Levon Aronian Urges Vladimir Kramnik To Reconcile Amidst Fiery Legal Dispute
The case stems from allegations Kramnik made concerning online cheating in chess, which triggered significant backlash and raised questions about the handling of such accusations within the chess world.
Addressing Kramnik directly in a post on X (formerly Twitter), Aronian began: 'Dear VBKramnik, Forgive me for addressing you publicly, but I feel that the chess world and the new generation need to know about who you are—and I want you to remember it as well."
Aronian's message served as both a personal reflection and a public call for healing. He spoke of his long-standing admiration for Kramnik, whom he referred to as one of his 'chess parents," acknowledging the Russian legend's profound influence on his development as a player.
'My dear friend, I want to share something I feel that I haven't yet shared with you… The last few years after you retired, I, to my surprise, saw a different Vlad that I never knew."
Describing Kramnik as a visionary who transformed the game, Aronian urged him to reconsider his current path.
'I know you as the biggest revolutionary when it comes to chess," he wrote. 'You challenged every single dogma and proved that you understand the core of chess like nobody before or after you. I ask you, as a friend who has always been open and honest to you, please, challenge your convictions."
Background: A Divisive Accusation
The controversy began earlier this year when Kramnik suggested, without hard evidence, that David Navara may have cheated during online games. In response, Navara published a heartfelt letter detailing the emotional toll the accusation had taken on his mental health. Rather than retract the allegation, Kramnik demanded legal redress or silence—ultimately opting to pursue legal action.
'We Are a Family"
Aronian's message seeks to de-escalate the situation and promote unity in the chess world.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
17 hours ago
- Indian Express
‘I'll take LEGAL ACTION against EVERY Slanderer': Kramnik escalates chess feud after Aronian's emotional appeal
After Levon Aronian's emotional open letter urging Vladimir Kramnik to seek reconciliation through 'unity and proper, unbiased analysis,' the Russian chess legend has issued a fiery response with doubling down on his legal battles and condemning the chess world's 'hypocrisy.' The 14th World Chess Champion, whom Aronian considers one of his 'chess parents,' launched a scathing critique: 'The modern chess world is mired in hypocrisy, duplicity, and has lost the most basic moral principles. In fact, we could even remove the word 'chess' from that sentence…,' said Kramnik. Kramnik's stance comes amid his ongoing defamation lawsuit against Chessdom, and GM David Navara. This legal offensive directly contradicts Aronian's plea ('We are a family; we can't keep suing over questionable online analyses'), with Kramnik saying, 'I will take LEGAL ACTION against EVERY slanderer. I'll make them answer for their words and deeds if they refuse to understand any other language.' The former world champion framed his actions as self-defence, citing decades of enduring 'dirty PR attacks and slander' and made clear he no longer intends to show restraint. Allow me to also publicly address you (one of the few people in today's chess world for whom I still have respect and any desire to explain anything) and speak the truth 'to your face,' hoping to 'get through' to you. The modern chess world is mired in hypocrisy, duplicity, and has lost the most basic moral principles. In fact, we could even remove the word 'chess' from that sentence… You know the reason — it's as old as the world itself: 'the metal for which people kill,' and on which a certain well-known structure 'calls the shots' (you're one of the few remaining people in chess who would understand this reference without needing to visit [Chagdzhipiti]). This entire choir of obedient orchestra members is ready to play whatever music they're told at the wave of a certain conductor's baton. That's their bread. 'Love comes and goes, but hunger is constant'… And to drown out the (still troubling to some) inner voice of conscience, they convince themselves and each other of their 'moral righteousness,' ignoring reality and facts. As one of the classics once said, 'The measure of a person is their ability to accept the truth.' Some ancient Greek also said something in his allegory of the cave, by the way. Though that was long ago, and who cares about him with his small number of 'followers' and modest financial success. Unlike, say, Levy Rozman, for example… I've never cared for the opinion of the 'crowd' or the 'in-crowd,' because I know its worth. As do you, for that matter. This 'opinion' is crafted by those who exploit those content to spend their whole lives in a cozy cave, all for financial gain. And without a doubt, they despise and mock their obedient 'flock' among themselves. Reread The Grand Inquisitor — the genius understood everything back then and explained it to us all (for those capable of understanding). You, Levon, understand perfectly well — as do many strong chess players (several of whom I've corresponded with) — the scale of cheating in modern online chess. Левону алаверды :) — Vladimir Kramnik (@VBkramnik) June 28, 2025 If you spent even a fraction of the time I've devoted to collecting and analyzing data, you'd immediately double your estimate. But even without that, you know (let's be honest, just between us) the true nature of some 'online talents' and their so-called successes (I rather liked that euphemism I saw online). In my ethical framework, it's hard to imagine a more despicable theft than, say, dining with a friend, excusing yourself for a moment, and rifling through their coat pocket to steal a couple hundred bucks. Yet this is exactly what's happening in chess regularly. And everyone watches calmly, pretending not to notice. I couldn't care less how the 'chess world' perceives these scoundrels—who, to call a spade a spade, are pickpocketing their colleagues. The 'Daddy' enabling this farce keeps organizing new tournaments, compensating, ensuring no one starves. He's generous, after all—we'll tolerate it. And if push comes to shove, we'll steal from someone's pocket ourselves; nearly everyone does it, so why not? Even the 'boss' turns a blind eye, even encourages it… And if the 'boss' demands it, we'll even sign an angry, dishonest letter. Who dares name the thieves and villains aloud? They're our thieves and villains… Rules are rules: hands off our beloved 'Daddy.' As the classics say, 'Where else would I get my bread?' Forgive me, dear sirs, but my conscience matters more than the 'opinion of the in-crowd.' I won't betray my principles for their favor. Now, irony aside — facts, only facts. For years, nearly the entire chess world has silently watched what is, without exaggeration… The large-scale mockery directed at me only grows more intense with each passing day. It has now tripled in force as 'Daddy,' facing exposure, has sent his entire 'royal army' to defend their generous monarch. Many, like the 'genius of home blitz' who plays for forty hours straight without any decline in quality, are clearly acting with full awareness. Another 'genius,' Daddy's loyal friend and ally, follows the orders of his soul — and that soul commands him to commit any misdeed, insult anyone, and act rudely whenever financial interests are at stake. After all, they're all obedient boys. They'll swallow it… And they'll even praise him publicly, shake his hand, and smile (while secretly despising him, of course). They know Daddy will cut them off from the trough quickly if they step out of line, so 'everything is under control.' Some, like a certain Eastern European 'darling,' might even be sincere. In battle, all means are fair—shameless lying is acceptable, and when caught, playing the innocent victim is the next move. The conductor will support them, the orchestra will chime in as needed — gens una sumus… Slander, vile insults, and blatant, provable lies flow like a river from the sweet lips of Daddy's lackeys and those eager to take their place 'in the sun' — pardon my French. All this happens under the deafening silence of the 'highly moral lambs,' many of whom would even defend the slanderers just to please 'public opinion' — an opinion shaped by influencers sitting on Daddy's payroll. I have too much dignity to play the victim, unlike many in the chess world, even though I have ten times more objective reasons to do so than anyone else. Nor do I have the slightest desire to participate in this fake, hypocritical game where anything goes — slander, lies, stealing from colleagues — as long as you never speak the truth. Daddy doesn't like that… he might punish you. And so, I will continue my efforts to change the chess world in accordance with my conscience and principles, no matter what anyone says. I'm no stranger to being the target of dirty PR attacks, slander, and underhanded tactics – I faced similar smears twenty years ago. That experience gave me some immunity. But from now on, I will take LEGAL ACTION against EVERY slanderer. I'll make them answer for their words and deeds if they refuse to understand any other language. As we've seen in this ongoing saga, polite appeals for people to stop lying and scheming don't work. I will defend myself and my family no matter how many collective 'open letters' they publish in the style of 'haven't read it but condemn it.' The time has come to expose 'Daddy' and his cronies. To rid the chess world of this infection. Judging by everything, it won't be much longer now. With respect and friendly regards, Vladimir (Note: This letter was translated from Russian to English; it might have a few inaccuracies)
News18
17 hours ago
- News18
Levon Aronian Urges Vladimir Kramnik To Reconcile Amidst Fiery Legal Dispute
The case stems from allegations Kramnik made concerning online cheating in chess, which triggered significant backlash and raised questions about the handling of such accusations within the chess world. Addressing Kramnik directly in a post on X (formerly Twitter), Aronian began: 'Dear VBKramnik, Forgive me for addressing you publicly, but I feel that the chess world and the new generation need to know about who you are—and I want you to remember it as well." Aronian's message served as both a personal reflection and a public call for healing. He spoke of his long-standing admiration for Kramnik, whom he referred to as one of his 'chess parents," acknowledging the Russian legend's profound influence on his development as a player. 'My dear friend, I want to share something I feel that I haven't yet shared with you… The last few years after you retired, I, to my surprise, saw a different Vlad that I never knew." Describing Kramnik as a visionary who transformed the game, Aronian urged him to reconsider his current path. 'I know you as the biggest revolutionary when it comes to chess," he wrote. 'You challenged every single dogma and proved that you understand the core of chess like nobody before or after you. I ask you, as a friend who has always been open and honest to you, please, challenge your convictions." Background: A Divisive Accusation The controversy began earlier this year when Kramnik suggested, without hard evidence, that David Navara may have cheated during online games. In response, Navara published a heartfelt letter detailing the emotional toll the accusation had taken on his mental health. Rather than retract the allegation, Kramnik demanded legal redress or silence—ultimately opting to pursue legal action. 'We Are a Family" Aronian's message seeks to de-escalate the situation and promote unity in the chess world.
Time of India
18 hours ago
- Time of India
Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie to fight trial about the French winery for 2 weeks; the ex-couple agrees with the timing
Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie , the Mr. & Mrs. Smith actors, have been at each other's throats for a long time. The infamous rivalry will now transform into a courtroom drama, as the fight for the French winery is going to continue. Pitt vs Jolie trial to begin... According to US Weekly, Brad Pitt revealed in the court documents that the expected time for the jury trial will last for a fortnight, regarding the lawsuit he has against his ex-wife. The court documents also reveal that Jolie has agreed to the given time period. However, the date of the trial is yet to be determined, as several of the motions are yet to be decided. The 'F1' star has anointed this case as 'complicated' as many foreign parties are involved in the matter, and the defence has filed many cross claims in the case. What is the mess around the Miraval winery? The Chateau Miraval winery was bought by Pitt and Jolie when they were still head over heels for each other in 2008. When the disastrous and allegedly abusive private jet incident occurred, the couple decided to part ways but keep the winery to pass it down to their 6 children. However, in 2022, Pitt filed a lawsuit against his ex-wife, claiming that she did not keep her promise of not selling their shares of the winery without informing the other person. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Secure Your Child's Future with Strong English Fluency Planet Spark Learn More Undo He told the court that he had spent a ton of money and effort on turning Miraval into a successful winery. In 2021, Jolie had approached Pitt to tell him that she wanted out of the Miraval shares through a private email, which the 'Fight Club' actor submitted to the court as one of the documents. 'In the past four years I have seen lots of inconsiderate behavior, money spent in ways that I would not have approved, and decisions made that I was not consulted on,' she wrote in the mail, before adding, 'I've been hurt by decisions that have been made that show no interest in sharing the business or changing it fundamentally into something that would be healthier for our children. ' While the ex-couple did work on buying her shares, Jolie claims that Pitt tried to make her sign an NDA, which would cover up years of abuse. Pitt denied the claim, and his lawyer argues that the accusations are a sham in the pretext of her selling the shares to a Russian billionaire, striking a deal with a third party.
