logo
Florida's Proposed Bear Hunt Pits Science Versus Emotion

Florida's Proposed Bear Hunt Pits Science Versus Emotion

Forbes3 days ago
Florida's black bear population has risen from a few hundred animals in the 1970s to more than 4,000 ... More today.
After years of bear population increases and growing numbers of human-bear conflicts, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) voted 4-1 last May to open a limited bear hunt for the first time since 2015.
Not surprisingly, the proposed season has sparked a backlash from anti-hunting groups and underscores the ongoing debate in some states about who should manage wildlife: residents in largely urban centers with little to no background in wildlife issues or the professionals of state fish and wildlife agencies? While the answer may seem obvious, emotionally charged campaigns backing statewide referendums looking to close hunting seasons have clouded the role of some state fish and wildlife agencies.
Between 2002 and 2015, Florida bear populations expanded by 50 percent according to state assessments. At the same time, the black bear range grew from 17 percent of the state's landmass to more than half of it. Moreover, bear populations in Florida have risen from merely several hundred in the 1970s to more than 4,000 today.
With that has come a growing number of complaints from residents. In 2023 alone, FWC received some 3,000 calls regarding nuisance bears. While a hunting season may not address complaints in residential areas, it's likely to help alleviate conflicts in more rural counties of the state where hunting will impact both bear populations and behavior. It's not uncommon for bears that aren't hunted to become habituated to human activity, often lacking a general fear of man.
Officers investigate the scene where Florida's first ever fatal bear attack occurred last May.
Shortly before the May FWC vote was taken, a black bear killed 89-year-old Florida resident Robert Markel and his dog near the town of Jerome—the state's first ever black bear fatality. The FWC confirmed the attack and identified the bear, finding DNA evidence and some of Markel's remains inside the bear that was one of three animals killed by state authorities the night Markel's body was recovered. In February, another black bear attack occurred near Silver Springs, Florida, but in this instance the victim survived.
Despite the preponderance of evidence justifying a limited bear hunt—not the least of which is public safety--animal rights groups in the state have launched campaigns to disrupt the proposed hunt. One of those groups is Speak Up Wekiva, a greater Orlando-based nonprofit that was created to oppose the state's bear hunt in 2015. The group is encouraging residents to apply for as many of the 187 available bear tags as possible.
Wekiva's website features a black bear cub on its home page with the caption, 'If you love me, buy the permit that will be used to hunt me…'. Never mind that no cubs nor sows with cubs are allowed to be hunted under the proposed rules. In fact, no bears under 100 pounds can be legally taken.
Moreover, the number of tags isn't random but is based on well-established black bear population models. If the target number of bears isn't taken, the state logically will up the allotment of tags. Many states issue more tags than would likely be needed to take a target number of animals, but when the quota is hit, they simply close the season to prevent taking too many animals. Apparently, that management reality is lost on Wekiva.
To further underscore the general flaw in the Wekiva ad, the greatest threat to bear cubs comes from bruins. A male bear will often kill the cubs of other bears to induce the sow to come back into estrus, the breeding cycle. While well, grisly, it is nature's way of diversifying the gene pool to guarantee survival of the fittest and, in the end, the species itself.
A FWC researcher collects black bear hair to conduct DNA studies.
Kodiak Island, Alaska, for instance, is home to the highest density of brown bears in the world—not despite the hunting that takes place there, but because of it. Hunt a limited number of mature bruins and that guarantees the survival of more cubs. In other words, the Wekiva ad featuring the cub could more accurately say, 'If you love me, allow the hunt to continue."
The reality is that with an estimated 4,000 bears in the population, even if all tags were filled, it would not stop the growth of the state's bear population. Thus, the biggest question facing the FWC might simply be: what liability will they incur should they fail to enact the hunt at the request of the agency and more attacks on humans occur? Ultimately, wildlife commissions have a responsibility to all state citizens—not simply the most vocal.
FWC employs more than 2,000 full-time fish and wildlife experts, with many possessing advanced degrees. 'FWC has incredibly talented and experienced bear biologists and researchers, who have provided Florida with some of, if not, the best black bear data in the country,' says George Warthen, FWC Chief Conservation Officer who has been with the agency for 15 years. 'This data is at the forefront of the decisions the FWC makes in managing bear populations in the state.'
'The actions of Animal Rights groups often have less to do with what benefits wildlife than what it does to line their own pockets,' says Jack Hubbard, Executive Director of the Washington, D.C.-based Center for Environment and Welfare. 'These groups have a long history of using emotionally charged imagery and rhetoric to raise money—often with very little evidence that the funds they raise ever do much to help animals.'
Review the successes and failures of wildlife management strategies across the globe and it's difficult not to conclude that the model of hunter-funded conservation is the most viable and sustainable method that's yet to be employed. This approach came of age following the ecological calamity of the Dust Bowl of the 1930s and remains the planet's most successful conservation approach.
Ultimately, however, the question facing the FWC is simple: Follow science…or emotion?
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Fresh Push to Add Donald Trump to Mount Rushmore: 'Essential'
Fresh Push to Add Donald Trump to Mount Rushmore: 'Essential'

Newsweek

time5 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Fresh Push to Add Donald Trump to Mount Rushmore: 'Essential'

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. House Republican Andy Ogles of Tennessee has asked Interior Secretary Doug Burgum to "put Trump on Mt. Rushmore," the South Dakota-based national memorial celebrating four iconic presidents, to mark his "recent achievements," and it's not the first time someone has suggested the addition. Newsweek contacted Representative Ogles and the Department of the Interior for comment on Friday via email outside of regular office hours. Why It Matters Ogles' proposal indicates the strength of grassroots Republican loyalty to President Trump, with a survey conducted between June 23 and 26 finding 79 percent of registered GOP voters approve of his performance. However, this was down from 86 percent in March. The National Park Service has previously said that any fresh carvings on Mount Rushmore would be impractical, and any official move to add Trump would almost certainly spark serious opposition. What To Know Ogles sent a letter to Burgum, a copy of which was seen by The Hill, on Thursday, urging him to "explore the addition" of Trump's sculpture to Mount Rushmore to recognize the president's "accomplishments in restoring American greatness." The Tennessee Republican added that such a move would have the "benefits of elevating the dignity and relevance of the site, thus increasing both its grandeur and its visitor traffic, will accrue to South Dakota, the Lakota Sioux, and the broader area." In an X post also made on Thursday, Ogles said: "I'm asking Secretary Burgum to put Trump on Mt. Rushmore. "Given the scale and scope of President Trump's recent achievements—especially the impending enactment of the Big Beautiful Bill, the historic act that will ignite America's Golden Age—it is essential that we immortalize President Trump's likeness on Mount Rushmore." A mock-up depicting President Trump on Mount Rushmore released by GOP Representative Andy Ogles. A mock-up depicting President Trump on Mount Rushmore released by GOP Representative Andy Ogles. Rep. Andy Ogles/X Thursday saw the House approve Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' in a 218 vs 214 vote, meaning the president will now be able to sign it into law as it narrowly passed the Senate earlier this week. The package includes tax cuts, additional funding for border security and the military, cuts to Medicaid and food stamps and a $5 trillion increase in the U.S. debt ceiling. Mount Rushmore was constructed in South Dakota's Black Hills between 1927 and 1941 and features head sculptures of iconic presidents George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Theodore Roosevelt and Abraham Lincoln. The site is controversial as it was taken from the Sioux Nation illegally, and in the 1980s, the Supreme Court ordered the federal government to pay $105 million in compensation. In January, Florida House Republican Anna Paulina Luna announced a bill calling for Trump to be added to Mount Rushmore, though it didn't proceed to a hearing. What People Are Saying In his X post, Ogles added: "Like Washington, Trump did not seek his position for glory but out of love for his country, championing American independence and reshaping the presidency with dynamism, clarity, and purpose. "Like Jefferson, he expanded America's horizons by pursuing new frontiers and breaking away from deep state tyrants. "Like Teddy Roosevelt, Trump took on entrenched interests, reinvigorated American industry, and avenged the working class against bureaucratic bloat and corporate corruption. "The legacy of Mount Rushmore cannot remain frozen in stone; it must evolve to reflect the full arc of American history, including its most recent and transformative chapter." Speaking to the Black Hill Pioneer newspaper in 2020, Mount Rushmore National Memorial Chief of Interpretation and Education Maureen McGee-Ballinger said: "The rock that surrounds the sculpted faces is not suitable for additional carving." What Happens Next There is no indication that the federal government has any immediate plans to add Trump to Mount Rushmore, and any such move would almost certainly spark controversy and legal challenges.

After an art heist hit a New Hampshire town, ‘the banana is back'
After an art heist hit a New Hampshire town, ‘the banana is back'

Boston Globe

time8 hours ago

  • Boston Globe

After an art heist hit a New Hampshire town, ‘the banana is back'

Franconia Police Chief Martin 'Mac' Cashin said in a video accompanying the social media post that he had confirmed the banana was the original artwork and not a duplicate banana. 'I would like to very much thank whoever returned it for doing so,' he said. 'It was the right thing to do.' In the original banana's absence, other bananas were affixed to the large steel fishing-rod, which was part of the original artwork. Cashin said those additions would remain on display, alongside a game camera, padlocks, and zip ties contributed by the police department to ensure the sculpture remains intact. Get N.H. Morning Report A weekday newsletter delivering the N.H. news you need to know right to your inbox. Enter Email Sign Up 'Enjoy your artwork, Franconia,' he said. Advertisement The piece was made by Massachusetts-based sculptor and art educator 'It's been the funniest outcome of any of my art ever,' Belenky said. 'I'm absolutely obsessed.' He said the police department is now planning to put it on a float for a town celebration on July 12. The banana was missing for about two weeks from late May into June. The artwork, entitled 'Elevated Fruit,' was installed on the front lawn of a local restaurant as part of the Advertisement The foam-and-fiberglass banana was only on display for four days before it first went missing, prompting community members to rally around the artwork, asking whoever had taken it to please bring it back. Someone apparently heeded their cry. Kathie Lovett, co-chair of the Franconia Artwalk, said one morning in June, the banana had been restored. During its hiatus, people had put up real bananas and inflatable bananas, Lovett said, in addition to a wooden banana her friend carved with a chainsaw. Lovett said she took the banana lookalikes down after a few days. She said everyone she spoke to was happy the banana was back. 'It felt like the banana crisis was sort of calming down,' she said. 'We said that we loved it, and somebody brought it back,' she said. Amanda Gokee can be reached at

Inter-American court says states must protect people from climate change
Inter-American court says states must protect people from climate change

Yahoo

time11 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Inter-American court says states must protect people from climate change

The Inter-American Court of Human Rights ruled Thursday that countries belonging to the Organization of American States (OAS) have an obligation to take "all necessary measures" to protect populations from climate change. The decision means that around 20 countries across Latin America and the Caribbean that recognize the court's jurisdiction must undertake legal reforms that could increase the requirements imposed on businesses, something environmentists have long advocated. "States must adopt all necessary measures to reduce the risks arising... from the degradation of the global climate system," the Costa Rica-based court said in response to a request submitted by Colombia and Chile. It underlined that "the right to a healthy environment" is included among the rights protected by the American Convention on Human Rights. The court is an autonomous legal institution that interprets and applies the American Convention, which has been ratified by more than 20 countries including Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Mexico and Peru. The court said countries must "adopt legislative and other measures to prevent human rights violations committed by state and private companies." "States must urge all companies domiciled or operating in their territory to adopt effective measures to combat climate change and its impacts on human rights," it said. The first government reaction to the decision came not from one of the OAS member states, but from the small Pacific island of Vanuatu, which hailed it as "groundbreaking." The ruling was also welcomed by environmentalists. The Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL), which was involved in the case, said such "advisory opinions" were "authoritative statements of binding international law and carry substantial legal weight." "The court has broken new ground and set a powerful precedent," said Nikki Reisch, the organization's climate and energy program director. "The court's conclusions should put big polluters, like the fossil fuel industry, on notice: climate-destructive conduct violates the law." Viviana Krsticevic, executive director of the Center for Justice and International Law (CEJIL), said the ruling established "legally binding standards" for the protection of the right to a healthy environment. Marcella Ribeiro, an attorney with the Interamerican Association for Environmental Defense, said that it was the first time an international court had "directly addressed climate change as a legal and structural human rights issue." bur-fj/dr/jgc

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store