Call to sustain position of milk producers on World Milk Day
The board has said that fair and adequate remuneration for dairy farmers is the only way to secure the future of the European dairy sector in the long-term and to ensure the supply of high-quality milk products to the population.
EMB president Kjartan Poulsen said: 'World Milk Day is an important occasion to recognise the hard work of our dairy farmers and, at the same time, to draw attention to the ongoing challenges in the sector.
'Without the right reforms, the existence of many farms remains under threat. It is high time that politicians create framework conditions that enable cost-covering prices and guarantee that producers are adequately remunerated for their valuable work.'
Milk producers
The EMB sees the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) of the EU as a key instrument for improving the producer position.
Against the background of World Milk Day, the EMB has drawn up reform proposals for the CAP and the Common Market Organisation (CMO), which aim to increase market stability and give farmers a stronger negotiating position.
The EMB's current reform proposals for the CAP/CMO include:
Integration of crisis instruments that have a preventive effect and are triggered early in the event of market imbalances. The aim is to avoid extreme price fluctuations and losses with instruments like the Market Responsibility Programme;
Strengthening the collective bargaining power of producers by promoting producer organisations with a pooling limit of 30% across the EU. This is intended to enable farmers to achieve fairer prices vis-a-vis the stronger processors and retailers;
Introduction of mandatory criteria – such as the prohibition of prices below costs – for fair trading practices along the value chain. This is intended to prevent unfair competition and the exploitation of market power;
Obligatory contracts with the appropriate clauses to promote fairness between producers and processors;
Integrating processing cooperatives into this market framework – with all its rights and obligations.
'The current discussions about the future direction of the CAP offer a decisive opportunity to set the course for a more resilient and fairer milk market,' Poulsen continued.
'It is of paramount importance that policymakers set a clear focus on empowering producers and are not swayed by other interests. The future of the European dairy sector depends on it.'
The EMB has appealed to policymakers at national and European level to implement these reform proposals in the interest of milk producers.
The board said that this is the only way to achieve the goal of strengthening the producer position along the chain and to ensure the sustainable production of high-quality milk in Europe in the long-term.
World Milk Day
World Milk Day is celebrated each year on June 1 and is about supporting nutrition, health, and economic resilience around the globe.
World Milk Day is described as a movement that highlights milk as a vital, accessible food source that nourishes billions.
Tomorrow (Sunday, June 1) marks the 25th anniversary of World Milk Day, with this year celebrating the power of dairy as a nutrient-rich food and an important part of healthy, sustainable diets.
Along with calcium and protein, milk is rich in iodine and vitamins B2 and B12, while also providing potassium and phosphorus.
Chief executive at the Dairy Council NI, Ian Stevenson commented: 'Milk is a naturally nutrient-rich choice that supports active lifestyles and healthy diets.
'Today, we raise a glass in appreciation of our local dairy farmers and processors and their vital role in producing wholesome, nutritious food for communities here in Northern Ireland and across the world.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
28 minutes ago
- Irish Examiner
Michael Flatley 'intends to seek nominations to run for President', court told
Lord of the Dance star Michael Flatley is moving back to Ireland in the next two weeks as he 'intends to seek nominations to run for President,' a court has been told. An affidavit opened before Ms Justice Eileen Roberts in the Commercial Court on Friday made the assertion, following on from speculation that the Irish-American would contest the upcoming presidential election. Mr Flatley's counsel Ronnie Hudson BL instructed by Maxwell Mooney solicitor introduced the document to court as part of a case where a building contractor and insurance companies involved in carrying out works at the Flatley Castlehyde mansion in Cork are seeking to have the star put up €2.8m security for costs before his action against them begins. A security for costs application is usually made when the defendants in the case apply to the court seeking to have their costs covered if they end up successfully defending the main proceedings. It is often sought when litigants are not resident in the EU. Mr Hudson told the court that Mr Flatley's intention to return to live in Ireland in the coming days represented a 'material change of circumstances' which must be considered by Ms Justice Roberts in her ruling on the security for costs application. Andrew Fitzpatrick SC, representing the underwriting and insurance defendants in the case, objected to the affidavit being admitted to court as the judge had already reserved judgement on the application. He also said it was 'hearsay', given that the affidavit was signed by Mr Flatley's solicitor Mr Mooney rather than the man himself. Counsel for building contractor Austin Newport, Stephen Dowling SC, meanwhile said that there were no details of where he would be living in Ireland and did not meet the threshold to be admitted. Ms Justice Roberts determined that the affidavit would be taken into account. 'In fairness to Mr Flatley, I will allow the affidavit to be admitted,' she said. 'I will treat it then with the weight, if any, I give to it.' The judge also indicated that she had already begun work on the judgement and it would be delivered in a 'reasonably short period'. Mr Flatley's side has previously described the security of costs application as 'a final effort to derail my claim'. Mr Hudson said Mr Flatley is an Irish citizen and has assets in this jurisdiction and he contended it could be 'a form of discrimination' if the court were to make an order for security of costs against him. In the main proceedings, the Riverdance performer claims he and his family had to vacate the Castlehyde period property in October 2023 after alleged toxic chemical residue was detected during routine maintenance. Mr Flatley is suing Austin Newport Group Ltd, the main contractor and insurance underwriters — MS Amlin Underwriting Ltd, AXA XL Underwriting Agencies LTD and Hamilton Managing Agency Limited along with Lloyds Insurance Company. All of the allegations are denied. The court has previously heard the dancing star, who recently directed and starred in his own self-financed action film Blackbird, had been intending to move back to Ireland. Last weekend, he told Brendan O'Connor on RTÉ Radio One that he was not ruling out a bid for presidency to succeed Michael D Higgins in this autumn's election. For Mr Flatley to get onto the ballot, he would need the backing of either 20 members of the Oireachtas or four local authorities. So far, the only candidates to put themselves in the race are independent TD Catherine Connolly and Fine Gael's Mairead McGuinness. Conor McGregor has also repeatedly posted on social media that he too wants to be the next president of Ireland. The election must take place before 11 November, when President Higgins' term ends.
Irish Post
an hour ago
- Irish Post
US-Japan trade deal signals risk for Ireland and the EU
THE United States' recent trade deal with Japan may be seen as a political success in Washington, but for Ireland and the EU, it's a major shift in global trade dynamics. The agreement introduces a 15% tariff on Japanese exports to the US, replacing a previously threatened 25% tariff on cars. While that appears to offer Japan temporary relief, it still marks a harsh rollback of more than a decade of progress on global trade cooperation. For Ireland, a small, open economy heavily dependent on international trade, especially with America, the implications are serious. The food and drink sectors are especially at risk. Exports like butter and whiskey could become less competitive if slapped with steep US tariffs, especially when compared to similar products from Northern Ireland or Britain, which already secured a more lenient 10% tariff arrangement in an earlier deal. Though far from perfect, that deal now appears favourable compared to what the EU may soon face. The European Commission is currently in negotiations with Washington, aiming to avoid a looming 30% tariff the U.S. has threatened to impose from August 1. In response, the EU has approved a list of countermeasures worth €93 billion in tariffs on US goods, set to take effect on August 7 if no deal is reached. Ireland's exposure is particularly high. The Irish government initially flagged €12 billion of imports at risk from inclusion in the EU's countermeasure list. Following negotiations, this has been trimmed by €2.4 billion, with nearly €1 billion worth of sensitive Irish imports, like pharmaceutical components, being removed. Thirty specific agri-food products valued at €33 million, including purebred horses, sugar, molasses and some chocolate products, were successfully excluded following intensive lobbying. Still, this relief is partial at best. Ireland's pharmaceutical sector, one of its most critical exports to the US, remains vulnerable. President Trump's vocal focus on drug pricing seems to suggest that pharmaceuticals will become tariff targets. Additionally, Japan's concession to accept US vehicle safety standards sets a worrying precedent. It hands regulatory influence to Washington and pressures Europe to follow suit, potentially undermining EU regulatory sovereignty. The investment dimension of the US-Japan deal adds to EU concern. The $550 billion in Japanese capital earmarked for US infrastructure represents a massive diversion of resources. If similar terms were demanded of the EU, Ireland could be forced to channel investment into projects that prioritise US interests. The EU's previous lack of a unified response to US tariffs has only emboldened the current American administration. When the US imposed a blanket 10% tariff on numerous countries earlier this year, the EU's limited and fragmented reaction did little to deter further measures. As a result, the US continues to apply pressure on major economies individually, knowing few are willing to risk short-term economic pain in defence of long-term principles. Simon Harris, Ireland's Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade, emphasised that while Ireland supports reaching a negotiated deal, it is also crucial to prepare credible countermeasures to protect EU interests. 'This is not escalatory,' Harris noted. 'It's a continuation of our calm, measured preparation.' However, the risks remain severe. Seamus Coffey, chairperson of the Irish Fiscal Advisory Council, has warned of major uncertainty in the lead-up to the tariff deadline. He noted that Irish companies, especially pharmaceuticals, are pausing investments, in anticipation of potential disruption. While some diversification of supply chains is underway, the short timeframe limits effective risk mitigation. Ireland's limited leverage in global trade negotiations, coupled with its deep reliance on US trade, makes it particularly susceptible to shifting tides.
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Taoiseach ‘hopeful' EU-US tariff deal will be done this weekend
A preliminary deal on trade tariffs between the European Union and the United States would 'hopefully be signed off before the weekend is over,' Taoiseach Micheál Martin has said. EU negotiators are trying to land a deal that would avert higher rates of import duties which US president Donald Trump has threatened on goods coming from Europe. Speaking on Friday, Mr Martin said it would be 'foolish' to put any bet on when a deal would be signed off by the EU and Mr Trump. Work was continuing to get a 'framework agreement' over the line, which would comprise the broad outline of a tariff deal, allowing further details to be worked out later. READ MORE [ What would a 15% tariff deal mean for Ireland? Opens in new window ] 'We're certain there will be detailed discussions afterwards in respect of line by line, in terms of many, many products. And so this will continue notwithstanding a framework agreement, [which] hopefully will be signed off before the weekend is over,' he said. 'Part of the reason for the intensity of those negotiations is to try and tie up as much as we can,' he said. The current outline of a draft agreement would see the EU accept blanket tariffs of 15 per cent on future trade with the US, up from a 10 per cent levy Mr Trump introduced in early April. The European Commission, the EU's executive arm leading the negotiations, wants any future tariffs on pharmaceuticals to be capped at that level. The EU is also seeking to have higher 25 per cent tariffs the US has put on EU-made cars to be reduced to that rate. National governments appear willing to stomach an across-the-board tariff of 15 per cent, to end the uncertainty Mr Trump's threats of potentially much higher levies has caused the European economy, or an escalating trade war if no deal is agreed. 'There has been a degree of volatility in all of this, which has been unsettling for investment and that's a concern I have,' Mr Martin said. The EU wanted to secure some 'certainty' around US tariffs targeting specific sectors, outside of the blanket rate, he said. The EU was not anxious to have to turn to possible retaliation, such as counter-tariffs on US products, he said. Speaking in Luxembourg, the Fianna Fáil leader said he hoped 'sense will prevail' in the ongoing negotiations concerning pharmaceutical products. The sector has avoided US tariffs to date, though Mr Trump previously promised they are coming in a bid to force companies to relocate manufacturing capacity and jobs to the US. Getting a deal on pharma products was 'of equal significance' to the US side, he said. Any 'significant disruption' of the heavily intertwined pharma supply chains would be damaging to the US, and potentially lead to shortages of medicines, Mr Martin said. Access to the European market had been of huge benefit to US pharma multinationals, he said. 'It's a two-way street ... unilateral action on the part of one [side] could ultimately damage the companies themselves and patients and consumers,' he said. Europe had to look at what it could do to increase trade within the bloc, to compensate for the knock-on impact of US tariffs on transatlantic trade, he said.
