Calcutta HC grants interim bail to law student Sharmistha Panoli, father expresses happiness
The court directed her to cooperate with the investigation, not leave the country, and furnished bail on a personal bond of Rs 10,000. The court also ordered appropriate police protection for her.
Her father, Prithviraj Panoli, expressed relief, citing her health issues, including kidney problems and Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
Prithviraj Panoli said, 'I am very happy... no father would like his daughter to stay in jail. Her mother was crying for a long time, but she is very happy now. There were two concerns: his kidney problem and Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). She needs regular medicine, but since we didn't have a prescription, the medicine wasn't given in jail.'
'Also, when the video was posted, we found out after two days and told her to delete it. We hoped this would be a lesson for her, and that she would do better in the future,' Panoli said.
According to Sharmistha's lawyer, DP Singh, bail was granted on three conditions: Sharmistha must surrender her passport, cooperate with the investigation, and sign a bail bond.
DP Singh argued that Sharmistha is a victim of circumstances and that her social media post was a defence of her country based on videos she had seen. He questioned the severity of the response, suggesting that the community's reaction was disproportionate to her actions.
Speaking to ANI, Advocate DP Singh said, 'She has got bail on 3 conditions, that she will surrender her passport, she will join the investigation and sign a bail bond...whatever is happening right now in the country is wrong. You just arrest students...they speak what they see, their exposure is different...whatever she said, she said it based on the videos she saw...These children don't know much...there is a fight between India & Pakistan and they are just defending their country, so in such a situation... if we remove the clip of 5-10 seconds, she didn't say anything wrong...She is a victim of circumstances...a whole community has stood up against her...it is not like a riot took place because of what she said, so why is she being punished?'
West Bengal Assembly Leader of Opposition and BJP leader Suvendu Adhikari said, 'Justice has been served today.'
In a post on X, Suvendu Adhikari said, 'Justice has been served today - Sharmistha Panoli, a law student, aged about 22 years, has been released on interim bail by the Hon'ble High Court at Calcutta.'
https://x.com/SuvenduWB/status/1930556756666585104
He called her arrest 'police atrocities' and said she was wrongly arrested for exercising her right to free speech. He accused Kolkata Police of acting to please political leaders.
'This is a case of police atrocities as an innocent young lady, for using her freedom of speech and expression, has been illegally arrested by the Kolkata Police and was sent to judicial custody. This is yet another example of police overzealousness and eagerness to please their political masters,' the post reads.
Meanwhile, BJP MLA Agnimitra Paul and West Bengal BJP Legal Cell member Sanjukta Samanta filed an FIR against Wazahat Khan, who filed an FIR against Sharmistha Panoli, at two Police Stations, Ballygunje Police Station, Kolkata and Howrah Police Station.
Paul said there should be equal rights and rules for every community.
Speaking to ANI, Agnimitra Paul said, 'Yes, I have filed a police complaint against Wazahat Khan, who filed a police complaint against Sharmistha Panoli. I believe that Dr BR Ambedkar Ji's constitution is applicable in West Bengal, and there should be equal rights and rules for every community...Wazahat Khan, who complained against Sharmistha Panoli, had posted an abusive post against our goddess Maa Kamakhya and Lord Krishna. If a Muslim is insulting my god and goddess, the same action needs to be taken for Wazahat Khan...As Assam CM Himanta Biswa Sarma has sent his police force to arrest Wazahat Khan, Mamata Banerjee's police, because of her Muslim appeasement, have been hiding and shielding Wazahat Khan...'
The 22-year-old law student from Pune, Sharmistha Panoli, was arrested by Kolkata Police in Gurugram on May 30, for allegedly hurting religious sentiments with a video on Operation Sindoor.
The Instagram clip was reportedly derogatory towards a particular religion. However, Panoli had deleted the video and issued an apology on May 15. (ANI)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
4 minutes ago
- Hans India
Naxalite couple surrenders before DGP
Vijayawada: Two senior Maoists J Nagaraju,state zonal committee member and incharge of East Bastar divisional committee and his wife M Jogeswari, divisional committee. member surrendered before Director General of Police Harish Kumar Gupta today. The Naxal couple frustrated with Maoist failures and surrendered before police to join main stream. Nagaraju carries a reward of Rs 20 lakh and Jogeswar has a reward of Rs 5 lakh. The DGP handed over cheques of Rs 20000 each to the couple for immediate relief.
Indian Express
4 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘Law of limitation binds everybody, including govt': Telangana High Court dismisses TSIDC's appeal due to 514-day delay
The Telangana High Court Friday dismissed an appeal filed by the Telangana State Industrial Development Corporation (TSIDC) against an order of a commercial court, citing an 'unexplained' and 'unreasonable' delay of 514 days in filing the plea. The bench of Justice Moushumi Bhattacharya and Justice BR Madhusudhan Rao was hearing an appeal filed by TSIDC challenging a commercial court order dated February 16, 2023, which dismissed its appeal seeking a decree of over Rs 1.3 crore with an annual interest at 17.5 per cent against the respondents. The appeal was filed on December 26, 2024, accompanied by an application for condonation of the significant delay of 514 days. The high court's rejection of TSIDC's appeal means that the original claim of Rs 1,30,31,000, with interest, which was already dismissed by the commercial court, remains dismissed. During the proceedings, the TSIDC filed two affidavits citing the delay and attributed it to several factors such as long time taken to understand the impugned order, officials being occupied with the state and Union election duties leading to a halt in decision-making on legal matters, the file going untraceable, and a change in leadership with three vice chairpersons and managing cirectors taking charge in quick succession. However, the bench found that 'the dates mentioned in the two affidavits contain several unexplained time-gaps..' Specifically, it found a four-month gap between the day the certified copy of the order was ready and the day when the Telangana Assembly elections were announced. Similarly, it found another six-month gap between the polling dates of the Telangana elections and the general elections, for which no explanation was provided. The court also observed that the TSIDC only realised the matter was pending in November 2024 when respondent No. 1 sought the return of original title deeds. This prompted the search for the missing file that was eventually traced in the second week of December 2024. The appeal was filed on December 26, 2024. While TSIDC relied on section 5 of The Limitation Act, 1963, which allows filing of an appeal or any application beyond the prescribed period of time subject to the court being satisfied of the sufficiency of cause shown by the appellant or applicant for the delay, the bench noted that 'the burden of proving the sufficiency of cause lies with the appellant or applicant.' Referring to various Supreme Court judgments, the high court reiterated that delay beyond the prescribed period, particularly in matters under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, should be condoned by way of exception, not as a rule. 'There is little doubt that the objective of a special statute like The Commercial Courts Act, 2015, is to ensure speedy resolution of high-value commercial disputes, without any exceptions. The focus is on quick resolution which includes government entities when they are parties to commercial disputes,' the order read. The judgment firmly stated that the 'law of limitation binds everybody, including the government'. Noting that the exercise of discretion under section 5 of The Limitation Act, 1963, empowers the court to entertain an appeal or application beyond the prescribed period of limitation subject to the court being satisfied of the sufficiency of cause shown by the applicant/appellant, the court observed, 'Sufficient cause must reflect a sense of purpose and a willingness to restore diligence. The reasons shown cannot be slipshod or nonchalant so as to demand condonation as a matter of entitlement. It must be borne in mind that delay may have created equity in favour of another in the interregnum.' The bench also noted that one of the grounds for the original impugned order against TSIDC was that its claim was already barred by limitation. 'Thus, it is all the more difficult to accept that the appellant would slip into a slumber for 514 days after having suffered an order, inter alia, on the ground of delay,' the court noted. Finding no satisfactory reason to condone the 514-day delay, the high court dismissed TSIDC's application for condonation of delay, consequently rejecting the commercial court appeal. Rahul V Pisharody is an Assistant Editor with the Indian Express Online and has been reporting from Telangana on various issues since 2019. Besides a focused approach to big news developments, Rahul has a keen interest in stories about Hyderabad and its inhabitants and looks out for interesting features on the city's heritage, environment, history culture etc. His articles are straightforward and simple reads in sync with the context. Rahul started his career as a journalist in 2011 with The New Indian Express and worked in different roles at the Hyderabad bureau for over 8 years. As Deputy Metro Editor, he was in charge of the Hyderabad bureau of the newspaper and coordinated with the team of district correspondents, centres and internet desk for over three years. A native of Palakkad in Kerala, Rahul has a Master's degree in Communication (Print and New Media) from the University of Hyderabad and a Bachelor's degree in Business Management from PSG College of Arts and Science, Coimbatore. Long motorcycle rides and travel photography are among his other interests. ... Read More
Indian Express
4 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘I was denied a job, my father was labelled a terrorist: Son of Punjab cop killed in 1993 fake encounter says 4 generations have suffered
In the wake of former Punjab Police officer Paramjit Singh's sentencing in the fake encounter case, Charanjit Singh, son of Surmukh Singh, one of the victims of the encounter, has talked about his struggles, including facing rejection for a police job due to the stigma surrounding his father, who was falsely labelled a terrorist. A Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) court in Mohali Wednesday sentenced former Beas station house officer Paramjit Singh, 68, retired superintedent of police, to 10 years' imprisonment and imposed a fine of Rs 50,000 for the abduction and custodial killing of two Punjab Police constables—Surmukh Singh of Muchhal village (Baba Bakala) and Sukhwinder Singh of Khiala village (Amritsar)—in a fake encounter in 1993. 'I was born after the murder of my father, Surmukh Singh. My mother took me to my maternal great-grandparents. She got remarried and my maternal grandparents raised me,' said Charanjit, who met his paternal grandfather only in his mid-teens. Human rights activist Jaswant Singh Khalra was the first to uncover that the bodies of the two constables had been cremated as 'unclaimed bodies' by the Punjab Police. On September 6, 1995, Khalra himself was allegedly abducted from his home, tortured, and killed in a similar fake encounter. His wife, Paramjit Kaur Khalra, subsequently approached the Supreme Court, requesting an investigation into how many such bodies were cremated in Punjab as 'unclaimed'. Acting on records compiled by Khalra, the court directed the CBI to conduct an investigation that led to the conviction of Paramjit Singh. It took over three decades for the court to reach a verdict. As one family member said, 'Delayed justice has left its own scars behind.' Charanjit recounted that his grandfather never spoke of the case directly but hinted at a possible police job through a contact, Paramjit Singh, now convicted for his father's killing. 'Actually, my grandfather father knew Paramjit Singh, who has now been convicted for the fake encounter of my father. I couldn't understand the meaning of it at that time,' Charanjit said. He alleged that Paramjit Singh promised a job in exchange for withdrawing the CBI case. In 2012, during a police recruitment drive, Charanjit cleared all the physical and medical tests. 'I was told that I cannot be given a job because my father was a terrorist. They told me that I was the son of a terrorist, so I cannot be given the job. My grandfather and I were devastated. First, they snatched my father and his dignity and then my job,' he said. Although he had passed the medical and written tests, he was rejected at the counselling stage. Following that, Paramjit Singh stopped responding to the family's calls. Human rights activist Sarabjit Singh Verka, who pursued the case, said, 'Paramjit Singh not only killed Surmukh Singh but also the hopes of his son Charanjit Singh. He was not the son of a terrorist. He was eligible for the job, but the police report was against him. Because Paramjit Singh had killed his father, tagging him as a terrorist.' Charanjit Singh said, 'We didn't get any compensation. Our four generations have suffered due to Paramjit Singh. My grandfather suffered. He spent his whole life seeking justice. He also tried to compromise on justice in the hope that I would be able to live a good life and my children wouldn't have to suffer the poverty as I did.' Now working as a private driver earning Rs 12,000 per month, Charanjit says the injustice has left his family emotionally and economically shattered. 'We were from a Dalit family. My father's job was a great source of hope to help us recover from poverty. His murder and the stigma that came with it pushed us back from where my father had started,' he said. Sukhwinder Singh, the second constable killed in the alleged encounter, also belonged to a Dalit family. He was unmarried and, according to relatives, the first in the family to get a government job. 'My grandfather had great expectations from him,' said Amritpal Singh, nephew of Sukhwinder Singh. 'But he was killed in a fake encounter, and after that, my grandfather spent all his life seeking justice.' His grandfather passed away in 2015, without seeing the case come to a conclusion. 'He couldn't wait for justice to deliver,' Amritpal Singh added. When asked if he knew about Jaswant Singh Khalra, Charanjit Singh said, 'My grandfather had told me that Jaswant Singh Khalra had come to our home. But I don't know much.' 'Punjab '95', the film based on the life and death of Khalra, starring Punjabi singer and actor Diljit Dosanjh, has remained stuck with the censor board for more than two years. Asked about the movie, Charanjit Singh said, 'I don't know about the movie. I am a driver. I don't know much about what is happening around. I have to raise my children. I want to give them what I missed all my life. I demand that the government give me commendation and dues. I also want my job back, which was denied to me because they tagged my father as a terrorist.' 'We will try to get the compensation to both families. Both victims were in police jobs, and they had bright futures ahead. Both families suffered as a result of this fake encounter. Paramjit Singh lived his life with all the salaries and dues. But these families were denied everything,' said lawyer Verka.
