
With ₹3.4 trillion already in, are DIIs the new market movers from here on?
DIIs infused ₹3.44 trillion into Indian equities between January and June 2025—the highest ever for this period since 2017, NSDL and BSE data showed.
One of the biggest shifts in the market is how more Indian households are steadily investing through systematic investment plans (SIPs). It is a real change in how people think about saving, putting small amounts regularly into the stock market and becoming part-owners of strong Indian companies. This is not quick, speculative money; it is long-term and consistent, explained Jiten Doshi, co-founder and chief investment officer, Enam AMC.
According to Doshi, India's economic resilience—GDP growth over 7%, stable inflation, robust corporate earnings—and liquidity driven by RBI rate cuts are making equities the go-to vehicle for long-term wealth creation.
'The market rally is a function of three core forces: the earnings trajectory, the participation structure, and liquidity," says Doshi.
Also read: Retail derivatives traders continue to bleed, finds Sebi
Volatility down, but valuations stretched
So far in 2025, the Nifty 50 has gained more than 7% but it has been anything but a smooth ride, with wild swings of volatility along the way. India's Volatility Index (VIX), also known as fear gauge, declined from a high of 22.79 on 7 April, the month when Trump first announced reciprocal tariffs, to over 12 level on Monday.
"Time and price corrections have played out across many sectors and stocks," says Jay Kothari, Global Head of International Business at DSP Asset Managers. That said, he feels a few names still look stretched on valuations, so it continues to be a stock picker's market.
Domestic inflows will not only remain resilient but also continue to outpace foreign investments in 2025 and beyond, largely driven by the "home-country bias" of Indian investors even as they will look for diversification globally in themes not available on Indian shores, he believes.
Even as investors diversify their portfolios, rising geopolitical tensions—from the Middle East to India-Pakistan, and the ongoing US-China tariff standoff—are pushing many to lean more heavily toward their home markets.
'There's a clear shift toward relative safety and familiarity of India will help in attracting foreign flows," noted Kothari.
India may be attracting steady interest, but it's not the only option for global investors. Some Asian markets like Taiwan and South Korea are also competing for foreign inflows, said Kothari. Meanwhile, Japan, the US, and Europe remain core allocations in most portfolios, especially as many investors benchmark against the MSCI ACWI.
The MSCI ACWI (All Country World Index) tracks large and mid-cap stocks across 23 developed and 24 emerging markets, covering about 85% of the global investable equity universe with 2,528 constituents.
Also read: India's share in global market cap up from recent low—but risks remain
Will homegrown flows keep outrunning foreign capital?
DII ownership has been steadily climbing. By the end of March 2025, domestic institutions held 17.4% of total shares in Nifty 200, highest since the low of 13.3% back in June 2021, according to Prime Database. Meanwhile, FII ownership slipped to 17.35% by March end 2025, their lowest since the 16.9% recorded as of September end of 2020.
Foreign flows are often seen through a 'push and pull' lens, either drawn in by compelling opportunities within emerging markets or redirected from developed markets due to weaker prospects there, notes a June report by GMO.
Even as near-term inflows into Indian equities remain strong on the back of steady DII support, foreign investors haven't been negative on India either, noted Nimesh Chandan, CIO at Bajaj Finserv AMC. In fact, he thinks foreign interest in Indian equities is only picking up, though a few pullbacks here and there are just part of the game, he adds.
'Not only do we see foreign participation in the secondary market, but also strong demand in initial public offers (IPOs) and qualified institutional placements (QIPs)."
Looking at the past two months, foreign investors have shown steady interest in recent IPOs. In Aegis Vopak Terminals, global names like Government Pension Fund Global, Aberdeen Standard, and Goldman Sachs picked up stakes in May.
Schloss Bangalore attracted the likes of CLSA, Citigroup Global Markets, Societe Generale, Fidelity, and Morgan Stanley in May. In June, the Government of Singapore invested in Kalpataru, while HDB Financial Services saw participation from marquee investors such as BlackRock, Abu Dhabi Investment Authority, Schroders, Allianz, and HSBC Global, according to Prime Database.
It is not just IPOs, foreign investors have been active in QIPs too. In June, Nomura Funds Ireland PLC picked up a stake in Kaynes Technology, while Capri Global Capital attracted big names like Societe Generale, Citigroup Global Markets Mauritius, Morgan Stanley Asia, Goldman Sachs, and BlackRock.
Also read: Mint Explainer: How Sebi sniffed out Jane Street's market manipulations
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
37 minutes ago
- Business Standard
This smallcap auto component co's stock rises 3%; Emkay upgrades to 'Buy'
Suprajit Engineering, auto component, and equipment maker, shares were in demand on Monday, as the stock advanced 2.9 per cent in trade on BSE. It registered an intraday high at ₹461.9 per share. At 12:44 PM, Suprajit Engineering's share price was trading higher by 1.3 per cent at ₹454.4 per share on the BSE. In comparison, the BSE Sensex was down 0.46 per cent at 82,123.68. The company's market capitalisation stood at ₹6,232.6 crore. The 52-week high of the stock was at ₹639.95 per share and the 52-week low of the stock was at ₹352.05 per share. Emkay upgrades Suprajit Engineering to 'Buy' Domestic brokerage Emkay Global Financial has upgraded its rating to 'Buy' from 'Add' on Suprajit Engineering. The brokerage has fixed the target price at ₹550 per share, implying an upside of around 22 per cent. The brokerage notes that despite a sharp turnaround in performance and global positioning, the company remains attractively valued—with the India business alone justifying the current ₹61,000 crore market capitalisation. 'Suprajit's standalone business trades at ~21x FY26E earnings, compared to ~28x for domestic peers. This offers both valuation comfort and downside protection,' the brokerage said in its latest note. 'Crucially, its global operations, which contribute 52 per cent of revenues, are being valued at near-zero despite five years of structural groundwork.' Over the past few years, the company has emerged as the second-largest global player in control cables, behind Japan's Hilex, through strategic acquisitions such as Wescon, Kongsberg LDC, and SCS. These moves have expanded its global reach and positioned it well for market share gains amid industry consolidation. Notably, profitability in the global business is turning around, with H2FY25 margins crossing the double-digit mark despite macroeconomic headwinds. The SCS acquisition—once a stressed asset—is now witnessing customer traction and improved growth, particularly in Morocco. The company expects SCS to turn Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortisation (Ebitda)-positive by Q4FY26, with a mid-term margin potential of 6–10 percent. Emkay projects a 9 per cent revenue Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) for Suprajet's global division over FY25–28, with margins expanding to 10.9 per cent by FY28 from 5.6 per cent in FY25. Domestic business looks beyond cables In India, Suprajit commands over 80 per cent market share in control cables for two-wheeler original equipment makers (OEMs) and has posted a 10 per cent revenue CAGR and 11 per cent profit after tax (PAT) CAGR over the last five years. But the company is now evolving 'beyond cables', with aggressive research and development (R&D)-led forays into electronics, brakes, instrument clusters, and actuators. Breakthrough order wins from both traditional and electric vehicle (EV) players—including seat activation chipsets for Jaguar Land Rover and electronic grips for a leading Chinese EV OEM—highlight SEL's growing relevance in next-gen mobility solutions. The domestic business is expected to maintain double-digit growth, with substantial upside from the brakes segment and faster scale-up of Phoenix Lamps Division (PLD). These optional growth levers are not yet priced into the stock, Motilal Oswal notes. Outlook and valuation Overall, Emkay Financial projects revenue, Ebitda, and PAT CAGR of 9 per cent, 21 per cent, and 48 per cent respectively over FY25–28, with return on equity (RoE) improving to 19 per cent and near-zero net debt. Though near-term macro concerns have led to 6 per cent cut in FY26/27 earnings estimates, the firm remains bullish on Suprajit's medium-term prospects.


India Today
37 minutes ago
- India Today
Mahadev betting app case: Companies owned by Vikas Garg under ED scanner
The Directorate of Enforcement (ED), investigating the Mahadev Betting app money laundering case, uncovered earlier this year how the mastermind of the betting network, Harishankar Tibrewal through Foreign Portfolio Investment (FPI) had invested in several listed Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) purpose of doing so was to manipulate stocks, artificially inflate the stock prices of SME companies in which FPI investments were made. Once the share prices rose, they were dumped and Tibrewal and his accomplices would double or sometimes triple their per sources, the acquisition of Nasdaq-listed Ebix Incorpotated, last year, by an Indian firm, Eraaya Lifespaces, which is promoted by one Vikas Garg, is now under the radar of the anti-money laundering agency. The suspicion by the agency is regarding the funds raised for the acquisition of Ebix Inc. by Eraaya Lifespaces. Ebix Inc. was acquired by Eraaya Lifespaces last year through funds raised from multiple channels and officials, as per sources, also flagged the meteoric rise in the share prices of Eraaya Lifespaces and asked Bombay Stock Exchange officials to investigate it. The suspicion is over the funds raised and later used for the are multiple such SME listed and unlisted companies, promoted and run by Vikas premises were also searched when multiple other companies and linked properties were searched on April 16 by ED of Garg's promoted companies which are under investigation are Vikas Lifecare Limited, Vikas Ecotech Limited, Advika Finvest, Advika Capital Limited and investigations revealed that Tibrewal had, through FPI, made investments in multiple firms owned by then, Garg has been issued multiple summons by ED officials to join investigations in the case. Earlier Garg's companies were under investigation by the Income Tax Investigation Wing, GST and few other other companies under investigation in the case have also been asked to join investigations, which include firms like Ease My Trip, IITL, JTL Industries, Gensol and others. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) also has been informed by ED officials regarding manipulation of shares and artificial inflation of proximity to Tibrewal is also being probed by agency officialhttps:// Acquisition attempts for a club in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) were also under the other companies where Tibrewal had invested through FPI, the promoters of many of those companies, are known to Garg has so far carried out around 170 raids across the country and several companies, persons and entities in the Mahadev Betting app case and assets worth over rupees 3000 crores in property, cash and movable properties have been attached, including demat accounts and share holdings.- EndsTune InMust Watch


Mint
39 minutes ago
- Mint
The Air India catastrophe should catalyse deep structural reform in the country
Next Story Vikas Dimble , Prachi Mishra The aviation tragedy in Ahmedabad calls for economic introspection. India needs to ponder questions of public versus private ownership, market concentration versus competition and diversified versus focused conglomerates. Our take-off for Viksit Bharat may depend on getting the answers right. The Ahmedabad tragedy should serve as more than a moment of grief, it should catalyse the deeper structural reforms necessary for India's sustainable development. Gift this article The tragic Ahmedabad air crash shook the nation, but beyond the immediate grief lies a deeper call for introspection. This isn't about assigning blame, but rather about examining structural questions. The tragic Ahmedabad air crash shook the nation, but beyond the immediate grief lies a deeper call for introspection. This isn't about assigning blame, but rather about examining structural questions. The timing is significant—this accident occurred soon after Air India transitioned from public to private ownership, highlighting three fundamental challenges on India's runway toward developed nation status: How should we balance public and private sector roles? What is the optimal level of market concentration versus competition? And should India Inc embrace specialization or continue with diversified conglomerates that span multiple industries? These questions go beyond aviation, touching the very foundation of India's economic strategy. Yet, aviation provides a perfect case study for examining these broader challenges. Let us start with the public versus public ownership. Also Read: Digital twins of aircraft: A big leap for civil aviation? India is conspicuous with a disproportionately large public sector, compared to other emerging and advanced economies. India's stock market is heavily dominated by state-owned enterprises. But our aviation sector, which has undergone complete privatization, offers a contrast. Globally, aviation ownership models vary dramatically. West Asian carriers remain fully government-owned, Chinese airlines are government-dominated and some European carriers maintain partial government stakes—25% of British Airways' parent company, for instance, is owned by Qatar Airways. Meanwhile, the US mirrors India's approach of minimal government ownership. The privatization of Air India is considered one of the Indian government's most successful divestments. As the private sector takes control, the need for robust regulation becomes critical. The question is not a binary whether or not to privatize, but how to regulate businesses effectively, especially in industries where lives are at stake. The government's role must evolve from owner-operator to an ever more vigilant regulator in both public perception and reality. Also Read: A tale of two sectors: Aviation soars while railways crawl Coming to the dilemma of competition versus concentration, India's economy has long been marked by the outsized influence of family-owned business groups. Remarkably, several of the largest groups from the 1950s still dominate, with the composition of the top 25 largely unchanged since 2010. At their peak in 2012, these groups generated revenues equivalent to 20% of India's GDP. While their dominance has declined somewhat since then, in 2020 that figure was still over 15%—higher than in 2001. The aviation sector typifies these trends. In India, the combined market share of its top two airlines is larger than in other markets globally, far exceeding the share seen in the US, UK, China or Brazil. IndiGo and Air India, both privately owned, carried over 90% of air travellers last year. The US airline industry is also privately owned but its market has much more competition. While larger firms benefit from economies of scale and greater clout, extreme concentration can also stifle innovation and harm consumer interests. Indian policymakers have been on top of this challenge. The sector has been opened to fresh competition repeatedly, but the industry has shown high business mortality, with a long list of airlines declared bankrupt or close to it; Sahara, Jet Airways, SpiceJet, Kingfisher and Go First tell a sobering tale of a harsh market. Why has competition withered in this sector? Is market size the determining factor (America's air traffic is five times that of India), or are there policy or market failures? Cost and efficiency determine survival, but consumer choices matter. Notably, both Air India and IndiGo rank low in global service standards. The transition from a state monopoly to private oligopoly outlines a delicate balance. While India needs stronger regulation in critical sectors, the broader economic imperative often calls for less onerous regulation; theEconomic Survey highlighted calls for greater deregulation and for government to get 'out of the way." Coming to the third issue of specialization versus diversification, economic theory suggests that countries should specialize in industries where they have comparative advantage. We can illustrate this through Bollywood: If Shah Rukh Khan, an economics graduate, specialized in economics, he would have been a successful economist. But even if he were to become the world's best economist, his 'opportunity cost' of missing a career as an actor would be too high, given the low wages he would earn compared to his earnings from cinema. Even with an absolute advantage in economics, his comparative advantage would lie in cinema. Specialization versus diversification represents a distinct strategic choice from concentration versus competition. Firms can maintain high market concentration while remaining either specialized or diversified. The jury is certainly out on this. Global trends reveal fascinating patterns. While emerging-market conglomerates are increasingly diversifying, those in advanced economies, particularly the US, are moving towards specialization. Emerging-market giants like the Tata Group in India (spanning salt to aviation), Samsung in South Korea and Fosun in China have expanded their sectoral reach dramatically, often doubling or tripling their presence across industries. Conversely, developed-market leaders like General Electric, Siemens and Johnson & Johnson have undergone significant consolidation or strategic splits. Most now operate as publicly traded entities with focused business models. So what is the path forward? What does it imply for India's aviation landscape—a three-way combination of private ownership, extreme concentration and the diversified nature of controlling conglomerates? This combination makes the sector distinctive globally but also potentially vulnerable. The stakes couldn't be higher. Markets often face efficiency versus equity trade-offs. Beyond that, there are efficiency and public safety trade-offs, at least in perception. Ultimately, there are no concrete recipes for success. That said, these questions are pertinent. As India marches towards Viksit Bharat, we must find appropriate answers. Our aviation sector's future—and by extension our broader economic strategy—depends on getting many balances right. The Ahmedabad tragedy should serve as more than a moment of grief. It should catalyse the deeper structural reforms necessary for India's sustainable development. Only through such introspection can we build an economy that is both dynamic and safe, competitive and responsible. The authors are, respectively, operations director, Ashoka Isaac Center for Public Policy (ICPP); and professor of economics, and director of ICPP, Ashoka University. Topics You May Be Interested In Catch all the Business News, Market News, Breaking News Events and Latest News Updates on Live Mint. Download The Mint News App to get Daily Market Updates.