What is ‘Crypto Week'—and how will it affect Bitcoin, XRP, and other cryptocurrency prices?
What is 'Crypto Week'?
Crypto Week is the term given to the week of July 14, 2025.
The term was coined by the U.S. House of Representatives' House Leadership, as well as the House Committee on Financial Services Chairman French Hill, and the House Committee on Agriculture Chairman GT Thompson.
Crypto Week is so designated because during this week, the House will vote on three bills that could significantly impact the future of cryptocurrencies in the United States. The bills, according to the U.S. House Committee on Financial Services, feature heavily in 'Congress' efforts to make America the crypto capital of the world.'
The House Committee on Financial Services originally announced Crypto Week at the beginning of this month.
'We are taking historic steps to ensure the United States remains the world's leader in innovation and I look forward to 'Crypto Week' in the House,' Chairman French Hill said. 'After years of dedicated work in Congress on digital assets, we are advancing landmark legislation to establish a clear regulatory framework for digital assets that safeguards consumers and investors, provides rules for the issuance and operation of dollar-backed payment stablecoins, and permanently blocks the creation of a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) to safeguard Americans' financial privacy.'
The legislation Hill referenced includes three different bills coming before the House this week:
The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025
The Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act
The GENIUS Act of 2025
Here's a rundown of what each bill entails.
The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025
As noted by CNBC, the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025, also known as the CLARITY Act, looks to regulate cryptocurrencies by establishing roles for the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to do so.
As noted by the bill's summary, the CLARITY Act 'establishes a regulatory framework for digital commodities,' which the bill defines as 'digital assets that rely upon a blockchain for their value'—in other words, cryptocurrency.
Generally, industries don't like regulation. However, as Coinbase notes, the passage of the CLARITY Act, which would give regulators more oversight over digital tokens, is viewed as beneficial for the crypto industry as a whole, as it would further legitimize the industry in the eyes of investors.
The increased legitimacy of cryptocurrencies, along with enhanced regulatory protections, could lead to more investors opting to invest in crypto, thereby boosting its value.
The Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act
The Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act would prohibit the Federal Reserve from issuing a digital dollar.
As stated by the bill's summary, the act would prohibit 'a Federal Reserve bank from offering products or services directly to an individual, maintaining an account on behalf of an individual, or issuing a central bank digital currency (i.e., a digital dollar).'
While many nations are exploring the issuance of their own digital currency, there are serious privacy concerns about such tokens. Privacy proponents fear that a state-backed digital currency could easily allow a government to track every transaction a person makes.
Privacy proponents also worry that if a digital dollar becomes the primary store of value, the government could retaliate against individuals or groups by cutting off their access to the currency, leaving them unable to spend their money.
The GENIUS Act of 2025
The Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins of 2025, or GENIUS Act, would regulate stablecoins, which are cryptocurrencies pegged to a stable asset, such as the U.S. dollar. Stablecoins pegged to the dollar are generally much less volatile than those that are not, which helps mitigate some investment risk.
Popular stablecoins include Tether and USDC.
The GENIUS Act would introduce regulation to the stablecoin market, requiring institutions that offer stablecoins to maintain liquid reserves that back up the value of their stablecoins.
In addition, the bill would establish other regulatory frameworks, including ensuring stablecoin holders have priority over other claimants in the case that a stablecoin issuer files for bankruptcy.
How will Crypto Week affect cryptocurrency prices?
It's impossible to tell how Crypto Week will impact cryptocurrency prices of coins like Bitcoin, Ethereum, and XRP. Crypto king Bitcoin recently hit all-time highs, and any legislation that is passed that makes Bitcoin a more appealing investment option could cause the digital token to rise even further.
The stock prices of companies involved in cryptocurrencies could also be impacted this week, depending on the outcome of voting on the above bills. Those companies include Coinbase Global, Inc. (Nasdaq: COIN) and Robinhood Markets, Inc. (Nasdaq: HOOD).
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump official criticizes Fed chief Powell as Trump takes aim over interest rates
A top Trump administration official accused Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell of leading an "ostentatious" office renovation project that may be "violating the law," a new broadside against the central bank chief as President Trump tangles with him over interest rates. "The President is extremely troubled by your management of the Federal Reserve System," Office of Management and Budget Chair Russell Vought wrote in a July 10 letter. The letter came after months of criticism from Mr. Trump over the Fed's decision not to slash interest rates. Economists say lowering rates may accelerate economic growth, but it also runs the risk of causing inflation to spike. That has led the Fed's interest rate-setting committee — which Powell chairs — to keep rates steady so far this year after cutting rates slightly last year. Mr. Trump has called on Powell to resign from his post, and last month, the president called Powell a "numbskull" over his interest rate decisions and said "maybe" he'll try to fire Powell — though federal law states the Fed chair can only be fired "for cause," which typically refers to firings due to specific misconduct or performance issues. In the past, Mr. Trump had said he doesn't plan on trying to fire Powell, whose term as Fed chair ends next year. Vought's letter took aim at Powell and the central bank over its yearslong office renovation project in Washington, D.C. The letter said plans for the project "called for rooftop terrace gardens, VIP private dining rooms and elevators, water features, premium marble, and much more." Vought also asked whether the Fed has made changes to its plans without seeking approval from a government commission that oversees D.C.-area federal building projects. In testimony to the Senate last month, Powell called some descriptions of the renovation project "misleading and inaccurate." He told lawmakers there isn't any new marble aside from what's necessary to replace broken old marble, and said there are no "special elevators," new water features or rooftop gardens. "All of the sort of inflammatory things that the media carried are either not in the current plan or just inaccurate," Powell said. Vought's letter argued that comment to the Senate "appears to reveal that the project is out of compliance with the approved plan," suggesting the Fed may have run afoul of a law requiring D.C.-area projects be approved by the National Capital Planning Commission. In a post on X, the Office of Management and Budget alleged Powell "slipped up and revealed he violating the law." The Fed's renovation plans were reviewed by the commission several years ago. Powell defended the Fed's handling of the project in a letter Thursday responding to Vought, saying the Fed has "taken great care to ensure the project is carefully overseen." He also said the project has been "subject to budget approval" by board members annually. The Fed chair said the Fed generally isn't subject to the National Capital Planning Commission's approval, but it did work with the agency "voluntarily" in 2020 and 2021. Since then, Powell said, the central bank has only "made a small number of design changes to scale back or eliminate certain elements," so no further review by the commission is needed. The Fed typically operates with a much higher degree of independence than most other government institutions. Federal law gives the Fed the power to make decisions about acquiring and remodeling buildings in Washington to serve as its office spaces. The Fed has previously acknowledged that the price tag for its office renovations had jumped due to "significant increases in raw materials costs," along with higher labor costs. On its website, the Fed says the two headquarters buildings that are getting overhauled "have not been comprehensively renovated since their construction in the 1930s." The central bank said there are no private elevators or new VIP dining rooms — instead, the project will refurbish old elevators and conference rooms, including ones that are sometimes "used for mealtime meetings." It also said plans for new water features were scrapped, though existing fountains will be repaired, and the garden terrace is actually a "ground-level front lawn." On July 2, Bill Pulte, the Trump-nominated head of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, accused Powell of "deceptive" testimony to the Senate about the office project. When asked about the allegation in a recent Cabinet meeting, Mr. Trump said: "Then he [Powell] should resign immediately. We should get somebody in it that's going to lower interest rates." Son of man who was violently detained by ICE reacts after release Mike Johnson breaks from Trump, calls on DOJ to release Epstein files 7.3 magnitude earthquake hits southern Alaska Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Reported birthday card from Trump to Epstein shines new light on their friendship as fallout from files release mounts
Donald Trump reportedly helped celebrate Jeffrey Epstein's 50th birthday with a bawdy greeting accompanied by a hand-drawn image of a naked woman. A report from The Wall Street Journal on Thursday uncovers new details about the relationship between the president and disgraced financier and convicted sex offender, whose death and connections to Trump are at the center of a A letter bearing Trump's name, which was reviewed by The Journal, contains several lines of typewritten text framed by a drawing of a naked woman. His signature is a squiggly 'Donald' below her waist, mimicking pubic hair, according to the report. The letter concludes: 'Happy Birthday — and may every day be another wonderful secret.' In an interview with The Journal, Trump denied writing the letter or drawing the picture: 'This is not me. This is a fake thing. It's a fake Wall Street Journal story.' Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein pictured in 1992. A new report shed new light on the friendship between the two men (NBC News) 'I never wrote a picture in my life. I don't draw pictures of women,' he told the conservative-leaning newspaper, which is owned by Rupert Murdoch, who has over the years supported Trump. 'It's not my language. It's not my words,' Trump told the newspaper. A typewritten note styled as an imaginary conversation between Trump and Epstein, written in the third person, is reportedly included inside the outline of the naked woman. In the imagined conversation, Trump says 'we have certain things in common, Jeffrey,' to which Epstein replies, 'Yes, we do, come to think of it.' 'Enigmas never age, have you noticed that?' Trump writes, according to The Journal, which had reportedly reviewed pages from a leather-bound album of birthday cards examined by Department of Justice officials who investigated Epstein and his former girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell, who was found guilty of child sex trafficking and other offences in 2022. The explosive revelation follows a disastrous week for the Trump administration as the president repeatedly tries to dismiss the so-called Epstein files as a Democratic 'hoax.' Thursday's revelations illustrate a closer than previously reported relationship between the president and Epstein, who was accused of sexually abusing dozens of minors before he was found dead in his jail cell in 2019. A Department of Justice memo on July 6 had effectively closed the case, affirming that no such 'client list' exists despite demands from Trump's supporters and allies for a full accounting of Epstein's death and alleged ties to a wider child trafficking conspiracy implicating powerful figures. On the campaign trail, Trump repeatedly promised to release FBI files related to Epstein, who was found dead in his jail cell on on August 10, 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. But the president's promises fell flat. Attorney General Pam Bondi, on Trump's directive, also promised to release the files, but after months of delays, the memo from the Justice Department and FBI said agencies would not be releasing any more documents relating to the case. Bondi had claimed the files were 'sitting on her desk' in February. She invited right-wing influencers to the White House for a photo-op at the end of that month, where they held up binders containing 'Phase 1' of the Epstein files, largely made up of already publicly available information about the case. Epstein died while in prison facing sex trafficking charges. While conspiracies have swirled about his 'client list,' Trump officials have recently said that no list exists () Bondi continued to stall. In May, she claimed there were 'tens of thousands of videos of Epstein with children or child porn,' which fueled further conspiracy theories that powerful people were being protected, and that 'Phase 1' binders were allegedly buying time. The administration's failure to release any other details about the investigation has been a major blow for Trump's supporters — including those within Trump's own administration. Deputy FBI director Don Bongino, who last year amplified conspiracy theories that Epstein was murdered, almost walked over the memo, according to reports. Trump has spoken out against those questioning him about the release of the Epstein files. (AP) While the White House likely hoped MAGA's fury would blow over quickly, outrage has only intensified. Frustrated, Trump lashed out at his supporters this week and reportedly complained in private that they won't 'shut the f*** up' about the Epstein files. Trump has spent several days publicly calling the Epstein case 'boring' and 'bulls***' as he questioned the loyalty of gullible 'weaklings' who demanded more from his Justice Department. 'Let these weaklings continue forward and do the Democrats work, don't even think about talking of our incredible and unprecedented success, because I don't want their support anymore!' Trump said in a Truth Social fury post. Even the White House has tried to temper the fury. On July 17, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt was asked whether the president would appoint a special prosecutor to oversee the Epstein case. 'The president would not recommend a special prosecutor in the Epstein case,' Leavitt said. 'That's how he feels. And as for his discussions with the attorney general, I'm not sure.' Trump's friendship with Epstein spanned the late 1980s, 1990s and early 2000s, and Trump's phone number — as well as First Lady Melania Trump's — were included in Epstein's infamous leaked address books. Trump's name also appeared seven times in passenger logs for Epstein's planes. The pair reportedly fell out in 2004, when Epstein and Trump both tried to buy a Palm Beach estate. The next year, the FBI began investigating Epstein for child sex trafficking. He pleaded guilty to a state charge of soliciting sex from a minor in 2008. Trump distanced himself from his former friend after Epstein's arrest in 2019, when Trump was president. 'Well, I knew him like everybody in Palm Beach knew him,' Trump said on July 9, 2019, one day after Epstein's arrest. 'I mean, people in Palm Beach knew him. He was a fixture in Palm Beach. I had a falling out with him a long time ago. I don't think I've spoken to him for 15 years. I wasn't a fan.' Asked three days later what contributed to that 'falling out,' Trump said 'the reason doesn't make any difference, frankly.' One month later, Epstein was found dead in his cell at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York City.
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Watch These Johnson & Johnson Price Levels After Stock's Post-Earnings Pop
Key Takeaways Johnson & Johnson shares fell slightly Thursday after soaring yesterday amid investor optimism about the company's better-than-expected earnings and full-year outlook. The stock rallied above key moving averages and a symmetrical triangle in Wednesday's trading session, though it remains in a long-term trading range. Investors should watch crucial overhead areas on J&J's chart around $168 and $180, while also monitoring major support levels near $155 and $ & Johnson (JNJ) shares lost ground Thursday after soaring yesterday amid investor optimism about the company's better-than-expected earnings and full-year outlook. The healthcare giant also slashed its tariff cost forecast, saying it now expects about $200 million in import levy-related costs this year, down from its prior projection of $400 million. The outlook soothed investors' concerns about what impact Washington's trade policies would have on the company after President Donald Trump recently said that pharmaceutical tariffs could be as high as 200%. The drugmaker said its portfolio and pipeline position it for elevated growth in the second half of the year, adding that it anticipates approvals and submissions across a range of therapeutic areas. J&J shares fell 1% to close today's session at around $163, after surging 6% on Wednesday to pace Dow Jones Industrial Average advancers. The stock has risen 13% since the start of the year, outpacing the Dow's gain of less than 5%. Below, we break down the technicals on J&J's weekly chart and identify price levels worth watching out for. Close Above Key Moving Averages Although the 50-week moving average (MA) crossed below the 200-week MA in late 2023 to form an ominous death cross, J&J shares have remained mostly rangebound since that time. However, more recently, the price rallied above both of these moving averages and a symmetrical triangle in Wednesday's trading session. While the relative strength index confirms a positive shift in momentum, yesterday's jump occurred on lackluster volume, indicating that larger market participants may remain on the sidelines. Let's point out crucial overhead areas on J&J's chart to watch and also identify a couple of major support levels worth monitoring during future retracements. Overhead Areas to Watch Upon further buying, Investors should monitor how the price responds to the $168 area. This level may provide overhead resistance near prominent peaks in September last year and March this year that touch a trendline extending back to February 2021. A decisive volume-backed breakout above this area could trigger a rally toward $180. Investors who have accumulated shares at lower prices may look for exit points in this location near notable peaks that formed in the chart in August 2021 and December 2022, both of which lie just below the stock's all-time high. Support Levels Worth Monitoring During future retracements in the stock, investors should monitor the $155 level. This area, which sits just below the 50-week MA and the symmetrical triangle's top trendline, may encounter support near a horizontal line that links a range of corresponding trading activity on the chart stretching back to the April 2020 peak. Finally, a deeper pullback in J&J shares could see the price revisit lower support around $145. Investors may look for buying opportunities in this region near several troughs that developed on the chart between October 2023 and January this year, a level that marks the lower level of the stock's trading range over that period. The comments, opinions, and analyses expressed on Investopedia are for informational purposes only. Read our warranty and liability disclaimer for more info. As of the date this article was written, the author does not own any of the above securities. Read the original article on Investopedia Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
