The latest Trump tariffs on SA smell of a bigger BRICS battle
A late-night WhatsApp response from a sales director in the local wine industry read simply: ' he's a [ expletive ] idiot ' – after being asked for comment on Donald Trump's latest trade letter to South Africa (SA) published on Truth Social.
That single sentence might just capture the collective sigh echoing across boardrooms, vineyards and orchards from Constantia to Killarney.
On Monday, 7 July, President Donald Trump signed an order imposing a 30% tariff on all South African exports to the US, effective from 1 August. It's a hammer blow – not just to South African oranges, macadamias and wine, but against an entire trade philosophy.
Reciprocity or retribution?
This is a vintage Trump play: loud, unilateral and unashamedly nationalist. The US President frames it as a patriotic correction of 'decades of bad trade deals', claiming that persistent trade deficits are not just bad economics, but existential threats to US sovereignty.
Answering press questions, Trump returned to his well of confusion and obfuscation: 'They're going to be tariffs. Tariffs are going to be the tariffs… But they go into effect on August 1st.'
His spokesperson, Karoline Leavitt, offered her own, unique take during a Monday press conference, describing the President's approach as if he were plotting a new season of The Apprentice: 'He's looking at every country on the planet, seeing where they are ripping off the American people… and he's correcting that.'
BRICS bites back
Meanwhile, the newly expanded BRICS bloc (now including Indonesia and a growing cohort of partners) has fired back in diplomatic parlance.
In their Rio de Janeiro declaration, they condemned 'unilateral coercive measures' as distortive and inconsistent with WTO rules, reaffirming a vision of a multilateral, fairer global trade order.
Trump's reaction? You guessed it: even more tariffs. Threatening an additional 10% penalty on countries 'aligning with BRICS anti-American policies' and adding fuel to an already roaring geopolitical braai fire.
Pork disease and power plays
Our micro-sectors have been fighting this battle for a long time. The South African pork industry, for example, is resisting US demands to drop biosecurity protocols against Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome (PRRS), a disease that SA has, so far, kept at bay.
Dr Peter Evans from the South African Pork Producers' Organisation warns that relaxing these standards could be catastrophic: 'We're just trying to keep our industry disease-free. Every time Agoa comes around, we have the same fight.'
Evans is referring to the 2015 standoff over pork imports, when US officials insisted that SA's PRRS-driven pork restrictions amounted to protectionism, while Pretoria's veterinary authorities stood firm that safeguarding the nation's disease-free status was non-negotiable.
That controversy escalated and became entangled with other agricultural disputes – most notably the long-standing tensions over US poultry and beef exports – with SA's Agoa eligibility hanging in the balance until a last-minute compromise paved the way for continued market access.
Local jobs in firing line
The economic tremors of the latest earthquake are already being felt. Sonja Boshoff, chair of Parliament's select committee on economic development and trade, was direct in a media statement shared with Daily Maverick: 'These industries are not abstract economic indicators; they are lifelines for tens of thousands of workers.'
As previously reported, the citrus industry alone supports more than 35,000 jobs and contributes more than R38-billion to the economy annually.
Boshoff warned that sudden tariff hikes sabotage decades of careful trade diplomacy, undermine confidence in agreements like Agoa, and threaten entire rural economies.
'No country can plan its industrial or export strategy under a cloud of sudden and unilateral tariff hikes.'
In political corridors, there's talk of offering strategic Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) procurement to the US as a bargaining chip. Boshoff, however, insists on swift, transparent negotiations. 'We cannot afford diplomatic dithering,' she said.
What this means for you
Jobs on the line: The citrus, steel and agricultural sectors face immediate existential risks. Exporters may pass costs onto local prices, hurting consumers too.
A shrinking US doorway: Agoa's benefits are now largely neutralised, and producers relying on the US market must urgently diversify.
AfCFTA as a safety valve: Local businesses can start exploring new African markets, but this demands investment, strategy and robust digital defences against fraud.
Policy crossroads: Government support, logistics aid and fast-tracked trade deals with the EU and Asia will be vital to plug revenue holes.
The continental plan B
While the US door starts to close, some industry players are eyeing the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) as a lifeline. Gregory Saffy of FedEx calls it 'one of the most important levers for driving inclusive growth and unlocking the continent's full trade potential'.
South African exports under AfCFTA have already reached around R820-million since January 2024, including mining equipment, plastics, apparel and food products. Yet for small and medium businesses, the reality is more nuanced.
Saffy points out that eliminating tariffs doesn't magically create customers: 'A free trade agreement doesn't create demand for a business's products.'
SMEs need to be export-ready, secure payment systems, and understand new markets; no small feat in a continent where paperwork and payment fraud are still major obstacles.
He advocates digitising customs systems, building transparent tariff schedules, and boosting SME readiness through targeted training and support.
The ultimate prize? A less US-dependent, more intra-African trade future that could blunt the force of global protectionism.
SA is caught between an increasingly hostile US and a collaborative but still-evolving BRICS vision. As Trump pushes his 'America first' agenda to new extremes, local producers are being forced to confront a reality where no market is guaranteed. DM
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TimesLIVE
29 minutes ago
- TimesLIVE
Witchcraft law clashes with African beliefs, argues University of the Western Cape researcher
A South African researcher from the University of the Western Cape is calling for the repeal of the Witchcraft Suppression Act 3 of 1957, arguing it is a colonial relic that continues to marginalise African cultural and spiritual practices. Happyness Nokwatu Raselabe, a forensic linguist, recently completed her master's research at the University of the Western Cape (UWC) and contributed a chapter to the book titled Courtroom discourse: practical insights from legal linguists, where she looked at the intercultural void that exists in South African law, with a particular focus on the Witchcraft Suppression Act, which is still in place more than 60 years later. Her study is titled Ityala ngumphikwa: Evidence lost in translation and interpretation — a critical analysis of language implications during court trials and focuses on how language barriers and outdated laws continue to disadvantage black South Africans in the justice system. 'My research critically analyses how language impacts court trials,' she said. 'I used a case I found at the Western Cape Archive Library titled Sityodana Mseswa, which was judged under the Witchcraft Suppression Act,' she said. Raselabe argues that this law contradicts more recent legislation, such as the Traditional Health Practitioners Act 22 of 2007, which recognises traditional healers. Raselabe believes the Witchcraft Suppression Act is a direct attack on traditional healers and people who practise African spirituality. 'You cannot have the Witchcraft Suppression Act, which suppresses the people who believe in 'witchcraft' and have the Traditional Health Practitioners Act. The Witchcraft SuppressionAct opposes everything the Traditional Health Practitioners Act was meant to correct,' she said. 'Traditional healers, diviners and any spiritual practice were umbrellaed under the WSA, resulting in abathandazeli [prophets/faith healers], amagqirha [traditional healers] and all other African spirituality practitioners practising in secret as they were prone to being labelled witches and risked being charged under this act.' Beyond the law itself, Raselabe's research also shines a light on the dominance of English in court proceedings, which she says disadvantages non-English speakers and wastes resources. 'Why not introduce African languages as languages of record in courts?' she asked. 'It's a waste of resources, taxpayers' money, and time.' She commended chief justice Mandisa Maya for once delivering a verdict in isiXhosa, saying: 'Our constitution advocates for the promotion of African languages. If we are indeed serious about ensuring that all languages are on the same parity, we must be serious about diversifying the language of records in courts.' In conducting her research, Raselabe had to dig through old court records, some handwritten in cursive from the 1950s and speak to elders, including getting insights from her grandmother who is over 100 years old. She also used her background in forensic linguistics, customary law and indigenous knowledge systems to explore how South African laws do not fully reflect African traditions and ways of life. 'You cannot expect people to abide by laws they do not understand or that are not written in their home language,' said Raselabe. One of her key findings was that despite public proposals to repeal the act, it remains in effect. 'We are still living in a highly Westernised system,' she said. 'We are moving at a snail's pace. We need to do something. We need to repeal these laws.' In her view, the legal definition of witchcraft remains rooted in colonial ideology. 'When we speak of witchcraft, what is that? How do you even define witchcraft ngeSintu [from indigenous perspectives]?' she asked. 'The concept of witchcraft in African cultures is more of a principle. The Western understanding does not align with our beliefs.' Raselabe hopes her research will raise awareness and pressure policymakers into action. 'I'm hoping that it will push the South African Law Reform Commission to get a move on. We need laws that reflect the majority of citizens.' She added that proper consultation was key: 'When the Witchcraft Suppression Act was put in place, there were no consultations. If we want to repeal it now, we must speak to the custodians of the traditions and the culture.' Her advice to other researchers: read widely, consult elders and confirm every source. 'Read as much as possible and engage with as many people as you can.' Raselabe has since completed her Master's degree at UWC and expanded her research to compare African and Western understandings of legal concepts such as adoption, abduction, defamation and ukuthwala.
Daily Maverick
2 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
NMB Business Chamber calls for urgent mitigation after devastating US tariff announcement
The Nelson Mandela Bay Business Chamber has described the 30% export tariffs levied on South Africa by US President Donald Trump as a 'direct blow' to local exporters. Roleplayers from the Automotive Sector, the components manufacturing sector and Nelson Mandela Bay's Business Chamber have called for urgent government action to mitigate the 30% tariffs imposed on South African exports by United States President Donald Trump. The move is likely to cause devastation to an already fragile Nelson Mandela Bay economy – the strongest economy in the Eastern Cape. 'We are extremely disappointed with US President Donald Trump's announcement of yesterday that he will subject imports from South Africa to 30% tariffs, effective from 1 August. 'This is a direct blow to local exporters who manufacture products according to world-class standards and employ thousands of people. There will be wide-ranging implications for South African exporters, with Nelson Mandela Bay being disproportionately impacted due to our high reliance on the automotive and agriculture sectors of our economy,' Chamber CEO Denise van Huyssteen said. '[The South African] government must move with absolute urgency to implement emergency measures to protect local exporters and the thousands of jobs linked to this. Potential mitigation actions could include still trying to find ways to establish mutually beneficial trade relations with the US to reduce the tariff burden, securing alternative markets for our products by negotiating with BRICS markets for Free Trade Agreements, strengthening trade relations with the European Union and South East Asia markets. However, it needs to be noted that switching markets takes a long time and is not something which can be done in the short term,' Van Huyssteen said. Eastern Cape economy According to an analysis from the Eastern Cape Development Corporation for Q4 of 2024, the decision from Trump comes as exports from the province were already in decline, by 22% at the end of 2024. The top four provincial export commodities are motor vehicles, wool and mohair. Competitive advantage Van Huyssteen said several countries would now have significant cost advantages over South Africa, including others in Africa, while Japan and Korea may have the flexibility to absorb the tariffs. 'This will put South Africa, which already from a logistics perspective [is] far from other markets, in a very uncompetitive position versus other countries around the globe, and on the African continent. There is no doubt that this will have a direct impact on the global strategies and decisions of multinationals on where the best manufacturing locations may be,' Van Huyssteen said. Retaliation tariffs She said other potential issues which might arise included other countries reducing their tariffs to the US, and SA exporters having to compete with these tariffs; retaliation tariffs from our current trade partners and the dumping of products in our market by other countries which can no longer compete in the US. 'An example of this is the impact of cheap tyres entering the country through anti-dumping loopholes, affecting the ongoing viability of local tyre manufacturing,' Van Huyssteen said. Goodyear Tyres announced last month that it was shutting down its manufacturing plant in Kariega. It is expected that around 900 people will lose their jobs. Earlier this year, Continental Tyres closed one of its specialist tyre factories. 'The United States is South Africa's second-biggest trading partner and is the automotive industry's second-biggest export market. The industry has for a number of years benefited from duty-free benefits under Agoa, but this has now permanently ceased,' Van Huyssteen said. 'The automotive industry requires economies of scale to be competitive and the South African industry only represents 0.6% of global vehicle production. By far the biggest risk in the short term to the medium term is the competition that South Africa will face from non-US manufacturing countries which may have a lower tariff base. 'Furthermore, those vehicle manufacturers who export vehicles to the US are likely to be more immediately impacted in the short term, with component exports to the US likely to be impacted soon afterwards. 'Our local economy is highly reliant on the automotive industry and employs almost half of the country's employment in this sector. We are particularly concerned about the potential knock-on impact of reduced vehicle assembly volumes of affected OEMs (original equipment manufacturers) who export to the US may have on the automotive components supply chain and surrounding ecosystem. 'Manufacturing is currently under immense pressure brought about by the electricity, logistics and municipal infrastructure challenges of the past few years, as well as the influx of cheap imports into the market. In terms of the automotive industry, cheaper imported vehicles are making inroads into the market, with consumers opting for these rather than purchasing from companies that manufacture vehicles locally. 'In fact, five out of the top-10-selling vehicles in the SA market are from companies that do not assemble vehicles locally. These factors, together with the potential of reduced export volumes to the US, make it even more difficult for the industry to be sustainable. 'The ecosystem linked to the automotive industry generates thousands of jobs from the vehicle manufacturers and components manufacturers, right through to the many medium and small businesses providing indirect services such as cleaning, security, IT and various other support services,' Van Huyssteen said. She said the agriculture sector, which like the automotive industry has benefited from Agoa, would be directly affected. Agriculture The Eastern Cape is the country's second-largest citrus-producing province, but does not export to the United States. There are concerns, though, that other citrus-producing areas will now compete for the Eastern Cape's export markets. Requirement for mitigation The Eastern Cape as a whole is likely to be disproportionately affected by the tariff announcements versus the rest of the country, given the extent to which its economy is anchored by the automotive and agriculture sectors. 'Speed and a proactive strategic response are required to enable South African-based manufacturers to find alternative solutions to navigating the fast-changing landscape and implementing mitigation actions,' Van Huyssteen said. Components manufacturing The CEO of the National Association of Automotive Component and Allied Manufacturers, Renai Moothilall, said the confirmation of the additional duties in the US market to be applied from 1 August were of great concern in the automotive sector. 'We are already seeing volumes of vehicle assemblies linked to those markets being reduced and the impact on the supplier base is negative. Having noted the content of President Trump's statement, Naacam urges a nuanced and urgent negotiation which highlights the positive trade relationship that the US enjoys with SA in terms of components coming from that country to be used in vehicles which are then exported back to the US,' he said. Automotive Business Council While he has not yet responded to the confirmation of the 30% tariff, Mikel Mabasa, CEO of Naamsa, the Automotive Business Council, said last month that the United States was the third-largest destination for South African automotive exports, with about R35-billion worth of vehicles shipped in 2024, accounting for 6.5% of total vehicle exports in 2024. 'The proposed 25% tariff increase will severely impact local manufacturers operating in South Africa, including BMW, Ford, Isuzu, Mercedes-Benz, Nissan, Toyota, and Volkswagen, who produce vehicles for global markets, including the US. Last month, while attending the Gauteng Investment Conference in Johannesburg, Mabasa said it could have serious implications for jobs in South Africa as the SA auto industry contributed significantly to economic development, employment and industrialisation. On Tuesday afternoon, he said that the council would meet on Tuesday night to discuss the new tariffs. DM
Daily Maverick
5 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
June 2025 round-up of Daily Maverick's #LiveJournalism
At Daily Maverick, our events and webinar department links public service journalism with audience engagement. We host webinars to deepen community connections, enhance understanding of key issues and bring stories to life through interactive experiences. We hosted five webinars in June, all of which can be found on our dedicated webinar platform or YouTube channel. Here's a round-up our latest live journalism webinars, the topics covered and key takeaways, just for you. Small business, big problems: What the government could be doing June started with a webinar for the small business owners in the Daily Maverick community and the systemic challenges throttling South Africa's small business sector. Neesa Moodley, editor of Business Maverick, was joined by Joshua Kadish, co-founder and CEO of Sourcefin, and Dr Shaheim Patel, academic dean at Regent Business School. Together, they examined hurdles to success such as access to finance, red-tape, digital infrastructure and more. An audience member said the session was 'brilliant' and that '[we] need more conversations like this'. Watch the full recording here. Antarctica's Precipice: Reimagining the South Pole Without US Commitment As winter took full effect in South Africa, the cold Antarctic took the agenda. As global tensions rise, the once-stable Antarctic Treaty is under strain. Antarctic investigative journalist Tiara Walters was joined by polar geopolitical experts, professors Klaus Dodds (Royal Holloway, University of London) and Alan Hemmings (Gateway Antarctica, University of Canterbury). The conversation included the growing likelihood of shifting power dynamics and nationalist agendas jeopardising the treaty's future ahead of negotiations in Milan. One attendee said it was 'great to see these growing issues being highlighted'. Another said they felt inspired ahead of their master's dissertation. Watch the full recording here. One Small Step: How parkrun Built a Global Community In a more lighthearted webinar, Mark Heywood, a social activist and avid parkrunner, was joined by Paul Sinton-Hewitt CBE, founder of the global parkrun and author of One Small Step, as well as South African running legend and parkrun SA CEO Bruce Fordyce. They reflected on how a small Saturday-morning run in London sparked a global movement that now spans five continents and 10 million participants. What made this webinar special was the personal stories of parkrunners in South Africa whose lives were changed after joining their local parkrun. 'Incredible incredible incredible… thank you so, so much for this discussion,' said one attendee. Another was grateful to the panel for 'gifting this lovely event to the world'. Watch the full recording here. Children in Crisis: Exploring ways to better protect SA's most vulnerable The sad nature of this webinar was offset by its solutions-focused panel. Maverick Citizen journalist Tamsin Meterlerkamp was joined by Sinah Moruane from Unicef SA and Miranda Jordan-Friedman, founding director of Women and Men Against Child Abuse. After giving appropriate attention and context to the brutal realities facing South Africa's children, the session was a call to action for anyone committed to a safer, more just future for the country's youngest citizens. One attendee said: 'Wow. Thank you for this. We need to have more of these and get more of the people who make major decisions nationally on these platforms to hear this information and be part of the solution.' Watch the full recording here. Just Energy Transition: Debating the role of nuclear in South Africa's energy mix Our Burning Planet's Ethan van Diemen hosted this timely webinar examining nuclear energy's place in the Just Energy Transition. With Professor Mark Swilling (Stellenbosch University), Emmanuel Montwedi (SAYNPS chair and nuclear engineer) and activist Makoma Lekalakala (Earthlife Africa), the panel unpacked the heated debate: is nuclear essential for stable, zero-emission power, or a risky, costly distraction? The debate was hot, respectful, full of insight and worth your while to understand the Just Energy Transition. One viewer said it was 'great to hear both sides of the story'. Watch the full recording here. DM
