Trump administration bans use of race, sex data in federal hiring
The directive was part of a broader set of guidelines sent to human resources leaders at government agencies fleshing out an executive order, opens new tab signed by President Donald Trump in January aimed at "restoring merit" to the center of the hiring process.
All hiring and promotion decisions must be based "solely on merit, qualifications and job-related criteria — not race, sex, color, religion, or national origin," the memo from the Office of Personnel Management on Thursday said.
The memo further ordered human resources leaders to "cease using statistics on race, sex, ethnicity or national origin, or the broader concept of 'underrepresentation' of certain groups," in relation to recruiting or hiring. The memo also said dissemination of such data was banned.
The directive is the latest move by Trump to undermine diversity and inclusion programs, many of which have been in place for decades in an effort to remedy historical injustices for marginalized groups. Trump and his allies have called such programs anti-merit and discriminatory against white people and men.
Advocates and experts have said racial or gender data collection, which has long been a standard across the federal government and many private sector U.S. companies, is a necessary tool to identify inequities or potential discrimination within hiring practices.
The OPM memo also said government agencies have been too focused "on elite universities and credentials, instead of merit, practical skill, and commitment to American ideals."
In addition to hiring veterans and individuals with backgrounds in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics, agencies should recruit more young people from state universities, religious colleges, trade schools, faith organizations and homeschooling groups, the memo says.
"Going forward, agencies shall ensure that early career recruitment focuses on patriotic Americans who will faithfully adhere to the Constitution and the rule of law," the memo says.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
25 minutes ago
- Reuters
Oil pauses rally as markets weigh Trump's ultimatum to Russia
NEW DELHI, July 30 (Reuters) - Oil prices took a breather in Asian trade on Wednesday after the previous session's spike of more than 3%, as investors awaited developments from U.S. President Donald Trump's tighter deadline for Russia to end the war in Ukraine. Most active Brent crude futures rose 8 cents, or 0.12%, to $71.81 a barrel by 0419 GMT, while U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude gained 8 cents, or 0.12%, to $69.29 a barrel. The Brent crude September contract expiring on Wednesday was up 18 cents at $72.69 per barrel. Both contracts had settled on Tuesday at their highest since June 20. On Tuesday, Trump said he would start imposing measures on Russia, such as secondary tariffs of 100% on trading partners, if it did not make progress on ending the war within 10 to 12 days, moving up from an earlier 50-day deadline. "The $4 to $5 per barrel of supply risk premium injected in recent days can be expected to be sustained, unless Putin makes a conciliatory move," said Vandana Hari, founder of oil market analysis provider Vanda Insights. The United States had warned China, the largest buyer of Russian oil, it could face huge tariffs if it kept buying, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told a news conference in Stockholm, where the U.S. was holding trade talks with the EU. JP Morgan analysts said in a note that while China was not likely to comply with U.S. sanctions, India has signalled it would do so, putting at risk 2.3 million barrels per day of Russian oil exports. The United States and the European Union averted a trade war with a deal for 15% U.S. tariffs on European imports, easing concerns about the impact of trade tension on economic growth and offering support to oil prices. In Venezuela, foreign partners of state oil company PDVSA are still waiting for U.S. authorisation to operate in the sanctioned country after talks last week, which could return some supply to the market, so easing pressure for prices to rise. "The oil market is keeping an eye on the U.S. trade deals and talks and on the Fed, but those are marginal influences on sentiment," Hari added. Despite President Donald Trump's objections, the U.S. Federal Reserve is expected to hold interest rates steady at its policy meeting later on Wednesday. On Tuesday, the International Monetary Fund raised global growth forecasts slightly for 2025 and 2026, but warned the world economy faced major risks, such as a rebound in tariff rates, geopolitical tension and larger fiscal deficits.
The National
35 minutes ago
- The National
Victorian approach to welfare shames Labour
With more than seven million low-income families still going without essentials, the JRF's cost of living tracker shines the spotlight on just how acute this situation is for low-income families with three or more children, with almost nine in 10 going without the essentials, and the highest number of families in arrears or holding a loan for essentials since their tracking began. This is a terrible indictment of Keir Starmer's government – no progress, no change, the very opposite of what Labour promised. Indeed, what strikes me most is just how little has changed since they came into power – the SNP are still pushing the UK Government to scrap the two-child cap and implement a similar benefit to our transformational Scottish Child Payment; Westminster is still digging its heels in. READ MORE: Keir Starmer commits to recognising Palestinian state after intense pressure My former colleague Alison Thewliss was dogged in challenging the Tory government on the two-child cap; yet here we are under Labour, and the asks remain the same while the situation is getting worse. The JRF says their modelling does not include impacts of cuts to health-related elements of Universal Credit for future claimants currently working its way through parliament. Damning reports like this should focus minds ahead of the delayed publication of the Child Poverty Strategy, with its recommendation to get rid of the two-child cap and strengthen the foundations of the social settlement. But is the Government listening, are they reading these reports, are they paying attention to best practice elsewhere, i.e. in Scotland? (Image: PA) On paper Labour say they are – for instance, the secretaries of state for work and pensions, and for education, say in their foreword to the introduction ahead of this new strategy that there is a lot they can learn from action already taken in Scotland. But in the chamber, it's a whole other ball game. Not a week goes by that I don't think of that phrase 'people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones' while I'm sitting in the House of Commons listening to what seems to be a coordinated strategy by Labour to attack the Scottish Government in Holyrood at every available opportunity even when the focus is very much on their own failures at [[Westminster]]. That's politics I hear you say, but it's more than that. In fact, I'd go as far to say it's like a kind of 'blame shifting' to use psychological terminology. A perfect example comes from just a couple of weeks ago, when the Secretary of State for Scotland, Ian Murray MP, was answering questions in the chamber on the Government's Spending Review. My colleague, MP Stephen Gethins, challenged Murray on his party's failure to scrap the two-child cap only to be met with a defensive volley on the number of children that are homeless in Scotland. A little rudimentary digging on Shelter England's website and you can see that of course Murray failed to highlight that in England, there are 164,040 children living in temporary accommodation with their families, which is the highest number on record and represents a 15% increase in the last year alone. Additionally, there are 126,040 households in England experiencing homelessness in temporary accommodation, another record high and a 16% increase in 12 months. This is hardly a record to be proud of, and not a position of strength from which to point the finger at other governments. Fortunately, a decent amount of finger pointing has already been done by Labour's own MPs, with their welfare cuts described as 'Dickensian'. Those MPs have been punished subsequently, more blame shifting rather than addressing the key problem which is Labour's terrible policy decisions. And only one of them was a Scottish Labour MP, while the others continue to bow and scrape to Number 10. Even the UN has waded in to highlight how Labour's welfare cuts could threaten the human rights of disabled people. And this from a government led by a former human rights lawyer. It reminded me of the UN's comments on the Tory government's welfare policies, with the special rapporteur on extreme poverty describing 'workhouse' conditions and the 'systematic immiseration' of the British population thanks to austerity. Red or blue, it's the same old same old. Collaborating with Scotland on best practice on social security – not just with our Scottish Child Payment but with our efforts to reinstate the Winter Fuel Payment for pensioners before Labour's major U-turn, and now our upcoming mitigation of the two-child cap – would change the narrative on Labour's Victorian approach to welfare. This would signal a more grown-up approach to politics than the current tribal mudslinging variety that Labour favours. Don't hold your breath. So, every time you hear a Labour MP, particularly the Scottish ones, have a poke at Scotland and the SNP Government at Holyrood, remember this coordinated blame shift. Because behind every snide and spurious comment about Scotland lies a truth that Labour can't deny – they're failing to make any progress, and fast. All the more reason for Scotland to be rid of Westminster for good.
The National
35 minutes ago
- The National
John Swinney's approach to Donald Trump didn't look good for Scotland
In 2019, Murray backed a House of Commons motion accusing Trump of 'misogynism, racism and xenophobia'. Fast forward six years and Trump's second administration has turbocharged a global rollback of human rights. In the US, it has carried out enforced disappearances, halted protections for abortion patients facing violence, and signed executive orders steeped in white supremacist ideology. On the global stage, Trump's withdrawal from the Paris Climate Agreement marks a surrender in the fight against climate breakdown – one of the greatest human rights threats of our time – as we now cross the grim milestone of 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial temperatures. Meanwhile, his sanctions on International Criminal Court officials have sent a chilling message that Israel is above international law, as we watch it carry out a live streamed genocide in Gaza. By undermining the institutions that uphold and advance human rights, Trump has compounded the damage done by other leaders and accelerated our plunge into a brutal new era of authoritarian practices and corporate greed. READ MORE: John Swinney gives statement after Donald Trump meeting – read in full Yet on Friday, he stepped off Air Force One to a warm welcome from the UK Government. 'I hope you're looking forward to a bit of downtime with some golf this weekend,' Murray reportedly told him. Perhaps the Scottish Government would take a firmer stance? The initial signs weren't promising. On Saturday, hundreds gathered in protest at Trump's visit. As speakers described the horrors of genocide in [[Gaza]] fuelled by the 2000-pound bombs the United States sends to Israel, we learned that First Minister John Swinney had written a cheque for £180,000 of Scottish public money for Donald Trump's Aberdeenshire hotel to host a golf tournament. Swinney insisted the funding would 'help drive economic growth and contribute to environmental sustainability while promoting Scotland through global profile.' But the First Minister should know better. Almost two decades ago as Finance Secretary he intervened to save Trump's controversial golf course development at the Menie Estate in Aberdeenshire after local councillors rejected it. What followed should have been a cautionary tale the Government never forgot. It's all documented expertly in the film "You've Been Trumped". The thousands of jobs promised never materialised – some estimates put the true number as low as 81. Trump's hostility to press freedom was made plain in his treatment of the film's director Anthony Baxter: 'I want real journalists … it's only questions like you ask that cause trouble'. Trump's development, approved against the advice of the Scottish Environmental Protection Agency, irreversibly damaged protected sand dunes that were home to wildlife and helped guard against coastal erosion. Molly Forbes, a 90-year old local resident, lived without access to clean water for years because a billionaire wanted a golf course. Scotland's 'global reputation' was cynically used to justify this disgrace. One Aberdeen Business School professor asked a protester objecting to Trump's attempts to force the sale of the homes neighbouring his development: 'Have you seen some of the ramshackle dumps … do you think that does any good to the vision of Scotland throughout the world?' Sadly, Swinney's decision to open the public purse for Trump's [[Aberdeen]]shire course suggests the lesson still hasn't sunk in. It sent an alarming message that despite Scotland's previous experience with Trump and despite the authoritarian practices on full display in his current administration – the [[Scottish Government]] is still open for business. By Monday any hope that the First Minister would rise to the occasion had largely evaporated. On social media he set out the issues he intended to raise with Trump. Among tariffs, trade and whisky was [[Gaza]]. There should be a significant increase in aid, an urgent ceasefire, and recognition of the state of Palestine as part of a viable two-state solution he said, failing completely to set himself apart from the limited position occupied by Keir Starmer earlier in the day. He left his bilateral with Trump on Tuesday morning praising the president's "pleasant company". READ MORE: The National Trump front page sold out – so you can buy it as a poster The First Minister clearly needs to decide what his vision for Scotland's global reputation is. Trying to do business with Trump while being seen as a principled global actor is like trying to ride two horses galloping in opposite directions. We're undeniably at a critical juncture for human rights, but there is hope. The residents of the Menie Estate took Trump on in a David and Goliath battle and saved their homes against the odds. Similarly, those protesting over the weekend – and I believe many more people in Scotland won't stand by quietly while rights are violated and the world becomes a more unequal and dangerous place. To fall for the suggestion that the global rise in authoritarian practices and dismantling of human rights is inevitable would be the greatest gift we could give leaders like Trump. If our own political leaders remain silent at this critical juncture, that is a choice we must judge them upon, but we can also make our own choices. If everyone who cares about justice and equality makes their voice heard, even in small ways, we can turn the tide.
