logo
Why India Should Be Worried About Pak Getting Chinese J-35 Stealth Jets

Why India Should Be Worried About Pak Getting Chinese J-35 Stealth Jets

NDTV20-06-2025
New Delhi:
In November 2024 China unveiled the J-35 - its second 5th generation stealth fighter. A twin-engine, single-seater supersonic jet for multirole missions, the J-35 boasts advanced avionics, including an active electronically scanned array, an electro-optical targeting system, and infrared search-and-track.
The Global Times, the Chinese government's mouthpiece, described the J-35 - compared to the United States' F-35, the world's most expensive fighter jet - as functioning within a stealth and counter-stealth combat framework to gain and maintain air superiority, while eliminating air defence forces".
And Pakistan, which also has 20 Chinese J-10C and JF-17 fighters, will reportedly buy 40 J-35s, with the first units expected later this year, pushing it into an elite club operating stealth fighter jets.
Pak will get the toned-down FC-31 but it will still be a stealth jet and India has none.
Why should India worry?
Because India does not have a stealth fighter. Because Islamabad's purchase of 5th generation aircraft might shift the balance of air power, at least till Delhi can catch up.
The J-35 is considered a 'black box' because of the lack of data on its capabilities, but its performance is seen as similar to, and even better than, the US' F-35.
But the J-35 has never seen combat.
Now, first-look images of the J-35, as the FC-31, surfaced in August 2024. There were two variants - a Navy one and another for conventional ground-based operations and export.
The Shenyang J-35A on show in Beijing (File).
Pak will likely get the second, which reportedly has the infrared search-and-track in its nose.
The jet, China Daily said, can also 'share targets' position with other weapon systems, like surface-to-air missiles, and use its radar to guide other weapons to bring the targets down'.
But the big feature here, of course, is the stealth capability.
The J-35 reportedly has a radar cross-section of 0.001 sq m, which is comparable to the F-35, and which will make Pak's new fighter jet very difficult to detect in combat scenarios with India.
This means India will take longer to detect the jets as it approaches the border.
A prototype of India's new 5th-gen stealth fighter, the AMCA (File).
There is another point of concern.
With China and Pak both operating stealth fighters, India's air defences could come under severe pressure in the event of multi-front hostilities.
This means Delhi must address the gap, starting with upgrading existing air defence systems and bring in 5th generation jets of its own, homemade or otherwise.
J-35 buy shows chink in India's Armour?
India does not have a 5th generation stealth fighter.
This is under development - an 'execution model', under the Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft programme was cleared last month by Defence Minister Rajnath Singh.
NDTV Explains | Everything About India's New 5th-Generation Stealth Fighter
But the AMCA jet will not patrol India's skies before 2035 at least.
Between then and now India, aviation combat experts told NDTV, should be worried.
The Indian Air Force has long had an edge over Pak when it comes to air superiority, an advantage emphasised by Delhi's recent acquisition of the French-made Rafales.
By 2031 India will have 60+ Rafale fighter jets patroling skies above its land and seas (File).
The J-35 deliveries (well, technically the FC-31) threaten to narrow that advantage.
"It is worrying news," Group Captain Ajay Ahlawat (retd.), a former fighter pilot, told NDTV, "... any version of the J-35 in Pakistani colours is going to raise concerns for our side."
India did consider the purchase option; the F-35 and the Su-57 were on the table.
However, these are "bad choices", Group Captain Ahlawat said. "The only good choice is AMCA," he said and called for a "national mission-mode push" to get it in service ASAP.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

MEA Shuts Down Rumours And Rejects Claims of India Suspending US Bilateral Agreements
MEA Shuts Down Rumours And Rejects Claims of India Suspending US Bilateral Agreements

India.com

time31 minutes ago

  • India.com

MEA Shuts Down Rumours And Rejects Claims of India Suspending US Bilateral Agreements

As the tariff row between India and the US continues, the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) on Sunday fact-checked reports that are making rounds on social media stating that the Indian government is reviewing the list of United States products exempted from tariffs. In a post on X, the fact-check unit of MEA has debunked the fake claims. This comes days after the United States President Donald Trump signed the executive order imposing revised tariffs for 70 countries, including India and Pakistan. Tariffs imposed on India's neighbouring countries are less than India's 25 percent, except for Myanmar at 40 percent. The new tariff for Pakistan is 19 percent, Afghanistan 15 percent, Bangladesh 20 percent, Indonesia 19 percent, Japan 15 percent, and Sri Lanka 20 percent. This is FAKE News!#MEAFactCheck — MEA FactCheck (@MEAFactCheck) August 3, 2025 In another post on the fact-check handle, MEA also refuted the claims that India is considering suspending or reviewing certain bilateral agreements with the U.S. "Disinformation being spread on X," the post read. Disinformation being spread on X.#MEAFactCheck — MEA FactCheck (@MEAFactCheck) August 3, 2025 No India-US F-35 Discussion? Earlier, Union Minister of State (MoS) for External Affairs Kirti Vardhan Singh informed the Lok Sabha in a written reply that there has been no formal discussion on F-35 fighter jets with the US. Singh was responding to questions raised by Congress MP Balwant Baswant Wankhade, who enquired about the relationship with the US on military assistance. On the role of American diplomats to stop hostilities between India and Pakistan, MoS Singh stated that there were a number of diplomatic conversations with various countries, including the US. He added that the discussion to cease military action took place directly between the two nations, and it was initiated at Islamabad's request. Trump's Oil Deal With Pakistan After Trump announced a trade agreement with Pakistan to explore a 'massive oil reserve,' a prominent Baloch leader, Mir Yar Baloch, publicly rejected Islamabad's claim over the resource-rich territory, asserting that the oil, gas, and mineral reserves lie within the sovereign territory of Balochistan, not Pakistan. In a letter addressed to Trump and shared via X, Mir Yar Baloch declared that Pakistan is making false claims to access the region's mineral wealth for financial gain. He emphasised that the resources, including rare earth elements, copper, lithium, uranium, and oil, belong exclusively to the Baloch people and cannot be bartered or sold by the Pakistani state. India's Oil Purchase Earlier, Trump on Friday (local time) claimed that India may cease purchasing Russian oil, calling it "a good step" if confirmed. However, ANI reported, citing sources, that Indian oil refiners continue to source oil from Russian suppliers.

Misunderstanding India's advocacy for multipolarity
Misunderstanding India's advocacy for multipolarity

Hindustan Times

timean hour ago

  • Hindustan Times

Misunderstanding India's advocacy for multipolarity

A growing number of liberal American geopolitical analysts and Donald Trump, whom they despise, have a few things in common — they are opposed to India's relationship with Russia, its association with Brics, and advocacy for multipolarity. Trump's criticism of India is sharp and direct, of course. The Trump presidency will end in another three-and-a-half years, but this rare consensus in Washington DC, on India's search for multipolarity will remain. This is something, therefore, Indian strategic thinkers must reflect on. Put differently, with or without Trump around, India's advocacy for multipolarity will continue to haunt New Delhi, particularly given the structural transformations underway in the international system today. India's foreign policy is not about indecision. It is a constant search for autonomy, balance and agency. (AFP) Let's begin by unpacking some important aspects of multipolarity, given its many layers of complexity and ambiguity. First, notwithstanding the general perception about the virtues of multipolarity, it is becoming somewhat clear that a multipolar world is not as pretty as we had imagined it to be. Even the imperfect multipolarity that we have today — with poles of various sizes and influence competing for power — seems messy, incoherent, confusing and hard to navigate. If this is what a system that is not even really multipolar looks like, what will a true multipolar system look like? Second, notwithstanding the messy nature of the quasi-multipolar order today, New Delhi remains committed to a multipolar world. The desire for multipolarity is deeply entrenched in India's tradition of non-alignment, which is one of the first principles of Indian foreign policy. When faced with a difficult choice, the first strategic instinct of political New Delhi is to be non-aligned, neutral, and multi-aligned. Mostly in that order. I would not view that as strategic escapism. It is very much part of the DNA of Indian foreign policy. It would also be wrong to mistake non-alignment (or a variation thereof) as not valuing friendships, loyalty or solidarity: In fact, India's foreign policy history is rich with examples of friendships, loyalty and solidarity. In that sense, India's foreign policy is not about indecision; it's a constant search for autonomy, balance and agency. This is where the country's fascination with a multipolar world becomes crucial, for there is no genuine autonomy, balance and agency in world affairs without true multipolarity. Third, India's complaints about American unipolarity are on a steady decline, even as the rhetoric remains. It would be a mistake, however, to view New Delhi's rhetoric against unipolarity as merely, or primarily, directed against the US because today, New Delhi is less anxious about America's global unipolarity than a potential Chinese unipolarity in Asia. While America's declining global unipolarity is mostly a theoretical concern for New Delhi, the prospect of a China-led unipolar Asia is the true source of anxiety. In that sense, New Delhi's desire for multipolarity is also an attempt at ensuring the absence of a unipolar (China-dominated) Asia. Therefore, even if New Delhi is more focused on countering Chinese unipolarity in Asia rather than US unipolarity globally, opposing regional unipolarity without opposing global unipolarity will ring hollow. There are two reasons why New Delhi would be concerned about China's unipolarity in Asia. One, this could mean that China might set the rules of geopolitical engagement in Asia. Once much of Asia falls under China's influence, it will be harder for New Delhi to push back Chinese hegemony. Two, a rise of Chinese unipolarity in Asia might prompt the US to think of accommodating China in a G2 format, especially if the American nativist and isolationist tendencies persist. In an ideal world, New Delhi's articulations must make a clear distinction between American unipolarity and Chinese attempts at unipolarity in Asia, but doing so is not easy for a variety of reasons, including that New Delhi continues to resist aspects of American unipolarity and is not yet willing to acknowledge the possibility of Chinese unipolarity in Asia. But New Delhi's rhetoric against American unipolarity and hegemony, without openly resisting the growing Chinese regional hegemony or a potentially unipolar Asia, could have unintended consequences. Some US administrations, especially the current one, might interpret India's rhetoric against American unipolarity as personal rather than an academic exercise, for the most part. This could prompt an unhappy Washington to undercut India's geopolitical standing in the region, thereby indirectly aiding China's attempts at regional hegemony. This creates a paradox: India aims to counter Chinese unipolarity in Asia by promoting global multipolarity, which annoys the US, prompting it to marginalise India in the region, thereby ultimately aiding Beijing's efforts to establish hegemony in Asia. New Delhi's rhetoric against American unipolarity and hegemony could also prompt the US, which is losing influence in various parts of the world, to seek ways of strengthening its influence in spaces where it can — this could lead to accepting Chinese unipolarity in Asia. More so, if the US reacts negatively towards India, as it is doing now, it could create a fertile ground for China and Russia to fan the Indian rhetoric against the US, encourage India to proactively participate in forums and arrangements aimed at undermining US unipolarity, and generate confusion within India's strategic community about the true motives behind India's multipolarity rhetoric. All of this will further drive the geopolitical wedge between New Delhi and Washington DC. There is no easy way out. New Delhi will need to have a lot more conversations and build trust with the US. That is not easy when a president like Trump occupies the White House. Happymon Jacob is the founder and director of the Council for Strategic and Defense Research and the editor of INDIA'S WORLD magazine. The views expressed are personal.

Following are the top foreign stories at 2100 hours
Following are the top foreign stories at 2100 hours

News18

time2 hours ago

  • News18

Following are the top foreign stories at 2100 hours

FGN6 BANGLA-HASINA ****Bangladesh tribunal commences trial of deposed PM Hasina over crimes against humanity Dhaka: Bangladesh's International Crimes Tribunal (ICT) on Sunday commenced the trial of deposed Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina in absentia over crimes against humanity related to the violent suppression of the 2024 student-led protests.**** FGN17 BANGLA-RALLIES ****B'desh: BNP's student wing, NCP hold rallies ahead of July Uprising anniversary Dhaka: Activists of the National Citizen Party and the BNP's student wing held separate rallies in Bangladesh on Sunday ahead of the first anniversary of the July Uprising that toppled the Sheikh Hasina-led government on August 5 last year.**** FGN9 PAK-IRAN-NUCLEAR ****Pakistan supports Iran's right to develop nuclear capability for peaceful purposes Islamabad: Pakistan on Sunday supported Iran's right to develop nuclear capability for peaceful purposes, as the two sides signed several agreements to expand cooperation in multiple fields.**** FGN8 PAK-IRAN-TRADE ****Pakistan: Iran decide to increase bilateral trade to USD 8 billion annually Islamabad: Pakistan and Iran agreed on Sunday to increase bilateral trade to USD 8 billion annually, taking advantage of their geography and the 'discount of distance," as trade ministers from the two countries held discussions to deepen economic and political ties.**** FGN14 US-INDIANS-ACCIDENT ****Four senior Indian-origin persons killed in car crash in West Virginia New York: In a tragic incident, four senior Indian-origin persons were killed in a car crash in West Virginia, authorities said on Sunday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store