
Is this Swedish start-up the answer to Europe's ammunition shortage?
It is now the most commonly used military explosive. And, after years of underinvestment and rise in demand due to Russia's invasion of Ukraine, in short supply in Europe.
Sovereign defence is a hot topic right now, with the EU committing billions of euros in a bid to increase the bloc's military capacity.
Some research suggests Russian ammunition production capabilities outweigh Europe's 4:1, though others think it could be as much as 6:1, and although Europe is home to some ammunition production giants such as Rheinmetall, BAE and KNDS, they don't produce their own TNT.
In this episode of The Big Question, Joakim Sjöblom, CEO and co-founder of Sweden Ballistics (SWEBAL), sat down with Euronews' Mared Gwyn Jones to discuss increasing Europe's TNT production capacity, along with the economic and security benefits.
Does Europe produce any TNT?
There is currently one TNT producer in Europe, which is Nitro-Chem based in Poland, and much of their product is exported away from the EU. In April 2025, Nitro-Chem signed a $310 million (€269m) deal to supply 18,000 tonnes of TNT over a 3 year period, destined for the US military.
It's estimated that Russia has an annual resource of 4.5-5 million artillery shells per year–with around 2M coming from allies North Korea. Europe's output was roughly estimated at 600,000 shells in 2023 and working together with the US, the 2024 output was estimated at 1.2million shells. The NATO deterrence philosophy is linked to the idea that the likelihood of conflict is significantly reduced if both parties are equally armed. There's around 10kg of TNT in every shell. In order to produce a comparable amount to Russia, Europe would therefore need a supply of roughly 50,000 tonnes of TNT.
While Nitro-Chem produces a good amount of TNT for Europe, supplies aren't currently sufficient, and the bloc relies heavily on Asian producers. Joakim fears the consequences of relying on external producers and only one local producer.
'If we go back to the COVID pandemic, we saw that the UK was producing vaccines but they were applying an export ban to it,' he recalls.
'If something were to happen in Poland, I am very certain there would be an export ban on TNT. Same goes for the Asian country that is currently exporting TNT. If there's a conflict in their proximity, there will be an export ban.'
China is one of the world's largest producers of TNT, although NATO countries exclude the country from their supply chains.
Increasing TNT production in Europe
Joakim's company SWEBAL is bringing TNT production back to Sweden and aims to be producing 4,500 tonnes per year of TNT at full capacity, enough for 400-450,000 shells by 2027. Whilst this isn't enough to plug Europe's shortfall, Joakim described it as a 'significant contribution' nevertheless.
'So Sweden used to have TNT manufacturing until 1998,' Joakim explained.
'But during this time when there was a lot of demilitarisation, you could refurbish TNT from the shells that you were demilitarising and the mining industry could get TNT almost for nothing. So there was no commercial incentive to run a TNT manufacturing plant in the 90s.'
'And now we're paying the debt for that,' he added. 'So we are actually building our plant 30 minutes from the old plant in Sweden and we're also building just three kilometres from the Alfred Nobel Dynamite factory, so we're building on very historical ground.'
With the right planning, Joakim is confident the growing industry could not only increase the bloc's security, it could provide economic benefits too.
'European member states are spending €200 billion every year on defence material. More than 60% of that is purchased from American producers.
'If those components were to be manufactured in the EU, we would create more than 10 million jobs,' he added.
SWEBAL is aiming for all of the machinery, materials and production in their supply chain to be sourced within a 550km radius. Not only is this good for the local economy, it helps to reduce lead time. Asian imports currently take over two months to arrive, as shipping is redirected around the Horn of Africa to avoid the Suez Canal.
Building a European defence industry
But while SWEBAL invests in scaling up production, is there significant funding for the European explosives industry?
The EU's ReArm Europe 2030 plan could release up to €800 billion over the next four years, which includes a €150 billion loan instrument called SAFE (Security Action for Europe) to help member states prioritise homegrown companies.
However, Joakim said procurement orders are not coming in from armed forces and member states as quickly as they are being asked to scale up.
'The risk profile is suboptimal right now. The industry needs to carry a lot of risk, which is a benefit as a new player in the industry, because we don't have the same shareholders to cater for and we don't have the same stock price that we consider on a quarterly basis,' he told The Big Question.
'My job here is to make sure that we prevent a future conflict, and making short-term profit is not high on my agenda.'
Joakim also highlighted another limiting factor for the industry in Europe.
'One of the biggest risks that I see in the European military is that we are not harmonised. So intercompatibility: the tanks of this country should be compatible with ammunition from another country.'
'And in order to achieve that, the market also needs to evolve… To use a famous quote, 'you either have an army or you have another country's army in your country'. So I think the price we pay if we don't do it is going to be even higher.'
The Big Question is a series from Euronews Business where we sit down with industry leaders and experts to discuss some of the most important topics on today's agenda.
Watch the video above to see the full discussion on European TNT production.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
Dutch group sues FIFA over transfer regulations after Diarra ruling
A Dutch foundation representing footballers has launched a class action lawsuit against FIFA and five football associations, alleging that transfer regulations unlawfully reduced players' earnings for over two decades. Justice for Players, the group behind the legal challenge, announced on Monday that professional male and female footballers who played for clubs within the European Union or the United Kingdom since 2002 are eligible to join the lawsuit. The action targets FIFA alongside the football federations of the Netherlands, France, Germany, Belgium and Denmark. According to the foundation, FIFA's rules on contract terminations and player transfers violated EU laws on competition and free movement of labour, a claim strengthened by a ruling from the European Court of Justice (ECJ) last year. "Preliminary estimates indicate that the number of affected footballers may comprise approximately 100,000 players," the foundation said in a statement. 'All professional football players have lost a significant amount of earnings due to the unlawful FIFA regulations," its Chair Lucia Melcherts added. "The past and even current system unduly favours FIFA who has far too much unilateral power. In any other profession, people are allowed to change jobs voluntarily," she explained. The legal case is rooted in the ECJ's ruling in the case of former Real Madrid, Arsenal and Chelsea player, Lassana Diarra, who joined Lokomotiv Moscow in 2013 before terminating his contract early due to alleged wage disputes. FIFA and the Court of Arbitration for Sport sided with the club and ordered Diarra to pay €10.5 million in compensation. Diarra argued that FIFA's rules had made it difficult for him to find a new club, as any new employer would have been liable for the fee. The ECJ ruled that such regulations contradicted EU competition laws. Some commentators have compared the judgment to the Jean-Marc Bosman ruling of 1995, which ended transfer fees for players whose contracts ended in the EU. The Diarra ruling has not yet led to systemic changes in the global football transfer market, which is worth more than €8.6 billion annually. Justice for Players cited economic analysis from consulting firm Compass Lexecon, which estimates that affected players earned on average 8% less over the course of their careers due to the contested regulations.


Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
Ukraine strikes five Russian fighter jets at annexed Crimea airfield
Five Russian fighter jets have been hit in an overnight drone attack by Ukraine's security service at an airfield in Saky in Russia-annexed Crimea. SBU stated that its Special Operations Centre "A" mission's drones destroyed one SU-30SM aircraft, damaged another and hit three Su-24s while also striking the aviation weapons depot. "The successful special operation carried out by the SBU in Saky marks another step toward weakening the enemy's capacity to wage its war of aggression against Ukraine," security service said. Su-30SM is a twin-engine, two-seat multirole fighter aircraft developed by Russia, with production beginning in the early 2010s. This fighter jet is priced between €30 and €43 million. The Su-24 is a strike bomber developed by the Soviet Union, with production starting in the early 1970s. The Saky airbase plays a critical role in Russia's military operations in the Black Sea and its regular attacks on Ukraine, as well as patrolling, radar surveillance, target guidance and escorting long-range aircraft. Kyiv has heavily degraded the Russian Black Sea Fleet and Moscow's military capabilities in the area. Ukrainian drones destroyed several Russian vessels, including the Caesar Kunikov landing ship, the Sergei Kotov patrol ship and the Ivanovets missile corvette, forcing Moscow to relocate its ships away from Crimea. Ukraine has also recently intensified its efforts in targeting Russian airfields and warplanes used to regularly bomb Ukraine. On 1 June Ukraine carried out an unprecedented Operation Spiderweb. In a mass drone attack, Kyiv targeted four Russian air bases in the deep rear of Russia. During the attack, Ukrainian forces reportedly damaged 41 aircraft, using drones concealed in trucks at multiple locations across Russia.

LeMonde
3 hours ago
- LeMonde
Trial begins for suspects in Moscow concert hall attack that killed 149
Nineteen people went on trial in Moscow on Monday, August 4 over an attack on a city concert hall that killed 149 people in one of the deadliest strikes in Russia. Armed men stormed the Crocus City Hall on the outskirts of Moscow on March 22, 2024, opening fire and then setting the building alight, injuring hundreds of people. The Islamic State (IS) group claimed responsibility. The four suspected attackers, all from Tajikistan – an ex-Soviet republic in central Asia – and another 15 people accused of being accomplices have gone on trial. An AFP reporter at the courtroom before saw some of the defendants in glass cages, their hands cuffed behind their backs. Around 30 survivors were also present. One of them, Tatiana Ruzanova, told AFP she came to the court to see the defendants. "They all sit quietly with their heads slumped in cages... I didn't see if they felt guilty, they all had their heads down," Ruzanova said. On the night of the attack, she came to the concert of the Russian rock group Piknik with a friend but did not make it inside the hall. "We saw everyone already in the foyer, maybe that saved us. We inhaled smoke. It was a miracle that we didn't make it," Ruzanova said. Closed-door trial Subsequent hearings are to take place on Tuesday and Thursday, according to the court's website. The judge ordered the trial to proceed behind closed doors. The attack shocked Russia, which has been battling Ukraine in a military offensive since February 24, 2022. Despite IS claiming responsibility, Russia implicated Ukraine in the attack, an allegation that Kyiv called baseless and absurd. The massacre ignited a debate about the reintroduction of the death penalty. Some hardline politicians publicly called for a moratorium, observed since 1996, to be lifted. It also sparked a wave of xenophobia against central Asian migrants in Russia. Nearly half of the victims were killed by smoke and carbon monoxide inhalation from the fire that broke out, rather than from gunshot wounds, the state TASS news agency reported on Sunday, citing case materials. Ekaterina Klimenko, who survived the attack, told AFP she hoped for a "fair decision" from the judges. "I still go to concerts, but intuitively I look around with my eyes to see if there is any danger," she said.