From recovery to resilience – acting electricity DG Pillay charts a bold vision to 2050
Speaking under the theme, Policy and Planning Considerations for Energy and Electricity in South Africa in the Years to 2050, acting Energy and Electricity DG Subesh Pillay opened the EE Business Intelligence webinar on Wednesday, 7 May 2025 by saying the country now stood at a strategic inflection point.
'We gather not in the shadow of crisis,' he said, 'but at a rare moment of inflection – one where signs of operational recovery offer us the space to shift our gaze beyond the immediate.'
He cited Eskom's latest Winter 2025 Outlook as evidence of this shift. Notably, South Africa experienced nine months of uninterrupted power supply from July 2024 to March 2025. Unplanned generation losses dropped from more than 18GW in early 2023 to less than 13GW by April 2025, and energy availability has climbed to 61%, with a trajectory toward a target of 70%.
Crucially, these gains were not driven by diesel overuse, but by structural improvements, including the return to service of a number of large Eskom generator units together with public and private sector renewable energy procurements.
Pillay made it clear that the time for reactive management was over.
'We now have the opportunity, responsibility and indeed the obligation, to reposition our planning focus – not simply to avoid load shedding, but to power inclusive growth, industrial expansion and climate resilience.'
Beyond technical fixes – addressing structural fragmentation
Tracing the roots of South Africa's systemic energy fragility, Pillay criticised the past two decades of underinvestment, misalignment between policy and execution and governance inertia. Deferred updates to the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP), a long-stalled Integrated Energy Plan (IEP) and fragmented institutional mandates left the country overexposed to breakdowns and unprepared for decentralised energy realities.
Yet, the address was not solely diagnostic. Pillay acknowledged recent progress, indicating his view that the Draft IRP 2025 now integrated industrial and spatial planning more closely, and the Gas Master Plan – said to be in an advanced stage of preparation – aimed to address the looming 'gas cliff' while fostering regional integration.
Still, he warned, 'Until the IEP is finalised and the various planning instruments are nested under a common strategic umbrella, the risk of fragmentation remains.'
A sector redefined – unbundling, competition and market redesign
Pillay also highlighted South Africa's electricity market transformation, driven by Eskom's unbundling and the operationalisation of the National Transmission Company of South Africa (NTCSA). This, along with the National Energy Regulator of South Africa's new Grid Access Rules and the Electricity Regulation Amendment Act, signals a shift toward competitive markets.
'This is a fundamentally new planning and market environment,' he said. Drawing lessons from countries like Vietnam and Chile, he called for a 'whole-system approach' integrating generation, transmission, embedded supply and storage, with robust coordination across national, municipal and regional levels.
Planning with purpose – five lenses to 2050
To shape a future-ready energy system, Pillay laid out five core planning lenses:
Energy security as a developmental imperative: A resilient mix of renewables, gas, clean coal, nuclear and storage – including regional projects like the Mozambique-South Africa gas pipeline.
Decarbonisation without destabilisation: Emphasising carbon capture, small modular reactors (SMRs) and green hydrogen, while sequencing coal retirements alongside industrial repurposing.
A fit-for-purpose distribution system: With more than R15-billion lost annually in municipal distribution inefficiencies, he called for electricity distribution industry (EDI) restructuring and readiness for rooftop solar, microgrids and bidirectional power flows.
Flexibility, technology and digitalisation: Expanding smart grids, real-time digital dispatch and Eskom's Virtual Wheeling platform, while stabilising grid performance with new technologies.
Planning as an industrial lever: Tying energy to new industries – green hydrogen, battery minerals and local manufacturing – while driving socioeconomic inclusion and asserting South Africa's leadership in global forums.
Institutions to match ambitions
However, Pillay cautioned that robust modelling meant little without institutional delivery. He outlined three foundational governance imperatives:
Policy certainty and regulatory clarity: Clear rules under the ERA Act, aligned procurement tools and synchronised planning frameworks.
A capable and coordinated state: Enhanced local capacity, improved alignment among Eskom, Independent Power Producers, municipalities and regulators.
Institutionalising planning: Embedding scenario analysis, social inclusion and learning processes within dynamic planning functions.
Energy planning as nation building
Pillay closed his address by reframing energy planning as more than a technocratic duty – it was, he asserted, 'a nation-building endeavour.' He stressed that the decisions made today would either entrench inequality or catalyse opportunity; lock in fragility or build resilience.
'As we look toward 2050,' he concluded, 'may this webinar not only interrogate models and assumptions, but also challenge institutions, expand inclusion and catalyse the leadership required to deliver the energy future that South Africa and Africa deserves.'
The address sets a bold new tone for what is likely to be a highly contested yet pivotal planning period for South Africa's energy sector – one that demands not just recovery, but systemic reinvention. DM
Chris Yelland is managing director, EE Business Intelligence.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
a day ago
- The Citizen
AbaQulusi residents outraged by sharp electricity tariff hikes
AbaQulusi residents have expressed their frustration and anger on Facebook since bearing the brunt of the increased electricity tariffs, which came into effect on July 1. Especially consumers who use prepaid meters have seen a sharp price hike, leaving them feeling concerned about their financial state. The increases form part of the municipality's 2025/26 budget implementation, but residents say there was little to no meaningful public engagement during the IDP roadshows, when the tariff hikes were proposed. 'We always buy R800 and used to get 299 units. Today, however, we only got 186 units for R800. It's ridiculous!' exclaimed one affected resident on the Vryheid Herald's Facebook page. These tariff hikes come after the National Energy Regulator of South Africa (NERSA) approved Eskom's price increases, which municipalities pass on to consumers. However, residents argue that AbaQulusi's service delivery failures – frequent outages, poor communication and ageing infrastructure – make the increases unacceptable. Another resident said, 'We would understand if they were charging us these exorbitant amounts for stable electricity supply, but they are charging us for electricity that is unstable.' In the Adopted Annual Budget, the municipality refers to the major challenge they are facing, namely vandalism, which has a negative impact on electrical infrastructure. 'This not only affects service delivery, as services become unavailable immediately after infrastructure has been vandalised, but it's also expensive to repair and replace.' Even though electricity is more expensive (according to the adopted municipal budget, which is available on their website), the real cost is much higher than consumers are being charged now. The 2025/26 Adopted Annual Budget and Medium-Term Revenue & Expenditure Framework (MTREF) reveal that the municipality is under financial pressure to keep the Electricity Department running. Despite a price hike of 11.32% in bulk electricity from Eskom, AbaQulusi is still not charging enough to fully cover costs. A 'Cost of Supply' study shows that to run the electricity section efficiently and keep up with Eskom's electricity increases, tariffs should ideally increase by 51%. But the municipality says that such an increase would be unaffordable for residents. Instead, the municipality has implemented the following tariff increases: • A 25% rise for residential users (prepaid and conventional) • A 15% rise for other consumers like businesses For the past three years, electricity sales have not brought in enough money to pay Eskom. As a result, other municipal funds have been used to subsidise the Electricity Department. Making matters more difficult is the fact that municipalities owing Eskom money, including AbaQulusi, are now required to include repayment plans in their annual budgets. NERSA has confirmed that it will only approve tariff applications based on 'Cost of Supply' studies that were submitted by municipalities. This means that tariffs are probably going to increase over the next few years. The municipality also implemented a 'High Season' tariff in the winter months of June, July and August, since Eskom charges municipalities more during this period. The current challenge is also that domestic consumers are being undercharged for electricity, while businesses and other consumers are being overcharged. According to the adopted budget, for consumers who use a prepaid meter, electricity is now charged using two pricing blocks instead of the previous four. This means that if you buy up to 350kWh in a month, you'll pay a lower rate (Block 1). If you buy more than 350 kWh in total during that month, the extra units will cost more per unit (Block 2). The system will keep track of how many units you have bought in that same month. This means that even if you buy electricity in smaller amounts, the total for the month is the same. Once you go over 350 kWh, consumers will pay the higher rate. Domestic prepaid electricity users (excluding the indigent) will have to pay a fixed monthly service fee, as well as higher rates during winter months. According to the municipality's adopted 2025/26 budget, this applies to households with single-phase prepaid connections between 30 and 60 amps, which are common in most homes. All prepaid consumers will pay a monthly service fee of R25. Domestic consumers (excluding the indigent) will pay R2.55 per kwh for the first 350 kWh purchased and thereafter R2.72 per kWh. During the Eskom high season (June to August), electricity will cost more: • R3.74 per unit for the first 350 kWh you use in a month. • R4.16 per unit for any units above 350 kWh. If you use a conventional (monthly billed) meter: Conventional consumers will pay a monthly service charge of R224 (excluding three phase consumers, who will pay a service charge of R1300 a month). • For the first 350 kWh used in the month, you'll pay R2.72 per unit. • After that, every extra unit costs R3.79. In Eskom's high season (June to August): • The first 350 kWh will be R3.35 per unit; • Over 350 kWh will be R4.12 per unit. The Vryheid Herald has requested a proper breakdown of the new tariffs, since consumers are complaining and confused. Unfortunately, this information from the municipality had not been received at the time of going to print. ALSO READ: Municipality warns residents to avoid scammer posing as disconnection official The news provided to you in this link comes to you from the editorial staff of the Vryheid Herald, a sold newspaper distributed in the Vryheid area. At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
The Star
2 days ago
- The Star
South Africa's Moral Crisis Demands More Than Another Commission
The recent public revelations by KwaZulu-Natal Police Commissioner, Lieutenant-General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi, strike at the very heart of South Africa's justice system. When a senior officer in uniform, under oath and under pressure, publicly accuses fellow high-ranking officials, including Police Minister Senzo Mchunu and Deputy Police Commissioner Shadrack Sibiya, of obstructing investigations into political killings and colluding with criminal elements, it is not just a political scandal. It is a national moral crisis. According to Mkhwanazi, more than 120 cases of politically motivated murders were being investigated when the task team was abruptly shut down. His accusation is simple but staggering: that certain high-level state actors are undermining justice not out of incompetence, but by design. This is beyond accusations of individual corruption. It is a claim of systemic sabotage. As a Christian leader and South African citizen, I write with deep concern at yet another example of the institutional rot that is hollowing out the pillars of our democracy. What we are witnessing is not just dysfunction but an indication that the erosion of the rule of law that has plagued our nation seems to be accelerating. This is a pattern that is all too familiar. Time and again we have seen dangerous precedents set where wrongdoing is reported, outrage follows, and then the machinery of delay and deflection kicks in. Justice, if it comes at all, comes too late and too quietly. We need look no further than the Phala Phala scandal, the debacle at Eskom and the widespread looting of municipal funds. We witness the long trail of unresolved State capture and infiltration during the Jacob Zuma presidency and the unfinished accountability from the Zondo Commission. It is no exaggeration to say that South Africa is caught in a vicious cycle of lawlessness. When high-level corruption goes unpunished, when whistle-blowers are sidelined or silenced, and when commissions of enquiry serve more as political shock absorbers than truth-telling instruments, ordinary citizens begin to lose faith, not only in government, but in the idea of justice itself. When justice is undermined, one of the first casualties is peace. South Africa has become an increasingly violent society, where life is cheap and criminality seems normalised. The danger is not only the crime itself, but our growing numbness to it. Like the proverbial frog in the kettle, we are being boiled alive while telling ourselves that everything is still under control. We cannot afford to go on this way. We need action. The current call for a new national dialogue is welcome, but it will be fruitless unless the core issues of accountability, transparency, and the protection of the innocent are addressed and acted upon. South Africa does not need another commission of enquiry. We need courageous leadership that acts decisively on the information we already have and the political will to follow through to ensure that the ends of justice are served. Yes, it is true that individuals are innocent until proven guilty, but that principle cannot be used as a shield to avoid accountability altogether. The process to establish guilt or innocence itself must be rigorous, open and transparent. As the saying goes, 'Sunlight is the best disinfectant'. We are at a place in our nation's history when the answer will not be found merely in political change, but with a moral renewal. South Africa's future depends on it. We cannot build a peaceful and prosperous society while the foundations and values that helped to create and sustain it are cracking beneath our feet. We must repair the breach, not paper over it. The time has come for righteous accountability, both from our leaders and from each of us who love this country and long to see it flourish. The Church will not remain silent while the integrity of our justice system is threatened. We stand with every courageous voice that speaks out against wrongdoing. We are calling on President Cyril Ramaphosa to take bold, visible action — not for political survival, but for the sake of our nation's soul. We will continue to speak, to serve, to stand and to intercede 'until justice rolls down like waters, and righteousness like a mighty stream' (Amos 5:24).
IOL News
2 days ago
- IOL News
South Africa's Moral Crisis Demands More Than Another Commission
The recent public revelations by KwaZulu-Natal Police Commissioner, Lieutenant-General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi, strike at the very heart of South Africa's justice system. When a senior officer in uniform, under oath and under pressure, publicly accuses fellow high-ranking officials, including Police Minister Senzo Mchunu and Deputy Police Commissioner Shadrack Sibiya, of obstructing investigations into political killings and colluding with criminal elements, it is not just a political scandal. It is a national moral crisis. According to Mkhwanazi, more than 120 cases of politically motivated murders were being investigated when the task team was abruptly shut down. His accusation is simple but staggering: that certain high-level state actors are undermining justice not out of incompetence, but by design. This is beyond accusations of individual corruption. It is a claim of systemic sabotage. As a Christian leader and South African citizen, I write with deep concern at yet another example of the institutional rot that is hollowing out the pillars of our democracy. What we are witnessing is not just dysfunction but an indication that the erosion of the rule of law that has plagued our nation seems to be accelerating. This is a pattern that is all too familiar. Time and again we have seen dangerous precedents set where wrongdoing is reported, outrage follows, and then the machinery of delay and deflection kicks in. Justice, if it comes at all, comes too late and too quietly. We need look no further than the Phala Phala scandal, the debacle at Eskom and the widespread looting of municipal funds. We witness the long trail of unresolved State capture and infiltration during the Jacob Zuma presidency and the unfinished accountability from the Zondo Commission. It is no exaggeration to say that South Africa is caught in a vicious cycle of lawlessness. When high-level corruption goes unpunished, when whistle-blowers are sidelined or silenced, and when commissions of enquiry serve more as political shock absorbers than truth-telling instruments, ordinary citizens begin to lose faith, not only in government, but in the idea of justice itself. When justice is undermined, one of the first casualties is peace. South Africa has become an increasingly violent society, where life is cheap and criminality seems normalised. The danger is not only the crime itself, but our growing numbness to it. Like the proverbial frog in the kettle, we are being boiled alive while telling ourselves that everything is still under control. We cannot afford to go on this way. We need action. The current call for a new national dialogue is welcome, but it will be fruitless unless the core issues of accountability, transparency, and the protection of the innocent are addressed and acted upon.
