
Tshwane goes to court in bid to douse volunteer firefighting services
The City of Tshwane is accusing volunteer firefighting services of operating illegally, interfering with the city's command and control structures during emergency incidents and compromising incident scene management.
The city also put a stop to AfriForum's Neighbourhood Watch and cleaning operations.
City spokesperson Lindela Mashigo said the city has filed a court application to enforce compliance with legislation.
Tshwane accuses volunteer firefighting groups of illegal operations
'These entities are functioning without legal authority, regulatory approval or formal agreements with the municipality, in direct contravention of national and local legislation governing emergency services.
'This development presents serious safety, legal and operational concerns that the city cannot ignore,' he said.
ALSO READ: One dead in a shack fire at informal settlement in Ekurhuleni
Mashigo said the city views this court action as necessary to restore order, protect public safety and ensure the regulation of emergency services.
'The provision of fire services is a constitutional mandate reserved exclusively for municipalities, as set out in Schedule 4, part B of the constitution of South Africa, 1996.
'Accordingly, any decision to outsource such services must be made by the municipal council following a rigorous process that includes public consultation, as required by the Municipal Systems Act (Act 32 of 2000).'
City has not adopted resolution to outsource its fire services
Mashigo said to date, the city has not adopted any resolution to outsource its fire services, nor has it entered into service level agreements with any private providers.
'Furthermore, the Fire Brigade Services Act (Act 99 of 1987) stipulates that any fire service operating outside a municipality must obtain a formal designation from the relevant provincial authority.
ALSO READ: WATCH: SA Breweries depot in Soweto goes up in flames
'None of the private fire services operating in Tshwane, including Fire Ops SA, Fidelity Secure Fire, Sinoville Firefighting Association and Laudium Disaster Management, has obtained such designation from the Gauteng MEC for cooperative governance and traditional affairs, as required by law,' he said.
'Moreover, they draw water from municipal fire hydrants without authorisation, contributing to unaccounted water losses and violating city bylaws.
'Beyond the legal infringements, these private services function on a 'for-profit basis', selectively targeting affluent suburbs and industrial areas, while ignoring the broader community,' he said.
City made efforts to engage with entities
'They also issue no burn permits in contradiction of the city's official procedures, creating confusion and undermining the authority of legitimate emergency services.'
The city has made multiple efforts to engage with these entities.
ALSO READ: Man dies after fire guts shack in Palm Ridge in Ekurhuleni
Directives were issued and engagements were referred to the appropriate disaster management authorities. However, these services remained noncompliant, he said.
'When letters of demand were served, they were met with threats and resistance. Despite several attempts at resolution, no cooperation was achieved.'
The Sinoville Firefighting Association (SBBV) hit back and said they will continue to save lives and serve the community, despite the court application.
SBBV hit back
SBBV founder Johan Botha said the SBBV operates within the law and was not illegal.
'The SBBV is a volunteer organisation from the community, for the community. Not a single cent of SBBV's income is spent on salaries,' he added.
ALSO READ: DEMS celebrates firefighters for their strive to save lives
Botha said SBBV has applied for official recognition, which was denied.
'It is time Tshwane emergency services recognises that organisations such as the SBBV are their allies.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Citizen
4 days ago
- The Citizen
Tshwane goes to court in bid to douse volunteer firefighting services
Tshwane moves to court, citing safety and legal concerns over volunteer firefighting and unauthorised use of city resources. The City of Tshwane is accusing volunteer firefighting services of operating illegally, interfering with the city's command and control structures during emergency incidents and compromising incident scene management. The city also put a stop to AfriForum's Neighbourhood Watch and cleaning operations. City spokesperson Lindela Mashigo said the city has filed a court application to enforce compliance with legislation. Tshwane accuses volunteer firefighting groups of illegal operations 'These entities are functioning without legal authority, regulatory approval or formal agreements with the municipality, in direct contravention of national and local legislation governing emergency services. 'This development presents serious safety, legal and operational concerns that the city cannot ignore,' he said. ALSO READ: One dead in a shack fire at informal settlement in Ekurhuleni Mashigo said the city views this court action as necessary to restore order, protect public safety and ensure the regulation of emergency services. 'The provision of fire services is a constitutional mandate reserved exclusively for municipalities, as set out in Schedule 4, part B of the constitution of South Africa, 1996. 'Accordingly, any decision to outsource such services must be made by the municipal council following a rigorous process that includes public consultation, as required by the Municipal Systems Act (Act 32 of 2000).' City has not adopted resolution to outsource its fire services Mashigo said to date, the city has not adopted any resolution to outsource its fire services, nor has it entered into service level agreements with any private providers. 'Furthermore, the Fire Brigade Services Act (Act 99 of 1987) stipulates that any fire service operating outside a municipality must obtain a formal designation from the relevant provincial authority. ALSO READ: WATCH: SA Breweries depot in Soweto goes up in flames 'None of the private fire services operating in Tshwane, including Fire Ops SA, Fidelity Secure Fire, Sinoville Firefighting Association and Laudium Disaster Management, has obtained such designation from the Gauteng MEC for cooperative governance and traditional affairs, as required by law,' he said. 'Moreover, they draw water from municipal fire hydrants without authorisation, contributing to unaccounted water losses and violating city bylaws. 'Beyond the legal infringements, these private services function on a 'for-profit basis', selectively targeting affluent suburbs and industrial areas, while ignoring the broader community,' he said. City made efforts to engage with entities 'They also issue no burn permits in contradiction of the city's official procedures, creating confusion and undermining the authority of legitimate emergency services.' The city has made multiple efforts to engage with these entities. ALSO READ: Man dies after fire guts shack in Palm Ridge in Ekurhuleni Directives were issued and engagements were referred to the appropriate disaster management authorities. However, these services remained noncompliant, he said. 'When letters of demand were served, they were met with threats and resistance. Despite several attempts at resolution, no cooperation was achieved.' The Sinoville Firefighting Association (SBBV) hit back and said they will continue to save lives and serve the community, despite the court application. SBBV hit back SBBV founder Johan Botha said the SBBV operates within the law and was not illegal. 'The SBBV is a volunteer organisation from the community, for the community. Not a single cent of SBBV's income is spent on salaries,' he added. ALSO READ: DEMS celebrates firefighters for their strive to save lives Botha said SBBV has applied for official recognition, which was denied. 'It is time Tshwane emergency services recognises that organisations such as the SBBV are their allies.'


The Citizen
4 days ago
- The Citizen
Recent municipal accounts billed R0
Tshwane residents have been left confused and concerned after receiving their latest municipal bills reflecting R0 being charged for rates and taxes. The error has left residents wondering whether to pay, ignore the statements, or wait for clarification and the city has confirmed that the issue stems from a technical glitch in its billing system. According to metro spokesperson Lindela Mashigo, the issue was caused by an unexpected processing error during the property rates charge cycle in the city's billing system and that approximately over 15 410 property rates payers have been affected. He said residents can rest assured that the city is reversing the incorrect invoices and re-billing them with the correct charges, emphasising that the correction process will not result in any overcharges. 'However, the city noted that residents with automated bank payment arrangements or active instalment plans may not see updated invoices for June 2025,' he said. Instead, these residents will see the missing property rates charge included in their July 2025 invoices as a double billing for that month. He confirmed that no interest will be charged after the R0 invoices. He said residents are encouraged to continue paying their normal monthly property rates despite the R0 charge reflected on the June invoices. 'Most of those affected would have underpaid, as the invoices showed only service charges and no property rates levies. Credit adjustments will be made in July for exempted property owners who were incorrectly billed,' Mashigo explained. He said the property rates charge is a fixed monthly amount and not based on usage, making verification of corrected charges straightforward. 'Updated invoices will be made available automatically via the e-Tshwane online platform and through the city's email communication channels.' He said there is no need for affected residents to request the revised bills manually. Mashigo assured residents that Tshwane is addressing the issue as a priority and urges the public to monitor their accounts and reach out if further assistance is needed. ALSO READ: Community demands half-built house is destroyed after grisly discovery Do you have more information about the story? Please send us an email to [email protected] or phone us on 083 625 4114. For free breaking and community news, visit Rekord's websites: Rekord East For more news and interesting articles, like Rekord on Facebook, follow us on Twitter or Instagram or TikTok. At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!

IOL News
5 days ago
- IOL News
Tshwane's controversial cleansing levy faces court challenge
Legal battle looms on July 24 over the City of Tshwane's special "cleansing" levy, where households not using the municipal bin services will face paying a special levy. Image: File AfriForum is expected to face the Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality in court on July 24 to stop the metro's decision to implement a so-called 'city cleansing levy'. With this levy, the metro intends to force almost 200,000 residential and more than 60,000 business property ratepayers to pay for a levy that AfriForum considers to be unfair double taxation. According to the metro's original communication, this levy was supposed to have kicked in on July 1. But AfriForum said it has since been informed that no recovery will be made before August 1. The levy will collect R194.37 per month from affected households, without offering any corresponding service delivery in return. AfriForum originally requested an urgent interdict in an attempt to stop the implementation before July 1, but following an agreement between it and the metro, the latter now has further opportunity to supplement their court documents. The urgent application is scheduled to be heard by the Gauteng High Court, Pretoria. At the heart of AfriForum's legal challenge is the question of why residents who do not use the city's waste removal services are being hit with an additional tax. AfriForum will argue that this levy amounts to nothing more than double taxation, as residents are already paying property rates which are supposed to fund 'city cleansing' services. In their court application, AfriForum argues that the City of Tshwane is trying to mask its financial mismanagement and budgetary failures by demanding more money from hard-working citizens under the guise of a 'cleansing'. The metro, represented by the Divisional Head of Waste Management, Louis Makhubele, in their answering affidavit labelled some ratepayers as 'freeloaders' and 'beneficiaries who make no contribution', but use the city's facilities. But AfriForum said these ratepayers are the backbone of Tshwane's income stream, contributing billions in property taxes and other tariffs annually. 'Yet the city chooses to scorn them for taking responsibility for their refuse removal when the municipality has consistently failed to deliver the service they are constitutionally obligated to provide,' said Arno Roodt, AfriForum's district coordinator for Greater Pretoria South. AfriForum warns that this issue in Tshwane is not an isolated case, but rather a symptom of a wider pattern of municipal collapse, where citizens are expected to carry the burden of dysfunctional administrations. The organisation argues that, if allowed to proceed unchecked, this levy will set a dangerous precedent for municipalities across South Africa to simply 'charge their way out' of failure, without accountability or actual service delivery.