Tensions Between Delhi and Islamabad: A Ceasefire Declared, but Will It Last?
The ongoing crisis between India and Pakistan continues to draw significant international attention. While the global community watches with concern over the fate of political relations between the two nuclear-armed neighbours, former US President Donald Trump announced that he had successfully influenced both Delhi and Islamabad to agree to an immediate ceasefire. In a tweet, Trump wrote: 'After a long night of talks mediated by Washington, I am pleased to announce that India and Pakistan have agreed to a full and immediate ceasefire. Congratulations to both nations for their common sense and great intelligence.'
The US Secretary of State also welcomed the ceasefire agreement and the opening of dialogue channels. Pakistan responded by reopening its airspace to all types of flights, while India announced a new round of negotiations scheduled for 12 May to follow up on the ceasefire implementation and activate military communication channels. However, mutual accusations and hostile statements between officials from both sides persisted.
Two days ago, The Guardian reported comments by US Vice President 'D. Vance' who stated that the current crisis between India and Pakistan was 'none of America's business', while expressing hope that the situation would not escalate into a broader regional conflict. He added that the United States would continue pursuing diplomatic channels to resolve the issue. Meanwhile, Reuters focused its coverage on an explosion in Lahore, while CNN, citing a Pakistani security source, reported that the recent air combat between Indian and Pakistani fighter jets was among the largest and longest aerial battles in modern military history.
Washington was not the only party involved in mediation. Several other capitals with good ties to both sides—such as Riyadh, Tehran, Ankara, and Abu Dhabi—also stepped in to defuse tensions. The US Secretary of State played a direct role in calming the political and military situation, maintaining communication with both the Pakistani Prime Minister and Army Chief. This coincided with Pakistan launching a large-scale military operation named 'Bunyan Mursas' (Solid Structure) in retaliation for recent Indian attacks. According to Pakistan's BOL News, the Pakistani Army targeted strategic Indian military facilities during the operation, including the 'Udhampur' and 'Pathankot' bases, and a 'BrahMos' missile facility. While Delhi confirmed the attack, it downplayed the damage, stating that its military installations had been targeted but denying that there had been any significant losses.
India responded with precise airstrikes targeting Pakistani airbases, military installations, and a radar site in the western sector, in retaliation for Pakistani drone attacks. In turn, Islamabad escalated the confrontation on the cyber front. BOL News reported that dozens of Indian government and private websites were hacked, resulting in a disruption of around 70% of the national power grid and affecting energy supplies. Despite reports of direct military communications between the two sides—suggesting efforts to reduce tensions through dialogue—hostilities remain high.
In light of these developments, it is clear that cyber warfare has become one of the most significant features of the tension between Delhi and Islamabad. Its emergence as an effective tool became particularly evident after the 'Pahalgam incident,' when a Pakistani threat group claimed responsibility for hacking websites connected to India's defence sector. This underscores the growing role of cyber activities in international crises. Indian groups had also conducted cyberattacks in late April, targeting Pakistani institutions like Habib Bank and the University of Balochistan.
Diplomatic sparring was also evident during the escalation. The Times of India cited the Indian Embassy in Washington, stating that Delhi possesses evidence of Pakistani terrorist involvement in the Jammu and Kashmir attack that killed 26 civilians. India criticised Pakistan's inaction and accused it of spreading misinformation. It insisted that its military operations were limited and specifically targeted terrorist sites, avoiding civilian and military infrastructure. The report also stated that India had informed the United States of its actions to underscore its transparency and international cooperation in fighting terrorism. India reiterated that the safety of its citizens is a priority and expressed willingness for dialogue—conditional upon Pakistan's serious commitment to counterterrorism. It is noteworthy that, despite the declared ceasefire, India continues to suspend the Indus Waters Treaty.
International and regional positions remain divided, with some countries supporting Delhi and others backing Islamabad. The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs expressed 'regret' over the Indian attacks on Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir, calling for calm and urging both sides to avoid further escalation. Turkey's foreign minister voiced concern over India's 'unjustified aggression and violation of Pakistan's sovereignty,' reaffirming Turkey's full solidarity with Islamabad. Pakistan's military announced the downing of six Israeli-made drones over Indian villages—an event that may have prompted the sudden and previously indifferent US intervention. This move may also reflect Washington's desire to counterbalance growing Chinese military support for Pakistan, which could undermine the global reputation of Western and American arms.
As for the global and UN response to the ceasefire—regardless of whether it proves durable—UN Secretary-General António Guterres welcomed efforts to de-escalate the situation. A UN spokesperson added that the organisation is closely monitoring developments and supports all efforts aimed at reducing tensions.
Egypt and the UAE also welcomed the ceasefire, commending former President Trump's role and expressing confidence in both countries' commitment to maintaining peace. Saudi Arabia likewise welcomed the truce, expressing hope that it will contribute to restoring regional security and stability. Saudi Minister of State for Foreign Affairs Adel Al-Jubeir visited both Delhi and Islamabad on 8 and 9 May to support diplomatic efforts.
Meanwhile, the UK's Foreign Secretary David Lammy hailed the ceasefire and urged both nations to continue de-escalating tensions for the benefit of all parties. Iran's Foreign Ministry welcomed the truce as well, stressing the importance of seizing this opportunity to reduce tensions and achieve sustainable peace. Turkey's Foreign Ministry added that true stability in South Asia requires sustained dialogue addressing security and counterterrorism. EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas described the ceasefire as a vital step toward de-escalation and emphasised the importance of its full implementation.
read more
Analysis- Turkey Has 0 Regional Allies... Why?
Analysis: Russia, Turkey... Libya in Return For Syria?
Analysis: Who Will Gain Trump's Peace Plan Fruits?
Analysis: Will Turkey's Erdogan Resort to Snap Election?
Analysis: What Are Turkey's Aspirations in Iraq?
Opinion & Analysis
Analysis: Mercenaries In Libya... Who Should Be Blamed?
Opinion & Analysis
Analysis- How 'Libya Nightmare' Takes Erdogan to Algiers
Opinion & Analysis
Analysis: What Happens After Brexit?
Opinion & Analysis
Analysis: Strategic Significance of Libya's Sirte, Jufra!
News
Egypt confirms denial of airspace access to US B-52 bombers
Lifestyle
Pistachio and Raspberry Cheesecake Domes Recipe
News
Ayat Khaddoura's Final Video Captures Bombardment of Beit Lahia
News
Australia Fines Telegram $600,000 Over Terrorism, Child Abuse Content
Arts & Culture
Nicole Kidman and Keith Urban's $4.7M LA Home Burglarized
Sports
Former Al Zamalek Player Ibrahim Shika Passes away after Long Battle with Cancer
Sports
Neymar Announced for Brazil's Preliminary List for 2026 FIFA World Cup Qualifiers
News
Prime Minister Moustafa Madbouly Inaugurates Two Indian Companies
Arts & Culture
New Archaeological Discovery from 26th Dynasty Uncovered in Karnak Temple
Business
Fear & Greed Index Plummets to Lowest Level Ever Recorded amid Global Trade War
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Egypt Independent
13 minutes ago
- Egypt Independent
NATO has promised a spending blitz. Can its European members afford it?
London CNN — The North Atlantic Treaty Organization, the defense alliance of 32 countries, is on a spending spree, with plans to funnel billions into their militaries and security systems over the coming decade. But it's a splurge that some European members of NATO, grappling with huge and ballooning debt burdens, can ill-afford. 'It's something unprecedented in peacetime to have such a massive increase in spending on any item – in particular, on defense,' Marcel Fratzscher, president of the German Institute for Economic Research or DIW, told CNN. Last month, NATO members agreed to boost their respective defense spending targets to five percent of gross domestic product by 2035 – more than double the current two percent target and the sort of major increase that US President Donald Trump has been demanding for many years. The pledge came as Europe's NATO members have to contend with an aggressive Russia and an America that has backed away from its long-standing role as the guarantor of the region's security. Governments have three options to meet the new spending target – cut other expenses, raise taxes or borrow more – but analysts told CNN that each is either politically unpalatable or unviable in the long term for heavily indebted European NATO countries. 'Many (European Union) countries face hard fiscal constraints,' analysts at Bruegel, a Brussels-based think tank, wrote earlier this month. 'It is unrealistic to expect countries that have struggled for decades to reach a 2 percent defense spending target to embrace credibly an ill-justified, much higher target.' Hard choices Many NATO countries have failed to meet the previous, two percent target, set in 2014. Most have increased spending in recent years in response to Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022 – so much so that the European Union's executive arm expects its 23 member states belonging to NATO to meet that target this year, based on their combined GDP. But they now need to go further. The new, five percent target includes a commitment by NATO member states to spend the equivalent of 3.5 percent of their annual GDP on so-called 'core' defense requirements, such as weapons, with the remaining 1.5 percent allocated to areas supporting defense like port infrastructure. For some nations, that will mean finding tens of billions of extra dollars a year. Frank Gill, a senior sovereign credit ratings analyst for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at S&P Global Ratings, thinks that meeting the 3.5 percent target alone will require European countries, including the United Kingdom, to borrow huge sums of money. Some nations may also cut or reallocate government spending to reduce the amount they need to borrow, he said, but that could prove difficult. Two older people walk in the garden of a retirement home in Potsdam, Germany, in July 2025. Fabian Sommer/dpa/picture-alliance/AP 'A lot of (European governments) are facing other fiscal pressures… not least aging populations, which are essentially leading to even higher pension spending,' Gill told CNN. 'Politically, (that) is very challenging to cut.' Fratzscher at DIW in Germany agrees. For most NATO countries, he argued, cutting spending is 'utterly impossible.' 'Europe is aging quickly,' he said. 'It's completely illusionary to believe that… governments in Europe could save on public pensions, on healthcare, on care more generally.' The only sustainable way to finance the 'kind of magnitude of extra (defense) spending' now pledged by NATO is to hike taxes, he argued. Yet there exists neither the political will nor the public support to spend 'in such a dramatic way in this direction… and actually accept the consequences.' Crushing debt Simply borrowing more is a similarly tricky option in Europe where a number of governments are already saddled with debts close to, or larger than, the size of their country's entire economy. All else remaining equal, meeting just the 3.5 percent 'core' defense spending target could add roughly $2 trillion to the collective government debt of NATO's European members, including the UK, by 2035, according to a recent analysis by S&P Global Ratings. That compares with combined GDP of $23.1 trillion for the EU – a proxy for European NATO members – and Britain, based on World Bank data for 2024. The extra debt would be particularly hard to swallow for countries such as Italy, France and Belgium. These NATO members had some of the highest public debt-to-GDP ratios at the end of 2024, at 135 percent, 113 percent and 105 percent respectively, according to the EU's statistics office. Countries such as France, where this photo was taken, are grappling with huge government debt burdens. Sameer Al-Doumy/AFP/Getty Images Those are already heavy burdens. On Tuesday, French Prime Minister François Bayrou said the EU's second-largest economy risks a 'crushing by debt.' He warned that, should nothing change, just the interest France pays on its debt will swell to €100 billion ($117 billion) in 2029, becoming the government's largest single expense. He still supports splashing the cash on defense, while reining in other government spending. The EU is trying to make it easier for member states to invest in their security. Brussels has exempted defense expenditure from its strict rules on government spending and pledged to create a €150 billion fund from which countries can borrow, at favorable interest rates, to invest in their defense. However, there is another option for EU NATO members, according to Guntram Wolff, a senior fellow at Bruegel. 'Just not doing it. Not spending more,' he told CNN. Already, Spain has said it will not meet the five percent target, arguing that doing so would compromise its spending on welfare. Last year, the southern European nation spent only 1.28 percent of its GDP on defense, based on NATO estimates. Wolff said the 'best predictor for the increase in defense spending is (a country's) distance to Moscow – much more than any pledges at the NATO summit.'
See - Sada Elbalad
9 hours ago
- See - Sada Elbalad
Pakistani Amb. in Cairo meets Governor of Giza
Basant Ahmed Pakistani ambassador in Cairo Aamir Shouket met Governor of Giza Mr. Adel Saeed Ibrahim El-Naggar in Cairo. Matters pertaining to promotion of Pakistan-Egypt shared aspirations, and cooperation in diverse avenues were discussed during the meeting. read more Gold prices rise, 21 Karat at EGP 3685 NATO's Role in Israeli-Palestinian Conflict US Expresses 'Strong Opposition' to New Turkish Military Operation in Syria Shoukry Meets Director-General of FAO Lavrov: confrontation bet. nuclear powers must be avoided News Iran Summons French Ambassador over Foreign Minister Remarks News Aboul Gheit Condemns Israeli Escalation in West Bank News Greek PM: Athens Plays Key Role in Improving Energy Security in Region News One Person Injured in Explosion at Ukrainian Embassy in Madrid News Israeli-Linked Hadassah Clinic in Moscow Treats Wounded Iranian IRGC Fighters Arts & Culture "Jurassic World Rebirth" Gets Streaming Date News China Launches Largest Ever Aircraft Carrier Sports Former Al Zamalek Player Ibrahim Shika Passes away after Long Battle with Cancer Videos & Features Tragedy Overshadows MC Alger Championship Celebration: One Fan Dead, 11 Injured After Stadium Fall Lifestyle Get to Know 2025 Eid Al Adha Prayer Times in Egypt Arts & Culture South Korean Actress Kang Seo-ha Dies at 31 after Cancer Battle News "Tensions Escalate: Iran Probes Allegations of Indian Tech Collaboration with Israeli Intelligence" Sports Get to Know 2025 WWE Evolution Results News Flights suspended at Port Sudan Airport after Drone Attacks
Al-Ahram Weekly
a day ago
- Al-Ahram Weekly
Iran says replaced air defence systems damaged during Israel war - Region
Iran has replaced the air defence systems damaged during its 12-day war with Israel last month, a senior army general said on Sunday according to state media. Israel launched an unprecedented surprise bombing campaign against Iran in mid-June, prompting Tehran to respond with drone and missile attacks. Israel's strikes dealt a significant blow to the Islamic republic's air defences, which were repeatedly activated in the capital Tehran and across the country throughout the war. "The Zionist enemy sought to destroy Iran's defense capabilities, and some of our defense systems were damaged in that war," army operations chief Mahmoud Mousavi was quoted as saying by the official IRNA news agency. "The damaged defence systems have now been replaced," he added. Iran's air defence network includes systems like the domestically built Bavar-373 and Khordad-15, designed to counter missiles and aircraft. Iran also installed Russia's S-300 air defense systems in 2016. The war with Israel killed more than 1,000 people in Iran, while Iranian fire killed at least 28 people in Israel, according to authorities in each country. Israel's attacks targeted military infrastructure and nuclear facilities across Iran. On June 22, Israel's ally the United States also carried out unprecedented strikes on Iranian nuclear sites at Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz. The full extent of the damage to Iran's nuclear programme remains unclear. US President Donald Trump has insisted the sites were "completely destroyed", but US media reports have cast doubt on the severity of the damage. On Friday, NBC News, citing a military damage assessment, reported that only one of the three sites was mostly destroyed. A ceasefire between Iran and Israel has been in effect since June 24. After the truce was announced, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu vowed to prevent Iran from rebuilding its nuclear capabilities, raising the prospect of renewed conflict. Earlier in July, Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz said Israel was formulating a plan to "ensure that Iran cannot threaten Israel again." Katz said the military had to maintain its "air superiority over Tehran, the ability to enforce restrictions on Iran and prevent it from rebuilding its capabilities". Follow us on: Facebook Instagram Whatsapp Short link:
