
Is Health Care a Right? Trinity Health CEO weighs in
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
This is a preview of Access Health—Tap here to get this newsletter delivered straight to your inbox.
What happens to a society that starts viewing health care as a privilege, not a right?
I posed that question to Mike Slubowski, president and CEO of Trinity Health, on Tuesday. We had been discussing Trinity Health's decision to take a vocal stance on proposed Medicaid cuts, alongside other large Catholic health systems.
"This isn't a political issue for us," Slubowski told me. "It's our mission."
Catholic social teachings speak to the common good, he continued. In a just society, everyone should have access to a fundamental level of health care services.
This belief is foundational to every nurse, physician and hospital executive that I've spoken to (or at least, that's what they've told me). When someone comes into the emergency department, staff will do everything in their power to save them—regardless of the patient's ability to pay. When a stranger needs a doctor on a plane, doctors are inclined to stand up, even if they're off-duty. Earlier this year, Dr. Brendan Carr, CEO of Mount Sinai, told me of the delicate balance hospitals must strike between survival and sacrifice: "We make lots and lots of decisions that are terrible business decisions on purpose, because it's tethered to our mission."
Regardless of politics, I'd gamble that most Americans agree with this mission in practice. When our children receive rare diagnoses, many of us would be relieved to learn that financial assistance is available for a novel, expensive treatment. When our parents need emergency surgery, many of us would be grateful to not have to scramble for a credit card first.
Indeed, the majority of Americans want Medicaid funding to either remain about the same or increase. That's true of Democrats, Republicans, independents, Trump voters and Harris voters, according to a recent survey from KFF.
But Americans are also frustrated by high health care costs and a perceived lack of price transparency. Many felt their trust in medical institutions fracture during the COVID-19 pandemic. For some, those cracks have only widened with time and increasingly political messaging. (Check this week's report from the conservative consumer advocacy organization Consumers' Research, which accused Cleveland Clinic, Vanderbilt University Medical Center and three other academic health systems of misappropriating government resources to prop up a "woke" agenda.)
All of this to say, for many voters, health care is confusing, frustrating and somewhat opaque: not unlike politics itself.
Senator Joni Ernst of Iowa made headlines earlier this month when, in response to questions from constituents about Medicaid cuts, she remarked, "We all are going to die."
Well, yes. But when I asked Slubowski what happens when a society starts behaving that way—when it views health care as a privilege, not a right—he focused more on the principles of the "common good." We can't prevent all deaths, but we can prevent some. In doing so, health care systems help preserve social order in times of chaos.
He pointed to health systems' actions during the COVID-19 pandemic: shutting down elective services, pouring all of their resources into caring for critical patients and protecting staff members from infection.
"You can't do that kind of thing without a well-developed health system that is also focused on public health," Slubowski said.
If Medicaid cuts come to fruition, health care leaders have testified that access will decline, the cost of uncompensated care will rise, and hospitals will not be able to reinvest in their facilities, staff and communities. Slubowski echoed these concerns.
"In my view, it's sort of like a downward spiral," he said. "In my view, the health system would not be prepared for another type of pandemic."
Slubowski reminded me that our population is rapidly aging; a new type of pandemic is already on the horizon.
Read on to the Pulse Check section for more of my interview with Trinity Health's CEO. And if you have thoughts to share on today's edition, I'd love to hear them. Email me at a.kayser@newsweek.com.
Essential Reading
Tensions are mounting amid ICE's mass deportation efforts—and this week, health care entered the national conversation. On Tuesday, advisers to Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. ordered CMS officials to transfer Medicaid data to immigration enforcement personnel at the Department of Homeland Security. California Governor Gavin Newsom questioned the order's legality.
Meanwhile, California hospitals and mobile clinics have been reporting immigration raids on their premises, according to CalMatters. One health system estimated that a third of medical appointments were canceled this week, purportedly because immigrant patients are afraid to attend them.
A new KFF report highlighted immigrants' role in the health care workforce. One in six hospital workers are immigrants, per the research foundation.
A second state has formally replaced the "physician assistant" title with "physician associate." Maine's legislature enacted the law on Monday, joining Oregon, which made the switch in April 2024. The AAPA has been advocating for states to adopt this change, saying it better reflects PAs' leadership roles and responsibilities in the modern health care system.
The former COO and CFO of Loretto Hospital in Chicago has been charged for allegedly submitting false COVID-19 testing claims to the government and seeking approximately $900 million in reimbursements for more than 1 million fake patients. Anosh Amed faces nearly two dozen charges for the scheme, which took place in 2021 and also involved laboratory leadership, according to an indictment that was unsealed Tuesday and reported by Block Club Chicago.
One health care company took home the gold in Newsweek's inaugural AI Impact Awards. Every Cure, which uses AI to find repurposing opportunities for existing drugs, was voted as the overall winner by a panel of cross-industry experts. View the full list of winners here.
Pulse Check
Mike Slubowski is the president and CEO of Trinity Health, one of the nation's largest nonprofit health systems spanning 26 states with a network of 93 hospitals. This week, I connected with Slubowski to discuss the expected impact of proposed Medicaid cuts.
For context, Trinity serves 875,000 Medicaid patients each year. If that enrollment is slashed by the predicted 12 percent, it would result in 105,000 fewer patients across the system.
As it stands, Medicaid payments fall short of covering the system's costs by $500 million each year. The proposed cuts would add an annual loss of $600 million to that shortfall, according to data the health system shared with me.
Here's what Slubowski told me during our Pulse Check.
Editor's Note: Some responses have been edited for length and clarity.
Mike Slubowski is the president and CEO of Trinity Health.
Mike Slubowski is the president and CEO of Trinity Health.
Trinity Health
How do you foresee Medicaid cuts impacting Trinity Health's financial stability and long-term strategy?
You can't cut billions from Medicaid and not affect people in the health of communities. Up to 10 million people losing coverage as a result of this is going to be devastating for our communities.
We know when people don't have access to care, they forego preventive care and they end up in the emergency departments, which are already overflowing. It results in more costly care and interventions.
Our calculations just on the House version—not all the stuff the Senate is now considering, which are even maybe more onerous for us—we estimate an [annual] impact of $600 million to our budget once implementation happens over the next couple of years.
As a faith-based, not-for-profit health system, we don't set goals to earn big margins or profits. In fact, this year, we've been running at three-tenths-of-a-percent operating margin. If we were living large, three percent would be the maximum [operating margin] that we believe we would need to reinvest in our future. So we don't set high aspirations.
But right now, we're barely above break-even. And so you can think about the impact of $600 million [lost], and what it's going to do for our communities. About 20 percent of our patients are on Medicaid—up to 25 percent in some of the communities that we serve.
That's a significant share. Specifically, what sort of ripple effect would this have on your ability to sustain your workforce and the services you offer?
Clearly, we're going to have to make decisions about services, locations, administrative support costs, some of our work on community health and wellbeing that's proactive instead of reactive. We have a lot of difficult decisions.
Even before these cuts, every year, the increases in Medicare and Medicaid payments—and even the commercial payers that push back—are far below inflation. Medical cost inflation right now with supplies, medical device suppliers, wages and salaries...there's a gap every year that we have to close of over $1 billion dollars between revenue and cost. Imagine adding $600 million onto that gap every year that we have to close. It's substantial.
Are there past policy or funding shifts that health systems can draw on to inform their response here?
Not at this magnitude. I want to emphasize: revenue increases are below inflation. Proposed Medicare, Medicaid increases in payment are below inflation levels. The commercial payers are reluctant to do increases. And frankly, the employers [that sponsor employees' insurance coverage] know that they are subsidizing federal and state underpayment as it is, and they can't withstand more cost.
So, you know, we're in a bit of a vise over this whole situation. There have been a lot of statements about, "Well, all we're focusing on is able-bodied adults, and we're getting rid of waste, fraud and abuse." But we have financial counselors that sit with people every day to try to help them qualify for Medicaid or other coverage. We know that there is not that level of waste, fraud and abuse in the program. There are very rigorous regulations and rules about who can be covered and how they can be covered, and we just don't see that this is an elimination of simple "waste, fraud and abuse" of the system.
C-Suite Shuffles
Amazon Health Services is reorganizing, simplifying the business into six units called "pillars," CNBC reported. The move comes after a recent string of leadership departures, including former Amazon Vice President of Healthcare Aaron Martin and Chief Medical Officer Dr. Sunita Mishra, and former Chief Medical Officer of Amazon Pharmacy Dr. Vin Gupta.
Internal Amazon and One Medical leaders were appointed to helm each new pillar, which are as follows: (1) One Medical Clinical Care Delivery, (2) One Medical Clinical Operations and Performance, (3) AHS Strategic Growth and Network Development, (4) AHS Store, Tech and Marketing, (5) AHS Compliance and (6) AHS Pharmacy Services.
Gary Herbst is retiring as CEO of Kaweah Health after 34 years with the Visalia, California-based health system. His departure is effective June 30, 2026, and the health system's board of directors will launch a nationwide search for his successor as early as July.
Wisp, the women's telehealth company, has appointed former White House physician Dr. Jennifer Peña to serve as its chief medical officer. Her resume also includes the CMO title at Nurx, K Health and Vault Health.
Executive Edge
Dr. Inderpreet Dhillon is the senior medical director at Grow Therapy and previously helmed the mental health virtual care department at the Permanente Medical Group. As both an organizational leader and a psychiatrist—who still sees patients—he's well-acquainted with the challenges facing today's physicians and health care executives.
This week, I connected with Dhillon to learn how he prioritizes wellness for himself and his colleagues as a mental health professional. He emphasized the importance of being a good listener, leading with empathy and modeling vulnerability—qualities derived from a difficult lesson he learned himself:
If you push yourself too hard, "the outcomes are not good, personally and professionally. A little over four years ago, I was working 40 to 60 hours a week, went back to school to get my MBA, and my twin girls were six at that point. I'm juggling that responsibility of being a father, having big administrative responsibilities, going to school, managing patient care—and I had a massive heart attack in my early forties.
"I remember lying down in bed at the cardiac ICU, and it was funny: there was a cemetery across the street, and that's what my view was. And I'm like, 'I'm here, but I could have been there.'
"There were a couple of realizations. What is most important for me? Of course, work is important for me because I chose this profession and I chose to be in a leadership role to bring the systemic change which I believe needs to happen. Kids are important to me. Family is important to me. So my first realization was, hey, I need to balance this better. The second realization was, I am not Superman. I feel most humans have this perception that nothing bad is going to ever happen to them, until it actually happens to them. Sometimes life comes and punches you smack in your face, and it's a wakeup call.
"I openly share this experience with my teams, with my colleagues...that bad things can happen to you, physically and mentally, if you do not slow down and understand what your priorities are, the workload you're carrying, the things you're juggling. Sharing that doesn't make me any weaker. Actually, it makes me more real and human for my team and my colleagues.
"These are important lessons, right? Not everybody has to learn them the hard way. Let's say that these are things which can be prevented and can be prevented if the culture is the right culture, if there is enough safety in the [organization], if the leaders are modeling those behaviors themselves."
This is a preview of Access Health—Tap here to get this newsletter delivered straight to your inbox.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

USA Today
26 minutes ago
- USA Today
A predictable day of 'horrific injuries': Doctors dread the Fourth of July
Data shows several Americans died from fireworks injuries and more than thousands were injured last year. The Fourth of July is anything but celebratory in the Emergency Room. Every year, doctors amputate fingers and hands damaged by fireworks. They try to save eyes. And sometimes they have to deliver the worst news imaginable to loved ones. That's the warning – and the cold hard truth – from doctors who are bracing for another busy Independence Day. Dr. Nicolas Lee had already amputated the hands of two boys who lost them to firework injuries the week before Fourth of July. He expects to see many more in the coming week. "These are effectively bombs people are holding in their hands," said Lee, a professor of clinical orthopedic surgery at the University of California San Francisco who directs a hand reconstruction program. "We see hands and fingers blown off, groin injuries, facial burns and damage. I've had kids blow off their eyelids so they can't close their eyes." Even though fireworks are legal in much of the nation and sold widely, they are dangerous and deserve care and respect, said Dr. Jeffrey Goodloe. He's already seen burns, lacerations and hand injuries from people holding fireworks. "They're like military battle wounds," said Goodloe, an emergency room physician in Tulsa, Oklahoma who's also vice president for communication for the American College of Emergency Physicians. "These are horrific injuries. People just don't realize that even publicly available fireworks pack enough punch to rip a finger or a hand off." Last year, 11 Americans died from fireworks injuries and more than 14,700 were treated in emergency rooms, according to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. In more than one-third of cases, the injuries were burns to the hands and fingers or head, face and ears. It's not just big rockets that hurt people. Last year, there were an estimated 1,700 emergency room injuries that only involved sparklers. One wrong move can change a person's life – and those people tend to be young. Almost a quarter of injuries are among people between 15- and 24-years-old and most are men. "I don't remember ever having a woman, it's always been young men," said Lee. 'We're going to see a lot of people who completely changed their lives because they made one simple, bad decision and now either they've lost a hand, they've lost their eyes, they've lost another appendage, or worse,' said Dr. Arvin Akhavan, an emergency medicine physician at the University of Washington. What are the most common firework injuries? The most common injury these doctors see is to the hands. "I've seen a number of people where the firework went off in their hand while they were holding it. Either they didn't have time to set it down or they were thinking they were going to aim it. But it blew up," said Goodloe. The hand literally blows apart, said Lee. The joints, bones, ligaments and skin are disrupted or destroyed by the blast. The most common digit to lose is the thumb. "That's 40% of your hand function," he said. "If it's really bad, the hand looks like a starfish. The fingers, the thumb, all the joints are dislocated and it just splays out," Lee said. "We try to save as many fingers as we can, we try to at least give you something to pinch with," he said. "But sometimes it requires amputation." There are also often facial burns, lacerations and injuries as people peer at fireworks. It's not uncommon for people to lose an eye. "I would love to show you actual photos of what happens, but it's too gruesome," said Chelsea Boe, a hand and microvascular surgeon at the University of Washington in Seattle. There are also groin injuries, if people are either sitting while they're lighting the device, or if they drop it and the blast radiates up towards them. Some injuries are to the solid organs in the core or to the head. "There are people who try to launch them off the top of their head or their chest," Lee said. For people setting off fireworks near shorelines or beaches, Lee has also seen injuries from sand that's cast up by the strength of the explosion. "The sand becomes thousands of little projectiles. It can get embedded in your skin, in your eyes, in your face. It's like getting a tattoo," he said. "It's hard to get out – you can't make that many micro incisions. So often you just have to leave it in." Fireworks safety tips The doctors who spend thousands of hours trying to save fingers, hands, eyes and other damage wish – fervently – that people would take a moment to think before they touch fireworks. "It's gunpowder with a fuse. They go off with unbelievable force and it goes right through the tissues," said Boe. "A lot of time, it's unsupervised kids. Or it's young men and boys who get together with their friends," she said. "They may or may not be drinking or using other substances. They may not be making the best decisions." Here's a few important tips: The damage Lee sees in the operating room is awful – and unnecessary. "It's so devastating and these injuries are entirely preventable," he said. "I hope this (article) can help at least one person from suffering this way." Can fingers be re-attached? In the movies, a person might light a firecracker and blow off a finger cleanly. They stick it in a bucket of ice, race off to the hospital, and it all gets sewn back together. Reality is not so forgiving. "In very few cases, even with a very skilled hand surgeon, are you going to be able to reimplant a finger," said Goodloe. The injuries are rarely clean and neat and the amount of damage to the digit is considerable. "The reality is that when your finger gets blown off, you've permanently lost your finger," he said. When do firework injuries occur? While many injuries occur on the actual Fourth of July, the two weeks before the holiday and the two weeks after are very busy in emergency rooms, as people start to play with fireworks they've purchased or want to set off fireworks they had leftover from the holiday. "For hand surgeons, this is our holiday in the worst possible way," said Boe. It's even worse when the Fourth of July happens near a weekend, as it does this year, because people are more likely to make a weekend of it – and to party and drink. At the University of Washington, which is the main trauma unit for the Seattle region, they saw close to 50 people who required firework injury-related surgery in the four days after the Fourth. "We do a huge amount of preparation. We have extra teams available, extra operating rooms. We cancel elective surgeries, we try to have extra anesthesia teams available," she said. "It's almost like we're triaging for a mass casualty event."


Chicago Tribune
26 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Willie Wilson: Chicagoans cannot wait 50 years for clean water
I was astonished to learn the city has submitted a request to extend its replacement of lead service lines — 30 years beyond the 20 years the federal government has proposed. The city plans to complete 8,300 replacements annually for 50 years, wrapping up in 2076. This pace defies common sense and is unconscionable. The city must move with a sense of urgency in replacing lead pipes. We know that structures built before 1986 have service lines that allow lead to leach into the drinking water. Chicago has over 400,000 lead service lines. The majority are located in Black and brown communities. Health experts agree there is no safe level of lead exposure. Exposure to lead can cause cognitive damage, developmental delays, difficulty learning and behavioral problems in children. Could this be a factor contributing to Black and brown children being overrepresented in special education classes and the prison system? Children's exposure to small amounts of lead-tainted water causes them to appear inattentive, hyperactive and irritable. Higher levels of lead exposure may cause children to have problems with learning and reading. Last year, a study published in JAMA Pediatrics estimated 68% of children younger than 6 years old in Chicago are exposed to lead-contaminated drinking water, with 19% of affected children using unfiltered tap water as their primary drinking water source. Elected leaders should be held accountable for lead in tap water. The failure to move with urgency in replacing lead service lines will place children and adults at greater risk of drinking lead-tainted water. The Chicago Housing Authority was ordered to pay $24 million in a lead paint poisoning case that affected two young children. According to the Illinois Department of Public Health in 2023, about 3,200 children tested positive for elevated blood lead levels. Preventing residents from consuming toxic water will reduce health costs and a potential public health crisis. Why would government leaders knowingly allow residents to be poisoned by contaminated water? This was the case in the city of Flint, Michigan, where the drinking water became contaminated with lead because of a change in the water source. WBEZ-FM 91.5 reports that the federal rule requires Chicago to replace nearly 20,000 lead pipes a year beginning in 2027 — more than double the speed of the city's current plan. Among the cities with the highest number of lead service lines, only Chicago has yet to adopt the federal deadline. Clean water is essential to life; without it, we cannot survive. The water we drink helps regulate body temperature, aids in digestion, carries nutrients to cells, flushes out waste, enhances our skin and much more. It is important that residents have confidence in water from the tap. A 2023 Gallup poll found 56% of Americans overall said they worry 'a great deal' about pollution of drinking water. However, that sentiment was expressed by 76% of Black adults and 70% of Hispanic adults, compared with less than half (48%) of white adults. The bottled water industry in 2016 surpassed soft drinks to become the most consumed beverage in the country. 'Bottled water in the U.S. has been found to be no safer than tap water on average, contains higher levels of microplastics, is less strictly regulated and consumers are much less likely to find out if contamination does occur,' a 2023 research paper published in WIREs Water noted. Moreover, distrust in the quality of public tap water is driving the growth of bottled water. The following are suggestions to ensure clean and safe drinking water for all residents: Elected leaders should consider children and the most vulnerable when urging a delay to remove lead service lines from homes. Long-term exposure to lead can contribute to an increased risk of kidney, testicular and potentially other cancers. Also, lead exposure can lead to high blood pressure and reproductive problems. Clean water is a universal human right. In 2010, the United Nations General Assembly formally recognized the right to safe and clean drinking water as a right inextricably linked to the full enjoyment of life and all human rights. The U.N. statement should be shared with elected leaders in Illinois. We cannot wait another 50 years to remove all lead service lines in Chicago. Every day we delay, the potential grows for more children to be poisoned by lead from their drinking water. I write this commentary to make those comfortable with allowing residents to drink lead-tainted water uncomfortable.

an hour ago
RFK Jr. wants everyone to use wearables. What are the benefits, risks?
Last week, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced the agency was launching a campaign to encourage all Americans to use wearables to track health metrics. Wearables come in the form of watches, bands, rings, patches and clothes that can be used for a variety of reasons including monitoring glucose levels, measuring activity levels, track heart health and observe sleeping patterns. "It's a way … people can take control over their own heath. They can take responsibility," Kennedy said during a hearing of the House Subcommittee on Health. "They can see, as you know, what food is doing to their glucose levels, their heart rates and a number of other metrics as they eat it. and they can begin to make good judgments about their diet, about their physical activity, about the way that they live their lives." He went on, "We think that wearables are a key to the MAHA agenda -- Making America Healthy Again. My vision is that every American is wearing a wearable within four years." Digital medicine experts told ABC News that wearables do have benefits and can be used to motivate someone to increase physical activity, which could reduce the risk of poor health outcomes. However, they said not everybody needs to have a wearable and there are some potential risks including data breaches. Nabil Alshurafa, an associate professor in the department of preventive medicine and the department of electrical and computer engineering at Northwestern University in Illinois, said wearables were born out of the quantified self movement. This is a movement that endorses using technology to track and analyze personal data for learning and improvement. "Just the way when we're driving a vehicle, we see whether we're low on gas, and then we pass by the gas station and repump," Alshurafa told ABC News. "So, the idea was sort of can I see when I'm active? Not active? Can I see when I have poor health habits and then adjust accordingly. Did I have good quality asleep last night? If not, let me try to improve that." He said there are benefits to wearables, mostly in the form of motivation to change behaviors. A July 2022 study found wearables can empower patients and help with diagnosing conditions, changing behaviors and self-monitoring. Additionally, a July 2019 study from the University of Florida in Gainesville found wearable devices can motivate and accelerate physical activity, although it did not find consistent improvement in health outcomes. Dr. David McManus, chair and professor of medicine at UMass Chan Medical School and a digital medicine expert, said an example would be if someone wants to walk 10,000 steps a day and they wear an activity monitor that tells them they only walked 5,000 steps on a particular day. This might motivate that person to walk further to achieve their goal. In turn, evidence shows people who are more physically active have fewer rates of heart attacks and are less likely to develop high blood pressure or obesity. "The benefit would be if a person actually used that information to change their behavior," he told ABC News. "That would be the clearest use case of a person using a wearable to learn. … I won't say there's convincing concrete evidence that a wearable will prevent heart attacks -- I would be uncomfortable saying that -- but I do think it's reasonable on the basis of preliminary studies and observational studies, there is some potential benefit for certain types of people from wearing devices to get people motivated to change." Alshurafa said clinicians can also receive more granular data about behaviors such as how much energy patients are expending and how many calories they are burning. It's unclear if Kennedy's connections have played a role in his endorsements of wearables. U.S. surgeon general nominee Casey Means co-founded Levels, an app that allows people to track their food, along with biometric data like sleep and glucose monitoring, to see how their diet is impacting their health. Additionally, her brother, Calley Means -- an adviser to Kennedy -- has a company that could benefit from more wearables in the world. His company, TruMed, allows people to use funds from Health Savings Accounts towards health products, such as fitness tracker watches. There are also drawbacks. McManus said there is not a high level of evidence that shows wearables have benefits over the long term. "One thing I've learned as a physician and researcher is it's really hard to get people to change their habits," he said. "So it's not so much that the sensors don't work, and it's not so much that they're inaccurate -- because there is plenty of data that shows that wearable devices can present really good, high-quality data -- but the missing link in the chain of wearables to good health is getting people to actually get off their couch and go be more active when they have a wearable them that they've been on the couch." There are also privacy concerns because of the substantial amounts of data that wearables generate, as well as the potential for misuse. McManus said if a database gets hacked, the data could be compromised and potentially used by a bad actor to steal additional personal information. "The more data that's generated, the greater the risk," he said. Authors of a JAMA Viewpoint article in 2019 said another risk is that data could be used against policyholders with higher premiums or to deny insurance. Because wearables collect health information such as weight, calorie intake and blood pressure, insurance companies could use the data to increase costs, the authors said. Alshurafa said not everyone needs to wear a wearable and it depends on the patient's condition and what they hope to achieve. "We feel once their health improves, we then wean them off it," he said. "So, this notion that someone has to wear a wearable constantly -- well, I mean once the problem is solved, then hopefully there's no need for it."