Latest news with #SpeakUpWekiva
Forbes
01-07-2025
- Politics
- Forbes
Florida's Proposed Bear Hunt Pits Science Versus Emotion
Florida's black bear population has risen from a few hundred animals in the 1970s to more than 4,000 ... More today. After years of bear population increases and growing numbers of human-bear conflicts, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) voted 4-1 last May to open a limited bear hunt for the first time since 2015. Not surprisingly, the proposed season has sparked a backlash from anti-hunting groups and underscores the ongoing debate in some states about who should manage wildlife: residents in largely urban centers with little to no background in wildlife issues or the professionals of state fish and wildlife agencies? While the answer may seem obvious, emotionally charged campaigns backing statewide referendums looking to close hunting seasons have clouded the role of some state fish and wildlife agencies. Between 2002 and 2015, Florida bear populations expanded by 50 percent according to state assessments. At the same time, the black bear range grew from 17 percent of the state's landmass to more than half of it. Moreover, bear populations in Florida have risen from merely several hundred in the 1970s to more than 4,000 today. With that has come a growing number of complaints from residents. In 2023 alone, FWC received some 3,000 calls regarding nuisance bears. While a hunting season may not address complaints in residential areas, it's likely to help alleviate conflicts in more rural counties of the state where hunting will impact both bear populations and behavior. It's not uncommon for bears that aren't hunted to become habituated to human activity, often lacking a general fear of man. Officers investigate the scene where Florida's first ever fatal bear attack occurred last May. Shortly before the May FWC vote was taken, a black bear killed 89-year-old Florida resident Robert Markel and his dog near the town of Jerome—the state's first ever black bear fatality. The FWC confirmed the attack and identified the bear, finding DNA evidence and some of Markel's remains inside the bear that was one of three animals killed by state authorities the night Markel's body was recovered. In February, another black bear attack occurred near Silver Springs, Florida, but in this instance the victim survived. Despite the preponderance of evidence justifying a limited bear hunt—not the least of which is public safety--animal rights groups in the state have launched campaigns to disrupt the proposed hunt. One of those groups is Speak Up Wekiva, a greater Orlando-based nonprofit that was created to oppose the state's bear hunt in 2015. The group is encouraging residents to apply for as many of the 187 available bear tags as possible. Wekiva's website features a black bear cub on its home page with the caption, 'If you love me, buy the permit that will be used to hunt me…'. Never mind that no cubs nor sows with cubs are allowed to be hunted under the proposed rules. In fact, no bears under 100 pounds can be legally taken. Moreover, the number of tags isn't random but is based on well-established black bear population models. If the target number of bears isn't taken, the state logically will up the allotment of tags. Many states issue more tags than would likely be needed to take a target number of animals, but when the quota is hit, they simply close the season to prevent taking too many animals. Apparently, that management reality is lost on Wekiva. To further underscore the general flaw in the Wekiva ad, the greatest threat to bear cubs comes from bruins. A male bear will often kill the cubs of other bears to induce the sow to come back into estrus, the breeding cycle. While well, grisly, it is nature's way of diversifying the gene pool to guarantee survival of the fittest and, in the end, the species itself. A FWC researcher collects black bear hair to conduct DNA studies. Kodiak Island, Alaska, for instance, is home to the highest density of brown bears in the world—not despite the hunting that takes place there, but because of it. Hunt a limited number of mature bruins and that guarantees the survival of more cubs. In other words, the Wekiva ad featuring the cub could more accurately say, 'If you love me, allow the hunt to continue." The reality is that with an estimated 4,000 bears in the population, even if all tags were filled, it would not stop the growth of the state's bear population. Thus, the biggest question facing the FWC might simply be: what liability will they incur should they fail to enact the hunt at the request of the agency and more attacks on humans occur? Ultimately, wildlife commissions have a responsibility to all state citizens—not simply the most vocal. FWC employs more than 2,000 full-time fish and wildlife experts, with many possessing advanced degrees. 'FWC has incredibly talented and experienced bear biologists and researchers, who have provided Florida with some of, if not, the best black bear data in the country,' says George Warthen, FWC Chief Conservation Officer who has been with the agency for 15 years. 'This data is at the forefront of the decisions the FWC makes in managing bear populations in the state.' 'The actions of Animal Rights groups often have less to do with what benefits wildlife than what it does to line their own pockets,' says Jack Hubbard, Executive Director of the Washington, D.C.-based Center for Environment and Welfare. 'These groups have a long history of using emotionally charged imagery and rhetoric to raise money—often with very little evidence that the funds they raise ever do much to help animals.' Review the successes and failures of wildlife management strategies across the globe and it's difficult not to conclude that the model of hunter-funded conservation is the most viable and sustainable method that's yet to be employed. This approach came of age following the ecological calamity of the Dust Bowl of the 1930s and remains the planet's most successful conservation approach. Ultimately, however, the question facing the FWC is simple: Follow science…or emotion?
Yahoo
07-06-2025
- Politics
- Yahoo
Anti-Hunters Will Attempt to Sabotage Florida's Bear Hunt With This Dirty Tactic
As Florida moves forward with plans to reinstate a regulated black bear hunt for the first time since 2015, opponents of the hunt from around the world are mobilizing an unconventional tactic — applying for the lottery hunt en masse. If these anti-hunters draw a tag, they'll hold onto it, effectively preventing a legal, well-intended bear hunter from drawing. Their goal is to flood the lottery and, theoretically, reduce the number of bears harvested. 'Never in my life did I think I'd be a hunter,' Chuck O'Neal, president of Speak Up Wekiva, a grassroots organization dedicated to protecting the Wekiva River and its watershed, told Naples Daily News. 'Now that we have a constitutional right to hunt, I might as well take advantage of that.' O'Neal was sarcastically referring to Amendment 2, Florida's new constitutional amendment that guarantees the right to hunt and fish for anyone with a proper license. Passed in 2024 with more than 67 percent support from the Florida electorate, the amendment protects individual participation in hunting and fishing. Also, it identifies these activities as the 'preferred means of responsibly managing and controlling fish and wildlife.' O'Neal and other opponents of the bear hunt argue that Amendment 2 makes it possible for them to purchase a license and apply for one of the black bear permits, which are likely to be allocated this year. 'We'll put in a few times or a few hundred times. It's an equal opportunity to enter this. I must admit, I'm not a good marksman. I may kill a bear with kindness,' O'Neal said. However, the specific language of the amendment could complicate the protest effort. It may not be illegal to purchase a tag and stay home, but the coordinated effort to obstruct legal hunting access seems to run afoul of the spirit of Amendment 2, which was intended to guarantee Floridians the right to hunt, not just to purchase a license. If anti-hunters snatch up a large quantity of the state's available bear permits, it would rob others of their constitutionally protected right. It also strips the state of the management tool that the amendment prioritizes. It's unclear how FWC would prevent anti-hunters from applying or if there would be any punishment for drawing with the intention of limiting hunting opportunity for others. Adding to the complexity of the issue is Florida's application process. The state requires individuals to complete a hunter safety course before purchasing a license. If non-hunters apply for the black bear lottery without completing the required course, they won't be able to buy a permit, even if they are drawn in the lottery. This could limit the protest's potential impact (unless, of course, those applicants are willing to complete hunter education). Read Next: Florida Just Approved a Black Bear Season. Connecticut Could Be Next The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission maintains the hunt is necessary to manage the state's growing black bear population and to mitigate rising human-bear conflicts, including a recent fatal attack on an 88-year-old man in Collier County. The FWC voted 4-1 to give preliminary approval for the hunt on May 15. A final vote on the proposed hunt, which would allot 187 black bear tags, is scheduled for August. The FWC was not immediately available for comment on whether the state has a plan to address protester-driven lottery entries.
Yahoo
13-03-2025
- General
- Yahoo
Push for new Florida bear hunt ignores real source of problems: Humans
The population of the Florida black bear is about what it was a decade ago, yet there are calls for hunting them again. (Photo via FWC) The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission is once again considering holding a bear hunt. To me, this is like saying, 'The captain of the Titanic in interested in sailing straight toward the nearest iceberg, because it went SO well last time.' The last bear hunt was a decade ago. I was there, so trust me when I tell you it was a disaster for both the bears and the FWC. James Cameron didn't direct a movie about it, the way he did for the Titanic, but he could have. The hunt was supposed to last a whole week. Instead, after hunters killed 304 bears in just two days, the wildlife commission's executive director shut it down early. Of that number, 36 lactating mama bears were slain, meaning there were probably some cubs left orphaned. One critic of the hunt, Chuck O'Neal of Speak Up Wekiva, said it was as challenging as hunting dairy cows. The bears were that laid back and easy to target. I am hopeful that this latest attempt to let people shoot at Florida's fairly rare bears can be blocked before a single gun is cocked. The wildlife commission is soliciting public opinion by holding an online hearing on the issue tonight (Thursday). The agency is also collecting feedback via email through BearComments@ A good question to ask them might be: 'Commissioners, how can you hold a hunt to kill bears when you can't even say for sure how many bears there are?' That question is one that even bothers the pro-hunting folks. Every day, about 900 new people move to Florida. Most of them have no idea we have bears here — or that the new home they just bought was built in what probably used to be bear habitat. Then when a bear shows up to hang out on their porch, or swing in their hammock or chillax in their hot tub, they freak out and call 911 as if it's the bear that's the intruder. Florida's bears are smaller than grizzlies, reaching a maximum of only 750 pounds (compared to more than 1,000 for their Western relatives). Their diet mostly consists of berries, acorns, and insects. That means they usually have no interest in gobbling up you or your little dog too. They once roamed all over the state, but between hunting and rampant development of their habitat, their population dwindled to just a few hundred by the 1970s. That's when the state listed them as threatened. There was talk of putting them on the federal endangered list too. But in 1992, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service said listing the Florida black bear was 'warranted but precluded' under the Endangered Species Act. What that meant was that other species needed protection more urgently and the government simply didn't have enough dough to cover the bears too. Six years later, though, the federal agency decided the bears did not need protecting after all. Agency officials said they were confident Florida's bears had a 'stable' future, thanks to the state's strict land management rules created by the 1985 Growth Management Act. Those are the rules that developers persuaded then-Gov. Rick Scott and the Legislature to ditch in 2011. They dumped them in favor of our current system, which is based on approving development wherever developers want to build it, no matter what problems may result. Meanwhile, the FWC took bears off the state's own imperiled wildlife list in 2012. The trouble started the following year. With so many people moving into the bears' habitat, conflicts were bound to happen. Sure enough, bears made a series of violent attacks on humans between 2013 and 2015. The bears were hungry and had wandered into areas where they found loose garbage can lids and the people who owned the cans. One Central Florida man, claiming he was 'the Bear Whisperer,' had even been feeding them by hand. At least, he did so until one of his neighbors was attacked. Why were the bears rooting in garbage cans? It was the state's own fault. In its infinite wisdom, the state Agriculture Department was letting people harvest unlimited amounts of saw palmetto berries from Florida's 37 state forests. The berry-pickers paid $10 for the right to collect an unlimited amount of berries. Then they would sell them to companies marketing them as a questionable cure for men's sexual problems. No, I am not making that up. Erectile dysfunction led to ecosystem dysfunction. Once the link between the berry collectors and the bear attacks became clear, the state halted the unlimited berry-picking in state forests. But by then, some members of the FWC had decided the best solution was to shoot a lot of bears for the first time in 21 years. Tens of thousands of people wrote in to urge the commissioners not to do it. When I asked the commission's pro-hunting chairman, Tampa mall developer Richard Corbett, why the board was ignoring the public's wishes, he about chewed my head off. 'Those people don't know what they're talking about,' Corbett barked at me. 'Most of those people have never been in the woods. They think we're talking about teddy bears: 'Oh Lord, don't hurt my little teddy bear!' Well, these bears are dangerous.' (Amid the subsequent uproar over Corbett's rant, he resigned.) Of course, the hunt showed which animal in Florida is the more dangerous one. Proposals for a follow-up hunt the next year were, pardon the pun, shot down. Yet ever since then, we've continued killing the bears — sometimes via poaching but more commonly by hitting them with our cars. About 300 died on Florida's roadways last year. Then came the December wildlife commission meeting. The commissioners, meeting in Lakeland, had a lot to talk about — gopher tortoise management, manatee protection zones, stone crabs, and so forth. But before they got to that stuff, they had scheduled 'a 5-year update on implementation of the 2019 Florida Black Bear Management Plan.' The update, delivered by a well-respected state bear expert named Mike Orlando, included, according to the agenda, 'an overview of bear management efforts and current research activities.' The subject of hunting was not on the agenda, but it came up anyway. If you want, you can watch the meeting the way I did this week, on video from the Florida Channel. It's fascinating. First comes Orlando's extensive and factual report on all that the scientists are doing, which includes his comment that they are not recommending any changes right now to what the commission is doing. Then comes a long line of public commenters, some of whom say they believe it's time for another hunt and some of whom say no new hunt is needed or wanted. One speaker, Katrina Shadix of Bear Warriors United, told the commissioners the state's human population was the one that had exceeded its carrying capacity, not the bear population. One thing both sides said, over and over, is that they'd like to see an updated, statewide population figure for the bears. Orlando said the scientists were working on it, but that such a number would not be ready until 2029. As soon as the public commenters were done, Commission Chairman Rodney Barreto, a Coral Gables developer (do you see a trend here?), asked if any of the commissioners had anything to say. Commissioner Gary Lester, who works for the developer of mega-retirement mecca The Villages, was the first to pipe up. 'I'll be very succinct,' he said. 'I would like to see a proposal from staff for a bear hunt.' That slippery sound you hear is the commission's skids being greased. 'For the FWC to even consider a hunt before these [population] studies are complete is outrageously irresponsible, dangerous and just plain WRONG!' Shadix told me via email. One of the people I talked to about this was a former wildlife commissioner, Ronald 'Alligator Ron' Bergeron. Bergeron got his nickname because he once tried to wrestle an alligator. It nearly drowned him before he punched it in the snout and made it turn loose of his hand. Bergeron, who's also been a rodeo champ and a python hunter, is not a shy guy. He was on the wildlife commission in 2015, and he was the lone commissioner who voted against holding the last bear hunt. He counseled his colleagues to slow down their unseemly rush to approve a hunt for a creature he first saw from his grandfather's airboat at age 5. Bears are an icon of the Florida wild and should be given respect, he contended. 'I believe that we need to evaluate, take our time a little bit here,' he told them. They ignored him. A year later, his was the loudest voice calling for the commission not to repeat that debacle. That time, his colleagues listened to him. When we talked this week, Bergeron introduced me to his daughter, Diamond, who is taking over his Bergeron Everglades Foundation. She was at the December wildlife commission meeting and noticed the same thing I did. Before holding the hunt in 2015, the FWC's scientists estimated there were about 4,300 bears, but they were still counting at that point. The commission pushed ahead with the hunt anyway. The most recent numbers from FWC's scientists are still an estimate, not a precise count. And the latest estimate, 10 years after that botched hunt, is that there are 4,050 bears. No gains, just a dip from a decade ago. 'I don't think they know how many bears there are in the state,' Diamond Bergeron said. 'I'm still trying to wrap my head around that.' The key to allowing humans to hunt wild animals is sustainability, the former wildlife commissioner told me. If you don't know how many bears there are, how can you be sure we won't kill too many in a hunt? How can you guarantee this important species will remain a part of wild Florida? Considering there have been no further incidents in which bears mauled people, as there were before the last hunt, what's supposed to be the goal of holding a new hunt? That's why, Bergeron said, 'I don't think any different than I thought in 2015. I don't believe [a hunt] is necessary.' And his daughter pointed out another figure, one that I had missed. In 2024, Orlando and his staff fielded the fewest number of human complaints about bears in the past five years, she said. So, if there are fewer conflicts between humans and bears, and no recent attacks by bears, and fewer bears than there were 10 years ago, then what's the point of hunting them? There are signs that this is part of a long game by a small group that's been planning for a long time to push the state into another hunt. And they fooled the voters on this last fall. Last year, some of the same people who want a bear hunt pushed through a vote on a strange state constitutional amendment that said hunting and fishing are recognized as rights under the law. The measure was sponsored by Sanford Sen. Jason Brodeur, who's such a friend to the environment that he won a 2021 award from the Florida Home Builders Association. It seemed like a pointless exercise, because no one was calling for a ban on either hunting or fishing. But some people — I was one — opposed this amendment because it also said that hunting and fishing would become the 'preferred method' of wildlife management in Florida. Hunting and fishing did not save the manatee or any other creature, including the bear. To give those practices preference in wildlife management seemed like an effort to tie the hands of scientists. The measure passed anyway. Several of the folks who spoke in December in favor of a new bear hunt cited that constitutional amendment as a reason to hold a new hunt, contending the voters wanted one. These claims are about as valid as those of Rep. Jason Shoaf, R-Shoot-em-up, who apparently saw a movie called 'Cocaine Bear' and believed it to be a documentary. He claimed last year that bears on drugs were wreaking havoc in Florida. 'We're talking about the ones that are on crack, and they break your door down, and they're standing in your living room growling and tearing your house apart,' Shoaf told a House committee considering an anti-bear bill he was pushing. Florida's bears are, unlike some Florida politicians, drug-free. Yet Shoaf's dopey bill allowing poachers to claim they were standing their ground against drugged-up bears passed both houses and was signed into law. Shoaf, by the way, has been calling for a new bear hunt since 2023. 'We really need a bear hunt,' he told the News Service of Florida two years ago. 'It's what we need here in North Florida. We're inundated. We've got way too many.' I think we need to send Rep. Shoaf, Commissioner Lester, and several other folks to some remedial math courses. That way maybe they can understand that what we're 'inundated' with is humans, not bears. Our growing population is crowding the bears, not the other way around. I'd also like to require them all to watch something — no, not the movie 'Titanic,' but another boating related entertainment. It's one of the earliest TV shows about Florida, which starred Dennis Weaver as an airboat-piloting game warden whose son had a pet bear. It was called 'Gentle Ben.' SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
