logo
Stray dogs and public safety: A humane reform rooted in progress

Stray dogs and public safety: A humane reform rooted in progress

Time of India6 days ago
India's approach to managing its stray dog population is evolving. With an estimated 20 million free-roaming dogs, the challenge is real—but so is the progress. The Supreme Court's recent suo motu cognizance of the issue, triggered by recent media reports, has reignited public discourse.
But this moment need not spiral into fear-driven policy. Instead, it can be a pivot toward scaling humane, evidence-based solutions already showing results.
The ABC Rules are Humane, Legal, and Working in Pockets: The Animal Birth Control (ABC) Rules, 2023 mandate sterilisation, vaccination, and release of stray dogs back to their territories. This model is not just compassionate—it's scientifically validated and increasingly effective where implemented well.
In Mumbai, over 4.3 lakh dogs have been sterilised. The BMC claims a reduction in stray population from 95,172 to 90,757.
In Bengaluru, a study showed a 10% reduction in stray dog population, with a 20% increase in neutering rates.
In Nagpur, nearly 40,000 dogs were sterilised in just 21 months, averaging 64 procedures per day.
These figures show that ABC works when done right—with trained personnel, infrastructure, and community support.
Why culling is a step backward: calls for culling often arise from frustration, but evidence shows it's counterproductive:
Removing dogs creates a vacuum effect, inviting unvaccinated, unsterilised dogs to migrate in.
Sterilised dogs guard their territory, preventing new entrants and stabilizing populations.
Rabies transmission is reduced when vaccinated dogs remain in their habitat.
India's legal framework already permits euthanasia for terminally ill or dangerous dogs, but expanding this definition risks legal misuse and ethical violations.
Implementation gaps still exist: Despite success stories, challenges remain:
Many municipalities lack trained staff and shelter infrastructure.
Funding for ABC programs has declined since 2021.
In slum areas, sterilisation efforts are often under-addressed, skewing data and outcomes.
But these are fixable problems, not reasons to abandon humane policy.
Global models reinforce India's path: Countries like Thailand, Bhutan, and the Netherlands have shown that neuter-vaccinate-return strategies can eliminate rabies and reduce stray populations—without culling.
Bhutan achieved 100% street dog sterilisation and vaccination in 14 years.
The Netherlands eliminated stray dogs through government-funded CNVR programs, strict anti-abandonment laws, and adoption incentives.
India's ABC rules align with these models—it's time to scale them, not sideline them.
A call for humane acceleration: The Supreme Court's intervention should be a catalyst for reform, not regression. A humane roadmap includes:
Mobile sterilisation units in high-incidence zones
Mandatory dog census and vaccination audits
Public education to reduce fear and promote coexistence
Community adoption and feeding protocols
Reinstated central funding and performance-linked grants
Reframing the Narrative: This isn't a runaway crisis—it's a governance challenge with proven solutions. Let's shift the conversation from fear to fact-based optimism, and from conflict to compassionate reform.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Foul play' alleged over solo BMC MRI tenders
‘Foul play' alleged over solo BMC MRI tenders

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

‘Foul play' alleged over solo BMC MRI tenders

Mumbai: In several tenders over the last couple of years, only one MRI manufacturer bid to supply machines for all four BMC-run medical college hospitals. Insiders now allege that the tender's terms were manipulated to favour this manufacturer, effectively blocking other companies from competing. A technical team comprising heads of radiology departments is responsible for deciding the required specifications. "These specifications heavily favour Siemens in the bidding process over a number of other companies. At this point, there needs to be a departmental enquiry into it after many years of delay, which impacted patient care," said a senior radiologist at one of the BMC hospitals. For instance, the tender specifies certain machine requirements, like 64 channels (which receive signals from the body), a gradient strength of 62 to 200 millitesla per meter (which affects image resolution and scan speed), and a 3-tesla rating. These conditions exclude several other companies like Philips, which offers only 32 channels, and GE Healthcare, which does not feature high shimmering -- mentioned as a requirement in minutes of the health department's meeting -- but provides "auto shimmering" instead. You Can Also Check: Mumbai AQI | Weather in Mumbai | Bank Holidays in Mumbai | Public Holidays in Mumbai Moreover, the radiologist said that when another potential bidder, United Imaging, entered the picture, a new country-specific clause was introduced to disqualify it. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Breakthrough "Skinny Pill" Takes Australia By Storm Her Life & Health Learn More Undo The tender floated this time states: "Magnet should be manufactured in the USA, Europe, or Japan." United Imaging manufactures this component in China. A Siemens Healthineers spokesperson said, "The tender's technical committee has engaged in multiple rounds of discussions with all prospective bidders. It is important to note that the specifications outlined in the tender are not unique to Siemens Healthineers. In fact, such units with comparable specifications have been procured by several government institutions across India." DMC (CPD) Sandhya Nandedkar said, "We extended it eight times because there was only a single bidder. Earlier tenders were cancelled due to higher quoted rates. The committee has been insisting that these requirements are necessary." One of the top former BMC officials said an earlier tender was set aside due to the lack of multi-bidder specifications. "It was turning out to be a more expensive endeavour as well. If the experts specifically wanted that particular machine for technical reasons, they could have opted for proprietary procurement instead of going through the farce of a tender process," said the official. Dr Neelam Andrade, Director of BMC Hospitals, said, "It was conveyed to all the HoDs that the terms should be such that multiple bidders can participate. We do not know why other companies chose not to come forward." A radiology HoD from one of the hospitals said, "We want to buy a high-end MRI for our poor patients, and we design the specifications accordingly. It's not that we want to favour Siemens; it's not our fault that no one else bids." A representative from one of the companies that participated in BMC's recent pre-bid meeting said, "One can bid only if there's a chance of winning. If the terms and conditions make it clear we won't win, we don't invest in the fees and earnest money deposits." BMC's AMC (health) Vipin Sharma and DMC (health) Sharad Ughade did not respond to queries till press time. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !

Activists and experts hail Supreme Court focus on mental health
Activists and experts hail Supreme Court focus on mental health

Time of India

time3 hours ago

  • Time of India

Activists and experts hail Supreme Court focus on mental health

Kolkata: Mental health activists and experts have welcomed the Supreme Court's explicit recognition of mental health as an integral part of the constitutional Right to Life under Article 21. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now They say this broadens the interpretation of the right to life to include psychological well-being, not just physical survival. The SC recognised the right to mental health as an integral component of the right to life under Article 21 while laying down binding guidelines for educational institutions and coaching centres across India. The observation was made in a case related to the death of a 17-year-old student undergoing coaching for the NEET examination. The apex court set aside orders of the Andhra Pradesh HC to allow transfer of the investigation into the death under suspicious circumstances to CBI. Mental health activist Ratnaboli Ray, who is the founder of Anjali, a rights-based organisation, said the order moves mental health from the realm of welfare or charity into the domain of legal and constitutional rights. "This means that the state and institutions are no longer simply encouraged but obligated to ensure mental health protections as part of their duty under the Constitution," said Ray, a psychologist by training. Ray also pointed out that by issuing guidelines for students' welfare in the context of mental health, the court has acknowledged the growing mental health crisis in educational spaces — ranging from anxiety and depression to suicide. This makes schools and universities potentially accountable for creating psychologically safe environments. Advocate Arush Sengupta said embedding mental health under Article 21 makes it justiciable. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now "If someone's right to mental well-being is violated, they can now take legal recourse based on constitutional grounds. This also strengthens the implementation of the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017, which already defines access to mental health services as a right, but until now lacked the direct constitutional force to ensure consistent and widespread enforcement," he said. Psychiatrist Aniruddha Deb felt the ruling has the potential to transform institutional accountability, public funding, and societal attitudes in India. "This is a landmark judgment. Till now, mental illness was perceived as a disability, a dysfunction and looked down upon. People with mental illness were relegated to second-class citizens. They were even denied right to vote. Being of unsound mind precluded them from holding any office. All that will change now," said Deb. Ray added that the moment demands bold, rights-affirming governance, not piecemeal or tokenistic gestures. "The judiciary has spoken. It is now the executive's responsibility to institutionalise this vision into everyday governance so that mental health is not only constitutionally protected, but meaningfully lived," she added.

Activists and experts hail Supreme Court verdict on mental health
Activists and experts hail Supreme Court verdict on mental health

Time of India

time3 hours ago

  • Time of India

Activists and experts hail Supreme Court verdict on mental health

1 2 Kolkata: Mental health activists and experts have welcomed the Supreme Court's explicit recognition of mental health as an integral part of the constitutional Right to Life under Article 21. They say this broadens the interpretation of the right to life to include psychological well-being, not just physical survival. The SC recognised the right to mental health as an integral component of the right to life under Article 21 while laying down binding guidelines for educational institutions and coaching centres across India. The observation was made in a case related to the death of a 17-year-old student undergoing coaching for the NEET examination. The apex court set aside orders of the Andhra Pradesh HC to allow transfer of the investigation into the death under suspicious circumstances to CBI. Mental health activist Ratnaboli Ray, who is the founder of Anjali, a rights-based organisation, said the order moves mental health from the realm of welfare or charity into the domain of legal and constitutional rights. "This means that the state and institutions are no longer simply encouraged but obligated to ensure mental health protections as part of their duty under the Constitution," said Ray, a psychologist by training. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like This Could Be the Best Time to Trade Gold in 5 Years IC Markets Learn More Undo You Can Also Check: Kolkata AQI | Weather in Kolkata | Bank Holidays in Kolkata | Public Holidays in Kolkata Ray also pointed out that by issuing guidelines for students' welfare in the context of mental health, the court has acknowledged the growing mental health crisis in educational spaces — ranging from anxiety and depression to suicide. This makes schools and universities potentially accountable for creating psychologically safe environments. Advocate Arush Sengupta said embedding mental health under Article 21 makes it justiciable. "If someone's right to mental well-being is violated, they can now take legal recourse based on constitutional grounds. This also strengthens the implementation of the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017, which already defines access to mental health services as a right, but until now lacked the direct constitutional force to ensure consistent and widespread enforcement," he said. Psychiatrist Aniruddha Deb felt the ruling has the potential to transform institutional accountability, public funding, and societal attitudes in India. "This is a landmark judgment. Till now, mental illness was perceived as a disability, a dysfunction and looked down upon. People with mental illness were relegated to second-class citizens. They were even denied right to vote. Being of unsound mind precluded them from holding any office. All that will change now," said Deb. Ray added that the moment demands bold, rights-affirming governance, not piecemeal or tokenistic gestures. "The judiciary has spoken. It is now the executive's responsibility to institutionalise this vision into everyday governance so that mental health is not only constitutionally protected, but meaningfully lived," she added. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store