Norwegian foreign minister says EU more important than ever for Norway
'A new multipolar world order — not to say disorder — is taking shape. This means that our cooperation and community with the EU, and the values we share, are becoming even more important than before,' he said.
'Security, economy and fundamental values are the foremost pillars of the European community of which Norway is a part. The Labour Party government will work to strengthen this community along all three pillars,' he added.
While not an EU member, Norway is tied to the bloc through the European Economic Area (EEA) Agreement. The EEA covers all EU countries plus non-members Iceland, Liechtenstein, and Norway.
READ ALSO:
Why Norway isn't a member of the European Union
Eurosceptics in Norway argue that the EEA Agreement means Norway doesn't have a say in EU directives, which Norway must implement and follow.
Earlier this year, the
Centre Party left the current minority government
due to a row over EU energy directives, leaving the Labour Party alone in government until general elections in September.
Eide also warned parties and politicians who have told voters they would try to pull Norway out of the EEA or negotiate the existing agreement in order to gain votes that this wasn't a realistic prospect.
Advertisement
'I hear those who advocate something less binding than the agreement we have today. It is fine to want something less binding than the EEA. However, I believe that critics of the agreement owe it to voters to make them aware that 'something less than the EEA' also means fewer opportunities for Norwegian companies, workers and consumers in Europe,' he said.
'Let me be clear. Talking about a renegotiation of the EEA Agreement, as some do, is tempting with a solution that does not exist,' he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Local Norway
2 days ago
- Local Norway
Naturalisation becomes 'fragile' as European countries make moves to strip citizenship
The first Global State of Citizenship report, by the Global Citizenship Observatory (GLOBALCIT) at the European University Institute (EUI) in Florence, analysed citizenship laws in 191 countries in 2024. Researchers found that "with the growing number of armed conflicts and incidence of terrorism worldwide, many countries have introduced provisions for withdrawing the citizenship of a person on the basis of national security grounds.' Over a third of countries, including many in Europe, 'can now strip a person of their citizenship when their actions are seen as disloyal or threatening to state security,' the report said. The trend has been gaining pace in recent years. The move to make it easier to take away someone's newly acquired nationality is linked to an 'increasing securitisation of citizenship' since the 2001 September 11th terror attacks in the US. Between 2000 and 2020, 18 European countries put in place measures to deprive individuals of their citizenship for reasons of national security or counter-terrorism. Before 2001, these measures were 'virtually absent'. Recently, the Swedish government commissioned an inquiry on the revocation of citizenship from individuals threatening national security . Germany's coalition parties discussed a similar policy for those found to be 'supporters of terrorism, antisemites, and extremists'. Hungary has also amended the constitution to allow the temporary suspension of citizenship for national security reasons. The Middle East and North Africa are other regions where these policies have expanded, the report said. Advertisement Ways to strip citizenship Four ways were identified in the report for when individuals can be stripped of their citizenship on security grounds. Nearly 80 per cent of countries have rules covering at least one of these situations. In 132 countries around the world, and two thirds of European states, citizenship can be removed for acts that threaten national security, such as treason, espionage, trying to overthrow a government or terrorism. These laws exist in Belgium, Estonia, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Turkey and the UK. In 89 countries, however, this rule concerns only people who were naturalised, not those who acquired citizenship by birth. Another reason that can lead to the stripping of citizenship is when naturalised individuals have committed serious criminal offences, which typically involves having been sentenced to imprisonment for a certain period. These rules exist in 79 countries but only a few in Europe. In 70 countries, citizenship can be removed if someone was found to have served in a foreign army and in 18 countries this measure concerns only people who acquired citizenship by naturalisation. In Europe, 40 percent of countries – including France, Germany, Greece, the Netherlands, Estonia, Turkey, Belarus and Bosnia Herzegovina – can remove citizenship under certain conditions if naturalised nationals were found to have served in a foreign army. Latvia, one of the countries that can revoke citizenship for such reasons, changed the law in 2022 to allow its citizens to work with the Ukrainian military forces. Citizenship can also be removed for providing non-military services to another state, such as being elected in a public office, working for certain agencies or even taking up a role in the civil service. Such rules exist in 75 countries around the world, including European countries such as France, Greece and Turkey. Advertisement Naturalised citizens more at risk Luuk van der Baaren, co-author of the report, said 'these developments indeed raise an important question as to what extent citizenship is still a secure legal status'. The data also shows that 'a large share of the citizenship stripping provisions are discriminatory in nature, as they only apply to specific groups, particularly naturalised citizens'. This is to prevent a person from becoming stateless, but it means that 'citizens by birth have a secure legal status, while those who acquired citizenship later in life do not,' he added. Losing citizenship may not only affect the individual's security and opportunities for work, but also that of dependants, the report warned. In 40 percent of countries removing someone's citizenship can extend to their children. Other ways of losing citizenship There are other ways, intentional or not, that people can lose their citizenship, according to the report. The most common, is to have it withdrawn because it was acquired in a fraudulent way. Such rules exist in 157 countries. Some 156 states also have rules on how to voluntarily renounce citizenship, usually with provisions to ensure that a person does not end up stateless. In 56 countries, people can lose their citizenship if they acquire another nationality, and in 55 this may occur by simply residing abroad. Under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 'everyone has the right to a nationality', but four million people in the world are stateless 'because their citizenship remains denied or unrecognised,' the report continued. On the other hand, 35 countries do not allow people to renounce citizenship, or they make it impossible in practice. Advertisement Unequal rights The report also looked at ways to acquire citizenship and concluded different countries offered 'highly unequal pathways'. Countries make vastly different demands on applicants when it comes to criteria such as economic self-sufficiency, civic or cultural integration, language or citizenship tests, and renunciation of other citizenships. And on residency requirements, the Americas and Western Europe have the more inclusive measures. Citizenship in European countries is also regulated via the European Convention on Nationality, under which the residence requirement cannot exceed 10 years. But in 15 countries the wait is longer than 10 years: Equatorial Guinea (40 years), United Arab Emirates (30), Bahrain (25), Qatar (25), Bhutan (20), Brunei (20), Eritrea (20), Oman (20), Chad (15), Gambia (15), Nigeria (15), Rwanda (15), Sierra Leone (15), St. Kitts and Nevis (14), and India (11).
Local Norway
6 days ago
- Local Norway
Q&A: What's Norway's stricter language requirement for permanent residency?
This week, the Norwegian government announced changes to the language requirements for foreigners seeking permanent residence permits. While the previous requirement for spoken proficiency at A1 level, applicants must now demonstrate A2-level or higher. 'Foreigners who want a permanent residence permit in Norway should have a certain level of oral Norwegian. Being able to speak and understand the Norwegian language is an important prerequisite for being able to participate in education and work', said Minister of Justice and Public Security Astri Aas-Hansen (Labour Party). The language levels refer to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR). At level A2, individuals can understand simple everyday language, express themselves on personal and basic topics such as family, and manage simple conversations. However, the new requirements include exemptions for those with special circumstances related to health or personal reasons. This particularly applies to adult immigrants with limited or no formal education, elderly people, and individuals with low literacy skills. In addition, the requirements for language and social studies tests will be moved from the Integration Act to the Immigration Act. This could indicate a change to the streamline process, reducing the need for assessments by local municipalities. In 2024, 10,554 individuals were granted permanent residency in Norway . To clarify what the new rules mean in practice, The Local contacted the Norwegian Ministry of Justice and Public Security to help us answer some of the frequently asked questions from applicants: Advertisement What exactly has changed regarding Norwegian language requirements? Under the new rules, applicants for permanent residency must pass an oral Norwegian test at level A2 or higher, replacing the previous A1 requirement. What about the social studies (samfunnskunnskap) requirement? Applicants are still required to pass the social studies test, but they are no longer obligated to submit documentation of having completed a course. The legislation mandates a passed test taken in a language the applicant understands. Who does this affect? The changes apply to people seeking permanent residence aged 18–67, including outside‑EU/EEA. The 18-year age limit is calculated based on the time of application and the 67-year age limit is calculated from the time of the decision (the time the application is decided). Advertisement When do these new rules take effect? The changes were officially announced June 26th, 2025, and apply to applications for a permanent residence permit submitted after September 1st 2025. Are there any exceptions? Yes. Applicants can be exempt from the spoken Norwegian test if they can document special health conditions or personal circumstances beyond their control that make it impossible to pass the A2-level test. This applies especially to adult immigrants with little or no schooling, limited reading and writing skills, or older age. People with learning difficulties, cognitive challenges, or mental health conditions such as neurological disorders, may also qualify for an exemption. Are there still written or reading exams required? No. The requirements to obtain a permanent residence permit are to pass an oral Norwegian language test at level A2 and to pass the social studies test.
Local Norway
26-06-2025
- Local Norway
KEY FACTS: How Norway is cracking down on private kindergarten chains
What's the new law coming into force in July 2025? From July 2025, public subsidies and parental payments received by privately run kindergartens, (known as barnehage in Norwegian ), can only be used to cover costs directly related to approved kindergarten operations and that are "reasonable in scope" for the goods or services being bought. This applies to all costs, including property-related expenses. Greater municipal oversight The new law will also give municipalities additional powers over private kindergarten chains, including: the power to issue local regulations on opening hours, staffing, and requirements for competence and also to set the maximum level of parental payment for a kindergarten place, although these changes will not come into force until August. greater control over the establishment of new kindergartens in their municipality. If companies running kindergartens receive an "establishment approval" from the municipality, they will be able to receive subsidies at an earlier stage. the right to approve any changes to the way private kindergartens operate that significantly deviate from what was promised in their application for establishment approval. This might include changes to approved play and activity space per child, expansion of existing operations, or relocation. Advertisement Tightened financial controls The law brings in stricter rules for transactions with "related parties", to prevent the disguised extraction of profits by those operating chains using their own companies to supply kindergartens at inflated prices. Private kindergartens will also be required to notify both the municipality where they are established and the Directorate of Education if they sell the properties where their kindergartens are housed in order to make it easier to spot misuse of government subsidies. The ruling Labour Party has said it wants to go even further in future and bring in additional restrictions which would make it more difficult for private kindergarten chains to sell off buildings and lease them back, passing the cost on to local municipalities. Advertisement What's the point of the new rules? The rules are intended to reduce the amount of profit that private companies running kindergarten chains can take out of their companies. In December 2020, a government inquiry into private actors in the welfare sector reported that the kindergarten sector had the biggest share of private providers of any of the government funded welfare sectors in Norway. It was also the most profitable sector for private actors. The committee concluded that municipalities have paid out an unnecessary amount of public subsidies to private kindergartens between 2011 and 2018, giving them more funding than was required to provide a high standard of care. "With these regulations, we are preventing the enormous profiteering that should have been stopped many years ago," Norway's education minister, Kari Nessa Nordtun, told the E24 financial newspaper after the law was passed. Advertisement What criticisms do private kindergarten operators have? Karita Bekkemellem, CEO of NHO Geneo, the trade body representing private kindergartens in Norway, has said she is "extremely critical" of the new law. A big criticism is that the good times for private kindergarten operators already came to an end in 2019 when stricter staffing requirements came into force. A report from Statistics Norway found that four out of ten private kindergartens made a loss in 2023, with 99 private kindergartens closing down in 2022 . They argue that the new laws will further dampen activity in a sector that is increasingly struggling, making it harder for parents to find places for their children and harder to provide quality care and education. Bekkemellem told the education sector website Utdanningsnytt that if Labour were to push ahead and ban companies from selling off properties and leasing them back, that would lead to more closures. "If restrictions are placed on this, it will in reality mean that the government is closing down more kindergartens," she said. "Then the municipalities will have to build their own, or buy private kindergartens. The question is how sound that is from a socio-economic perspective."
