
Tax department probes over 20 insurers over breach of expense limits
insurance
companies they to see if that have breached regulatory Expense of Management (EoM) limits over the past two fiscal years, according to people familiar with the development.
The move could impact five to six life insurers and as many as 15 general insurers, including standalone firms such as Niva Bupa Health Insurance and GoDigit General Insurance.
Explore courses from Top Institutes in
Select a Course Category
Data Analytics
Data Science
Healthcare
healthcare
Finance
Operations Management
Product Management
Cybersecurity
Others
Public Policy
PGDM
Technology
Project Management
Management
MBA
Leadership
Artificial Intelligence
Digital Marketing
CXO
others
Data Science
Degree
Design Thinking
Skills you'll gain:
Data Analysis & Visualization
Predictive Analytics & Machine Learning
Business Intelligence & Data-Driven Decision Making
Analytics Strategy & Implementation
Duration:
12 Weeks
Indian School of Business
Applied Business Analytics
Starts on
Jun 13, 2024
Get Details
To be clear, no notices have been sent as yet.
These insurance companies under the scanner either overshot their regulatory expense limits or failed to provide sufficient explanations for cost overruns. Notices are expected to land in the coming weeks, with tax implications likely if companies are unable to justify the expenditures post change in norms by IRDAI in April 2023, sources in the know added. The income tax scrutiny follows 2022 notices by the DGGI to around 20 general insurance companies operating in SEZs, alleging unpaid dues of ₹2,000 crore. Similarly, life insurers have been facing a huge tax battle with the GST authority for allegedly issuing invoices without rendering actual services, with the adjudicating authority concluding that transactions were not actual.
HDFC Life
, for instance, is facing ₹5,500 crore tax notice for 2017-2022. Similarly, others including ICICI Prudential Life have also allegedly routed excessive commission payments to corporate agents under the guise of advertising expenses through marketing vendors.
Following these tax notices, IRDAI, in April 2023 removed product-specific commission caps, putting an overall cap on expenses. This led to a jump in commissions paid by life insurers by 22% year-on-year in FY24 to ₹51,524 crore, while those by general insurers nearly doubled to ₹39,600 crore, according to IRDAI's annual report.
About half of those companies are yet to limit their EoMs to 30% or 35% that the regulator has stipulated. The regulator has asked for a clear roadmap every quarter in terms of what is their plan to achieve the numbers within that limit of 30% or 35%.
Listed Niva Bupa had reported expense of management ratio of 37.4% for FY25, which is 190 basis points above the allowable expense ratio of 35.5% considering 35% and some allowances on insure tech. The company has given a glide path in achieving EOM norm.
While Go Digit has been able to reduce expense ratio to 33.4% in FY25 against 36.3% in FY24, it is still above the regulatory requirement of 30%.
"Now, IRDAI obviously would be very serious about this, and this is my personal opinion, that I would expect IRDAI to take some corrective actions on EOM so that they can actually achieve the objective of lower commissions," said Kamesh Goyal, founder Go Digit Insurance, during an investor call in May. "So, we are on the path of reducing EOM, and the reduction has been decent. But the industry's trend is otherwise, especially with 1/n, and a lot of companies would actually be seeing an increase in EOM, bigger or smaller ones both."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
14 minutes ago
- Time of India
Crypto or virtual assets not regulated in India: MoS Finance
Academy Empower your mind, elevate your skills The question of the legality or illegality of specific crypto platforms does not arise as of date as crypto or virtual assets are not regulated in India, Minister of State for Finance Pankaj Chaudhary told Parliament on to ensure oversight from an anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) perspective, the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU-IND) registers Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), he said in a written reply in the Lok Sabha."At present, crypto / virtual assets are not regulated in India. Consequently, the question of the legality or illegality of specific crypto platforms does not arise as on date," he registration requirement applies equally to domestic and offshore platforms that cater to users based in India, he therefore maintains a dynamic list of virtual asset service providers who are not registered with them, he he said, the Finance Act, 2022, introduced Section 194S in the Income-tax Act, 1961, mandating a 1 per cent Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) on the transfer of Virtual Digital Assets (VDAs).This applies to all transactions, including those involving offshore entities, if the income is chargeable to tax in India, he the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has issued advisories warning users, holders, and traders of virtual currencies or crypto assets about the potential risks, including economic, financial, operational, legal, and security concerns, he advisories have been sector-wide and have not commented on individual platforms, he to another question, Chaudhary said the tax on income from transfer of Virtual Digital Assets (VDA), under section 115BBH of the Income Tax Act , 1961, was introduced from of tax on income from VDA as per Income Tax Returns was Rs 269.09 crore in 2022-23 as compared to Rs 437.43 crore in 2023-24, he government is utilising data analytics tools to trace and detect tax evasion from VDA related transactions, he analysis includes the use of Non-Filer Monitoring System (NMS), Project Insight and internal databases of the Income Tax Department, to correlate available information on VDA transactions with the transactions disclosed in the return of income by the taxpayer, he capacity-building initiatives are being undertaken by the government to equip officers for effective compliance monitoring and investigation of VDA-related transactions, he programs, specialized workshops, Chintan Shivirs and hands-on workshops are regularly conducted by various training institutes under the Income Tax Department, he a local level, he said, field offices conduct training sessions and webinars on digital forensics, blockchain analysis, legal frameworks, and handling of digital officers and officials are also imparted short-term training on digital forensics, in partnership with National Forensic Science University (NFSU), Goa, which empowers them to identify and trace VDA-related transactions from data captured during intrusive actions, he added.


News18
38 minutes ago
- News18
Crypto or virtual assets not regulated in India: MoS Finance
Agency: New Delhi, Jul 21 (PTI) The question of the legality or illegality of specific crypto platforms does not arise as of date as crypto or virtual assets are not regulated in India, Minister of State for Finance Pankaj Chaudhary told Parliament on Monday. However, to ensure oversight from an anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) perspective, the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU-IND) registers Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), he said in a written reply in the Lok Sabha. 'At present, crypto / virtual assets are not regulated in India. Consequently, the question of the legality or illegality of specific crypto platforms does not arise as on date," he said. The registration requirement applies equally to domestic and offshore platforms that cater to users based in India, he said. FIU-IND therefore maintains a dynamic list of virtual asset service providers who are not registered with them, he said. Separately, he said, the Finance Act, 2022, introduced Section 194S in the Income-tax Act, 1961, mandating a 1 per cent Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) on the transfer of Virtual Digital Assets (VDAs). This applies to all transactions, including those involving offshore entities, if the income is chargeable to tax in India, he said. Further, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has issued advisories warning users, holders, and traders of virtual currencies or crypto assets about the potential risks, including economic, financial, operational, legal, and security concerns, he said. These advisories have been sector-wide and have not commented on individual platforms, he said. Replying to another question, Chaudhary said the tax on income from transfer of Virtual Digital Assets (VDA), under section 115BBH of the Income Tax Act, 1961, was introduced from 2022-23. Amount of tax on income from VDA as per Income Tax Returns was Rs 269.09 crore in 2022-23 as compared to Rs 437.43 crore in 2023-24, he said. The government is utilising data analytics tools to trace and detect tax evasion from VDA related transactions, he said. The analysis includes the use of Non-Filer Monitoring System (NMS), Project Insight and internal databases of the Income Tax Department, to correlate available information on VDA transactions with the transactions disclosed in the return of income by the taxpayer, he added. Several capacity-building initiatives are being undertaken by the government to equip officers for effective compliance monitoring and investigation of VDA-related transactions, he said. Training programs, specialized workshops, Chintan Shivirs and hands-on workshops are regularly conducted by various training institutes under the Income Tax Department, he said. At a local level, he said, field offices conduct training sessions and webinars on digital forensics, blockchain analysis, legal frameworks, and handling of digital evidence. The officers and officials are also imparted short-term training on digital forensics, in partnership with National Forensic Science University (NFSU), Goa, which empowers them to identify and trace VDA-related transactions from data captured during intrusive actions, he added. PTI DP MR view comments First Published: July 21, 2025, 20:30 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
44 minutes ago
- First Post
Who pays GST on bonuses that cover your GST on online gaming bets?
India's online gaming industry is facing a fresh tax quandary as authorities move to levy GST on promotional bonuses that are specifically designed to cover the GST paid by users on their bets read more India's online gaming industry is facing a fresh tax quandary as authorities move to levy Goods and Services Tax (GST) on promotional bonuses that are specifically designed to cover the GST paid by users on their bets. These bonuses, widely used across real-money gaming platforms to attract and retain users, typically match the 28 per cent GST paid by players and are credited as non-withdrawable in-game credits. While players may see them as free rewards, the tax department now argues that these incentives constitute a 'consideration' for services, and should be taxed accordingly. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD According to The Economic Times, at least four gaming firms have received notices from the indirect tax department alleging non-payment of GST on such bonuses. The authorities claim that even if users do not directly pay for these credits, the platforms are effectively doing so on their behalf, making the amount taxable under GST rules. 'The bonuses are usable for gameplay and are therefore part of the overall transaction value,' a senior official told the publication. The government is relying on Rule 31B of the Central GST Rules, introduced in October 2023, to justify applying the 28 per cent GST rate on the full value of these credits. Gaming firms argue that the interpretation is flawed. One industry executive said via a closed forum that their company had been issued a summons and urged to make voluntary payments. 'Our business operations have been severely impacted, and we are preparing to challenge this in the Supreme Court next week,' the person said. The controversy only serves to add another layer to the legal battles on the issue that are already under way, with the sector contesting retrospective tax claims from 2017 to 2023. Now, the key question for regulators and the courts is whether GST applies even when the player isn't the one footing the bill. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD