Legendary car brand is axing 'beast' 4x4 in Europe despite increasing popularity
It should help the manufacturer towards meeting its fleet average targets
DEAD END Legendary car brand is axing 'beast' 4×4 in Europe despite increasing popularity
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
A LEGENDARY car brand has axed its "beast" 4x4 in Europe despite its increasing popularity.
This move represents a significant transition for the company.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
1
Legendary car brand is axing 'beast' 4×4 in Europe next year despite its increasing popularity
Credit: YouTube
Ford's Ranger pickup, with the popular 2.0-litre diesel engine is set to be axed as the brand shifts focus to its new plug-in hybrid model.
The 2.0-litre EcoBlue engine, often described as a beast of machine, will be removed from the Ranger in early 2026.
What does this mean?
A Ford spokesperson confirmed the decision to Professional Pickup, leaving the pickup relying on the 3.0-litre V6 EcoBlue engine and the new 2.3-litre EcoBoost plug-in hybrid.
Ford of Europe will continue offering the Ranger with the 3.0-liter EcoBlue V6 turbo diesel.
The Ranger Raptor is presently available with either 2.0-liter EcoBlue or 3.0-liter EcoBoost muscle in this part of the world.
This move represents a significant transition for Ford's best-selling pickup, and shows the brand's confidence in the PHEV as a viable mainstream option for both work and leisure buyers.
The shift to a PHEV powerplant will raise entry costs, with the plug-in model commanding a premium of around £2,500 over the existing 2.0-litre diesel models.
However, Ford is positioning the Ranger PHEV as a highly capable alternative, with up to 27 miles of electric-only driving and a total power output that exceeds the current four-cylinder and even V6 diesel models.
Crucially, the PHEV will retain the Ranger's full one-tonne payload limit and 3,500kg towing capacity — a key requirement for many business users.
Why did they make the decision?
New tax changes have created headaches for company pickup drivers, but Ford's decision to drop the EcoBlue engine is unrelated.
Ford is forced to immediately shut down factories and halt car production as CEO admits 'day to day' struggle for brand
Instead, EU emissions regulations require manufacturers to meet stringent fleet CO₂ averages or face substantial fines.
With diesel variants like the Wildtrak emitting 230g/km, switching to a low-emission PHEV cuts pickup emissions by more than half, to 72g/km, helping the manufacturer towards its fleet average targets.
The Ranger PHEV nets 68 grams of carbon dioxide for every kilometer in WLTP testing, whereas the high-output version of the 2.0-liter EcoBlue is listed with 230 grams.
By comparison, the 3.0-liter EcoBlue and EcoBoost emit 264 and 315 grams, respectively.
Available in single- and bi-turbo flavors, the 2.0-liter EcoBlue made its debut in February 2018 with the unveiling of the original Ranger Raptor.
When is this going to happen?
The 3.0-litre V6 diesel, currently used in high-spec models such as the Wildtrak and Platinum, will continue for the foreseeable future.
With 240hp and 600Nm of torque, it offers strong performance for operators needing extra muscle, and is likely to remain a core part of the range until at least the end of the decade.
The Ranger Plug-in Hybrid arriving with dealers now, with customer deliveries expected to begin shortly.
Production of the 2.0-litre models will cease in early 2026. The Sun has approached Ford for comment.
Meanwhile, a major recall issued by Ford over concerns for passenger safety will also affect its UK models.
The recall was issued earlier this week in the US over a major safety defect that could leave passengers trapped in their cars.
And Britain's best-selling car brands have been revealed with the 'devastatingly handsome' Ford STILL topping the charts – see full list.
Plus, Ford is forced to immediately shut down factories and halt car production as CEO admits 'day to day' struggle for brand.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Auto Blog
3 hours ago
- Auto Blog
I Drove the 2025 Mazda CX90 & 2025 Ford Explorer, Which One is Best? Here's My Brutally Honest Review
View post: I Drove the 2025 Mazda CX-50 & 2025 Subaru Outback, Which One is Best? Here's My Brutally Honest Review So similar, yet so different I was stunned to see that on paper, the Mazda CX-90 and Ford Explorer were so close in so many ways. While they both sport different powertrains and different performance numbers, they are remarkably competitive in terms of measurements, features, utility, and even pricing. Still, they cater to very different audiences and have completely different personalities. 2025 Ford Maverick: 4 reasons to love it, 2 reasons to think twice Watch More After driving both vehicles within days of each other, I came to a simple conclusion: despite their similarities, they are very different vehicles. I was able to take both vehicles on a similar route, which included a 200-mile loop from Torrance to Santa Barbara, CA, in addition to other test drives. Without a doubt, these two vehicles represent some of the best options in this class. The question is: which one is best for you? 2025 Mazda CX-90 ($38,045 – $56,350) 2025 Mazda CX-90 — Source: Mazda The Mazda CX-90 recently replaced the well-regarded CX-9, but make no mistake, this is an entirely different machine. Built on a new rear-wheel-drive-biased platform and powered by a turbocharged inline six-cylinder engine, the CX-90 draws comparisons to BMW in both architecture and driving dynamics. All models come with standard all-wheel drive, and Mazda has crafted a world-class three-row SUV that's balanced, engaging to drive, and impressively upscale. While not without flaws, the CX-90 is a standout effort. Trims & Pricing Mazda offers a wide range of trims across its gas and plug-in hybrid (PHEV) models: Gas models: Select Turbo – $38,045 – $38,045 Preferred Turbo – $41,145 – $41,145 Premium Sport Turbo – $46,600 – $46,600 Turbo Premium Plus – $49,600 – $49,600 Turbo S Premium – $53,150 – $53,150 Turbo S Premium Plus – $56,650 Autoblog Newsletter Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. Sign up or sign in with Google Facebook Microsoft Apple By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. PHEV models: PHEV Preferred – $49,945 – $49,945 PHEV Premium Sport – $54,900 – $54,900 PHEV Premium Plus – $57,950 These prices may seem steep for a Mazda, but the CX-90 genuinely competes with luxury models from Europe and Asia, especially when it comes to refinement, tech, and driving enjoyment. Powertrains There are three distinct powertrains: 3.3L Inline-6 Turbo (Mild Hybrid) 280 hp / 332 lb-ft 24 mpg city / 28 mpg highway 3.3L Inline-6 Turbo S (Mild Hybrid) 340 hp / 369 lb-ft 23 mpg city / 28 mpg highway 2.5L PHEV (Plug-In Hybrid) 323 hp / 369 lb-ft 26 miles of electric-only range 56 MPGe combined / 25 mpg gas-only Max range: ~490 miles While the PHEV offers strong specs on paper, it's the least refined of the bunch. It feels heavier, has jerky transitions between electric and gas power, and doesn't deliver a driving experience that justifies its price premium. With the base Turbo models already returning solid fuel economy and providing a smooth, responsive drive, the PHEV feels like the odd one out, particularly when you consider the minimal real-world fuel savings. 2025 Ford Explorer ($39,755 – $54,260) 2017 Ford Explorer Sport — Source: Ford The 2025 Ford Explorer continues to evolve with improved features, sharp styling, and a broad range of trims that offer something for everyone, from daily family hauling to spirited driving. The tuning of the suspension in every 2025 Explorer I sampled was excellent, with enough comfort for smooth commuting, and just enough firmness for spirited driving. That's especially true with the ST. Trims & Pricing Active – $39,755 ST-Line – $44,615 Platinum – $52,250 ST – $54,260 Rear-wheel drive (RWD) is standard across lower trims, while all-wheel drive (AWD) is optional on upper trims. Powertrains There are two distinct powertrains: 2.3-liter turbocharged inline 4-cylinder 300 hp / 310 lb-ft 21 mpg city / 28 mpg highway 10-speed automatic transmission 3.0-liter twin-turbocharged V6 400 hp / 415 lb-ft EPA-estimated: 18 mpg city / 25 mpg highway (RWD) – AWD is about 1mpg less 10-speed automatic transmission The V6-equipped Explorer ST feels more like a muscular grand tourer than a traditional SUV, with strong acceleration and a refined, aggressive exhaust note. The Platinum variant, meanwhile, provides a more luxurious spin on that performance. To be fair, the 4-cylinder option is suitable for most consumers, but it has to work hard to move that bulk around. That's especially true when passing, under load. Which One Should You Choose? Performance/Towing: Ford Explorer V6/ST – more torque, faster straight-line speed (0–60 ~5.3 s), higher towing at 5,600 lb (the Mazda maxes out at 5,000-lbs). Efficiency & Hybrid Tech: Mazda CX‑90 PHEV – strong fuel numbers and electric range Interior Feel: Mazda CX‑90 – luxury-level materials and design, Ford has a softer ride Space & Functionality: Ford Explorer – more cargo and passenger room Tech & Features: Tie – The Ford Explorer for screen size & BlueCruise, and the Mazda CX‑90 for refined controls & sound Final thoughts Although I naturally gravitate toward the Mazda CX-90 for its beautifully crafted interior, sleek exterior, and overall premium finish, the Ford Explorer would ultimately be my pick. It offers a smoother ride, and its beefy twin-turbo V6 is an absolute powerhouse. As someone who tows frequently, the Explorer's superior tow rating is also a major advantage. That said, both vehicles are excellent choices, and no matter which trim you select from either lineup, you're bound to be rewarded with a capable, comfortable, and feature-rich SUV.
Auto Blog
5 hours ago
- Auto Blog
Ford Should Be Concerned About the Kia EV6's Charging Speed
One of the best EVs in the business The Kia EV6 broke onto the electrified crossover scene for the 2022 model year, and even then, it was one of the top models when it came to range and charging speeds. Since then, Kia's electric crossover has only gotten better, with varying powertrains that can offer extensive ranges or thrilling performance. While competitors, including the Ford Mustang Mach-E, offer more contention these days, few EVs can match the Kia EV6 when it comes to long-range road trips. 2025 Kia EV6 — Source: Kia The 2025 Kia EV6's charging speed makes it a top pick At its peak, the 2025 Kia EV6 boasts a maximum range of 319 miles, which isn't exactly out of the norm these days. In its most range-competitive variation, for example, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers a 320-mile range. By range alone, both electric crossovers are excellent picks for family road trips, at least until you take charging speed into consideration. Note that both models have access to Tesla's Supercharger network, eliminating accessibility as a deciding factor for some drivers. 2025 Ford Mustang Mach-E — Source: Ford The Ford Mustang Mach-E features a maximum charging speed of 150 kW, which isn't bad at all. With those speeds, you could charge a Mustang Mach-E with a standard 73 kWh battery from 10% to 80% in around 32 minutes at a DC fast charger. Upgrading to the larger battery pushes that charging speed out to around 36 minutes. The Kia EV6 offers one of the highest charging speeds in the industry, with an 800-volt electrical architecture that can take advantage of a DC fast charger better than nearly every other EV. When connected to a DC fast charger, the Kia EV6 can charge from 10% to 80% in as little as 20 minutes, regardless of whether it comes equipped with the standard or larger battery. As though 20 minutes isn't crazy enough, the top-spec GT trim can see that time reduced to as little as 18 minutes. 2025 Kia EV6 — Source: Kia While DC fast charging speeds are great for road trips, most drivers will charge their electric crossovers at home or at Level 2 chargers. Thanks to its faster charging speeds, the Kia EV6 with an extended-range battery excels there as well, reaching a full charge in around seven hours. Comparatively, a Ford Mustang Mach-E connected to a level 2 charger can achieve a full charge in around nine hours. Kia and Ford's EVs are great rivals Rivalry promotes innovation, of which Kia and Ford are living proof. Both the EV6 and Mustang Mach-E offer a variety of powertrain and battery setups that allow consumers to create a car that fits their needs. As similar as they are, however, there are some differences when it comes to performance. 2025 Ford Mustang Mach-E — Source: Ford As the name implies, the Mustang Mach-E offers high performance from the base level, with 264 horsepower and 387 lb-ft of torque serving as the floor. That's a good deal more than the base EV6's 167 horsepower and 258 lb-ft of torque. The gap narrows once the dual-motor all-wheel drivetrain comes into play, with the Mustang Mach-E offering 325 horsepower and 500 lb-ft of torque with a standard range battery. The Kia EV6 sees its performance boosted to 320 horsepower and 446 lb-ft of torque with AWD. The gap between the EVs nearly closes at the top of the range, with the Mustang Mach-E Rally's performance topping out at 480 horsepower and 700 lb-ft of torque. That kind of power launches the electric crossover to 60 mph in just 3.4 seconds. The Kia EV6 GT is close behind in terms of torque, topping out at 641 horsepower and 568 lb-ft of torque with launch mode, matching its American competitor's 3.4-second 60 mph time. Without launch mode, the EV6 GT taps 60 mph in 3.6 seconds. 2025 Kia EV6 — Source: Kia Final thoughts There's no denying the Kia EV6 and Ford Mustang Mach-E are rival EVs that offer an excellent combination of range, performance, and standard equipment. With 319- and 320-mile maximum ranges respectively, they're evenly matched in the road trip category. Once you factor in charging speeds, however, the Kia EV6 has a significant advantage. The capability to charge to 80% in 20 minutes or less at a fast charger simply can't be understated. If Ford manages to narrow that gap, the competition between these two EVs would only get more intense. About the Author Joseph Pudlewski View Profile
Auto Blog
9 hours ago
- Auto Blog
Ford's Cheapest Car In America Is A Great Buy
The Cheapest New Ford Isn't A Cramped Hatchback Or Sedan It wasn't too long ago that you could buy several cheap, affordable Ford models for around $20,000 or less, but those days are gone. The Fiesta, Focus, and EcoSport were some of the cheapest Ford cars that were perfect for first-time buyers, but all have been discontinued. Today, you'll have to spend almost $30k to buy the cheapest Ford model on sale. However, it's not a small hatchback nor a compact sedan. Once we interrogated the data, it became clear that the Ford's cheapest car is a pretty good deal, despite its price going up recently. So what model are we talking about? Previous Pause Next Unmute 0:00 / 0:10 Full screen 2025 Ford Maverick: 4 reasons to love it, 2 reasons to think twice Watch More The Cheapest New Ford Is The Maverick XL Pickup Truck Source: Ford By a slim margin, the 2025 Ford Maverick XL is the Blue Oval's cheapest new model, starting at $28,145 before options or the destination charge of $1,695. The next cheapest new Ford is the Escape, which begins at $29,515 – every other new Ford begins at over $30,000. By choosing to re-enter the compact pickup segment, Ford has found a way to offer buyers something practical, rugged, and efficient, all packaged in the form of a truck, the body style preferred by a large percentage of Americans. It's little wonder that Maverick sales are so strong. The Maverick's smaller footprint and unibody underpinnings have helped keep costs down compared to the Ranger, but is it worth the price? Furthermore, how does the cheapest Maverick compare to its only rival, the Hyundai Santa Cruz? Maverick XL Looks Basic, But That Works For A Truck The 17-inch steel wheels, absence of fog lights, and lack of chrome finishes leave no doubt that this is a basic pickup, not a range-topper. However, while a poverty-spec sedan or sports car may be visually disappointing, a basic pickup is entirely sensible. After all, these vehicles are supposed to be used for towing, camping trips, and carting around awkwardly shaped items. With this in mind, the Maverick XL's looks are appropriate. Autoblog Newsletter Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. Sign up or sign in with Google Facebook Microsoft Apple By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. It's still a modern-looking truck, although Ford's recent facelift plonked a slightly awkward slab of metal around the bottom of the grille, and not everyone loves it. The following standard features can be found on the Maverick's exterior: Six tie-downs Flexbed storage system LED reflector headlights 17-inch Sparkle Silver steel wheels You can choose from colors like Velocity Blue and Eruption Green if the commercial look is a bit too unsettling, and there are a wide range of other options to customize the bed area and exterior. Functional And Basic Interior, But Infotainment Is Modern Black Onyx cloth seats can be found inside the Maverick XL's cabin, and there are no alternatives on this trim level for livening up the appearance. You can also expect many hard plastics, but the base Maverick doesn't feel flimsy. Being the cheapest Ford on sale, seats must be adjusted manually, there is no automatic climate control, and the best safety features are baked into an optional package. The following interior features are standard: 13.2-inch touchscreen and eight-inch digital gauge cluster Wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto Manual, single-zone air conditioning Remote keyless entry Six-way manual driver's seat Pre-collision system with automatic emergency braking For $795, you can add the Ford Co-Pilot 360 pack with blind-spot monitoring, reverse parking sensors, lane-keep assist, and more. Efficiency Or Performance: Take Your Pick Source: Ford The standard powertrain for the Maverick XL is a 2.5-liter four-cylinder hybrid with 191 horsepower and 155 lb-ft of torque. Power goes to the front wheels only via a CVT, and if all of that sounds uninspiring, consider that this is the most efficient pickup on the market: The Maverick hybrid returns 42/35/38 mpg city/highway/combined with FWD. For only $125, you can select the 2.0-liter EcoBoost four-cylinder turbocharged engine. This automatically adds all-wheel drive and an eight-speed automatic, but more importantly, outputs rise to a healthy 250 hp and 280 lb-ft. Naturally, efficiency drops significantly with the EcoBoost, which gets 22/30/25 mpg, but it's by far the more potent performer, and we appreciate that Ford charges almost nothing for the upgrade, giving buyers the flexibility to choose efficiency or power. Properly equipped, the Maverick can tow up to 4,000 lbs. That's minimal for a truck, but very good when compared with similarly sized crossovers. How Does The Maverick XL Compare To Its Only Rival? 2025 Hyundai Santa Cruz — Source: Hyundai Only one other automaker builds a compact pickup truck, and that's Hyundai with the Santa Cruz. In entry-level SE guise, the Santa Cruz starts at $28,750, which means the price gap between these two has almost closed entirely. For several years, the Ford undercut the Hyundai comfortably, but a series of price increases – and the likely implication of tariffs – has seen the Maverick's price rise steadily. The base Hyundai Santa Cruz gets a naturally-aspirated four-cylinder engine that matches the Maverick hybrid's power (191 hp), but is far less efficient (25 mpg combined). Given that the Maverick EcoBoost still undercuts the Hyundai, the Ford wins this category. Furthermore, at this price point, the Ford can tow 500 lbs more, has a more spacious bed, and boasts a better payload. The Hyundai claws back some points in its interior, which feels more modern. You also get standard lane-keep assist, blind-spot collision warning, and rear cross-traffic alert on the Santa Cruz, all of which cost extra on the Ford. If you want a small truck that feels more like a crossover, get the Hyundai. But if you want a small truck to do truck stuff with, the Maverick wins. Other Affordable New Fords If you want an affordable Ford at around the $30k mark but don't fancy a pickup truck, the brand has two other options worth looking at. Ford Escape: $29,515 Source: Ford Slightly pricier than the Maverick, the base Ford Escape Active offers the typical compact SUV experience. It's nimble enough in the city, smooth enough on the highway, and has reasonably handsome looks. It's better specified than the base Maverick, with standard alloy wheels and dual-zone climate control, so this is the preferred choice if you don't need the versatility of a truck. Ford Bronco Sport: $30,995 Source: Ford As good as the Escape is, the Bronco Sport is even better. In Big Bend form, it starts at $30,995, and gets a standard 4×4 system with various driving modes for different terrains. The butch looks are great, and the 180-hp EcoBoost engine is efficient. About the Author Karl Furlong View Profile
