the first attempts to curb them back in 2022, and took a ride in one ourselves, which you can read all about here.
ITV News
2 days ago
- ITV News
Mother who lost arm and leg in 'devastating' Tube accident takes TfL to court
Sarah de Lagarde, who lost an arm and leg after falling on the train tracks and being hit by a tube, talks ITV News Reporter Jay Akbar as she takes TfL to court A mother, who lost an arm and leg after falling on the train tracks and being hit by a tube, says she is "terrified" every time her daughters get the Underground, as she takes Transport for London to court. In September 2022, Sarah de Lagarde, 47, slipped on a platform at High Barnet station, in north London, and fell down the gap between the train and the platform. After being hit by two separate trains, she was taken to hospital and had to have an arm and a leg amputated, and now uses two prosthetic limbs. She tells ITV News London it had a "devastating impact" on her life, with her husband and children becoming her carers. While the payment claim is large, she says she would "trade anything to get her limbs back". Mrs De Lagarde is bringing a legal claim against London Underground Ltd (LUL), which is part of Transport for London (TfL). The first hearing in the case was held at the Royal Courts of Justice on Wednesday for breach of duty. Speaking to ITV News London, she said she was bringing about the action as TfL is not doing enough to make the underground safe. She said: "I really think that this is a bigger issue than just my case. This is affecting millions of commuters. "I have two daughters who are of age to use public transport. I am absolutely terrified every time they go because I know the risks they're taking and I know that safety is a real issue. " At the preliminary hearing, Judge Roger Eastman said an eight-week trial would likely take place at the beginning of 2027, with a further hearing due to take place in September this year. He also said: 'I appreciate this is a very high value claim, potentially, and very serious claim.'James MacDonald, representing Mrs De Lagarde, told the court the case was 'not an ordinary personal injury case'. In written submissions, he said the issues the trial judge will have to decide include whether LUL was in breach by not having a system in place to ensure that the Platform Train Interface (PTI) is monitored as passengers are getting off a train at a terminus station. Another issue is whether LUL 'was in breach by virtue of its train operators not being trained to look for passengers on the tracks when entering a station'. Prashant Popat KC, for LUL, said: 'We recognise that this is a tragic case, and the claimant sustained some horrific injuries.' In written submissions, he added: 'The defendant denies these allegations. 'It also pleads contributory negligence. 'The parties are agreed that the case should proceed first towards a preliminary issue trial on liability. This would encompass breach of duty, causation and the issue of contributory negligence.' A TfL spokesperson said: 'We are responding to a legal claim brought by Sarah de Lagarde. It is not appropriate to discuss details of our defence while this case is ongoing. 'Our thoughts continue to be with Sarah and her family following this terrible incident, and we will continue to make every possible effort to learn from any incident on the Tube network. Safety is our top priority and we will always place it at the forefront of our thinking.'
Telegraph
2 days ago
- Telegraph
Sadiq Khan ‘avoids cleaning Tube graffiti' in push for extra funding
The graffiti epidemic on the Tube is 'helpful' for Sir Sadiq Khan, Transport for London (TfL) insiders have admitted. Sources said the declining condition of the Bakerloo line was benefiting the Mayor of London's campaign for a multi-million-pound Government handout to fund new trains. But the remarks prompted accusations that Sir Sadiq had chosen not to completely eradicate the vandalism because it boosted his political ambitions. A group of Londoners earlier this month cleaned graffiti from the interior of Bakerloo trains themselves after a proliferation of vandalism on the line. Vandals have defaced the interiors of the line's trains with tens of thousands of 'tags', a form of signature which gives them kudos among fellow graffiti artists. Sources at TfL, which Sir Sadiq leads, said it welcomed 'anything that helps make the case for new trains' – including the graffiti. An insider said: 'In terms of the graffiti, anything that helps make the case for new trains is going to be helpful. We would rather the graffiti wasn't happening, obviously. 'But if this is going to help, we want to replace them and we need money from the Government to do it.' Sir Sadiq is lobbying the Government to fund new trains for the Bakerloo line to replace its existing 1970s-era rolling stock. He has also called for the line to be extended to Lewisham, in south-east London, but has said TfL could not afford either without receiving additional taxpayer cash from central Government. Keith Prince, transport spokesman for the City Hall Conservatives, said Sir Sadiq could 'solve this blight' of graffiti if he wanted to. He said: 'The idea that graffiti on the Tube is this shockingly bad purely because Starmer won't give Khan money for the Bakerloo line is just nonsense, and nonsense that Londoners will see right through. 'Pull the other one Sadiq, and actually use your powers as TfL chair to solve this blight.' Former police officers believe the Bakerloo and Central lines are particularly targeted by graffiti vandals because they do not have any CCTV cameras in their carriages. Graham Wettone, a retired Metropolitan Police officer, said: 'The 'tag' is the type and style of initials or icon left by the so-called artist and has become in some places an accepted form of 'modern art'. 'The absence of CCTV is likely to be one significant factor because there is less of a deterrent to the offenders.' Andrew Trotter, former chief constable of the British Transport Police, added that not having CCTV made it difficult to even identify the culprit, let alone prosecute them. He said: 'You always want CCTV. I think one of the great things about trains these days is that just about every train, every carriage, every platform is covered. 'Any time there is an investigation, you know your officers are very good at getting the CCTV and tracking people through the system. So it is a real shame.' Rory Geoghegan, a former police officer and founder of the Public Safety Foundation, said the graffiti epidemic would not end unless CCTV was retrofitted to the Bakerloo and Central lines. He added: 'The mayor and TfL urgently need to get a grip. Secure the depots, clean the trains, retrofit CCTV, and make clear that public space will be protected. Anything less is a failure of leadership.' TfL has no plans to install CCTV, however, because it believes this would be 'prohibitively expensive'. 'We're already talking to the Government – and we've already said several times – about wanting to replace the trains,' an insider said. 'So it wouldn't make a great deal of sense to retrofit CCTV on the Bakerloo Line, just from a financial perspective.' Graffiti is also widespread on the Bakerloo line because TfL no longer has enough of the half-a-century-old rolling stock to take vandalised trains out of service to be cleaned, which is the policy on other lines. That means transport chiefs are forced to continue using vandalised trains to maintain a regular service on the line. TfL said its 'accelerated cleaning programme' was removing 3,000 'tags' a week from Bakerloo and Central line trains. A spokesman said: 'We previously withdrew trains from service as soon as they had been vandalised, but with reduced availability due to ageing trains, this isn't always possible without impacting services. 'This is why we are working to secure investment in the Tube network, to replace and upgrade trains and ensure we can deliver the world-class transport network that Londoners and visitors deserve and expect.' The spokesman added: 'We are removing graffiti from the Tube network absolutely as fast as possible. It is completely untrue to suggest that any graffiti is left for longer than necessary for any reason. 'We have deployed an accelerated cleaning programme in response to the specific increase in graffiti on the Central and Bakerloo lines. Teams are removing graffiti 24/7, and are currently removing more than 1,000 tags per week on the Bakerloo line and more than 2,000 on the Central line.'
