Woman who harassed two teachers causing both to quit jobs gets suspended jail sentence
A woman who harassed two teachers at a school in the New Ross district to such an extent that both of them ended up leaving their positions has received a ten month suspended prison sentence.
The woman in her early 60s who was charged with harassment was present in court last week when both injured parties described the effect her actions had had on them during her campaign of harassment.
Garda Donal Doyle told the court that he had received correspondence from Victim A, in November 2020 that appeared to be a letter from the Teaching Council which was delivered to the school attaching the code of conduct signed off as the 'Education Department' within the council.
Brendan Curran, state solicitor, queried with Garda Doyle if this department exists to which he confirmed it does not.
After this incident on February 14, 2022 Victim A received a Valentines day card which was posted to her home address which read 'Happy Valentines Day, see you soon'.
Victim A was in a long term relationship at this time.
A month later a St. Patrick's Day card was also sent to her home.
Mr Curran put to the court that the implication of these cards was that they were from a secret admirer and could cause significant issues in her relationship.
Garda Doyle confirmed these cards were sent to Victim A's home address and caused her significant stress.
The second complainant, Victim B, was a colleague working in the school alongside Victim A.
Both women had raised concerns within the school and in June 2020 Victim B received a letter which again appeared to be from the teaching council which was sent to her home address.
This letter seemed to accuse the injured party of harassing and bullying co-workers and referred to health and safety legislation.
On December 18, 2020 the defendant was staring into the classroom of Victim B.
The defendant also phoned Victim B's mother-in-law. The court heard these calls were not threatening but deemed inappropriate, with Garda Doyle saying 'the tone was not great'.
In October 2021 Victim B received correspondence purporting to be from the teaching council with the code of conduct attached and again Garda Doyle said it didn't come from the council.
Ultimately complaints were made and investigated by Garda Doyle.
In relation to the St. Patrick's Day card received by Victim A in March 2021 the stamp was able to be traced to the post office it was bought as well as the date and time it was bought.
This allowed gardaí to locate CCTV and identify the accused as the person buying the stamp.
As a result of this warrants were executed, one of which led to the seizure of a printer which correlated to a print test page that was on the back of one of the letters included in the letters purporting to be from the teaching council, and the accused was then arrested.
She made admissions at the time and was further interviewed on two occasions where she also made full admissions to the correspondence but did not accept the accusation of staring into the window at the school.
The accused claimed she was trying to help her sister who held a position within the school at the time.
Victim A read her victim impact statement into court.
She detailed that in the final three years of teaching within the school there were staff issues and during this time she began to receive anonymous post.
Victim A said that these malicious letters were sent to damage her professional and personal relationships, and her sense of trust in the workplace felt undermined.
She became worried that she had been reported to the teaching council and was incredibly upset, on the same date it was received the teaching council confirmed that it was not from them.
Victim A claimed the third and fourth letters received, the cards sent to her home address, were the most devastating as they implied she was having an affair and attempted to cause a rift in her relationship.
She stated in her final two years of teaching she became increasingly anxious and isolated, entering the school only through the back door and rarely leaving her room unless necessary.
Victim A said how she had ultimately decided to leave the school which she described as 'one of the most difficult decisions I've ever made'.
She added the effect the letters had was 'devastating' as she began to feel stressed and anxious, and felt vulnerable and unsafe at the idea of receiving further letters. The victim added that her peace of mind was taken from her. She said the 'emotional pain had been all consuming'.
Victim A also noted that the defendant, who also had an educational background herself, should have known the serious damage her actions could cause.
Victim A ended her statement on a bittersweet note stating she is finally beginning to put her life back together and that she is grateful for the years she had in this school and remembers her past pupils fondly and is thankful for the colleagues she has had the privilege of working with stating they are still some of her greatest friends.
Victim B then shared she felt she was targeted for raising child and staff safety issues within the school over two years and seven months.
She described how she felt unsafe, threatened, and under attack by the letters as the letters suggested insider knowledge of the school's issues.
Victim B said she felt hurt over the loss of what had been a good school atmosphere. She stated she had reported all the letters received to her Board of Management yet no action was taken, as a result she worried constantly about another letter.
Victim B emphasised to the court the premeditation involved in these letters as they needed to be 'typed, printed, folded, placed into an envelope, addressed, stamped, brought to a post office or letterbox, and posted'.
When Victim B as informed by Garda Doyle that the defendant, who Victim B said was a former principal in addition to holding other educational qualifications, was the culprit behind the letters she felt her conduct was a betrayal of the teaching profession.
Victim B also recounted an incident in January 2021, when the defendant contacted her elderly mother-in-law, leaving phone calls and voicemails that the victim described as threatening and demanding.
She felt that the tone of these calls showed a complete lack of respect for the elderly woman and caused immense worry and stress. As a result of the ongoing harassment, Victim B became 'constantly on high alert', fearing that the defendant was watching or following her.
She described the worry as 'relentless". Ultimately, the victim made the difficult decision to leave the school. She described the emotional toll as leaving her feeling 'afraid, weak, helpless, unsafe, and vulnerable'.
She referred to the entire ordeal as 'a nightmare I could not wake from' in which there was no escape or relief. Victim B thanked the gardaí for their professionalism, commitment, and kindness in this case and also stated she is grateful to her family, friends, and colleagues for the support received during these circumstances and counts herself lucky for these people in her life.
Ross Pratt O'Brien BL, counsel for the defendant, confirmed that there was ongoing issues within the school and stated it was a fair assessment to say there were a number of parties involved at the time.
Mr. Pratt O'Brien BL told the court that the defendant is the older sister to a woman who worked within the school and this woman would have kept the accused appraised of everything going on within the school.
As a token of remorse a sum of €4,000 was offered to both victims which Garda Doyle confirmed was refused.
Mr. Pratt O'Brien BL described the incident as 'not a very sophisticated operation' which Garda Doyle confirmed but stated there was a bit of thought in putting everything together.
Garda Doyle confirmed the accused has no previous convictions, made early admissions, and has not come to An Garda Síochána attention since the last incident in March 2022.
The defendant then took to the witness stand to convey her apologies to both of the injured parties. She acknowledged the hurt and expressed her deep regret for the hurt she caused to the individuals involved.
She stated she felt immense pressure to support her sister who was experiencing challenges within the school and acknowledged how she should not have allowed her emotions to dominate and control her actions and should have maintained a neutral and objective stance.
She described her actions as 'unwise and very regrettable". The accused offered her sincere apologies to all parties involved and expressed her deep remorse for the impact her actions had.
Mr. Pratt O'Brien BL urged the court to consider a probation report in the unusual circumstances of the case where there were ongoing issues within the school and Walsh felt protective of her sister.
The barrister told the court that the defendant is working part time as a lecturer and her career is essentially winding down.
Counsel reminded the court of the accused's sincere apology and remorse for her actions and stated he is seeking a probation report as he feels certain issues will come to light in this report.
Judge John Cheatle described the incident as an 'out of character event with very serious consequences' but did not order a probation report and instead opted to finalise matters for the peace of mind of both injured parties.
Judge Cheatle commended the victims for their statements and also the gardaí for their professionalism in this case.
He remarked that when the defendant began sending these letters that she had no idea of the 'catastrophic effect' her actions would have on both women and their families and friends in so many ways.
Judge Cheatle stated he cannot see the benefit in imprisoning the accused and imposed a 10-month sentence suspended for 12-months, and also ordered €4,000 be paid to each of the injured parties as a gesture of remorse and in circumstances where the victims do not want the money they can nominate a charity for the funds to be paid to.
Funded by the Courts Reporting Scheme
Wexford Courthouse.
Today's News in 90 Seconds - July 16th
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
17 hours ago
- Irish Times
The show mustn't go on for RTÉ underperformers, say RTÉ news staff
What is needed to turn things around at RTÉ ? Heads on plates, according to the staff engagement survey taken in the news department in May of this year. Certain things look positive, to be sure, with two-thirds of respondents saying they were proud to work for the State broadcaster, and more than 70 per cent believing they know what they're supposed to do and why they're supposed to be doing it ('I know what I need to do to be successful in my role' and 'I know how my work contributes to the goals of RTÉ' respectively). Other indicators in the poll answered by 202 staff members are, however, decidedly negative. Are resources being deployed effectively towards RTÉ's goals? Only one in 10 said yes. Are the right people rewarded? A mere 8 per cent said yes. And most alarming was the response when they were asked whether they agreed with the statement: 'When it is clear someone is not delivering in their role, we do something about it.' Only one in 20 respondents said yes. The insights report, seen by The Irish Times, pledges forms of action that will be familiar to anyone who has ever been subjected to a staff satisfaction survey: better communication, better opportunities for career development and so on. A promise to 'do something' about underperformers is not listed. If doing bird is bad for hens ... The formal visiting committee at Shelton Abbey prison in Co Wicklow must be familiar at this stage with the idea that long stretches in confinement are not very nice, but their 2023 trip, described in a report published this week, still made the point in a surprising way. The visitors happened to visit the open prison, which runs a farm, at a time when bird flu was on the rampage, and the hens had to be locked up all day until the department allowed their release. 'This we find has a profound negative effect on the wellbeing of the hens and they start to fight with each other which causes premature deaths,' the report said. A vision of Mountjoy in the verdant garden of Ireland? Irish prisons are now operating at 119 per cent of capacity across the country, the Irish Prison Officers Association warned this week, with its own trolley crisis – mattresses on the floor – in full swing and staff warning that such overcrowding will inexorably lead to conflict. 'Hopefully this issue will be resolved sooner rather than later,' said the visiting committee of the avian flu issue. Baker's run for the hunger strikers The National Hunger Strike Commemoration is almost here again, and what better way to remember than with a bracing Sunday-morning jog? Sinn Féin MLA Danny Baker this week announced what is described as a 'commemorative run' intended to 'remember those who died on hunger strike during the conflict'. Republicans will gather at Colin Glen Forest Park in Belfast at 9am on Sunday, August 24th to honour the legacy of the 10 who died in Long Kesh in 1981 and others who died in hunger strikes over the years. They will presumably then start their Strava sessions with a blip of their watches and attempt to set a personal best, inspired by those who 'set in motion a series of events that made political and social change unstoppable', per Baker. As well as honouring history, participants will receive a commemorative T-shirt, a race bib and a medal. No fish please, we're Irish Last month, The Irish Times reported that the European Parliament was moving to ban vegetarian and vegan food producers from using traditional meat terms to describe their replacement products . Now, with fake bacon banished, a report for the EU's fisheries committee has European sights set on faux fish. The report recommends banning the use of the commercial name of fish, such as tuna or cod, in veggie versions, as well as potentially imposing the name of the actual main ingredient, such as tofu or beans. The imaginative products mentioned include something called Kraken, which is 'inspired by octopus', and has suckers like an octopus tentacle but is in fact made out of fungus protein; Tuno, which is plant-based tuna in a can; and AubergEel, which is eel made of aubergine, intended for sushi. This could cause ructions in places such as Spain and Germany, where such products are available for sale and the concept of 'a person who once ate a lot of fish but is now a vegetarian' is relatively common. Less so in Ireland, where picky consumers shun the fruits of the ocean to the extent that we lie 22nd in the European list of fish and seafood eaters per capita despite being a large Atlantic island. Impressively, we're below Luxembourg, Slovakia and Austria, all of which are landlocked. Nothing to BBC here Another censorship controversy this week with the BBC at the centre as it opted to play an edited version of Dunboyne singer CMAT 's latest single, Euro-Country. The cut material, essentially the first verse, was in Irish. The broadcaster said it played a radio edit supplied by the record label. CMAT, for her part, said she had had no input into the cut. You can see why some people would be suspicious, weeks after live coverage of those laochra Gael, Kneecap , was dropped from the annual Glastonbury multichannel livestream extravaganza. It's not just Paddy in the crosshairs. BBC Radio also refused to play Freezing This Christmas by Sir Starmer and the Granny Harmers. This was an unlikely-sounding but very popular parody attempt at Christmas number one last year, which criticised cuts to winter fuel subsidies for pensioners. The broadcaster binned freelance BBC Newcastle presenter Chris Middleton when it emerged he was involved. It has also been under fire for more consequential censorship. Earlier this year, the BBC shelved a documentary called Gaza: Doctors Under Attack over impartiality concerns, only to see Channel 4 broadcast it anyway. Newsroom hacks – 111 of them, anonymously, in one open letter – are not happy with the higher-ups. We await their satisfaction survey.
Irish Times
4 days ago
- Irish Times
US attorney general told Trump his name is among many in Epstein files, Wall Street Journal reports
US attorney general Pam Bondi told president Donald Trump in May his name appeared in justice department files related to financier Jeffrey Epstein, the convicted sex offender who died in prison, the Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday, citing senior administration officials. Reuters was not able to immediately verify the Journal's report, which the White House characterised as 'fake news'. The newspaper's report threatened to expand what has become a political crisis for Mr Trump, whose past friendship with Epstein has drawn renewed scrutiny after his administration said it would not release the files, reversing a campaign promise. The justice department released a memo earlier this month that there was no basis to continue investigating the Epstein case, triggering a backlash among Mr Trump's political base, who demanded more information about wealthy and powerful people who had interacted with Epstein. READ MORE Mr Trump has not been accused of wrongdoing related to Epstein and has said their friendship ended before Epstein was first prosecuted. Epstein died by suicide in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges. He had pleaded not guilty and the case was dismissed after his death. Under political pressure last week, Mr Trump directed the justice department to seek the release of sealed grand jury transcripts from the case. A federal judge denied that request earlier on Wednesday. While the White House immediately dismissed the report as fictitious, Ms Bondi and deputy attorney general Todd Blanche issued a statement that did not directly address the Wall Street Journal's reporting. [ Donald Trump sues Rupert Murdoch and Wall Street Journal publisher for $10bn over Jeffrey Epstein report Opens in new window ] 'Nothing in the files warranted further investigation or prosecution, and we have filed a motion in court to unseal the underlying grand jury transcripts,' the officials said. 'As part of our routine briefing, we made the president aware of the findings.' The Journal reported that Ms Bondi and her deputy told Mr Trump at a White House meeting that his name, as well as those of 'many other high-profile figures', appeared in the files. Last week, the newspaper reported that Mr Trump had sent Epstein a bawdy birthday note in 2003 that ended, 'Happy Birthday – and may every day be another wonderful secret.' Reuters has not confirmed the authenticity of the alleged letter. Mr Trump has sued the Journal and its owners, including billionaire Rupert Murdoch, asserting that the birthday note was fake. Since the justice department's memo, Mr Trump has faced growing frustration among his base of supporters, after far-right figures spent years promoting conspiracy theories – at times echoed by Mr Trump – about Epstein and alleged ties to prominent Democratic politicians. Epstein hung himself in prison in 2019, according to the New York City chief medical examiner. But his connections with wealthy and powerful individuals prompted speculation that his death was not a suicide. The justice department said in its memo this month that it had concluded Epstein died by his own hand. [ Top Republican Mike Johnson shuts US Congress early to avoid Epstein vote Opens in new window ] In a sign of how the issue has bedevilled Mr Trump and his fellow Republicans, US House speaker Mike Johnson on Tuesday abruptly said he would send lawmakers home for the summer a day early to avoid a floor fight over a vote on the Epstein files. His decision temporarily stymied a push by Democrats and some Republicans for a vote on a bipartisan resolution that would require the justice department to release all Epstein-related documents. More than two-thirds of Americans believe the Trump administration is hiding information about Epstein's clients, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll conducted last week. Wednesday's court motion stemmed from federal investigations into Epstein in 2005 and 2007, according to court documents. US district judge Robin Rosenberg found that the justice department's request in Florida did not fall into any of the exceptions to rules requiring grand jury material be kept secret. The justice department also has pending requests to unseal transcripts in Manhattan federal court related to later indictments brought against Epstein and his former associate Ghislaine Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year prison sentence after her conviction for child sex trafficking and other crimes. – Reuters (c) Copyright Thomson Reuters 2025
Sunday World
16-07-2025
- Sunday World
Woman who harassed two teachers causing both to quit jobs gets suspended jail sentence
Victims told the court how they were on 'constant alert' and felt helpless and unsafe A woman who harassed two teachers at a school in the New Ross district to such an extent that both of them ended up leaving their positions has received a ten month suspended prison sentence. The woman in her early 60s who was charged with harassment was present in court last week when both injured parties described the effect her actions had had on them during her campaign of harassment. Garda Donal Doyle told the court that he had received correspondence from Victim A, in November 2020 that appeared to be a letter from the Teaching Council which was delivered to the school attaching the code of conduct signed off as the 'Education Department' within the council. Brendan Curran, state solicitor, queried with Garda Doyle if this department exists to which he confirmed it does not. After this incident on February 14, 2022 Victim A received a Valentines day card which was posted to her home address which read 'Happy Valentines Day, see you soon'. Victim A was in a long term relationship at this time. A month later a St. Patrick's Day card was also sent to her home. Mr Curran put to the court that the implication of these cards was that they were from a secret admirer and could cause significant issues in her relationship. Garda Doyle confirmed these cards were sent to Victim A's home address and caused her significant stress. The second complainant, Victim B, was a colleague working in the school alongside Victim A. Both women had raised concerns within the school and in June 2020 Victim B received a letter which again appeared to be from the teaching council which was sent to her home address. This letter seemed to accuse the injured party of harassing and bullying co-workers and referred to health and safety legislation. On December 18, 2020 the defendant was staring into the classroom of Victim B. The defendant also phoned Victim B's mother-in-law. The court heard these calls were not threatening but deemed inappropriate, with Garda Doyle saying 'the tone was not great'. In October 2021 Victim B received correspondence purporting to be from the teaching council with the code of conduct attached and again Garda Doyle said it didn't come from the council. Ultimately complaints were made and investigated by Garda Doyle. In relation to the St. Patrick's Day card received by Victim A in March 2021 the stamp was able to be traced to the post office it was bought as well as the date and time it was bought. This allowed gardaí to locate CCTV and identify the accused as the person buying the stamp. As a result of this warrants were executed, one of which led to the seizure of a printer which correlated to a print test page that was on the back of one of the letters included in the letters purporting to be from the teaching council, and the accused was then arrested. She made admissions at the time and was further interviewed on two occasions where she also made full admissions to the correspondence but did not accept the accusation of staring into the window at the school. The accused claimed she was trying to help her sister who held a position within the school at the time. Victim A read her victim impact statement into court. She detailed that in the final three years of teaching within the school there were staff issues and during this time she began to receive anonymous post. Victim A said that these malicious letters were sent to damage her professional and personal relationships, and her sense of trust in the workplace felt undermined. She became worried that she had been reported to the teaching council and was incredibly upset, on the same date it was received the teaching council confirmed that it was not from them. Victim A claimed the third and fourth letters received, the cards sent to her home address, were the most devastating as they implied she was having an affair and attempted to cause a rift in her relationship. She stated in her final two years of teaching she became increasingly anxious and isolated, entering the school only through the back door and rarely leaving her room unless necessary. Victim A said how she had ultimately decided to leave the school which she described as 'one of the most difficult decisions I've ever made'. She added the effect the letters had was 'devastating' as she began to feel stressed and anxious, and felt vulnerable and unsafe at the idea of receiving further letters. The victim added that her peace of mind was taken from her. She said the 'emotional pain had been all consuming'. Victim A also noted that the defendant, who also had an educational background herself, should have known the serious damage her actions could cause. Victim A ended her statement on a bittersweet note stating she is finally beginning to put her life back together and that she is grateful for the years she had in this school and remembers her past pupils fondly and is thankful for the colleagues she has had the privilege of working with stating they are still some of her greatest friends. Victim B then shared she felt she was targeted for raising child and staff safety issues within the school over two years and seven months. She described how she felt unsafe, threatened, and under attack by the letters as the letters suggested insider knowledge of the school's issues. Victim B said she felt hurt over the loss of what had been a good school atmosphere. She stated she had reported all the letters received to her Board of Management yet no action was taken, as a result she worried constantly about another letter. Victim B emphasised to the court the premeditation involved in these letters as they needed to be 'typed, printed, folded, placed into an envelope, addressed, stamped, brought to a post office or letterbox, and posted'. When Victim B as informed by Garda Doyle that the defendant, who Victim B said was a former principal in addition to holding other educational qualifications, was the culprit behind the letters she felt her conduct was a betrayal of the teaching profession. Victim B also recounted an incident in January 2021, when the defendant contacted her elderly mother-in-law, leaving phone calls and voicemails that the victim described as threatening and demanding. She felt that the tone of these calls showed a complete lack of respect for the elderly woman and caused immense worry and stress. As a result of the ongoing harassment, Victim B became 'constantly on high alert', fearing that the defendant was watching or following her. She described the worry as 'relentless". Ultimately, the victim made the difficult decision to leave the school. She described the emotional toll as leaving her feeling 'afraid, weak, helpless, unsafe, and vulnerable'. She referred to the entire ordeal as 'a nightmare I could not wake from' in which there was no escape or relief. Victim B thanked the gardaí for their professionalism, commitment, and kindness in this case and also stated she is grateful to her family, friends, and colleagues for the support received during these circumstances and counts herself lucky for these people in her life. Ross Pratt O'Brien BL, counsel for the defendant, confirmed that there was ongoing issues within the school and stated it was a fair assessment to say there were a number of parties involved at the time. Mr. Pratt O'Brien BL told the court that the defendant is the older sister to a woman who worked within the school and this woman would have kept the accused appraised of everything going on within the school. As a token of remorse a sum of €4,000 was offered to both victims which Garda Doyle confirmed was refused. Mr. Pratt O'Brien BL described the incident as 'not a very sophisticated operation' which Garda Doyle confirmed but stated there was a bit of thought in putting everything together. Garda Doyle confirmed the accused has no previous convictions, made early admissions, and has not come to An Garda Síochána attention since the last incident in March 2022. The defendant then took to the witness stand to convey her apologies to both of the injured parties. She acknowledged the hurt and expressed her deep regret for the hurt she caused to the individuals involved. She stated she felt immense pressure to support her sister who was experiencing challenges within the school and acknowledged how she should not have allowed her emotions to dominate and control her actions and should have maintained a neutral and objective stance. She described her actions as 'unwise and very regrettable". The accused offered her sincere apologies to all parties involved and expressed her deep remorse for the impact her actions had. Mr. Pratt O'Brien BL urged the court to consider a probation report in the unusual circumstances of the case where there were ongoing issues within the school and Walsh felt protective of her sister. The barrister told the court that the defendant is working part time as a lecturer and her career is essentially winding down. Counsel reminded the court of the accused's sincere apology and remorse for her actions and stated he is seeking a probation report as he feels certain issues will come to light in this report. Judge John Cheatle described the incident as an 'out of character event with very serious consequences' but did not order a probation report and instead opted to finalise matters for the peace of mind of both injured parties. Judge Cheatle commended the victims for their statements and also the gardaí for their professionalism in this case. He remarked that when the defendant began sending these letters that she had no idea of the 'catastrophic effect' her actions would have on both women and their families and friends in so many ways. Judge Cheatle stated he cannot see the benefit in imprisoning the accused and imposed a 10-month sentence suspended for 12-months, and also ordered €4,000 be paid to each of the injured parties as a gesture of remorse and in circumstances where the victims do not want the money they can nominate a charity for the funds to be paid to. Funded by the Courts Reporting Scheme Wexford Courthouse. Today's News in 90 Seconds - July 16th
